Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Should PA have a Psych Rock Lounge?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedShould PA have a Psych Rock Lounge?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Rivertree View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Band Submissions

Joined: March 22 2006
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 17630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 17:31
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:


 
...

If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.

...



now that makes it clear what your intention is.

You are not the first to claim such a change, this comes up on and off. But my answer, alongside with Dean, always will be - this is a progressive rock archive, as for that we only are willing to add progressive rock acts to our subgenres - simple as that Smile

would be interesting to know btw how this new subgenre should be named - non-progressive psychedelic/space rock, or something like that?





Edited by Rivertree - December 14 2014 at 17:39


Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:36
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Very good, Gents. You've all given me the answer I expected (except for Atavachron, Finnforrest and Sventonio) without asking the pertinent question: Why?
 
PA's Psych/Space rock site excludes key psychedelic groups that range from the 13 Floor Elevators, Country Joe and The Fish, The Red Crayola, Lost And Found, The Golden Dawn, The Bubble Puppy, Silver Apples and about two dozen more nascent and influential psychedelic groups that I could list.
 
PA's So called 'Pysch/Space' site is for groups that are just that: Floyd, Hawkwind and their clones.
 
The old rule adage goes "When something isn't broken, don't fix it"
 
That old adage does not apply to PA's current Psych/Space Rock sub genre. Obvious key Psychedelic Rock groups should have been or need to be included.
 
If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.
 
That would be the point for doing this. It's too bad we could not have a had a back and forth discussion about this, but I'm not surprised by this anymore.
 
 
Good, surprises are seldom welcome and back and forth internet discussions rarely ever resolve.

You failed to ask us why we say "No"

We are not here to catalogue all that is Psychedelic Rock, that is not our function, mandate, raison d'etre, role, goal, aim, ambition, desire, need or requirement. It is not why the site exists or why we are here. If this is what you want then I suggest looking elsewhere - try a Psych Rock archive or something - or Rate Your Music. We are here to catalogue all that is Progressive Rock. 

Any category listed on the PA Front Page in Orange is regarded here as a subset (or subgenre) of Progressive Rock and those in Yellow are not. So once again: the "Progressive" in Psychedelic/Space Rock (which is shown in Orange on the Front Page) is implicit. This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock.


We include *some* non-Prog Psychedelic Rock bands under Proto Prog (which is shown in Yellow on the Front Page) if they were germane to the formation of Progressive Rock as a genre, but this does not mean that we should, could or would include every Psych band, regardless of how "key" you believe them to be. [Clue: none of the bands you've listed thus far need to be included under Proto Prog or Psych/Space].





Edited by Dean - December 14 2014 at 16:38
What?
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:30
LOL On that bomb shell I say 'Goodnight to you, sir!'
Big smile

ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:22
It's a Christmas thing.

“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:21
Oh, I wasn't critising you, just looking for confirmation that we were thinking in the same direction. ;-)

And yes, you should blush, you're bra hasn't seen a laundry basket in weeks now. Tongue
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:19
Sorry Angelo, that post wasn't directed at you even if I used it as a starting point
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:13
Isn't that in line with what I wrote? As long as it's 'rock', we can take it in or consider it. Otherwise, we don't - unless we change to 'progressive music' and end up in the mess you describe. 

RYM could be different - it is possible to put different front-ends (sites) next to each other that share content.
At some point I thought Max had a vision like that, when he started Metal Music Archives and Jazz Music Archive next to this site. It would've been great to be able to put everything in the right genre, publish it at the right site and have a single database behind it all to redirect people to the right place. Maybe one day...
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:06
The problem therein is when do you stop? Wu-Tang Clan were hugely progressive. Just like Sarah Vaughan, Sun Ra, Funkadelic, Bob Dylan, The Stooges, The Fall, NWA, Edith Piaf, Neil Young, The Velvet Underground, Beethoven, Django Reinhardt, Cocteau Twins, RZA/Gravediggaz/Bobby Digital, Stockhausen, Varese, Hallucinogen, Sphongle, Napalm Death, Muddy Waters, etc etc etc. and it never stops. We end up like RYM in the end, because going full 'progressive music archives' also means that we can't pick and chose. It would entail all kinds of styles ranging from RnB to Grindcore to trance to classical. RYM here we come!

Just because a band isn't listed on here though doesn't mean that we can't appreciate it and converse about it's aural bliss. That's what general music discussions are for
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 15:46
Ok... I missed the second question for some reason. If the line below is accurate, then why not just propose these bands to the Psych/Space team? 

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

That old adage does not apply to PA's current Psych/Space Rock sub genre. Obvious key Psychedelic Rock groups should have been or need to be included.

As long as they have 'rock' applied to their music, they should be headed for acceptance. Only if non-rock bands show up it becomes different - which would lead to the question that also came up in the Miles Davis discussion this weekend: why is PA about progressive rock, and not about progressive music? 

 


Edited by Angelo - December 14 2014 at 15:47
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 15:20
Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Very good, Gents. You've all given me the answer I expected (except for Atavachron, Finnforrest and Sventonio) without asking the pertinent question: Why?
 
PA's Psych/Space rock site excludes key psychedelic groups that range from the 13 Floor Elevators, Country Joe and The Fish, The Red Crayola, Lost And Found, The Golden Dawn, The Bubble Puppy, Silver Apples and about two dozen more nascent and influential psychedelic groups that I could list.
 
PA's So called 'Pysch/Space' site is for groups that are just that: Floyd, Hawkwind and their clones.
 
The old rule adage goes "When something isn't broken, don't fix it"
 
That old adage does not apply to PA's current Psych/Space Rock sub genre. Obvious key Psychedelic Rock groups should have been or need to be included.
 
If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.
 
That would be the point for doing this. It's too bad we could not have a had a back and forth discussion about this, but I'm not surprised by this anymore.
 
 
I agree. But if there is not a real chance that the key bands of classic psychedelia to find the place at PA Psych / Space list, then the management should simply add the word *progressive*. Of course, there is a description, but it looks like, for example, if you've opened an Italian restaurant with a menu of variety of dishes as carpaccio, sea food and so on, and then above the entrance to put a banner that says Pizzeria.
Clap 
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 15:19
Originally posted by Lear'sFool Lear'sFool wrote:

Good news, then, is that Silver Apples are under Proto. I would say it would be a bit contentious to promote them to Psych, though, since they are also the first prog electronic group.
Whew! Thank god for that. Wink
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:52
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Very good, Gents. You've all given me the answer I expected (except for Atavachron, Finnforrest and Sventonio) without asking the pertinent question: Why?
 
PA's Psych/Space rock site excludes key psychedelic groups that range from the 13 Floor Elevators, Country Joe and The Fish, The Red Crayola, Lost And Found, The Golden Dawn, The Bubble Puppy, Silver Apples and about two dozen more nascent and influential psychedelic groups that I could list.
 
PA's So called 'Pysch/Space' site is for groups that are just that: Floyd, Hawkwind and their clones.
 
The old rule adage goes "When something isn't broken, don't fix it"
 
That old adage does not apply to PA's current Psych/Space Rock sub genre. Obvious key Psychedelic Rock groups should have been or need to be included.
 
If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.
 
That would be the point for doing this. It's too bad we could not have a had a back and forth discussion about this, but I'm not surprised by this anymore.
 
 
I agree. But if there is not a real chance that the key bands of classic psychedelia to find the place at PA Psych / Space list, then the management should simply add the word *progressive*. Of course, there is a description, but it looks like, for example, if you've opened an Italian restaurant with a menu of variety of dishes as carpaccio, sea food and so on, and then above the entrance to put a banner that says Pizzeria.
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:40
Call this thread the Psych Lounge, and have your way with it. As often, better to apologise later if your wrong than to spend months of debate to get approval. :)
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:26
Good news, then, is that Silver Apples are under Proto. I would say it would be a bit contentious to promote them to Psych, though, since they are also the first prog electronic group.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:15
Very good, Gents. You've all given me the answer I expected (except for Atavachron, Finnforrest and Sventonio) without asking the pertinent question: Why?
 
PA's Psych/Space rock site excludes key psychedelic groups that range from the 13 Floor Elevators, Country Joe and The Fish, The Red Crayola, Lost And Found, The Golden Dawn, The Bubble Puppy, Silver Apples and about two dozen more nascent and influential psychedelic groups that I could list.
 
PA's So called 'Pysch/Space' site is for groups that are just that: Floyd, Hawkwind and their clones.
 
The old rule adage goes "When something isn't broken, don't fix it"
 
That old adage does not apply to PA's current Psych/Space Rock sub genre. Obvious key Psychedelic Rock groups should have been or need to be included.
 
If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.
 
That would be the point for doing this. It's too bad we could not have a had a back and forth discussion about this, but I'm not surprised by this anymore.
 
 


Edited by SteveG - December 14 2014 at 14:28
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 12:11
Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Originally posted by earlyprog earlyprog wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

PA should have that Psych Rock lounge imo, because prog is a child of that 

This is often postulated. But it's just that - a postulate.

So, 'NO' and 'NO WAY'.

I respect your opinion, but then the current section should be renamed as "progressive psychedelia / space rock".

There is absolutely no point in doing this.

The sub-genre name is Psychedelic/Space Rock - the fact that is Psychedelic Progressive Rock is implicit. If further clarification is required this is also stated in the sub-genre description:

"Psychedelic progressive rock music may contain the elements previously described in varying combinations, but the artistic perspective of progressive rock is another factor. Some psychedelic rock bands stuck to the mid 1960's beat rock style in purist form, not partaking in the experimental development of the impressionistic possibilities of psychedelic rock music others spearheaded."




What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 12:05
Originally posted by Rivertree Rivertree wrote:

Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Another sub genre? Another one?

No.        No.        No.        No.

Just in case it isn't clear enough.........NO


a lounge would not necessarily mean a new sub genre
if the thread is intended to open a door for another subgenre (as this was openend in the Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge section) or to change/extend the genre definition - I would not agree though.

such a lounge would be placed in the General Music Discussions section at best Smile

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

 
Could/should psych rock have it's own genre listing in PA for these types of band's albums?
Wink
What?
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 10:42
Originally posted by earlyprog earlyprog wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

PA should have that Psych Rock lounge imo, because prog is a child of that 

This is often postulated. But it's just that - a postulate.

So, 'NO' and 'NO WAY'.

I respect your opinion, but then the current section should be renamed as "progressive psychedelia / space rock".

Back to Top
Rivertree View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Band Submissions

Joined: March 22 2006
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 17630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 10:38
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Another sub genre? Another one?

No.        No.        No.        No.

Just in case it isn't clear enough.........NO


a lounge would not necessarily mean a new sub genre
if the thread is intended to open a door for another subgenre (as this was openend in the Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge section) or to change/extend the genre definition - I would not agree though.

such a lounge would be placed in the General Music Discussions section at best Smile



Back to Top
earlyprog View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams

Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 10:33
Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

PA should have that Psych Rock lounge imo, because prog is a child of that 

This is often postulated. But it's just that - a postulate.

So, 'NO' and 'NO WAY'.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.