Not Mozilla Firefox compatible!? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 31 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1475 |
Topic: Not Mozilla Firefox compatible!? Posted: June 20 2005 at 17:14 |
I cannot use my preferred browser for this site, as it refuses to let me log in properly (logging in goes OK, except that at the end I'm still not logged in... ). In fact, this is the only site for which I still have to use explorer.
|
|
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: June 20 2005 at 18:44 |
Where ? in the FORUM ?
|
|
Prog On !
|
|
Verisimilitude
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 09 2004 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Posted: June 20 2005 at 23:48 |
I have exactly the same problem... I use Firefox and I've been unable to log in successfully... Everytime I log in it works fine, but then when I get returned to the forum I'm still not logged in... |
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: June 21 2005 at 00:01 |
It works for me, just re-logged in, using mozilla (normaly use explorer), but it seems to work
|
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Verisimilitude
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 09 2004 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 114 |
Posted: June 21 2005 at 02:58 |
Strange... It's not a problem that's replicated at any other forums... I can't really explain it with any more clarity or understanding of what's wrong... Here's an image of it... |
|
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: June 21 2005 at 06:38 |
As weird as it may sounds,
I would to have more people helping here... please ? |
|
Prog On !
|
|
barbs
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 04 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 562 |
Posted: June 21 2005 at 09:03 |
Firefox is working fine for me to. Could it have something to do with
the firewall settings? I remember at one stage not being able to access
something using firefox and it had something to do with the firewall
blocking everything until I changed the settings so that it would
accepts cookies from the selected sites.
|
|
Eternity
|
|
Velvetclown
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 8548 |
Posted: June 21 2005 at 09:05 |
Better than the alternative
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 31 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1475 |
Posted: June 21 2005 at 15:45 |
I allow cookies, and in fact this is the only site of the many that I visit regularly that fails to log me on automatically, and then refuses to do so manually (just like Verisimilitude posted)
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 31 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1475 |
Posted: June 28 2005 at 16:57 |
Weirdness - now it works!?
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 31 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1475 |
Posted: June 29 2005 at 14:47 |
And it does not work again. On the same computer. Not important, but it bugs me no end that I can't fugire out why.
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: July 05 2005 at 18:54 |
I mentioned this months ago I get the same as Dragon Phoenix + it works on IE.
|
|
BillBoh1971
Forum Groupie Joined: October 02 2004 Status: Offline Points: 52 |
Posted: July 20 2005 at 18:25 |
These are a few errors Firefox reports in the Javascript console:
Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/search_form.asp?FID=0 Line: 31 Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/search_form.asp?FID=0 Line: 31 Warning: Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope. Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead. Source File: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/search_form.asp?RP= S&KW=open+source&SM=1&SI=TC&FM=0&OB=1&am p;SPN=1 Line: 31 Apparently the site is not 100% written in W3C web standards. That's all i can make of it (am not that knowledgeable). |
|
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:55 |
I see in the computer press that several security holes have now been found in Firefox and hackers are starting to target it now that the user base is increasing. It sounds like it's not the silver bullet everyone was making it out to be last year. To any Firefox users out there: Avoiding hype, please, are there any *big* benefits over IE? I personally never have trouble using IE and would need a very good reason for switching, especially if it causes problems browsing PA.
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: July 21 2005 at 11:12 |
Every update to IE over the last year or so is a copy of something Firefox implemented months before , Firefox is also more standards-compliant (which does mean sites that aren't compliant don't always show properly) and I've had no spyware issues since switching.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21206 |
Posted: July 21 2005 at 12:17 |
Firefox (Gecko) has some serious problems with sites that heavily rely on CSS for formatting. I hope they will finally get it right with yet another rewrite of the rendering engine. Other browsers (not just IE, but also Opera) don't have any problems with these things, and they ARE conforming with the standards ... |
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: July 25 2005 at 09:28 |
I might have been trying to apply something not really relevant then. But IE does (or certainly did around version 5) include lots of stuff that isn't part of the standards, people then write websites to be seen in IE and it messes up in other browsers. I think Netscape did the same.
Incidentally, using IE Mariah Carey seems to be following me around |
|
chopper
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20030 |
Posted: August 24 2005 at 13:52 |
The benefits to me are - the ability to have multiple tabs open (how long before Microsoft copy that one?), the Bookmark Manager, higher security (at the moment) and it's not Microsoft. |
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: August 24 2005 at 15:13 |
Next version! |
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 10 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1149 |
Posted: August 24 2005 at 19:37 |
Current version of firefox is 1.0.6. If you are using firefox you
should be running this version. Firefox may already be telling you to
download the newest patch. Look for a red arrow underneath the google
quick link top right.
[edit] Cookies must be enabled- but I see some have already discussed this. Windows XP has its own built in firewall that may be tampering with this (or any other firewall you may have installed such as symantec) Edited by cobb |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |