Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32536
|
Posted: March 27 2009 at 11:26 |
The Beatles in the late 70's- Disco. The Beatles in the 80s-
|
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: March 27 2009 at 11:04 |
Who knows?
But judging by the later solo efforts of all of the former Beatles, I would say not. (Of course, that depends upon your definition of "prog.")
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: March 27 2009 at 11:00 |
mrcozdude wrote:
Weather the beatles went prog or not.The mothers still would of changed the world. |
I wonder whether you feel you have weathered the Beatles.
And of course the mothers of us all would have changed the world (and many diapers in the process) no matter what.
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|
Leftoverture
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 27 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 31
|
Posted: March 27 2009 at 03:54 |
yeah my feeling is that come 72, 73 they would have made a prog-ish album. I dont see them having gone to glitter rock, but my how diff. the world might be if the Beatles went another 5 years and kept experimenting.
now playing - family- best of..
|
|
ProgShine
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 04 2005
Location: Kalisz, Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1256
|
Posted: March 27 2009 at 02:03 |
I think that the band probably followed their paths not as a prog band, but I think if they come till the '73they probably fell in temptation to make one more conceitual album :D
|
https://progshinerecords.bandcamp.com
|
|
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: March 27 2009 at 01:39 |
"What is prog!? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me.... no more" at least I amuse myself. Seriosuly though, they probably would have done a side long track at some point. They wouldn't have stayed together at that point that.
|
|
darkshade
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 19 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 10964
|
Posted: March 26 2009 at 23:27 |
Atavachron wrote:
I've pondered this much and my feeling is that if you take the best of the solo work from Lennon, Harrison and McCartney, you get a glimpse of what the albums would've been like.. as far as becoming 'prog', no not in the traditional sense, in fact knowing the Beatles they probably would've done their own thing, each new album a fresh statement unlike what others were doing.
|
ah, but who knows, maybe one or 2 of those albums would be competing for the #1 spot on the top 100 list on the home page right now, had they been made. The band would probably have been in a different mindset if they were still together as a band. not to mention those 'what is prog?' discussions would be even more complex.
|
|
|
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
|
Posted: March 26 2009 at 23:07 |
Weather the beatles went prog or not.The mothers still would of changed the world.
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65306
|
Posted: March 26 2009 at 22:07 |
I've pondered this much and my feeling is that if you take the best of the solo work from Lennon, Harrison and McCartney, you get a glimpse of what the albums would've been like.. as far as becoming 'prog', no not in the traditional sense, in fact knowing the Beatles they probably would've done their own thing, each new album a fresh statement unlike what others were doing.
|
|
soundsweird
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 408
|
Posted: March 26 2009 at 21:50 |
Right
|
|
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: March 26 2009 at 19:16 |
imo they went from art-rock in the late 60s to pop , blues & rock'n'roll in the 70s, so in no way they could have contributed more to the progressive movement...
|
|
Leftoverture
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 27 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 31
|
Posted: March 26 2009 at 19:11 |
sorry if this has been done, but
we were discussing at work whether or not the Beatles would have started to make "prog" albums in the early 70's like many contemporaries did. I for one see it going either way. Let It Be was throwback, but the masterpieces like Sgt Peppers and MMT led the way for prog. The sum of what those for did on solo albums suggests that they wouldnt have, but with studio wizardry and the way those 4 made music, I think we missed out on maybe an even better prog masterpeice than DSOTM. I dunno, do you guys think they'd have gone there?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.