Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Meshuggah on prog archives???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMeshuggah on prog archives???

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Bryan View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 01 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2005 at 22:08
I love Meshuggah, and I think their more recent works could be considered prog, but I wouldn't have added them to the archives.
Back to Top
glass house View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 16 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 4986
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 30 2005 at 02:29

    To Mike, now we're talking personal preferences, that is always highly debatteble.

Catch 33 doesn't do anything for me. It is one mush of sound. Erase was although chaotic at times more clear.  But mainly it is a feeling. And that sometimes is difficult to explain or to write down.

Back to Top
coffeeintheface View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 397
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 21:47
goddammit stop saying trash, its THRASH for god's sake!!!!!!
OBQM: www.soundcloud.com/onebigquestionmark (solo project)
nQuixote: www.soundcloud.com/n-quixote (ambient + various musical ideas)
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 18:36
Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Just listen to their new records (the ones I mentioned above). "More than complex" is of course a subjective attribute, what seems like "more" to me may appear to be just silly to you ... but maybe not.

Yeah, I guess I kinda see what you mean.

But you kinda threw me off with "more than complex."

I just meant that they don't just use odd signatures. They have complex lyrics, recurring themes in the songs, and - and that's again subjective - are quite consistent on their albums and not really predictable.

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 18:32
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Meshuggah shouldn't be on here. Just because a band is complex doesn't mean they are "prog" or "prog-metal."

Well, too bad for you ... they're more than just complex.

How so?

Please enlighten me!

Just listen to their new records (the ones I mentioned above). "More than complex" is of course a subjective attribute, what seems like "more" to me may appear to be just silly to you ... but maybe not.

Yeah, I guess I kinda see what you mean.

But you kinda threw me off with "more than complex."

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 18:27
Originally posted by Rune3000 Rune3000 wrote:

Many people can't hear the King Crimson complexity in Tools sound, but they're still Prog

 

Many can't spot the Prog i Mars Volta, but they're still Prog

 

Many can't hear the difference between Trash and complex Prog, but it's still Prog!

What's Trash?

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 18:25

Originally posted by glass house glass house wrote:

  To Mike : imo Catch 33 is a very poor album.  Destroy, Erase, Improve however is one of the more innovative metal albums ever.

Define poor.

It is more daring, and completely different. I'd prefer Catch 33 over Nothing, and Destroy Erase Improve over Chaosphere. But that's only me ...

What's bad about Catch 33?



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Rune3000 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 17:34

Many people can't hear the King Crimson complexity in Tools sound, but they're still Prog

 

Many can't spot the Prog i Mars Volta, but they're still Prog

 

Many can't hear the difference between Trash and complex Prog, but it's still Prog!

Back to Top
glass house View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 16 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 4986
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 17:15
  To Mike : imo Catch 33 is a very poor album.  Destroy, Erase, Improve however is one of the more innovative metal albums ever.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 14:59
Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Meshuggah shouldn't be on here. Just because a band is complex doesn't mean they are "prog" or "prog-metal."

Well, too bad for you ... they're more than just complex.

How so?

Please enlighten me!

Just listen to their new records (the ones I mentioned above). "More than complex" is of course a subjective attribute, what seems like "more" to me may appear to be just silly to you ... but maybe not.

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
GoldenSpiral View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 14:09

It looks like it may be time for the collaborators to really think about what this site should be.  Should it be an all-encompassing progressive music site?  Or should it be restriced to groups that are specifically of the Prog Rock genre? 

It's a tough debate that seems to be going on in random places throughout the forums.  One argument is that the inclusion of any progressive band, such as Meshuggah, can lead to the unnecessary addition of bands that are related to other bands that are only loosely related to prog rock ("well, so and so should be on the site because they sort of sound like such and such, and such and such sort of sound like this other band who is DEFINITELY prog...). 

However, the inclusion of a more diverse array of progressive bands leads to the inclusion of more people on the site and can promote a growing prog rock community.  People often groan in the forums about how prog isnt popular anymore.  Well, maybe it is, just in a different form, and if you open up your eyes a bit, you can find some really great things.  Also, fans of these 'outsider' prog bands may find this site, and their eyes can be opened to more 'traditional' prog.

 

http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:58
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Meshuggah shouldn't be on here. Just because a band is complex doesn't mean they are "prog" or "prog-metal."

Well, too bad for you ... they're more than just complex.

How so?

Please enlighten me!

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:52
Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Meshuggah shouldn't be on here. Just because a band is complex doesn't mean they are "prog" or "prog-metal."

Well, too bad for you ... they're more than just complex.

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:51
Originally posted by The Miracle The Miracle wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

No offense, but only ignorant people confuse Trash with Thrash.

BTW: Meshuggah compare to Pantera as Dream Theater compare to Metallica ( in terms of complexity).

Pardon my ignorance, but what is the difference?

"Trash Metal" doesn't exist as a genre. It is just misspelled. Thrash Metal it is, and Thrash means this:

  • give a thrashing to; beat hard
  • convulse: move or stir about violently; "The feverish patient thrashed around in his bed"
  • slam dance: dance the slam dance
  • beat so fast that (the heart's) output starts dropping until (it) does not manage to pump out blood at all
  • move data into and out of core rather than performing useful computation; "The system is thrashing again!"
  • beat the seeds out of a grain
  • a swimming kick used while treading water
  • bat: beat thoroughly in a competition or fight; "We licked the other team on Sunday!"
    www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn2.1
  •  

    It doesn't have anything to do with garbage.

    Thrash Metal is just a label for Metal bands that play agressively and use complex riffs. If you look at their performance, it looks like they're constantly "thrashing" their instruments.

    Release Polls

    Listened to:
    Back to Top
    Arsillus View Drop Down
    Forum Senior Member
    Forum Senior Member
    Avatar

    Joined: March 26 2005
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7374
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:49

    Hahaha. This is my EVIL post.

    Arsillus
    Senior Member
    Senior Member
    Avatar

    Joined: 2005 27 March
    Location: United States
    Online Status: Online
    Posts: 666

     

    Meshuggah shouldn't be on here. Just because a band is complex doesn't mean they are "prog" or "prog-metal."

     



    Edited by Arsillus
    Back to Top
    Manunkind View Drop Down
    Forum Senior Member
    Forum Senior Member


    Joined: February 02 2005
    Location: Poland
    Status: Offline
    Points: 2373
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:42

    I wonder... Meshuggah are obviously progressive, but so are some brutal death metal bands, like Morbid Angel, Cryptopsy, Suffocation or Gorguts. IMO they're not prog, though. I love all of those bands but I wouldn't want to see them in the archives - they have just too little in common with most of the bands here. I feel we should have at least some sort of common denominator for the inclusion of bands into the archives, or else the site risks losing focus. 

    This doesn't mean I'm going to bitch about Meshuggah in every thread devoted to them, though.  

    "In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
    Back to Top
    The Miracle View Drop Down
    Prog Reviewer
    Prog Reviewer


    Joined: May 29 2005
    Location: hell
    Status: Offline
    Points: 28427
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:42
    Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

    No offense, but only ignorant people confuse Trash with Thrash.

    BTW: Meshuggah compare to Pantera as Dream Theater compare to Metallica ( in terms of complexity).

    Pardon my ignorance, but what is the difference?

    Back to Top
    TheProgtologist View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

    Joined: May 23 2005
    Location: Baltimore,Md US
    Status: Offline
    Points: 27802
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:33
    I am glad Meshuggah is now in the archive.I have been a fan of this band from their first album and have watched this band progress from a death.thrash metal band to a prog metal sound.I think they ventured into prog metal territory with Nothing,and actually made it with the brilliant ep I(love it)and Catch 33.If Cynic and Opeth are in this archive Meshuggah should be too.BTW,has anyone ever heard of a Scandinavian band called Mnemic?They are in the same vein as Meshuggah.Very good band,check em out.


    Back to Top
    Bj-1 View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: June 04 2005
    Location: No(r)Way
    Status: Offline
    Points: 31644
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:32
    Catch 33 is progressive if you listen to the whole album without stopping. It's basically one 47-minute progressive song divided in 13 parts. "I" is also progressive. The earlier period (91-98) is not that progressive but it still have some prog elements.  
    RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
    Back to Top
    MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
    Special Collaborator
    Special Collaborator
    Avatar
    Honorary Collaborator

    Joined: April 22 2005
    Location: Sweden
    Status: Offline
    Points: 21598
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2005 at 13:20

    Originally posted by Logos Logos wrote:

    "Nothing" is pure prog-metal.

    No, it isn't, Catch 33 is much more pure. Nothing's great, though. I read an interview with them and they said that Nothing was a bit of a work in progress ...

    Release Polls

    Listened to:
    Back to Top
     Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

    Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



    This page was generated in 0.586 seconds.
    Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.