Print Page | Close Window

Was Genesis really that influential?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
Forum Description: Make or seek recommendations and discuss specific prog albums
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=98462
Printed Date: February 21 2025 at 06:02
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Was Genesis really that influential?
Posted By: SteveG
Subject: Was Genesis really that influential?
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 16:21
Was Genesis really that influential? Hello! I've seen a lot of testimonials lately on TV, web interviews, etc. where almost every group from Dream Theater to Metallica credits early Genesis as some sort of an influence. I did not think that the Gabriel era band, as good as they were, had anything more than a European cult following. Would anyone like to comment on this widespread retroactive following?



Replies:
Posted By: HemispheresOfXanadu
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 16:36
Ask Eddie Van Halen. Wink

-------------
https://twitter.com/ProgFollower" rel="nofollow - @ProgFollower on Twitter. Tweet me muzak.


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 16:47
^EVH too? It's got to be a conspiracy!!


Posted By: The T
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:05
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Was Genesis really that influential?

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

I've seen a lot of testimonials lately on TV, web interviews, etc. where almost every group from Dream Theater to Metallica credits early Genesis as some sort of an influence. 


/thread 


-------------


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:10
I think I know what the OP is driving at - it's like the Velvet Underground.  If everyone who claims to have been a fan was actually a fan, the band probably wouldn't have nearly starved to death.

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:22
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think I know what the OP is driving at - it's like the Velvet Underground.  If everyone who claims to have been a fan was actually a fan, the band probably wouldn't have nearly starved to death.


I agree....I cannot imagine that DT, Metallica were Genesis fans in 1974-76.
Probably more like 1982-1990 and then went backwards.

-------------


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:24
...and the MC5's. 

-------------
What?


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:25
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think I know what the OP is driving at - it's like the Velvet Underground.  If everyone who claims to have been a fan was actually a fan, the band probably wouldn't have nearly starved to death.


I agree....I cannot imagine that DT, Metallica were Genesis fans in 1974-76.
Probably more like 1982-1990 and then went backwards.
Just like me!  :D

But actually, I do recall that Genesis was extremely popular in Italy during the early 70s - and seeing the scene that came out of there, I'm quite inclined to believe that they were extremely influential, at least in that part of the world.


-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:41
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:




Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think I know what the OP is driving at - it's like the Velvet Underground.  If everyone who claims to have been a fan was actually a fan, the band probably wouldn't have nearly starved to death.


I agree....I cannot imagine that DT, Metallica were Genesis fans in 1974-76.
Probably more like 1982-1990 and then went backwards.
Just like me!  :D
But actually, I do recall that Genesis was extremely popular in Italy during the early 70s - and seeing the scene that came out of there, I'm quite inclined to believe that they were extremely influential, at least in that part of the world.




I can only imagine the influence they had in Europe/UK....My first exposure to Genesis was Seconds Out in '77, I remember hearing songs off Trick/Tail, but Seconds Out pulled me in and I have never left

-------------


Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:42
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

...and the MC5's. 

 
THe MC5s?




-------------
Help me I'm falling!


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:49
Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:


Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

...and the MC5's. 
 THe MC5s?
the Mike Clark Five. C'mon, keep up.

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: Rick Robson
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 17:57
^The Motley Crue 5 components. Don't ask me which are them please.
 
I'm figuring out what's the point: For a core prog fan the most successful prog rock bands were the most influential  in the whole rock and roll world - that's too much for my mindset, for I realized I'm NOT that core prog fan since I began to frequent this forum.


-------------


"Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy." LvB


Posted By: Rick Robson
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 18:36
If they are american then that's MC5:
 
 
  
 


-------------


"Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy." LvB


Posted By: Metalmarsh89
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 18:57
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think I know what the OP is driving at - it's like the Velvet Underground.  If everyone who claims to have been a fan was actually a fan, the band probably wouldn't have nearly starved to death.


I agree....I cannot imagine that DT, Metallica were Genesis fans in 1974-76.
Probably more like 1982-1990 and then went backwards.


True, but the members of Dream Theater were just a bunch of kids then, and Metallica was hardly much older, with the possible exception of Cliff Burton. But I would agree that they probably backtracked from the popular 80's material. I think the only Genesis song DT has covered is Turn it on Again. Is that correct?


-------------
Want to play mafia? Visit http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow - here .


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 19:06
Originally posted by Rick Robson Rick Robson wrote:

If they are american then that's MC5:
 
 
  
 
Yes, The Motor City 5. 

Sorry for the spurious pluralisation of the initialisms, I'm so used to seeing the phrase "MC5's Kick Out The Jams " I typed MC5s without realising. 

Anyway ... they're another band that seems to have had fewer actual fans than the number of bands that have since claimed to be influenced by them. (I was responding to Steve's post about the VU, José'spost slipped in between as I was typing).




-------------
What?


Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 19:29
Rush certainly were big Genesis fans and from early on too. When I first got into Prog it just happened that I bought a lot of Neo-Prog and man there were many of those bands who sounded like Genesis or at least their vocalist sounded like Gabriel.

-------------
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"

"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN


Posted By: Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 20:09
Absolutely essential in influencing ENDLESS other prog bands - I mean, more or less a starting point for many Neo bands initially - but for music overall....I doubt it. The majority of the world probably remembers them as that `Phil Collins pop group'...


Posted By: hellogoodbye
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 20:21
Not me Smile


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 20:26
Originally posted by Aussie-Byrd-Brother Aussie-Byrd-Brother wrote:

The majority of the world probably remembers them as that `Phil Collins pop group'...

And that's rather unfortunate as people who only know their 'pop' music will probably never experience this group when it was on the cutting edge of art music and creating music that blurred boundaries. Such a shame.


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 21:00
Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:


Originally posted by Aussie-Byrd-Brother Aussie-Byrd-Brother wrote:

The majority of the world probably remembers them as that `Phil Collins pop group'...

And that's rather unfortunate as people who only know their 'pop' music will probably never experience this group when it was on the cutting edge of art music and creating music that blurred boundaries. Such a shame.

I have a Genesis t-shirt I sometimes wear, it has a collage of all their album covers on the front with the band name at the top, and I've lost count of the amount of times I've had people comment `Cool, Genesis - "I cant Dance!"....    

I just think "These people have no idea...", and it's useless trying to explain. Usually they lose their minds when you start to mention Gabriel was in the band - "Peter Gabriel as in Genesis?!" Move along, people!

Occasionally some 50-60+ year old balding hippy will give me a knowing heads-up!


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 21:08
As great as a band PG Genesis was, Collins' Genesis was good too k

I listen to Mama just as much as any other PG song. 


-------------
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.


Posted By: Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 21:14
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

As great as a band PG Genesis was, Collins' Genesis was good too k
I listen to Mama just as much as any other PG song. 

Absolutely, definitely a ton of good stuff the band did in the Collins-led years!

I always thought `Mama' was borderline industrial, very dark!   


Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 21:18
I also like many songs from the Collins era Genesis a lot, but the classic era was something special.


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 22:19
Influenced me and that's really all that matters...

Avatar

Nice, Dean. Big smile


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 22:33
Originally posted by Mellotron Storm Mellotron Storm wrote:

Rush certainly were big Genesis fans and from early on too. When I first got into Prog it just happened that I bought a lot of Neo-Prog and man there were many of those bands who sounded like Genesis or at least their vocalist sounded like Gabriel.

If there is any band ( other than early Marillion) that have similarities to each other it would be Genesis and Rush, especially from circa Signals/ATTWT. Rush instrumental passages sound very " Down and Out" like but I would put this down to both bands morphing at the same time, Rush though never went overly commercial however.


-------------
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]


Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 22:38
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

As great as a band PG Genesis was, Collins' Genesis was good too k

I listen to Mama just as much as any other PG song. 

ClapClapClap

CollinsApprove


-------------
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: June 03 2014 at 23:08
Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

I also like many songs from the Collins era Genesis a lot, but the classic era was something special.

From the Collins era, I like A Trick of the Tail and Wind & Wuthering. That's about it. Big smile


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 01:08
Yes , ELP and KIng Crimson were I believe more influential in the early years of prog rock but the whole neo prog scene was founded on Genesis 1970-1978 imo.


Posted By: Svetonio
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 01:39
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

I think I know what the OP is driving at - it's like the Velvet Underground.  If everyone who claims to have been a fan was actually a fan, the band probably wouldn't have nearly starved to death.

I couldn't agreed more; also, a great comparision with The Velvet Underground "case".
That would be like, after all, with a number of the bands who have recorded their debut albums in the last few years. After a while, everyone will tell the stories that were their fans.


Posted By: SLB
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 03:43
As a survivor of the 60s and 70s in the UK I can happily confirm that Genesis were astoundingly popular and extremely influential at that time.    Ignore all the Phil Collins solo stuff later and listen to their early pieces. They were ahead of their time and had the following to match.


Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 04:36
If by 'influential' we mean that we can hear Genesis' music in other later bands, the quick answer is No, at least compared to ELP or Yes.   But if it is spiritually influential, then I'm sure their inventiveness and high standards were making a big impression on musicians.



-------------
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy


Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 09:01
Given that most reviewers resort to comparisons with other bands when appraising Prog music, one of the most common examples cited is something along the lines of this bit kinda sounds like Genesis on Foxtrot etc. It seems self evident that Genesis are used in this fashion because they are one of the most widely known Prog bands of all time and the writer believes the reader will have no problem understanding the frame of reference. To wit, the admittedly tiresome barb from mainstream rock fans in the 80's that Marillion sucked because they sounded 'just like Genesis' (i.e. probably the only prog band they had ever heard) I sorta agree with David (Atavachron) here in that anyone's answer to the question depends on how you define 'influential' They are a standard against which we measure Prog but as far as hearing Genesis music in other bands, their post Gabriel output has probably had more influence on artists from a wide gamut of genres than that of their earlier material. (let's face it, that sh*t is very difficult to play)


-------------


Posted By: HemispheresOfXanadu
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 09:48
Originally posted by HemispheresOfXanadu HemispheresOfXanadu wrote:

Ask Eddie Van Halen. Wink
Logged out too early last night to explain. Referring to Hackett influencing Eddie to tap.

-------------
https://twitter.com/ProgFollower" rel="nofollow - @ProgFollower on Twitter. Tweet me muzak.


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 10:05
Note From The OP:  glad to see all the response. Just to make things clear, the bands that were citing Genesis influence were all hard rock and metal bands. Prog On!Smile


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 11:01
Originally posted by Chris S Chris S wrote:


Originally posted by Mellotron Storm Mellotron Storm wrote:



Rush certainly were big Genesis fans and from early on too. When I first got into Prog it just happened that I bought a lot of Neo-Prog and man there were many of those bands who sounded like Genesis or at least their vocalist sounded like Gabriel.

If there is any band ( other than early Marillion) that have similarities to each other it would be Genesis and Rush, especially from circa Signals/ATTWT. Rush instrumental passages sound very " Down and Out" like but I would put this down to both bands morphing at the same time, Rush though never went overly commercial however.


...word..

-------------


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 13:44
^Early Rush always sounded to me like they were mainly influenced by Zep, Yes and Larks era Crimson. Subdivisions and other 80's keyboard heavy songs seem to owe more to the then contemporary Collins led Genesis. What are your thoughts?


Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 16:27
Rush = Zeppelin, Cream, The Who
Fly By Night, CoS, 2112.. = Genesis, Yes, Floyd


-------------


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 04 2014 at 16:35
^That seems to equal out


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: June 05 2014 at 01:02
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^Early Rush always sounded to me like they were mainly influenced by Zep, Yes and Larks era Crimson. Subdivisions and other 80's keyboard heavy songs seem to owe more to the then contemporary Collins led Genesis. What are your thoughts?

Always considered Rush to be a 'hybrid' of Heavy Rock and Prog Rock. They cleverly kept a foot in either camp until maybe Signals saw them completely develop their own style which I struggle to compare to anyone. As an ELP fan I always felt that Rush were the band that I wanted ELP to be . Power WIndows is so drenched in keyboards and orchestra it could almost be a version of ELP in a parallel universe (ignoring the vocals of course). Rush never sounded much like Genesis at any time to me although they had similar aims of making their sound and style more sleeker and contemporary in the eighties.


Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: June 05 2014 at 03:20
Have people here perhaps looked at the contemporary charts and seen how Genesis' now-classic LPs stack up against those by ELP, Jethro Tull, The Moody Blues, Pink Floyd, Yes etc.? Would be the easiest way to answer the question if you ask me.

-------------
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 01:22
Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Have people here perhaps looked at the contemporary charts and seen how Genesis' now-classic LPs stack up against those by ELP, Jethro Tull, The Moody Blues, Pink Floyd, Yes etc.? Would be the easiest way to answer the question if you ask me.

not sure I fully understand this. Genesis sold shed loads in the late seventies and eighties when they moved away from 'full on' prog. The earlier albums were not massive sellers. They clearly influenced a lot of eighties neo prog bands and that was partly because they remained visible at a time when many seventies bands just disappeared. Also they were easier to copy than ELP and Yes who tended to push boundaries on the musical/instrumental/technical side more. The appeal in Genesis music is that its more rounded and accessible. Even Lamb has many good tunes that wouldn't be out of place on the radio. Genesis represented the commercial template for prog rock. Thats how I see it anyway.


Posted By: Toaster Mantis
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 02:44
Well, I'm obviously referring to Trespass up through The Lamb... here. Wikipedia says that from Trespass onwards they did crack the top 20 in Continental Europe even getting to number 1 in some countries like Belgium and Italy, but in the UK didn't even get to 12 until Foxtrot.

Selling England by the Pound
did get to number 3 in the UK and went gold in the US, though. I'm pretty sure that album was mighty influential.


-------------
"The past is not some static being, it is not a previous present, nor a present that has passed away; the past has its own dynamic being which is constantly renewed and renewing." - Claire Colebrook


Posted By: Rick Robson
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 07:14
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Have people here perhaps looked at the contemporary charts and seen how Genesis' now-classic LPs stack up against those by ELP, Jethro Tull, The Moody Blues, Pink Floyd, Yes etc.? Would be the easiest way to answer the question if you ask me.

not sure I fully understand this. Genesis sold shed loads in the late seventies and eighties when they moved away from 'full on' prog. The earlier albums were not massive sellers. They clearly influenced a lot of eighties neo prog bands and that was partly because they remained visible at a time when many seventies bands just disappeared. Also they were easier to copy than ELP and Yes who tended to push boundaries on the musical/instrumental/technical side more. The appeal in Genesis music is that its more rounded and accessible. Even Lamb has many good tunes that wouldn't be out of place on the radio. Genesis represented the commercial template for prog rock. Thats how I see it anyway.

 
Seconded. Finally someone here clearly sinthesizes this whole thread about Genesis, and also clearly explains why there is a just a million threads about this band in the forum, many of them annoyingly repetitive.


-------------


"Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy." LvB


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 11:19
^The point of my post was to help establish that early Genesis was appreciated at a much later time, nothing wrong with that as great painters were often celebrated centuries after they died. A little honesty from the bands the bands I posted about woud have gone along way to boltser their credibilty. There's nothing wrong starting out with Motorhead and then discovering The Lamb a bit later.



Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 11:27
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:


Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^Early Rush always sounded to me like they were mainly influenced by Zep, Yes and Larks era Crimson. Subdivisions and other 80's keyboard heavy songs seem to owe more to the then contemporary Collins led Genesis. What are your thoughts?

Always considered Rush to be a 'hybrid' of Heavy Rock and Prog Rock. They cleverly kept a foot in either camp until maybe Signals saw them completely develop their own style which I struggle to compare to anyone. As an ELP fan I always felt that Rush were the band that I wanted ELP to be . Power WIndows is so drenched in keyboards and orchestra it could almost be a version of ELP in a parallel universe (ignoring the vocals of course). Rush never sounded much like Genesis at any time to me although they had similar aims of making their sound and style more sleeker and contemporary in the eighties.


Great points about ELP and Rush, looking back at ELP the grandious playing seemed to be a LOVE IT or HATE IT scenario. I agree Rush never "sounded" like Genesis but the writing, playing style could be faintly similar and yes until Rush found their house sound after Hemispheres....Clearly why you have two Rush camps, just like Genesis. It seems more people cringe at the post Gabriel era than the post Hemispheres/MP era or even post Signals Rush era.

For me and Genesis I have always been very vocal that start to finish, assuming Genesis is done now, all Genesis is amazing....I mean come on its Genesis    

-------------


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 12:28
^I like post Hemispheres Rush better but generally prefer pre Collins Genesis. Go figure.Wacko


Posted By: Metalmarsh89
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 13:31
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:


Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^Early Rush always sounded to me like they were mainly influenced by Zep, Yes and Larks era Crimson. Subdivisions and other 80's keyboard heavy songs seem to owe more to the then contemporary Collins led Genesis. What are your thoughts?

Always considered Rush to be a 'hybrid' of Heavy Rock and Prog Rock. They cleverly kept a foot in either camp until maybe Signals saw them completely develop their own style which I struggle to compare to anyone. As an ELP fan I always felt that Rush were the band that I wanted ELP to be . Power WIndows is so drenched in keyboards and orchestra it could almost be a version of ELP in a parallel universe (ignoring the vocals of course). Rush never sounded much like Genesis at any time to me although they had similar aims of making their sound and style more sleeker and contemporary in the eighties.


Great points about ELP and Rush, looking back at ELP the grandious playing seemed to be a LOVE IT or HATE IT scenario. I agree Rush never "sounded" like Genesis but the writing, playing style could be faintly similar and yes until Rush found their house sound after Hemispheres....Clearly why you have two Rush camps, just like Genesis. It seems more people cringe at the post Gabriel era than the post Hemispheres/MP era or even post Signals Rush era.

For me and Genesis I have always been very vocal that start to finish, assuming Genesis is done now, all Genesis is amazing....I mean come on its Genesis    


I would still take Rush from start to finish (whenever that is) over Genesis from start to finish. Genesis has been good, but Rush has been unbelievable.




-------------
Want to play mafia? Visit http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com" rel="nofollow - here .


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 14:53
^Can't even argue against that statement. Rush was class from A to (YY)Z no matter what their styles were.


Posted By: ProgMetaller2112
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 16:43
Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:

Originally posted by Aussie-Byrd-Brother Aussie-Byrd-Brother wrote:

The majority of the world probably remembers them as that `Phil Collins pop group'...

And that's rather unfortunate as people who only know their 'pop' music will probably never experience this group when it was on the cutting edge of art music and creating music that blurred boundaries. Such a shame.

I remember them as both Wink


-------------
“War is peace.

Freedom is slavery.

Ignorance is strength.”

― George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four



"Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk Hand in Hand"- Neil Peart





Posted By: Chris S
Date Posted: June 06 2014 at 18:02
^ Yes I remember them as one band from start to finish and loved every minute. Every minute of material from the band is wonderful. Noone like them, ever. Were they influential? Of course they were, we have a zillion neo prog offshoots and clone bands. Some excellent. The thing is every era and evolutionary change heralded great works, even commercially. I believe all members contributed to the sound even AFTER they left. It was carried forward in the band's DNA and well , no secret on PA, personally Phil Collins for me was the most influential member too, Brand X era or his solo era which released equally great commercial contributed work from Rutherford and Banks.

-------------
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]


Posted By: prog4evr
Date Posted: June 11 2014 at 21:31
Originally posted by HemispheresOfXanadu HemispheresOfXanadu wrote:

Originally posted by HemispheresOfXanadu HemispheresOfXanadu wrote:

Ask Eddie Van Halen. Wink
Logged out too early last night to explain. Referring to Hackett influencing Eddie to tap.
Exactly.  Most, if not all of the great tappers (Steve Vai, for another one) look back to Hackett as a great innovator and one to imitate and expand on...


Posted By: Prog_Traveller
Date Posted: June 12 2014 at 00:15
Genesis are arguably the most influential prog band. For one thing nearly the entire neo movement was built upon their sound in particular but with a somewhat edgier element to it. Genesis weren't really all that huge as a prog band at least not in the US and at least not compared to some of their contemporaries but their influence has nonetheless been very substantial. They are usually one of the first three or four bands that most newbies discover.


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 12 2014 at 15:37
Originally posted by Prog_Traveller Prog_Traveller wrote:

Genesis are arguably the most influential prog band. For one thing nearly the entire neo movement was built upon their sound in particular but with a somewhat edgier element to it. Genesis weren't really all that huge as a prog band at least not in the US and at least not compared to some of their contemporaries but their influence has nonetheless been very substantial. They are usually one of the first three or four bands that most newbies discover.
I agree totally that Genesis were an influence on the later neo-prog bands, DT and the like but not to Metallica, Saxon and other thrashers.


Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: June 12 2014 at 15:54
In the seventies in Boston ("not much of a college town"), Genesis was barely noticed.  FM radio stations (where the good music was played - top 40 was on AM) frequently played ELP, Yes, Floyd, Jethro Tull, even some Zappa, Focus, and of course, Kansas.  Genesis finally got some airplay with the title track from Lamb.
 
I had some prog friends that loved Genesis - I liked some of their songs, but most just elicited the 70's version of "meh". 
 
"And Then There Were 3" finally brought radio prominence.  But "Follow You, Follow Me" was hardly a prog masterpiece.
 
Many keyboardists I played with in those days were highly influenced by Genesis.  Most could easily master the arpeggios of Tony Banks, and were apt to show this to the other musicians.  Few would dare to imitate Emerson or Wakeman.
 
But the 80's seemed to be when Genesis-sounding bands really began to flourish.  I'd tell you my theory on why that was, but many Genephiles would get angry at me.


-------------
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.


Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: June 12 2014 at 15:57
They already are.  LOL

-------------
Help me I'm falling!


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: June 17 2014 at 00:27
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

In the seventies in Boston ("not much of a college town"), Genesis was barely noticed.  FM radio stations (where the good music was played - top 40 was on AM) frequently played ELP, Yes, Floyd, Jethro Tull, even some Zappa, Focus, and of course, Kansas.  Genesis finally got some airplay with the title track from Lamb.
 

I had some prog friends that loved Genesis - I liked some of their songs, but most just elicited the 70's version of "meh". 

 

"And Then There Were 3" finally brought radio prominence.  But "Follow You, Follow Me" was hardly a prog masterpiece.

 

Many keyboardists I played with in those days were highly influenced by Genesis.  Most could easily master the arpeggios of Tony Banks, and were apt to show this to the other musicians.  Few would dare to imitate Emerson or Wakeman.

 

But the 80's seemed to be when Genesis-sounding bands really began to flourish.  I'd tell you my theory on why that was, but many Genephiles would get angry at me.

Admittedly I was pretty young, but I could swear Genesis was actually getting radio play in Buffalo, NY as early as Selling England by the Pound. This converges with them having done a limited US tour then. It's not quite the same thing as "influence" per se, but the band did experience rivalries with Gentle Giant, VdGG and Lindisfarne. I think Genesis definitely influenced Italian Prog, as was already mentioned. I'm also quite certain Genesis had more influence relatively speaking on classic British Symph prog than Zappa or Kansas, so it's odd to have mentioned those two. There are a lot of shared approaches to guitar between Hackett, Fripp and Akkerman. Who influenced who, though?...


Posted By: Prog_Traveller
Date Posted: June 22 2014 at 12:18
Here's the thing. Genesis' influence in the prog community is sort of an after the fact kind of thing. What I mean by that is even though Genesis were around in the seventies and were pretty big in some countries they weren't as big as the biggest prog bands of the day(at least not in the US). So when we look at their influence it's not fair to look at how popular they were during their prog days just like you wouldn't judge Gentle Giant that way. Their influence came later after musicians and many fans were introduced to them by and large in the eighties. I remember when I saw Genesis in 2007 their audience was very mixed. Yeah there were some people there who probably were into the band in the seventies but there were just as many who were my age and younger and probably many of them aren't even into prog let alone know what it is.


Posted By: Queen By-Tor
Date Posted: June 22 2014 at 12:24
is a retroactive following any less legitimate as influence or fandom as following the band in their peak? That would be impossible for some of us who weren't born yet.


Posted By: Prog_Traveller
Date Posted: June 22 2014 at 12:25
[I think Genesis definitely influenced Italian Prog]

I agree but I'm going to be bold and say the opposite is also true. I feel that Italian prog influenced Genesis. I've never heard anyone say this before but it's my speculation and I don't think it's unreasonable considering how much time Genesis spent in Italy in the early seventies. If you listen to the synthesizer on SEBTP and then listen to say PFM and Banco(but especially PFM)you can hear where Genesis may have gotten some of their synth solo ideas from(as far as adding them in a way that PFM was doing and with the mellotron in the background). I remember when I first heard "Per un amico" it hit me that it probably had some influence on SEBTP.


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: June 23 2014 at 01:02
Originally posted by Prog_Traveller Prog_Traveller wrote:

[I think Genesis definitely influenced Italian Prog]

I agree but I'm going to be bold and say the opposite is also true. I feel that Italian prog influenced Genesis. I've never heard anyone say this before but it's my speculation and I don't think it's unreasonable considering how much time Genesis spent in Italy in the early seventies. If you listen to the synthesizer on SEBTP and then listen to say PFM and Banco(but especially PFM)you can hear where Genesis may have gotten some of their synth solo ideas from(as far as adding them in a way that PFM was doing and with the mellotron in the background). I remember when I first heard "Per un amico" it hit me that it probably had some influence on SEBTP.


quite likely true just as Aphrodite's Child 666 didn't go unnoticed either


Posted By: ProgSword
Date Posted: June 23 2014 at 15:52
The fact that an entire genre centered around the behavioral quirks of that "Genesis sound" (neo prog) says a lot.


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 23 2014 at 15:55
Originally posted by ProgSword ProgSword wrote:

The fact that an entire genre centered around the behavioral quirks of that "Genesis sound" (neo prog) says a lot.
I agree in a way but when neo prog started it was a real cottage industry in relationship to the punk rock that was so popular at the time.


Posted By: The Doctor
Date Posted: June 23 2014 at 16:04
Yes.   

-------------
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 23 2014 at 17:02
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Yes.   
Not sure what you're getting at Doc, but what I meant was with only 5 neo prog groups in the '80s with 5 members per band , well lets see, that's... 25 Genesis fans! LOL


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: June 25 2014 at 09:26
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:




Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Yes.   
Not sure what you're getting at Doc, but what I meant was with only 5 neo prog groups in the '80s with 5 members per band , well lets see, that's... 25 Genesis fans! LOL


Tribute bands should be counted too.


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: June 25 2014 at 09:54
Originally posted by Queen By-Tor Queen By-Tor wrote:

is a retroactive following any less legitimate as influence or fandom as following the band in their peak? That would be impossible for some of us who weren't born yet.

I agree. I was in high school in 1980-84. There was a building on school grounds that had "Genesis Rael" spray painted on it large enough to cover one whole side. I didn't do it. It was another Genesis fan, necessarily a fan of old Genesis. Old Genesis fans were well represented in the 80s in the region I grew up in. True I remember I had to explain the "Rael" reference to a friend of mine who was mainly into Yes, Floyd, Zappa, and Tull. Buffalo NY, being two hours from Toronto, suffered no shortage of Rush fans either.


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: June 25 2014 at 16:27
Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by Queen By-Tor Queen By-Tor wrote:

is a retroactive following any less legitimate as influence or fandom as following the band in their peak? That would be impossible for some of us who weren't born yet.

I agree. I was in high school in 1980-84. There was a building on school grounds that had "Genesis Rael" spray painted on it large enough to cover one whole side. I didn't do it. It was another Genesis fan, necessarily a fan of old Genesis. Old Genesis fans were well represented in the 80s in the region I grew up in. True I remember I had to explain the "Rael" reference to a friend of mine who was mainly into Yes, Floyd, Zappa, and Tull. Buffalo NY, being two hours from Toronto, suffered no shortage of Rush fans either.
I'm not sure if I agree HF, that's why I posted the question. Did these retro fans, as I call them, really listen to Genesis or did they listen to peer groups like Judas Priest or Iron Maiden and then claim Genesis influence later on?


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: June 28 2014 at 16:42
Originally posted by Evolver Evolver wrote:

In the seventies in Boston ("not much of a college town"), Genesis was barely noticed.  FM radio stations (where the good music was played - top 40 was on AM) frequently played ELP, Yes, Floyd, Jethro Tull, even some Zappa, Focus, and of course, Kansas.  Genesis finally got some airplay with the title track from Lamb.
...
 
Sadly, sometimes it's like you are talking to folks that do not know "history" and on top of it, they think it didn't exist.
 
You see, they live in the age of Harry Potter sorcery and occultness, thus the ability to define "progressive" other than some over rated pop music, is really scary! Specially when they think the world was stupid, not intelligent at all, and could not play a Fender or a Yamaha keyboard, or heaven forbid a Hammond organ!
 
All of the stuff you mentioned and then some ... way before Genesis ... in Santa Barbara, Genesis didn't really get started until AFTER the import "Selling England By The Pound" made its way, and that was almost 6 months AFTER the English release, to give you an idea. After that, more Genesis got played on Friday and Saturday nights courtesy of my roomate, since the other folks in the station thought it was just pretentious music.
 
And the same roomate played "The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway" in its ENTIRETY as soon as he got it, TWICE, in the same night.
 
True story!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: June 29 2014 at 05:38
Go Mo Big smile

-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: June 29 2014 at 20:30
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by Queen By-Tor Queen By-Tor wrote:

is a retroactive following any less legitimate as influence or fandom as following the band in their peak? That would be impossible for some of us who weren't born yet.

I agree. I was in high school in 1980-84. There was a building on school grounds that had "Genesis Rael" spray painted on it large enough to cover one whole side. I didn't do it. It was another Genesis fan, necessarily a fan of old Genesis. Old Genesis fans were well represented in the 80s in the region I grew up in. True I remember I had to explain the "Rael" reference to a friend of mine who was mainly into Yes, Floyd, Zappa, and Tull. Buffalo NY, being two hours from Toronto, suffered no shortage of Rush fans either.
I'm not sure if I agree HF, that's why I posted the question. Did these retro fans, as I call them, really listen to Genesis or did they listen to peer groups like Judas Priest or Iron Maiden and then claim Genesis influence later on?

The Genesis fans I new listened to Genesis. They might have gotten started on an 80s album and worked back. I never new anyone who was a Judas Priest or Iron Maiden fan that moved to Genesis. Genesis was not a cool band to heavy metal fans, so if a metal band claimed influence from them, it seems to me fairly honest. The only claim of influence I came across from Iron Maiden was from an interview in the 80s in which they raved about Steve Hackett's Voyage of the Acolyte. I bought my only Iron Maiden album after reading that. Though not obscure on PA, this is quite obscure for a mainstream audience, so what laurel's would they have gained? What would have been the motive?


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: July 07 2014 at 10:34



Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by Queen By-Tor Queen By-Tor wrote:

is a retroactive following any less legitimate as influence or fandom as following the band in their peak? That would be impossible for some of us who weren't born yet.

I agree. I was in high school in 1980-84. There was a building on school grounds that had "Genesis Rael" spray painted on it large enough to cover one whole side. I didn't do it. It was another Genesis fan, necessarily a fan of old Genesis. Old Genesis fans were well represented in the 80s in the region I grew up in. True I remember I had to explain the "Rael" reference to a friend of mine who was mainly into Yes, Floyd, Zappa, and Tull. Buffalo NY, being two hours from Toronto, suffered no shortage of Rush fans either.
I'm not sure if I agree HF, that's why I posted the question. Did these retro fans, as I call them, really listen to Genesis or did they listen to peer groups like Judas Priest or Iron Maiden and then claim Genesis influence later on?

The Genesis fans I new listened to Genesis. They might have gotten started on an 80s album and worked back. I never new anyone who was a Judas Priest or Iron Maiden fan that moved to Genesis. Genesis was not a cool band to heavy metal fans, so if a metal band claimed influence from them, it seems to me fairly honest. The only claim of influence I came across from Iron Maiden was from an interview in the 80s in which they raved about Steve Hackett's Voyage of the Acolyte. I bought my only Iron Maiden album after reading that. Though not obscure on PA, this is quite obscure for a mainstream audience, so what laurel's would they have gained? What would have been the motive?
I can see no sinister motive for this HF as A Tower Struck Down was a song that metal heads could get into. I know, I was one of them. I think that a  lot of the retro appeal is down to the fact that PROG was just a dirty word to many metal heads in the 80's and with the deminishment of the that pejurative phrase, many probably started listing to Genesis later on and went the backwards route I.E, Collins led Genesis back to the Gabrial era band. Aside from the progressive metal stylings of Sabbath and similiar metal bands, I would think that some of these later Gabrial era Genesis ackowledgers are seeking the credability that Prog metal acts like Rush are finally getting. To me, I take the retro appreciation as a compliment and vindication of the Prog rock genre and early Genesis in particular but; I still find that isolated stoner parties in the late seventies that revolved arond Lamb era Genesis or DSOTM Pink Floyd were far from influential to '80s metal groups.



Posted By: Sinful
Date Posted: July 21 2014 at 00:32
They were also influential to the industry of music as pioneers of technology.

Peter Gabriel used Phil Collins on drums for his second solo album after leaving Genesis, and asked him not to use any cymbals on the album, which is what caused Phil and producer Hugh Padgham to invent the gated reverb, which is now an industry standard effect that is found in every studio and musicians effects. It  became widely known and was called the Phil Collins drum sound in the 80s.

Then there is the Lighting which they pioneered with Showco in texas, The Vari-lite in 1980, which is also now an industry standard. They were the first band to have intelligent lighting in the world, and for many years afterward everyone else rented them from them. It took until 2000 for the industry to catch up with the vari-lite, which now you will never see a show without moving intelligent computer controlled lights, but for ten years they were the only ones in the world who had them in large amounts.


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: July 21 2014 at 15:53
Originally posted by Sinful Sinful wrote:



They were also influential to the industry of music as pioneers of technology.
Peter Gabriel used Phil Collins on drums for his second solo album after leaving Genesis, and asked him not to use any cymbals on the album, which is what caused Phil and producer Hugh Padgham to invent the gated reverb, which is now an industry standard effect that is found in every studio and musicians effects. It  became widely known and was called the Phil Collins drum sound in the 80s.
Then there is the Lighting which they pioneered with Showco in texas, The Vari-lite in 1980, which is also now an industry standard. They were the first band to have intelligent lighting in the world, and for many years afterward everyone else rented them from them. It took until 2000 for the industry to catch up with the vari-lite, which now you will never see a show without moving intelligent computer controlled lights, but for ten years they were the only ones in the world who had them in large amounts.


I agree that Collins and Padgham did come up with Gated reverb drum sound which has, like most other 80's recording sounds, has worn out it's welcome. (thank the gods)


Posted By: Sinful
Date Posted: July 27 2014 at 15:47
I know what you are saying, but you would be hard pressed to find a album or concert not using it. 

And the issue is really that with refinements it has overcome most of the rattiness. Phil however used what is known as the "stone room" to achieve the sound back then, not a inferior reverb of that time.


-------------
The Path is clear


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: July 28 2014 at 09:10
^Agreed. It's rattling intensity has been toned way down when it is used (thank the gods)


Posted By: Genital Giant
Date Posted: August 06 2014 at 19:29
 I think the reason why Genesis has had the most influence over any other Prog band is simply because they had the best songwriting. In the end, Songwriting beats out great chops or great playing, etc., and I think all the Neo-Prog groups that started up in the 80's plus so many of the Prog groups that got started in the 90's onwards have an obvious Genesis influence because everyone wants to be able to write great songs, and that's what Genesis was really best at. They weren't going to wow you with virtuoso musicianship like Yes or something, but the songwriting was pretty unbeatable.


Posted By: PrognosticMind
Date Posted: August 08 2014 at 05:02
Originally posted by prog4evr prog4evr wrote:

Originally posted by HemispheresOfXanadu HemispheresOfXanadu wrote:

Originally posted by HemispheresOfXanadu HemispheresOfXanadu wrote:

Ask Eddie Van Halen. Wink
Logged out too early last night to explain. Referring to Hackett influencing Eddie to tap.
Exactly.  Most, if not all of the great tappers (Steve Vai, for another one) look back to Hackett as a great innovator and one to imitate and expand on...

I'm so glad other people are discussing this. The first thing I thought when I first heard "The Return of Giant Hogweed" was "Holy hell, this is like pre-EVH stuff!", lol. I remember EVH once mentioning that he borrowed the technique from Jimmy Page, but I wouldn't doubt if he was spinning Genesis records in his room back in the day as well.


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 08 2014 at 05:38
No it wasn't, it was f**king Porcupine Tree who influenced Marillion

-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: August 09 2014 at 09:57
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

No it wasn't, it was f**king Porcupine Tree who influenced Marillion
 
Weird ... considering that Marillion was around for at least 10 years before PT!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: PrognosticMind
Date Posted: August 09 2014 at 10:54
^That's what I was thinking, but I couldn't tell if someone was trying to pull a fast one or not...


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 09 2014 at 11:23
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

No it wasn't, it was f**king Porcupine Tree who influenced Marillion
 
Weird ... considering that Marillion was around for at least 10 years before PT!
don't you smell the irony?

PT suck an enormous amount of arse


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: August 09 2014 at 14:00
They certainly influenced many bands over the years since we all know quite a few that 'sound like Genesis'....including the above mentioned Marillion.
 
btw ...just as an FYI:
PT has 5 four star albums and many 3 star ones...close to 4 stars
Marillion has 4 four star albums and about the same number of highly rated 3 star albums.
 
Of course this is based on ratings from members here and what do they know about prog rock anyway.
Wink


-------------
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin


Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: August 09 2014 at 15:26
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

No it wasn't, it was f**king Porcupine Tree who influenced Marillion
 
Weird ... considering that Marillion was around for at least 10 years before PT!

There is no rule that states you cannot be influenced by a band that came later. Marillion have changed over the years. I guess he is referring to Marbles?


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 05:54
Come on people I was joking PT never influenced anyone if it wasn't a garage band

-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:11
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

No it wasn't, it was f**king Porcupine Tree who influenced Marillion
 
Weird ... considering that Marillion was around for at least 10 years before PT!
don't you smell the irony?

PT suck an enormous amount of arse

I'm not a great fan of Porcupine Tree, but I would never say they 'suck'. Grow up! Porcupine Tree members are all accomplished musicians.


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:29
Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:

 

I'm not a great fan of Porcupine Tree, but I would never say they 'suck'. Grow up! Porcupine Tree members are all accomplished musicians.


If I don't like them I say they suck, simple as that.


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:37
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:

 

I'm not a great fan of Porcupine Tree, but I would never say they 'suck'. Grow up! Porcupine Tree members are all accomplished musicians.


If I don't like them I say they suck, simple as that.

Why can't you just say you don't like them? Saying something 'sucks' to me means that they're completely abysmal, which obviously isn't true at all.


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:39
Because he is a troll. We wanted to cause trouble in the Marillion vs PT poll now he's moved on to here. 

-------------
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:45
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Because he is a troll. We wanted to cause trouble in the Marillion vs PT poll now he's moved on to here. 

I suppose I should stop feeding the troll? Big smile


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:52
Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:

Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Because he is a troll. We wanted to cause trouble in the Marillion vs PT poll now he's moved on to here. 

I suppose I should stop feeding the troll? Big smile

Either that or just let him make himself look more and more like a moron. 


-------------
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:55
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:

Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Because he is a troll. We wanted to cause trouble in the Marillion vs PT poll now he's moved on to here. 

I suppose I should stop feeding the troll? Big smile

Either that or just let him make himself look more and more like a moron. 

That would work as well. Smile


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:55
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

 

Either that or just let him make himself look more and more like a moron. 

again arsehole what's the problem?


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 11:57
Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:


Why can't you just say you don't like them? Saying something 'sucks' to me means that they're completely abysmal, which obviously isn't true at all.


well but it sounds better, more poetic if I say they suck an enormous amount of arse , if I say I don't like them it's nothing special


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: Mirror Image
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:06
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:


Why can't you just say you don't like them? Saying something 'sucks' to me means that they're completely abysmal, which obviously isn't true at all.


well but it sounds better, more poetic if I say they suck an enormous amount of arse , if I say I don't like them it's nothing special

But to me, you're putting down the band in an unfair way and somehow trying to elevate yourself in the process, which is something an elementary school kid would do.


-------------
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:18
Originally posted by Mirror Image Mirror Image wrote:

 
But to me, you're putting down the band in an unfair way and somehow trying to elevate yourself in the process, which is something an elementary school kid would do.


no, I am just trying to say, they're nothing special, to me they suck and I have no power to put down any band, it's just an opinion


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:24
Just like before LOL

The second someone calls you out, the tone of your posts gets so defensive and innocent. Stop acting like an a****le and just post your opinion. 


-------------
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:30
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Just like before LOL

The second someone calls you out, the tone of your posts gets so defensive and innocent. Stop acting like an a****le and just post your opinion. 


you came here just to call me names, so look at yourself, you look like a real troll now.


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:32
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Just like before LOL

The second someone calls you out, the tone of your posts gets so defensive and innocent. Stop acting like an a****le and just post your opinion. 


you came here just to call me names, so look at yourself, you look like a real troll now.

Nah, i'm 100% serious. 


-------------
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.


Posted By: LSDisease
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:38
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

 

Nah, i'm 100% serious. 


you're 100% troll, that wasn't a convo between you and me, I hope your tiny little brain can get it.


-------------
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"


Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: August 10 2014 at 12:44
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

 

Nah, i'm 100% serious. 


you're 100% troll, that wasn't a convo between you and me, I hope your tiny little brain can get it.

Posting on a public forum page where anyone can read and respond? 

"I hope your tiny little brain can get it"


-------------
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk