Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Porcupine Tree for Eclectic?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPorcupine Tree for Eclectic?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 23:37
LOL @ this thread.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 22:23
^ they were in Psych, which doesn't suit them any better than Heavy, actually I lean toward LiquidEternity's suggestion of Exp/Post Metal.. to be honest I don't really care what category they're in and would be fine with them in Eclectic, if EcTeam wants 'em we'll talk, till then they're fine where they are




Back to Top
Conor Fynes View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 11 2009
Location: Vancouver, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3196
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 21:36
Originally posted by Kotro Kotro wrote:

They should never have left their original allocation - the change to heavy prog made as much sense as moving Genesis to Prog-Related.
 
What WAS their original allocation??
Back to Top
Kotro View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 16 2004
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 2815
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 08:20
They should never have left their original allocation - the change to heavy prog made as much sense as moving Genesis to Prog-Related.
Bigger on the inside.
Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 08:16
I really don't find PT that eclectic at all. Just as eclectic as any prog band that's been around that long ends up sounding like. But I wouldn't be uncomfortable, in light of their last few albums, to find them in Experimental/Post Metal.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 08:08
Another thing to consider is that many prog websites adapted to at least multiple genres per artist years ago ... maybe PT are simply both Space Rock, Eclectic and Heavy, and the database is simply too limited to express that.

Incidentally: Progfreak may be the most genre-centric prog website of all, but there are also no genre discussions there ... even among those who contribute regularly :-)
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 07:52
Originally posted by Petrovsk Mizinski Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:

Predicting this thread:


3. [...] it will possibly end up going totally off topic.




Prophecy fulfilling.
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 07:52
Good to see we agree on something, HarrySmile!
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 07:46
I've never been to Progressive Ears ever.
I just had to look now.

Someone said:
"I liked PA a few years ago, but too many people now (especially people who, for one reason or another, cannot communicate in English), too many non-prog bands, and WAY too many inane forum topics."

ololol.
So true sadly.

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=61446


Sadly we have threads like this that prove the point too.


Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - September 23 2009 at 11:11
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 07:26
They've already been moved once, from Space/Psych to HP. I don't see how anyone would really benefit from this game of ping-pong. This obsession with the 'perfect fit' is what is keeping dozens of up-and-coming prog bands out of the site, as well as having PA ridiculed around the internet. As a long-time member of this site, I don't like to see comments such as the ones I saw in a thread at Progressive Ears - unfortunately, they were quite true for the most part.

Anyway, while I agree that some form of categorization is useful (libraries would be impossible to use without categories), I can't help feeling that for some members it has become more important than the music itself.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 07:11
Originally posted by Petrovsk Mizinski Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:

I didn't know I needed an opinions on this:P

But yeah I honestly couldn't care that much either way if they got moved or not, but I know it wont happen anyway.
They got some heavy stuff, leave 'em in heavy prog lol.



That was the same thing I was trying to say before - I don't really think they belong in heavy, but I don't think it matters enough for them to be moved.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 07:08
I didn't know I needed an opinions on this:P
But yeah I honestly couldn't care that much either way if they got moved or not, but I know it wont happen anyway.
They got some heavy stuff, leave 'em in heavy prog lol.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 06:24
^ so we simply disagree about whether their albums are inherently eclectic or not ... I don't have any problem with that. However, I think that simply calling them "Heavy Prog" does describe their style too well. Even on FOABP only a small part is heavy - the same with Deadwing or the latest. 
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 06:16
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ so eclectic is more a mood than a style thing?


I don't understand the question.


The way I understood your post is that PT aren't eclectic to you because darkness and - on the later albums - heaviness are present on most of the albums. I would agree to that these elements are recurring, but still most of their albums contain a broad range of styles. To me, stylistically, they are clearly an eclectic band.


I think I agreed that, as a band, PT's evolution during the career is the greatest lobby for it to be relocated in Eclectic. As far as the albums go, the same level of eclecticness and switchovers can't be found. I fairly anticipate this could be denied by going into details and nuances (you yourself find the opposite, saying make use of a "broad range of styles"), but to me most PT albums can really be labeled in a straight way stylistically, while clearly having a very powerful referential core.

I didn't relate to the dark flavours their music sometimes embrace to dismiss the eclecticness, I argued that those flavours were fully taken in account, when summing up the parts that were found fit for Heavy, and leaving the Crossover/Alternative in second tier. Even with the 90s psych/space and the post-'04 metal and heavy having distinct traits, the two, I repeat, were considered adequate in the same way for Heavy Prog.

Summing up styles without finding a (significant) common denominator leads to Eclectic Prog. For PT as a band, that's fine and makes broad sense. For PT's albums, that's less convincing.


Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 05:04
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ so eclectic is more a mood than a style thing?


I don't understand the question.


The way I understood your post is that PT aren't eclectic to you because darkness and - on the later albums - heaviness are present on most of the albums. I would agree to that these elements are recurring, but still most of their albums contain a broad range of styles. To me, stylistically, they are clearly an eclectic band.


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - September 23 2009 at 05:44
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 04:21
Originally posted by Petrovsk Mizinski Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:

Predicting this thread:

1.Will end up in 5+ pages of arguing about this
2. Somehow PT fanboyism will come into it.
3. People will cite more examples of other artists and their albums in the fight for For and Against and it will possibly end up going totally off topic.
4. Someone will get offended, most likely a fanboy or an anti fanboy

Absolutely concrete facts:

1. Nothing will change as a result of this thread, the band will stay in Heavy Prog.
(2. Fortunately this hasn't made to the second page yet at the time of writing)




Yeah, so far so good, but it will likely happen the way you said it.

Do you have an opinion on this, btw?
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 04:14
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ so eclectic is more a mood than a style thing?


I don't understand the question.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 04:04
I'm not sure if they should be moved, but I wouldn't say they belong in HP... I'd only really say their four latest are heavy prog, and the other 6 aren't really suitable for one genre either.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 03:52
Predicting this thread:

1.Will end up in 5+ pages of arguing about this
2. Somehow PT fanboyism will come into it.
3. People will cite more examples of other artists and their albums in the fight for For and Against and it will possibly end up going totally off topic.
4. Someone will get offended, most likely a fanboy or an anti fanboy

Absolutely concrete facts:

1. Nothing will change as a result of this thread, the band will stay in Heavy Prog.
2. Fortunately this hasn't made to the second page yet at the time of writing


Back to Top
Any Colour You Like View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12294
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2009 at 03:23
If anything, I would lean towards moving them to eclectic. I'm no eclectic expert, but I just feel that HP doesn't suit their style... but hey, it's up to the collabs.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.