Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Original Proto Electronic Prog
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Original Proto Electronic Prog

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2016 at 13:33
Nice piece which also states is electronic music, note I never said the Varese was the first - he is just the most influential and best of his time. 

The mention of the Varese Déserts piece is also of interest.
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2016 at 10:14
Wiki piece on electronic music in history....according to this there were several before Varese.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_music
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2016 at 04:10
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Circular arguments are such fun, why is it not music as you state your is just an opinion without any supporting facts...... The responses received to this posts would seem to indicate a very closed mind set. Varese was in fact a major influence on many Prog rockers and in particular the use of sound collages popular in early proto prog by artists including Zappa, Chicago and even the Beatles among others.

 
I find arguments to be circular only when I have to quote myself to be clear, so I'll state my position again. And I quote: "Technically, it is music, but very poor music, IMO."
 
I never said that it was not music. Or that Varese was not universally influential. I said that you failed to provide opinions of, once again, why you consider this work to be prototypical electronic prog.
 
Now, carry on ignoring my request for opinions concerning same, and spin the wheel again.
 
 


Edited by SteveG - December 16 2016 at 04:25
Back to Top
2dogs View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 03 2011
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 705
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2016 at 00:02
I've started to investigate this sort of music in the last couple of months after wondering just what one could have listened to fifty years ago, and have been very surprised to discover just how experimental it all was compared to the rock music of the time. The composers seem to be trying to escape from the rigid sets of notes, timings and orchestral tones and develop something completely new, but as a result of just concentrating on hearing the absorbing atmospheres I am now beginning to pay more attention to the patterns of sounds going on around me and wondering just what is and isn't music. My favourite piece from Varèse at the moment is Déserts - 1954 and he was incorporating industrial noise and feedback into an orchestral piece Big smile. The only problem with the Decca Complete Works CD I have is that some faint hearted engineer turned the tape sections down so low they sound like they're in the next room, but fortunately they're separate tracks on the CD so having done a lossless import to iTunes I could set them for a 40% volume boost. Now when playing the piece back through headphones the iPod automatically whacks the volume up then back down at the end of the track to avoid being deafened by the next orchestral section - a true wonder of technology Clap.

Edited by 2dogs - December 16 2016 at 02:55
"There is nothing new except what has been forgotten" - Marie Antoinette
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2016 at 13:55
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

So to be on this site everyone must listen to the same music - that seems to be what your are saying, don't think that is what this site is about.

My comment is a response to the previous comments, which I believe are in rather poor taste, I started this thread and expressed an opinion on Varese's work Poeme Electronic (Varese was the major influence to Zappa's work if you didn't know) and then get all the trolls coming out of the wood work stating that this is mot music, yeah so of course I going to react and I can tell you I'm significantly older the 30 - as alluded to by another poster. I thought this was a relatively free thinking site but this thread has shown un ugly nasty side to PA which I find repulsive. 
With over 20 subgenres, it is beyond reason that "everyone should listen to the same music" on this website. This site is free thinking and of free speech. I, unlike Dean, make distinctions between what I consider to be acoustic electronic manipulated sounds and music. You proposed that Varese's electronically manipulated sounds are music. Technically, it is music, but very poor music, IMO. And that's the key phrase: "In my opinion." You have stated your's clearly but offer no reason why this piece is good, other than the fact that you personally like it, and have stated little to support your claim that it's Proto Electronic Prog.
 
Come up with some reasons and qualifications of why  you think it's both proto and prog, and I'll be happy to talk further. If not, then this post will have failed to advance your claims.
Circular arguments are such fun, why is it not music as you state your is just an opinion without any supporting facts...... The responses received to this posts would seem to indicate a very closed mind set. Varese was in fact a major influence on many Prog rockers and in particular the use of sound collages popular in early proto prog by artists including Zappa, Chicago and even the Beatles among others.

https://billsmusicalbox.wordpress.com/2012/08/13/the-godfathers-of-american-prog-rock/
https://thebluze.com/2016/01/30/why-is-progressive-rock-so-controversial/
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=UIqkCAAAQBAJ&pg=PT277&lpg=PT277&dq=Varese++Prog+rockers&source=bl&ots=oD6_FrTkmV&sig=PowDYh5hj6iMdnQnEaRw_84uQJw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6_urohvfQAhVIa7wKHfaTAYwQ6AEIOzAF#v=onepage&q=Varese%20%20Prog%20rockers&f=false
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2016 at 04:28
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

So to be on this site everyone must listen to the same music - that seems to be what your are saying, don't think that is what this site is about.

My comment is a response to the previous comments, which I believe are in rather poor taste, I started this thread and expressed an opinion on Varese's work Poeme Electronic (Varese was the major influence to Zappa's work if you didn't know) and then get all the trolls coming out of the wood work stating that this is mot music, yeah so of course I going to react and I can tell you I'm significantly older the 30 - as alluded to by another poster. I thought this was a relatively free thinking site but this thread has shown un ugly nasty side to PA which I find repulsive. 
With over 20 subgenres, it is beyond reason that "everyone should listen to the same music" on this website. This site is free thinking and of free speech. I, unlike Dean, make distinctions between what I consider to be acoustic electronic manipulated sounds and music. You proposed that Varese's electronically manipulated sounds are music. Technically, it is music, but very poor music, IMO. And that's the key phrase: "In my opinion." You have stated your's clearly but offer no reason why this piece is good, other than the fact that you personally like it, and have stated little to support your claim that it's Proto Electronic Prog.
 
Come up with some reasons and qualifications of why  you think it's both proto and prog, and I'll be happy to talk further. If not, then this post will have failed to advance your claims.


Edited by SteveG - December 15 2016 at 07:45
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2016 at 01:04
Ummm.......George Harrison - Electronic Sound ???
I know it's just Moog generated noise from, well, Bernie Krause in reality, but it's the earliest form of true 'electronic' I have on vinyl.....
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2016 at 00:59
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

So why do you quote Wiki at all.....
Actually, I didn't and rarely do. I merely linked to their Electroacoustic Music page for anyone who hadn't heard the term before since not everyone is knowledgeable on early experimental music and occasionally some presume that it's all "Electronic Music". The only other reference I made to Wikipedia was in response to Doug's post on the bottom of page 1, where again, I neither cited nor quoted Wiki but merely pointed out that it also listed Edgard Varèse's Poème électronique under "Examples of notable electroacoustic works".

Then, you can prove anything with bloody facts mate.LOL
What?
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2016 at 00:14
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:


My response regarding the 30 y/o age was in response to zravkapt and not to yourself  either "you're"or not "your".
I know, but your response quoted my post. Ergo, it was nothing to do with me. If you have an issue with Darryl then quote his post and take it up with him, not me.
It quoted your post and others.......
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Your definitions are fine but they are your definitions and nothing more............
I have defined nothing, my comments are opinions and discussion points and nothing more. People falsely presume that internet posts are statements of irrefutable defined fact when in reality they are nothing but opinion (albeit backed up with suitably chosen citations).
I didn't see any suitable citations
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

you seem to quote Wiki when it suits you..............
As does everyone. Wikipedia is authored and edited by many different people so it doesn't present a coherent and consistent view on anything. It would be unwise and somewhat reckless to cite it as the ultimate truth of everything, especially when it gives two differing opinions on the same topic. 
So why do you quote Wiki at all.....
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 23:42
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:


My response regarding the 30 y/o age was in response to zravkapt and not to yourself  either "you're"or not "your".
I know, but your response quoted my post. Ergo, it was nothing to do with me. If you have an issue with Darryl then quote his post and take it up with him, not me.
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Your definitions are fine but they are your definitions and nothing more............
I have defined nothing, my comments are opinions and discussion points and nothing more. People falsely presume that internet posts are statements of irrefutable defined fact when in reality they are nothing but opinion (albeit backed up with suitably chosen citations).
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

you seem to quote Wiki when it suits you..............
As does everyone. Wikipedia is authored and edited by many different people so it doesn't present a coherent and consistent view on anything. It would be unwise and somewhat reckless to cite it as the ultimate truth of everything, especially when it gives two differing opinions on the same topic. 


Edited by Dean - December 14 2016 at 23:44
What?
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 23:22
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Some people have very bad taste and no no sense of what is good music...............

Some people can't catch the irony in their own words.

Some people have more well developed musical tastes than others who are satisfied with plan Jane music
And some people have no idea of what other members of this site listen to. If you feel that you have more developed musical tastes than a majority of the this site's members, then you are sadly mistaken. Perhaps it's time you closed your ears to your self obsessed music listening and take a serious look at what other PA members listen to.
Btw, your "I know and appreciate better music than thou" stance is a real turnoff.
I tend to differentiate between appreciating something and actually liking it. I can appreciate Stockhausen and his music without liking it, and I can make the same observation of Roine Stolt and Miles Davis. This is why I tend to avoid making negative judgemental criticism of any piece of music - however, even if I like something I'll often only say so if it adds something to the conversation or is in response to a specific question. 

This is also why I'll never state a preference between vinyl and CD - that I buy both formats regularly is all the information anyone really needs to know. Same is true it I own more than one album by an artist as I'm not quite dumb enough (yet) to buy a second album if I didn't like the first (though it is perfectly possible that I subsequently disliked the second).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Whether I like or dislike this particular piece of music is somewhat immaterial if we are simply talking about whether it is an example of proto-electronic prog or not... that it is an example of 1950s experimental music is beyond doubt and its use of electronics is important to the development electronic music in general even though it wasn't entirely composed using electronic sounds nor was it the first or most ground-breaking. Many other pieces from the that era are just as important. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To be regarded as Proto Electronic Prog then we have to view that in context of what Progressive Electronic music is and how that differs from all other forms of Electronic Music (including that composed by Cage, Riley, Ligetti and a whole raft of others such as Wendy Carlos and the all folks who worked at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop), and while this may not at first appear obvious, the key element there is the very close association with Progressive Rock, and here I would stress the Rock element of that, if it ain't Rock then it cannot be Prog Rock. Similar things happen in Jazz Rock/Fusion (some people forget the Fusion bit must include some Rock element to be regarded as Progressive Rock) and Avant-Prog (Avant Garde without the Rock element cannot seriously be considered as fitting Avant-Prog, it's just Avant Garde). For Poème électronique to be some kind of precursor to the Progressive Electronic subgenre then there has to be a rock association, as opposed to an experimental or electronic(ish) association otherwise Stravinsky and Bach would be regarded as Proto Prog (which they aren't and never can be).


So to be on this site everyone must listen to the same music - that seems to be what your are saying, don't think that is what this site is about.
I suspect you are responding to the wrong post as I can't see what you've written here has to do with what I posted but since you have, here goes. 

What I have posted, if it relates to "what people should listen to" at all, would be saying the diametric opposite. Note here that it was YOU who criticised the taste of others for not liking the music you like whereas the implication in my post is that if no one ever says whether they like something or not then no one can make that snap assessment of them and they can listen to whatever the hell they ruddy well like.

btw: "you're" not "your". .

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

My comment is a response to the previous comments, which I believe are in rather poor taste, I started this thread and expressed an opinion on Varese's work Poeme Electronic (Varese was the major influence to Zappa's work if you didn't know) and then get all the trolls coming out of the wood work stating that this is mot music, yeah so of course I going to react and I can tell you I'm significantly older the 30 - as alluded to by another poster. I thought this was a relatively free thinking site but this thread has shown un ugly nasty side to PA which I find repulsive. 
I never mentioned your age however I have asserted the validity of Poème électronique as music in an previous post so this has fu_kall to do with me. If you have a problem with other posters in this thread then take it up with them, not me, but frankly chief you need to be a lot more open minded towards the opinions and views of others to survive on this site. Stern Smile

My response regarding the 30 y/o age was in response to zravkapt and not to yourself  either "you're"or not "your".

Your definitions are fine but they are your definitions and nothing more............ you seem to quote Wiki when it suits you..............


Edited by EddieRUKiddingVarese - December 14 2016 at 23:23
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 22:28
Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

Some people have very bad taste and no no sense of what is good music...............

Some people can't catch the irony in their own words.

Some people have more well developed musical tastes than others who are satisfied with plan Jane music
And some people have no idea of what other members of this site listen to. If you feel that you have more developed musical tastes than a majority of the this site's members, then you are sadly mistaken. Perhaps it's time you closed your ears to your self obsessed music listening and take a serious look at what other PA members listen to.
Btw, your "I know and appreciate better music than thou" stance is a real turnoff.
I tend to differentiate between appreciating something and actually liking it. I can appreciate Stockhausen and his music without liking it, and I can make the same observation of Roine Stolt and Miles Davis. This is why I tend to avoid making negative judgemental criticism of any piece of music - however, even if I like something I'll often only say so if it adds something to the conversation or is in response to a specific question. 

This is also why I'll never state a preference between vinyl and CD - that I buy both formats regularly is all the information anyone really needs to know. Same is true it I own more than one album by an artist as I'm not quite dumb enough (yet) to buy a second album if I didn't like the first (though it is perfectly possible that I subsequently disliked the second).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Whether I like or dislike this particular piece of music is somewhat immaterial if we are simply talking about whether it is an example of proto-electronic prog or not... that it is an example of 1950s experimental music is beyond doubt and its use of electronics is important to the development electronic music in general even though it wasn't entirely composed using electronic sounds nor was it the first or most ground-breaking. Many other pieces from the that era are just as important. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To be regarded as Proto Electronic Prog then we have to view that in context of what Progressive Electronic music is and how that differs from all other forms of Electronic Music (including that composed by Cage, Riley, Ligetti and a whole raft of others such as Wendy Carlos and the all folks who worked at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop), and while this may not at first appear obvious, the key element there is the very close association with Progressive Rock, and here I would stress the Rock element of that, if it ain't Rock then it cannot be Prog Rock. Similar things happen in Jazz Rock/Fusion (some people forget the Fusion bit must include some Rock element to be regarded as Progressive Rock) and Avant-Prog (Avant Garde without the Rock element cannot seriously be considered as fitting Avant-Prog, it's just Avant Garde). For Poème électronique to be some kind of precursor to the Progressive Electronic subgenre then there has to be a rock association, as opposed to an experimental or electronic(ish) association otherwise Stravinsky and Bach would be regarded as Proto Prog (which they aren't and never can be).


So to be on this site everyone must listen to the same music - that seems to be what your are saying, don't think that is what this site is about.
I suspect you are responding to the wrong post as I can't see what you've written here has to do with what I posted but since you have, here goes. 

What I have posted, if it relates to "what people should listen to" at all, would be saying the diametric opposite. Note here that it was YOU who criticised the taste of others for not liking the music you like whereas the implication in my post is that if no one ever says whether they like something or not then no one can make that snap assessment of them and they can listen to whatever the hell they ruddy well like.

btw: "you're" not "your". .

Originally posted by EddieRUKiddingVarese EddieRUKiddingVarese wrote:

My comment is a response to the previous comments, which I believe are in rather poor taste, I started this thread and expressed an opinion on Varese's work Poeme Electronic (Varese was the major influence to Zappa's work if you didn't know) and then get all the trolls coming out of the wood work stating that this is mot music, yeah so of course I going to react and I can tell you I'm significantly older the 30 - as alluded to by another poster. I thought this was a relatively free thinking site but this thread has shown un ugly nasty side to PA which I find repulsive. 
I never mentioned your age however I have asserted the validity of Poème électronique as music in an previous post so this has fu_kall to do with me. If you have a problem with other posters in this thread then take it up with them, not me, but frankly chief you need to be a lot more open minded towards the opinions and views of others to survive on this site. Stern Smile


Edited by Dean - December 14 2016 at 23:03
What?
Back to Top
andreol263 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 28 2014
Location: Terra de Cabral
Status: Offline
Points: 790
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 19:36
Yeah, my mistake :d
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 19:28
Did you mean White Noise, I can can't find White Sound?




"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
andreol263 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 28 2014
Location: Terra de Cabral
Status: Offline
Points: 790
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 19:24
^Not bands, but albums, White Noise's An Electric Storm, Popol Vuh's Affestunde(i would recommend In Der Garten Pharaos, but this is a more organic type of electronic music), Tangerine Dream's Electronic Meditation. 
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 19:21
^ thanks,  I will check out the bands you mention Thumbs Up

Edited by EddieRUKiddingVarese - December 14 2016 at 19:21
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
andreol263 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 28 2014
Location: Terra de Cabral
Status: Offline
Points: 790
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 19:15
Wow, i've never listened to anything by Edgar Varese, but i've found this piece amazing, it fells so mechanical but i like it, for some reason it remembers me of White Sound, Electronic Meditation,Affestunde, and many others in that vein.

Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 19:09
I would suggest a good dose of Tabasco sauce is in order............
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 18:47
I'm definitely obnoxious, and I couldn't care less about sources, anyone's sources, not just yours.   After a life of music, I am my own source.





Edited by Atavachron - December 14 2016 at 18:54
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
EddieRUKiddingVarese View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 04 2016
Location: Aust
Status: Offline
Points: 1802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2016 at 16:22
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Trolls huh.   Ugly and nasty huh.

Wake up and smell the coffee.   You started a thread with nothing other than a sample of music and a proclamation and then get pissed off when some here have something to say about it.   That's what this friggin' forum is for, that's what it's about.   Music discussion, and yes, argument, debate, maybe even just conversation.   You think one disagrees just to aggravate you?   Guess again.

But you didn't want a real conversation.   No, you wanted to make some statement, leave it at that, and then get pissy when the very statement you made gets responses.   I imagine you thought the posts would along the lines of "Yeah man, great, 'The Original Proto Electronic Prog', right on, keep it up!".   It don't work that way: this is a premier music appreciation site that draws listeners and experts from around the globe of all ages and backgrounds, making it among the most comprehensive depositories of music analysis and appreciation in the world.   This could have been a constructive (and probably needed) talk about origins of electronic progressive music.   But you wouldn't have that.   No, the moment someone had a different position, you began with the attacks.

And another thing:  Most of us here have learned to not accept what some book, site, source, magazine, interview, person, or any other source has to say about anything.   It's called independent judgement, and it comes after a lifetime of careful listening, not reading some page on Wiki-bloody-Pedia.

Yeah, I'm a troll.   A prog rock troll who enjoys talking about things I love and understand.   We're all trolls according to you, so get used to it.


You have obviously not looked at my posts and the Source links that I posted to support my original post. 
You are obnoxious in the extreme and do not warrant a reply
"Everyone is born with genius, but most people only keep it a few minutes"
and I need the knits, the double knits!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.