![]() |
Progressive Electronic: Determining proggy-ness |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Author | |
ForestFriend ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 23 2017 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 685 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can't comment too much on electronic music because it's not really my cup of tea, but albums don't necessarily get good reviews for being progressive. Also, I think the main criteria for being progressive is doing something that hasn't been done before, rather than musical complexity. Perhaps weird time signatures, tempo changes and different instruments appeal to people looking for symphonic prog or other subgenres, but not necessarily progressive electronic.
|
|
![]() |
|
Naglefar ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: August 26 2008 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As a fan of both progressive rock (obviously) and electronic music, I always wondered what basis electronic music was evaluated on to determine how progressive it is. Is it unusual time signatures? Tempo changes? Instrument ensembles?
I'll listen to certain album, none I'll explicitly mention, and say to myself "man that sounds pretty damn progressive, it's all over the place!" and then find it has a 3.12 rating. Now I know these are all opinions and everyone has different tastes, but it still surprises me sometimes to see stuff I think is progressive and has a sub-par rating. Please don't think of this as a rant, because it's not. Just an observation. Maybe I'm just a jackass (probably). Feel free to elaborate. Discuss. Critique. Flame.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |