ROCKING THE CLASSICS: THE ENGLISH PROGRESSIVE ROCK MOVEMENT & THE COUNTERCULTURE
I am suspicious that because of both Ed Macan academic background and this book's structure, that it was originally the basis of a masters or even PhD thesis - and indeed the hallowed Oxford University Press, best know for it heavy academic tomes, published it. This is a text setting down ideas as to why the progressive rock movement developed as it did in its early days in the UK, through the discussion of the music, the musicians who played it and the associated artwork, along with the more recent developments in the genre (at least to the mid 90's) - Djam Karet are praised. However, the serious prog fans and scholars are recommended to read this with some reservations.
After an general introduction, Macan sets out to demonstrate his argument about the Englishness of prog rock through analyses of 5 landmark prog albums (by Yes, Genesis, ELP, Floyd, etc). The importance of the the artwork of albums and the theatrical sets at live gigs are rightly dealt with. There are good reviews of the different musical approaches and influences, and why these bands "progressed" rock along. The book finishes with a review of the current state of play in this musical genre. Rocking The Classics is not a comprehensive overview of the subject or a book providing any broad history - but doesn't set out to be like this. Instead the author constrains himself to a handful of specifics. One central thesis suggests progressive rock came about because of certain middle class English institutions,(e.g. the Anglican church and its music) especially in the SE of England! Debatable. British may seem small to a Californian but to a Brit this island is comparatively huge, with significant regional differences at less than 50 miles apart. One could argue Yes's success was more about the Lancastrian upbringing of Jon Anderson. In other words, Macan doesn't get agrip of the relevant British social history here, that should have been employed in developing his thesis, which is used elsewhere for instance made the Syd Barrett biography Lost In The Wood, special.
An irony, especially from my viewpoint as a Brit who grew up during this period, is that the early American contribution is hardly dealt with at all. I would have like to seen something about proto-prog/psychedlic scene that laid down some of the foundations, e.g. Vanilla Fudge (who influenced Nice and ELP, and Jeff Beck and therefore Led Zeppelin), even something about the experimental work of the Electric Prunes. The omission of the Californian band Touch, who influenced Yes, Kansas and probably Genesis, suggests the research was less thorough than it might have been. Here and there, statements are made which annoy, e.g. "Allan Holdsworth is a typical Canterbury guitarist" - which I hold as patent nonsense when there was no such being as typical Canterbury guitarists - Steve Hillage, Kevin Ayers, Phil Miller, Andy Summers, Holdsworth and others are distinctly different from one another.
However, for new comers who have ignored the media tirade against prog and want to know more, this is a reasonable starting point. Also check out Ed Macan as the amateur prog musician - through his two albums under the band name Hermetic Science, where he shows his love of ELP.
3 and half stars.
NOTE: Currently availability is limited, therefore try OUP directly:
http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Music/PopularM usic/PopRockPopularCulture/?ci=0195098889&view=usa