Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Special reviewers age needs to be included.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSpecial reviewers age needs to be included.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
BarryGlibb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 28 2010
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Status: Offline
Points: 1781
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 10 2017 at 02:49
It's not so much the age of the reviewer, but how many times has the reviewer actually listened to the album. I don't review much these days, but when I have, I had a rule that I must listen to the album at least a dozen times.

If for instance I had reviewed A Passion Play after 6 listens; I would have given it 2 stars...after a dozen listens it went to 4 stars; after 20 listens it went to 5 stars.

So maybe there should be a section in the review where you can put how many times you have listened to the album rather than worrying about how old the person is.




Back to Top
Quinino View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2011
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 3654
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 14:19
I would more easily get some clues about taste from knowing the facial hairstyle of the reviewer: close-shave, goatee, moustache, full beard, you name it... Ermm
But then again that would be getting too personal, wouldn't it (I use a 10-day stubble, btw, how can you get cooler than that Cool )


Edited by Quinino - October 08 2017 at 14:20
Back to Top
convocation View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 13:00
I hope you're kidding.

Anyway, the discussion might have splintered a bit.

Age by itself has no bearing on the quality of reviews. Limits on age are basically common sense: you should to write in clear & succinct English. This does challenge some of our non-English native speakers/writers.....so I don't want to be construed as trying to exclude people....but then again posts are already edited...yes?
 
However,  one suggestion was to include at what age a special reviewer first discovered a particular track or artist. Also, it took me some not insignificant time to feel satisfied with a review before I posted....the age you write/post also does indeed have some bearing....just by the fact that our prose, observations, and perspective change in time.   I hope for the better, but in reality not always I suppose.

I'm 62.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 11:55
More than 40.......Less than 80
            
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24639
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 07:04
Originally posted by Mascodagama Mascodagama wrote:

I don't really see the relevance. One can be an ignoramous at fifty or insightful at eighteen. The content of the review is what matters.
 
Neither do I. I am neither an avid (11 reviews) nor a good reviewer. But if I ever write another review, I'll try to incorporate my age (now 60 years minus 100 weeks - this nice beaver won't see a leap day before reaching that noteworthy age) nevertheless Wink.
 
@OP: Nice you're posting here anyway Smile. I like to see low-frequency long time PA members popping up now and then.


Edited by someone_else - October 08 2017 at 07:05
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 03:38
Originally posted by Mascodagama Mascodagama wrote:

I don't really see the relevance. One can be an ignoramous at fifty or insightful at eighteen. The content of the review is what matters.

Indeed.

Anyway we have far more troubling issues at hand as it is.

Edited by Guldbamsen - October 08 2017 at 03:45
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Online
Points: 20414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 02:53
for the PA progreviewers, there is a way to describe his background in their profile page

I like the idea, but I don't believe it will be enougn to give the age, because it won't tell you at what age you discovered the album you're publishing the review of. Being 54, it's obvious that I can't have discovered Anglagard's Hybris (released 92) at age 18, but I could've discovered two months ago.


Back to Top
Kepler62 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2017
Location: Fort Erie
Status: Offline
Points: 501
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 01:59
I have tried my hand at a handful of reviews. But  what's the point of giving Close To The Edge it's kazzilionth review.  personally at this point I think I know as much as I have to know about that album. I occasionally read or scan  some of the reviews if I have the time and don't see much difference between the "experts " or just someone who is just a "member". What qualifies someone as an "expert" in music? Anyone can write anything on the internet really. I guess you could call someone such as Chis Welch an "expert " but he is a trained journalist. He's even published books about artists from Led Zeppelin to Tina Turner. He even "interviewed " Gentle Giant. I'm sure some people here probably have never heard of Chris Welch but if you lived through the seventies he was everywhere. A person's age is not their fault but I think certain music belongs to an era and it helps to have lived through that period in time to really understand the impact certain music had relative to the times.



Edited by Kepler62 - October 08 2017 at 03:11
Back to Top
Mascodagama View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 00:18
I don't really see the relevance. One can be an ignoramous at fifty or insightful at eighteen. The content of the review is what matters.
Soldato of the Pan Head Mafia. We'll make you an offer you can't listen to.
Bandcamp Profile
Back to Top
Windhawk View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 28 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2017 at 00:11
My age isn't a secret. I will be 46 before this year ends.
Websites I work with:

http://www.progressor.net
http://www.houseofprog.com

My profile on Mixcloud:
https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2017 at 23:38
This should be in the 'Help us improve the Site' subforum.

I hear what you're saying but I think you'd get a lot of blowback.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2017 at 20:38
45, but nobody special
Back to Top
convocation View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2017 at 19:17
The site currently asks for birth date for members....but that is too personal...given the damage done by putting putting personal info out in public....but I can't help want to have the historical significance of the reviewers opinions  to judge reviewers contributions in the proper context. Age does - without argument -  matter when evaluating the reviewers stand point. I am suggesting age be a requisite factor that must be given up in joining PA for special reviewers. 

It's ok to be anonymous...and still contribute...but the persons who dominate the reviews for artists should reveal more about their background...than being totally anonymous out side of shear quantity of contributions. After all, age does not determine quality any more than quantity.

Think about it


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.410 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.