Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What does anyone hear in Porcupine Tree?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

What does anyone hear in Porcupine Tree?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2022 at 10:06
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

I'm not sure it is about what someone enjoys and I don't (or the other way around), that is the issue ...

Honestly, I think this is exactly the issue! At least, it is this kind of questions that fill PA's forum pages... (which might be considered "useful" to some). It is about appreciation and appreciating (positively or negatively) someone else's appreciation. This is - indeed - not so much about the music, but about our appreciation of that music, which is of course very personal and has nothing to do with any kind of objective stance about this or that music...

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17531 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2022 at 06:58
Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

Originally posted by PhideauxFan PhideauxFan wrote:

Always the same question: "Is this band progressive or not ?" Boring for me.
The most important question is: "Is it good or not ?"
And in my opinion, "new" bands like Porcupine Tree, The Pineapple Thief, ... are better than 80% of 70's progressive artists (compositions, vocals, production).

^This
And, of course, what is good for one person may not be for another. There’s no need to belittle what someone else enjoys just because you don’t. The arguments “against” PT in this thread are as boring as a certain someone on this forum who complains about Opeth every chance he can.


Hi,

I'm not sure it is about what someone enjoys and I don't (or the other way around), that is the issue ... when you have a well rounded schooling FOR LISTENING (I don't mean college or U.) ... you will not have "favorites", and will tend to be able to listen to a lot more music, and more different things. The big issue here, is that it's almost always VERY OBVIOUS when someone is not reading, listening, or give a band a chance ... one word comment ... "boring" ... with not explanation. All it says is that the person is not well rounded musically to even make that statement, and of course, that person will come after me, because they are not going to study a little more like I did for 50+ years.

I have a couple of favorites, but for me to sit here and say that one band is better than another ... is stupid!

What I hear in PT, or any other band, is not as important here, because the only thing you see is I like it and I don't ... and music, or any art, is NOT about liking or not ... it's about it making a statement that stood the test of time, and screw you and I if we don't agree. It stood up ... and all we are doing is crying because we can not stand up to the art!

PT is fine, and SW is fine. Not my "favorite" (check the new Marillion by comparison), because a lot of SW's words in my book, are not as important, and tend to go towards the pop sentimentality a lot more than it does about its importance and meaning! But maybe that's what I see!


Edited by moshkito - February 20 2022 at 07:00
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2022 at 03:00
Originally posted by PhideauxFan PhideauxFan wrote:

Always the same question: "Is this band progressive or not ?" Boring for me.
The most important question is: "Is it good or not ?"
And in my opinion, "new" bands like Porcupine Tree, The Pineapple Thief, ... are better than 80% of 70's progressive artists (compositions, vocals, production).

^This
And, of course, what is good for one person may not be for another. There’s no need to belittle what someone else enjoys just because you don’t. The arguments “against” PT in this thread are as boring as a certain someone on this forum who complains about Opeth every chance he can.
Reviewer for The Progressive Aspect
Back to Top
PhideauxFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 14 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 4579 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PhideauxFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2022 at 02:11
Always the same question: "Is this band progressive or not ?" Boring for me.
The most important question is: "Is it good or not ?"
And in my opinion, "new" bands like Porcupine Tree, The Pineapple Thief, ... are better than 80% of 70's progressive artists (compositions, vocals, production).
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28085 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2022 at 01:55
Originally posted by Zeph Zeph wrote:

SW holds himself up as the savior of prog rock? Hasn’t he been trying to distance himself from the «prog» label all the time?

Whatever he has said or how someone has interpreted it, the fact remains that PT and SW are some of the most successfull and acclaimed acts of the 20th century. His work obviously connect with a lot of listeners, but everything can’t suit everyone. And that is fine.

When I look past the 70’s, PT/SW has put out some of the best music the last forty years. Certainly more interesting than what a lot of the top 70’s bands has produced in the same forty years.

I think he’s done a great job working metal and heavy rock into his music.

Don't disagree although I think it suited him to be attached to the label and also be aloof at the same time. The guy is not stupid although I am being ultra cynical . I did say I like a lot of his music and anyway the Raven That Refused To Sing is clearly not him distancing himself from the prog label as I see it Wink
Back to Top
Hugh Manatee View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2021
Location: The Barricades
Status: Offline
Points: 1587 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hugh Manatee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 15:54
Originally posted by Jared Jared wrote:

Of course, they rarely lead to anything wholesome as the OP has already made their mind up about a subject and is just waiting for someone to 'bite'....

Ah, but nothing fires up a forum quite like conflict. Evil Smile
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote timothy leary Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 13:27
My version of what I hear from Porcupine Tree is special. I don't need no stinking waveforms.
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 19374 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jared Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 13:04
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

These types of thread questions have gotten lame. I remember when we had one thread a month asking if TOOL were really prog. Times have sure have changed.

I agree completely, Steve, but these types of threads have always been around.. I remember around 15 years ago, someone entitled a thread something like: Rush... Is that it?  LOL

Of course, they rarely lead to anything wholesome as the OP has already made their mind up about a subject and is just waiting for someone to 'bite'....
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 12:17
These types of thread questions have gotten lame. I remember when we had one thread a month asking if TOOL were really prog. Times have sure have changed.

Edited by SteveG - February 15 2022 at 12:18
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 11642 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 11:01
^Umm, the waveforms show more dynamic range on the original mix, specifically when the organ is shredding.
Back to Top
Meltdowner View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 25 2013
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 10232 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Meltdowner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 10:50
^ That's just a fade out that wasn't exactly like the original. It's bound to happen in a remix. From that snippet I prefered SW's mix, less compressed and the highs are less aggresive.
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 11642 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 10:30
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

The point I am making is one that you keep skirting around, that you called out SW as not a good sound engineer.
Never did I say that SW was not a good sound engineer. You are twisting my words to create a false statement about what my point was. And I'm not going to repeat that point for the fifth time! You need to simmer down, Jose.

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

You do realize that the original recording of JTull TAAB is pretty bad right? And the SW remix of TAAB is pretty much lauded as how the record should have sounded upon original release.
 Again, I have the original vinyl. It sounds great. Do you have a the original vinyl release and did you A/B it with the SW remixed vinyl to back up your claim? 

And I'm sure you knew this about SW's TAAB mix. 
 
Ooops!






Edited by Grumpyprogfan - February 15 2022 at 10:32
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 09:31
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

^Wow!! You total ignored my point and went on a rant. I never said SW was bad at anything, all I said was there are many engineers who can record acoustic guitar as well as SW. BTW I owned TAAB on vinyl in the 70's. It sounded great to me and so does the original CD.

It's not a rant, it's when people make claims with nothing much to back it up, but then default to their "own ears", which is perfectly fine but you made comments that go against the norm regarding a recording engineer. The point I am making is one that you keep skirting around, that you called out SW as not a good sound engineer.

You can carry on....I'm done with this thread.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2022 at 09:17
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

Plus, nobody records an acoustic guitar as well as Steven.
Disagree. Not sure of the engineers, but Neil Young, Jim Croce, James Taylor, Willie Nelson, Glen Campbell, Jethro Tull, and others, have better acoustic guitar sounds, imo.


No I agree, you miss the point from BrufordFreak......SW is an excellent recording engineer and mixing engineer. So how he captures an acoustic guitar in this case, he is clearly one of the best.

Your talking about the sound these players make with their acoustic guitar vs how it is recorded.
You miss my point and have said the opposite of what I mean. I am not taking about the sounds those players make with acoustic guitar, I'm talking about how those instruments were recorded. All the artists I listed have better recorded sounds than SW, imo.

You wrote this.....
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17531 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 17:05
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

You do realize that the original recording of JTull TAAB is pretty bad right? And the SW remix of TAAB is pretty much lauded as how the record should have sounded upon original release.
...

Hi,

This is strange ... regardless of the "fact" that TAAB is supposed to have been a bad recording, in the end, it was still known and remembered and appreciated.

The SW remix, is the same thing as hearing an orchestra today doing Stravinsky or Beethoven ... it is much cleaner than before, and you will listen to it, and ... wow ... that's new ... I never heard that before kind of thing, and thus, the SW remix sounds way better, and we think that the original was bad. 

The "standards" have changed since the 70's. If you are suggesting that one recording is "better" than the other, I think you did not have a proper turntable and system to hear the original ... which would likely make it sound very poor specially when the CD was first made and it was a copy of a copy of a copy ... kind of thing. No master anywhere to be found is my thought.

"Should have sounded" is a bizarre idea ... so all the movies from 50 years ago were crap, because they did not have the far out this and that of today? Are you crazy?

The elements in "recording" have changed, and they have helped it look like things are better than they were before ... I don't think they are better ... they are simply a different take on how it was originally done! ... but the music is still ALIVE and appreciated. So, in some ways, a "remix" was not necessary!

In the end, the whole thing is NOTHING, except about how the technical end has changed and been improved so much in the last 50 years and some. Extremely visible in film. And even more so in music! Hard to believe that we think that we need to see a "new" reprint of 2001, in order to say that ... it is now even better than the original. Heck, even in the Cinerama Dome that was awesome. Even music hasn't tried that!


Edited by moshkito - February 14 2022 at 17:08
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 11642 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 16:58
^Wow!! You total ignored my point and went on a rant. I never said SW was bad at anything, all I said was there are many engineers who can record acoustic guitar as well as SW. BTW I owned TAAB on vinyl in the 70's. It sounded great to me and so does the original CD.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 16:05
You do realize that the original recording of JTull TAAB is pretty bad right? And the SW remix of TAAB is pretty much lauded as how the record should have sounded upon original release. If you are simply listening to a CD of these recordings you also realize your not listening to the original mix, they have most probably been remastered for CD.
SW is not a Mastering engineer, he does not focus on that part of the process, his talents are in mixing and especially re-mixing older recordings, whether they are originally analog or digital. Unplugged was mastered by Ted Jensen at Sterling Sound, who is one of the best mastering engineers around but different than what a mixing engineer does.

I took a look James Taylor album as I don't have that one, originally mastered and cut by Darrell Johnson in 1970, don't know who he is.....but the remastered version you are probably hearing or streaming is from 2008 remastered and cut by Kevin Gray and Steve Hoffman, which I am sure is much better than the 1970 version. Again, those two are some of the best mastering engineers around.

If you don't like what SW does that's fine, but your opinion of his work would be in the severe minority.....Ask Robert Fripp as well Ian Anderson what they think of his work.
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 11642 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 15:23
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

Plus, nobody records an acoustic guitar as well as Steven.
Disagree. Not sure of the engineers, but Neil Young, Jim Croce, James Taylor, Willie Nelson, Glen Campbell, Jethro Tull, and others, have better acoustic guitar sounds, imo.


No I agree, you miss the point from BrufordFreak......SW is an excellent recording engineer and mixing engineer. So how he captures an acoustic guitar in this case, he is clearly one of the best.

Your talking about the sound these players make with their acoustic guitar vs how it is recorded.
You miss my point and have said the opposite of what I mean. I am not taking about the sounds those players make with acoustic guitar, I'm talking about how those instruments were recorded. All the artists I listed have better recorded sounds than SW, imo.

Ok, I'll play.......what are your reasons why you think this?
There is nothing to "play". Hearing is subjective. Sonically albums like Neil Young "Harvest", James Taylor "Sweet Baby Jane", Jethro Tull "TAAB", Eric Clapton "Unplugged", Cat Stevens "Tea for the Tillerman", etc. have better recorded acoustic guitar sounds than anything SW has done. And it's not because the albums mentioned were recorded in analog. Eric Clapton's "Unplugged" was a digital recording. They sound good because the engineers who recorded the guitar sounds were as good or better than SW. 
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 12:48
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

Plus, nobody records an acoustic guitar as well as Steven.
Disagree. Not sure of the engineers, but Neil Young, Jim Croce, James Taylor, Willie Nelson, Glen Campbell, Jethro Tull, and others, have better acoustic guitar sounds, imo.


No I agree, you miss the point from BrufordFreak......SW is an excellent recording engineer and mixing engineer. So how he captures an acoustic guitar in this case, he is clearly one of the best.

Your talking about the sound these players make with their acoustic guitar vs how it is recorded.
You miss my point and have said the opposite of what I mean. I am not taking about the sounds those players make with acoustic guitar, I'm talking about how those instruments were recorded. All the artists I listed have better recorded sounds than SW, imo.

Ok, I'll play.......what are your reasons why you think this?
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 11642 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 14 2022 at 10:41
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

Originally posted by BrufordFreak BrufordFreak wrote:

Plus, nobody records an acoustic guitar as well as Steven.
Disagree. Not sure of the engineers, but Neil Young, Jim Croce, James Taylor, Willie Nelson, Glen Campbell, Jethro Tull, and others, have better acoustic guitar sounds, imo.


No I agree, you miss the point from BrufordFreak......SW is an excellent recording engineer and mixing engineer. So how he captures an acoustic guitar in this case, he is clearly one of the best.

Your talking about the sound these players make with their acoustic guitar vs how it is recorded.
You miss my point and have said the opposite of what I mean. I am not taking about the sounds those players make with acoustic guitar, I'm talking about how those instruments were recorded. All the artists I listed have better recorded sounds than SW, imo.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.