Metallica ?

I did use a sticky-out tongue to show that it was all in fun.

Heh, I never noticed that. I don't even know what to say, aahahaha.

Cloud Zero wrote: Certif1ed wrote: ^Wow, I really understand the deep thought and appreciate the constructive criticism you've put into your post - most befitting of a collaborator.   Don't get me wrong Cert. It's not only about splattering a flaming comment on the thread to deeply explain our likes or dislikes upon Metallica based on retrospectives, facts or grounds. Think it's all about respectable opinions wheter they're possitive or negative and never offensive.   I love the crunch and vicious harshness of Metallica, but to me they don't belong here. I believe there's a place for them within the warps of heavy metal or whatever you wanna call it. They ain't prog, that's for sure.   Before performing my part of Collab in the PA, I'm like many other around here, a voice and an opinion. The tag I'm entitled to, means nothing to a personal matter of perspective. And you should now better than that for all the seniority over the PA that back you up. So I rather believe that with your comment you were just being moronic instead of sarcastic!   Cheers amigo!

As I see you're online again Cloud - there's some work for you as a collab waiting. Check the progfreak charts; there's a few artists in our part of these that needs checking out and some voting ;-)

^ this may be a language problem, but a statement like "They ain't prog, that's for sure" ... sorry, that sounds a bit arrogant. Why are you so sure that you're right and we're wrong?

Not all Metallica reviews have been positive :)

would of been nice if Steeleye Span got the same sort of positive reviews

Windhawk wrote: It's kinda funny in a sad way to see some of the reactions coming here. For about a month there was a thread going discussing this band's addition, where arguments were called for from both sides to get as fair a verdict and as good grounds as possible for evaluation. Where were the people complaining now when this went on? And even after the addition when people complain in here, the line of reasoning rarely ventures beyond the lines of "Metallica aren't progressive because I think so", "It's obvious that Metallica aren't progressive" od the classic "they don't belong here". As when the possible addition was first discussed, there are no arguments, just statements. Is it really that hard to find a line of reasoning and to actually analyze a little to be able to post some opinions based on a more factual foundation - rather than throwing knee jerk reactions around?

It's kinda funny in a sad way to see some of the reactions coming here.

For about a month there was a thread going discussing this band's addition, where arguments were called for from both sides to get as fair a verdict and as good grounds as possible for evaluation.

Where were the people complaining now when this went on?

And even after the addition when people complain in here, the line of reasoning rarely ventures beyond the lines of "Metallica aren't progressive because I think so", "It's obvious that Metallica aren't progressive" od the classic "they don't belong here".

As when the possible addition was first discussed, there are no arguments, just statements.

Is it really that hard to find a line of reasoning and to actually analyze a little to be able to post some opinions based on a more factual foundation - rather than throwing knee jerk reactions around?

Cloud Zero wrote: I'm a headbanger alright, but I'm aware the Frisco band ain't  got nothing to do in the depths of the Archives, that's for sure.

Oh oh.....