Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=93527 Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 20:38 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: The Prog MindPosted By: Second Life Syndrome
Subject: The Prog Mind
Date Posted: May 16 2013 at 20:24
How important are the philosophies and ideas in prog to you? I find more and more that I often appreciate the lyrical message more than the music, at least at first. The lyrical content often opens up the door for me to fall in love with the music! One example: Riversea's "Out of an Ancient World". This album is a masterpiece in my opinion, but the philosophy is what gripped me at first. Truly, prog is music for thinking men!
I've been thinking about this concept for a while, and so I started a Facebook page called The Prog Mind. I want it to be a community of prog lovers that appreciate the message just as much as the melody. They place emphasis on the lyrics and on the music. I feel that this will get us closer and closer to the true soul of prog: that undefinable aura that seems to embrace prog. If you feel like it, join my community at https://www.facebook.com/TheProgMind" rel="nofollow - https://www.facebook.com/TheProgMind If not, share your feelings about this topic!
Replies: Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 16 2013 at 22:35
Lyrics and ideas in the songs have always been important to me. They enhance the listening experience. I often have trouble listening to a band if the lyrics are lousy/trite even if the music is decent.
For instance I found out early on that Fripp was into Gurdjief and Bennett; ie, The Fourth Way Work. It encouraged me to find out what the philosophy was all about nd I spent several years reading about it which led me to other philosphical ideas. The same with Yes and Topographic Oceans which led me into Paramahansa Yogananda and Vedic ideas.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: Ambient Hurricanes
Date Posted: May 16 2013 at 22:49
VERY important to me. I like my music to actually mean something. I can deal with crappy lyrics from time to time but trite themes annoy the heck out of me. It's even more important to me in my own music.
Lyrics (and music) should speak to a vital part of the human experience and tell part of the great story of life/history. Even if I don't agree with the philosophies/messages behind a song's lyrics, I can still enjoy them.
------------- I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Posted By: Second Life Syndrome
Date Posted: May 16 2013 at 23:12
Ambient Hurricanes wrote:
VERY important to me. I like my music to actually mean something. I can deal with crappy lyrics from time to time but trite themes annoy the heck out of me. It's even more important to me in my own music.
Lyrics (and music) should speak to a vital part of the human experience and tell part of the great story of life/history. Even if I don't agree with the philosophies/messages behind a song's lyrics, I can still enjoy them.
I completely agree! I can appreciate the music even if I happen to disagree. What's important to me is that they put some thought into it. For instance, Epica's Design Your Universe is quite pantheistic or something similar. I disagree, but I still feel a great pull into the music based on the lyrics. However, I want to see some serious thought. Last year, Galahad released Beyond the Gates of Euphoria, and the philosophical train of thought was terrible. It was all over the place. They contradicted themselves multiple times! The music was great, but I still have trouble listening intently to it;
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:09
Philosophy is a waste of a mind, it is the single most useless invention mankind has ever created, and the nonsense that dribbles from the mouths of pop and rock lyricists are some of the worst example of that. Prog lyrics are often poor poetry and even poorer philosophy even when compared to the inane banality of Hit Me baby One More Time. Why should I think that the probably drunken and possibly drug-addled musings of a singer in a rock band should carry any meaningful message or insight into the human condition. If the words tell a story then great, if they attempt to impart wisdom then ... meh.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:14
------------- What?
Posted By: Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:24
Completely off topic, but damn, Dean, what a band Mansun were....I've still got a Mansun t-shirt somewhere, but I hardly ever wore it because people that didn't know them assumed that good looking bunch of young lads were a poppy boy group like Nsync etc lol!
Anyway, thanks for throwing in such a random Mansun plug, and....
Posted By: Neo-Romantic
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:27
I love a good lyrical message. It's not something I always found important, but as I get older, I find I'm more invested in the words and what story or mood they're trying to convey. Often a song that I regard as my favorite nowadays is based on the criteria of a strong lyrical message augmented by powerful, deep music that adds to the meaning without becoming a distraction.
A perfect example for me is A Louse is Not a Home by Peter Hammill. Lyrically and musically, it's one of the best songs I've ever heard. I'm moved by the poetry on such a deep level, and the images the text depicts is matched flawlessly by the musical gestures throughout.
I also have a similar preference for albums with strong, unified narratives, such as Opeth's Still Life and Genesis's The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway. Two of my top 5 albums for this very reason.
Posted By: Svetonio
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:33
Gabriel era Genesis' lyrics got me when I was a minor kid.
Also some verses by King Crimson.
Posted By: Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:46
The lyrics of bands and artists such as the Flower Kings, Magenta, Neal Morse, Unitopia, etc mean a lot to me, I find the blend of religious/spiritual elements, new age philosophies and vague enough suggestions on how to approach your life absolutely inspiring.
Other than that, one of the things I've always loved about prog is how cryptic, confusing, vague, subtle and complex the words often are. I love really giving them a lot of thought and working out what they might possibly mean. Sometimes even one line can really stand out and mean something of great importance to me.
To me, those sort of lyrics can be just as much a prog trademark as striking artwork and involving arrangements are!
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:49
Aussie-Byrd-Brother wrote:
Completely off topic, but damn, Dean, what a band Mansun were....I've still got a Mansun t-shirt somewhere, but I hardly ever wore it because people that didn't know them assumed that good looking bunch of young lads were a poppy boy group like Nsync etc lol!
Anyway, thanks for throwing in such a random Mansun plug, and....
It wasn't random. Mansun were reknowned as being the "bedsit-philosophy" band of the 90s and the darlings of the student philosopher, just like Yes and Genesis were in the 70s and Marillion in the 80s. Fans would pour over the lyrics, analysing the words for meaning. Realising this would happen with the songs on the Attack Of The Grey Lantern album, Paul Drapper penned An Open Letter To A Lyrical Trainspotter as a hidden coda track to close the album, but to no avail, the bed-sit philosophers still picked over the lyrics. Which of course leads directly on to their Prog-Opus: Six, where they made a deliberate effort to show all the songs references in the cover art, including showing all the literature that inspired them in the book titles on the desk and the images in the background.
------------- What?
Posted By: Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:56
Dean wrote:
Aussie-Byrd-Brother wrote:
Completely off topic, but damn, Dean, what a band Mansun were....I've still got a Mansun t-shirt somewhere, but I hardly ever wore it because people that didn't know them assumed that good looking bunch of young lads were a poppy boy group like Nsync etc lol! Anyway, thanks for throwing in such a random Mansun plug, and....
It wasn't random. Mansun were reknowned as being the "bedsit-philosophy" band of the 90s and the darlings of the student philosopher, just like Yes and Genesis were in the 70s and Marillion in the 80s. Fans would pour over the lyrics, analysing the words for meaning. Realising this would happen with the songs on the Attack Of The Grey Lantern album, Paul Drapper penned An Open Letter To A Lyrical Trainspotter as a hidden coda track to close the album, but to no avail, the bed-sit philosophers still picked over the lyrics. Which of course leads directly on to their Prog-Opus: Six, where they made a deliberate effort to show all the songs references in the cover art, including showing all the literature that inspired them in the book titles on the desk and the images in the background.
Guess what, Dean, I was one of those people that pored over those details too! I've got a massive framed poster of the `Six' album cover, and I remember when I was younger I used to stare at that thing all the time, along with my vinyl copy! Guilty....and loved every bit of it!
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 02:57
Any form of art is made to vehiculate messages, conscious or not. I'm used to look at track titles when listening to instrumental music because even without a real concept an instrumental contains emotions and states of mind.
Also, knowing what an artist had in mind during the composing process can be very important and can give us the possibility to catch the message. The way one listens to Jugband Blues is very different if you know the story behind. One thing is a psychedelic-pop song, another is the testament of an artist aware of his mental illness.
It's the same in literature: the short horror tale "The extraneous" written by HP Lovecraft is apparently meaningless and surely not interesting, but bearing in mind the author's story and what he has suffered as child because of his mother, it becomes self-biographical and it's really moving.
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: Tom Ozric
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 03:14
In my Prog world, lyrics have often come 'secondary' to the music. I love Jon Anderson's lyrics, even if they are a bunch of kozmik and spiritual rambling, I love Peter Hammill's lyrics, more often than not, unique and intelligent. At the same time, Todd Rundgren has a knack of writing from the heart. Even some nonsensical lyrics I can overlook as long as the music behind it is well played. Some lyrics are just plain dopey..........
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 03:22
Aussie-Byrd-Brother wrote:
Guess what, Dean, I was one of those people that pored over those details too! I've got a massive framed poster of the `Six' album cover, and I remember when I was younger I used to stare at that thing all the time, along with my vinyl copy! Guilty....and loved every bit of it!
Should I ever decide to write another album review (unlikely), it would be of a Mansun album (which one is hard to chose), however since I put so much into their PA biography and the few reviews they have here being so good, I'm not sure what I could add that isn't repetition of what's already been written. More people should listen to Mansun.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 10:38
Yeah, lyrics are important for me, but not more than the music. I can enjoy a song with very good music and crappy lyrics, but there is no way I can really enjoy a song with excellent lyrics but crappy music (though I might come to admire said song for it's message or significance, but not really enjoy it).
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 10:49
Dean wrote:
Philosophy is a waste of a mind, it is the single most useless invention mankind has ever created, and the nonsense that dribbles from the mouths of pop and rock lyricists are some of the worst example of that. Prog lyrics are often poor poetry and even poorer philosophy even when compared to the inane banality of Hit Me baby One More Time. Why should I think that the probably drunken and possibly drug-addled musings of a singer in a rock band should carry any meaningful message or insight into the human condition. If the words tell a story then great, if they attempt to impart wisdom then ... meh.
I don't understand what is wrong with philosophy. People learn from it.
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 11:05
As with any other performance art, I am interested mainly in expression in music. So I look at lyrics too from the standpoint of expression, rather than the content. I am not particularly interested in whether I agree or disagree with the content (and the content by itself has never influenced my way of life) but in whether I find the manner convincing and engaging. I love how in the line "Plans that either come to nought or half a page of scribbled waste", Waters presents a reflection on Britain in a manner that could be interpreted and related to a personal situation as well. On the other hand, while Neil Peart may make a good point at times, I don't like his lyrics because of the way he frames his thoughts (which comes across as somewhat banal and 'captain obvious' to me).
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 11:10
Dean wrote:
Philosophy is a waste of a mind, it is the single most useless invention mankind has ever created, and the nonsense that dribbles from the mouths of pop and rock lyricists are some of the worst example of that. Prog lyrics are often poor poetry and even poorer philosophy even when compared to the inane banality of Hit Me baby One More Time. Why should I think that the probably drunken and possibly drug-addled musings of a singer in a rock band should carry any meaningful message or insight into the human condition. If the words tell a story then great, if they attempt to impart wisdom then ... meh.
This.
-------------
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 11:12
^ Then stories are just as much of human waste as philosophy. We have nothing to learn from them.
Posted By: cstack3
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 11:14
They can be very important. I became an environmental scientist because, when I was in college, I was really touched by Jon Anderson's lyrics and philosophy. A key moment for me was TFTO, especially the line "...let them rape the forests."
I told this to Jon backstage at the Chicago 35th Anniversary show, and he gave me a wonderful smile. I guess I made the right choice, better than accounting!
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 11:28
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Philosophy is a waste of a mind, it is the single most useless invention mankind has ever created, and the nonsense that dribbles from the mouths of pop and rock lyricists are some of the worst example of that. Prog lyrics are often poor poetry and even poorer philosophy even when compared to the inane banality of Hit Me baby One More Time. Why should I think that the probably drunken and possibly drug-addled musings of a singer in a rock band should carry any meaningful message or insight into the human condition. If the words tell a story then great, if they attempt to impart wisdom then ... meh.
I don't understand what is wrong with philosophy. People learn from it.
In the entire history of mankind we have never, ever, learnt anything from the navel-gazing pasttime known as "Philosophy", just as we have never, ever, ever, learnt anything from history or even from a story. We will repeat the same mistakes regardless of how much we know it is destined to failure because we are an arrogant species who denies its past mistakes. Philosophy has caused more harm, and killed more people, than any other academic discipline. Stories are an entertainment, just as music is an entertainment, nothing more, nothing less.
------------- What?
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 11:57
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Philosophy is a waste of a mind, it is the single most useless invention mankind has ever created, and the nonsense that dribbles from the mouths of pop and rock lyricists are some of the worst example of that. Prog lyrics are often poor poetry and even poorer philosophy even when compared to the inane banality of Hit Me baby One More Time. Why should I think that the probably drunken and possibly drug-addled musings of a singer in a rock band should carry any meaningful message or insight into the human condition. If the words tell a story then great, if they attempt to impart wisdom then ... meh.
I don't understand what is wrong with philosophy. People learn from it.
In the entire history of mankind we have never, ever, learnt anything from the navel-gazing pasttime known as "Philosophy", just as we have never, ever, ever, learnt anything from history or even from a story. We will repeat the same mistakes regardless of how much we know it is destined to failure because we are an arrogant species who denies its past mistakes. Philosophy has caused more harm, and killed more people, than any other academic discipline. Stories are an entertainment, just as music is an entertainment, nothing more, nothing less.
So... what the hell else are we supposed to do with our brains?
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:08
Larree wrote:
So... what the hell else are we supposed to do with our brains?
Something worthwile perhaps, if that's not too much to ask. A cure for the common cold, cancer, appathy, bad hair... anything other than the trite "I think therefore I am" bollocks, even origami is a more meaningful employment of an idle mind.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:09
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Philosophy is a waste of a mind, it is the single most useless invention mankind has ever created, and the nonsense that dribbles from the mouths of pop and rock lyricists are some of the worst example of that. Prog lyrics are often poor poetry and even poorer philosophy even when compared to the inane banality of Hit Me baby One More Time. Why should I think that the probably drunken and possibly drug-addled musings of a singer in a rock band should carry any meaningful message or insight into the human condition. If the words tell a story then great, if they attempt to impart wisdom then ... meh.
I don't understand what is wrong with philosophy. People learn from it.
Philosophy has caused more harm, and killed more people, than any other academic discipline. Stories are an entertainment, just as music is an entertainment, nothing more, nothing less.
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:17
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
Sounds nothing like politics, though the philosophy of politics has some bearing considering that politics are based upon some philosophical idealism and are modified and corrupted by other philosophical idealisms and are enacted by people subscribing to some philosophical idealism.
However, do you want to give a nice concise example where philosophy that has been a positive expansion of our understanding of the world?
------------- What?
Posted By: progbethyname
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:18
I hold great ties to philosophy. After all it was, by far, my favourite subject in the academic world of higher learning.
My feelings towards the subject of music and lyrics definitely go hand in hand with me. Subject matter and dealing with life problems certainly have been easier to understand and to deal with because of music, for me that is :)
Anyway, I can list an example where philosophy has been strongly present within the music.
First of all. IQ's album SUBTERRENEA gives a very interesting outlook on life after death and spiritually. Certainly key philosophical topics were present in this album. For instance, topics like 'is the mind separate from the body and is their really such a thing as 'higher levels of conscienceness.' Anyway, these are topics that even Some of the great minds of our history as human beings have tried to tackle. The French philosopher, Rene Descartes wrote an 8 piece meditative argument called the cogito which battles the whole universal principal that the mind is separate from the body and certainly this ontological argument helped spawn one of the most infamous quotes 'I think...therefore I am.'
Long story short. When I listened to subterranea it conjured up a ton of philosophical quandaries for me and it even challenged me to think about the exsistence of god as well, so you can be sure I thought about the works of St. Augustine and Tomas Aquinas. Anyway, my point is that philosophy serves its purpose and is definitely connected to a lot of music, especially prog.
------------- Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:24
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
Sounds nothing like politics, though the philosophy of politics has some bearing considering that politics are based upon some philosophical idealism and are modified and corrupted by other philosophical idealisms and are enacted by people subscribing to some philosophical idealism.
OK. What kind of damage has philosophy done to us (besides that on political grounds)?
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
However, do you want to give a nice concise example where philosophy that has been a positive expansion of our understanding of the world?
I wouldn't know anything about that. I've never ever heard or read anyone telling the public that this philosophical quote has changed his/her/its way of thinking. For all I know, philosophy has the potential of helping us improve our lifestyles.
Dean wrote:
We will repeat the same mistakes regardless of how much we know it is destined to failure because we are an arrogant species who denies its past mistakes.
1) What kind of failure is it destined to? 2) Not all of us are arrogant. 3) We don't deny our past mistakes ... that's what history classes are for.
Posted By: progbethyname
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:26
Also. One last thing. We, as human beings, should never disregard philosophy. Actually, in a way, we are all philosophers and we all carry our own mantras, ideas and outlooks on life that are different and unique.
Disregarding philosophy is next to impossible cause we all use it everyday even with ourselves only. You just don't even know or realize it. To me, if you castigate philosophy it means that you are a misanthropic, embittered person who really can't stand the noble worth of other peoples thoughts and opinions. Not very open minded to me.
------------- Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:33
If we had no connection to philosophy or history we would be on the same level as farm animals. All we would be is food for something higher and deeper than us.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:34
Maybe we are being monitored by aliens who are waiting for the right time to invade Earth.
Posted By: Morsenator
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:35
Dean wrote:
Larree wrote:
So... what the hell else are we supposed to do with our brains?
Something worthwile perhaps, if that's not too much to ask. A cure for the common cold, cancer, appathy, bad hair... anything other than the trite "I think therefore I am" bollocks, even origami is a more meaningful employment of an idle mind.
Don't know, but that sounds somewhat like a claim derived from a philosophically positivist worldview.
------------- You love the music, the music loves you!
http://moonsofjupiter.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - http://moonsofjupiter.bandcamp.com/
Posted By: Monadology
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:36
Either Dean's attitudes toward philosophy rest of some dogmatic set of values by which the consequences of philosophy are judged, or Dean's attitudes toward philosophy rest of some set of values which was derived from philosophical thinking about what is good and what are bad, by which the consequences of philosophy are judged. In the first case, I think it's safe to say that dogmatically held values have done far more harm than philosophy ever has. In the second case, Dean is sawing the branch supporting him. Either way, there's not much use debating with him.
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:37
Morsenator wrote:
Dean wrote:
Larree wrote:
So... what the hell else are we supposed to do with our brains?
Something worthwile perhaps, if that's not too much to ask. A cure for the common cold, cancer, appathy, bad hair... anything other than the trite "I think therefore I am" bollocks, even origami is a more meaningful employment of an idle mind.
Don't know, but that sounds somewhat like a claim derived from a philosophically positivist worldview.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: progbethyname
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:38
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Maybe we are being monitored by aliens who are waiting for the right time to invade Earth.
What?? Has the mothership come already?
------------- Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:40
progbethyname wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Maybe we are being monitored by aliens who are waiting for the right time to invade Earth.
What?? Has the mothership come already?
Yeah man! Back in 1976. Here is the video!
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:50
Anyway, back to the brass tacks: The only sound things I can think of off the top of my head are only some of those penned by Mr. Hammill and Mr. Rogers Waters.
(I know this one is not prog, but here it goes:) "Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine" - don't mean jack s%$t to me, especially since the time of Jesus was rather very poorly documented, and I don't freaking know whether he has ever really existed. PG's "Biko" has brought the cruelty in the Apartheid-stricken corners of the world to the attention of the rest of the world, but had not done much else (at least to my knowledge, especially since my knowledge I find rather feeble, let alone in the history of the world).
I want lyrics that can change a person. I, as a songwriter, want to develop a brand of lyric-writing that can help improve a person's lifestyle and worldview (of course, that depends how I would define the word "improve", but that's a topic for another day).
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:54
I generally find philosophy a waste of time, and generally don't find it
interesting in song lyrics. As far as lyrics go I usually appreciate
the ability to tell stories or create characters or express emotion more than any philosophical twaddle musings. I can't say I've ever found any prog lyrics to be profound and it's not something I look for.
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:55
^ You mean developing on the theme of solitude is a waste of time.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:56
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Anyway, back to the brass tax
TACKS.
It's Brass Tacks, not Brass Tax.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 12:56
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Anyway, back to the brass tax
TACKS.
It's Brass Tacks, not Brass Tax.
I was close.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:03
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
Sounds nothing like politics, though the philosophy of politics has some bearing considering that politics are based upon some philosophical idealism and are modified and corrupted by other philosophical idealisms and are enacted by people subscribing to some philosophical idealism.
OK. What kind of damage has philosophy done to us (besides that on political grounds)?
Where would you like to start? Religion,Idealism, Dogma, Politics, Economics, War, Eugenics, Ethnic Cleansing and Racism?
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
However, do you want to give a nice concise example where philosophy that has been a positive expansion of our understanding of the world?
I wouldn't know anything about that. I've never ever heard or read anyone telling the public that this philosophical quote has changed his/her/its way of thinking. For all I know, philosophy has the potential of helping us improve our lifestyles.
Everyone assumes that philosophy does nothing but good, yet there is little evidence of that. In its basic form, philosophy does nothing and gives us nothing, it has never produced anything of value, for every philosophical thought there is an counter train of thought that states the opposite view. One man's philosophical panacea is another man's anathema.
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
We will repeat the same mistakes regardless of how much we know it is destined to failure because we are an arrogant species who denies its past mistakes.
1) What kind of failure is it destined to? 2) Not all of us are arrogant. 3) We don't deny our past mistakes ... that's what history classes are for.
Show me one case where we as a species has learnt from their mistakes. We are all arrogant. Empires still rise and fall, we still wage pointless wars, people still die of starvation. History has taught us nothing.
------------- What?
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:07
I like strong lyrics and content but since it's the music that draws me in and keeps me interested first and foremost then if that's missing I really couldn't care less about the lyrics. In fact, for most of my favorite songs I don't even know more than 1 or 2 random lines regardless of whether their being sung or growled, rasped or spoken as I find delivery to be far more important.
Take Between the Buried and Me's Mordecai, it's a rather rough song being from their second album but the second half of the song is breathtaking for Tommy Rogers passionate delivery, and despite having the album for over 2 years I still haven't a clue what it is he sings, he just does it really well.
The caveat to this is that obvious pointless nonsense stands out quite badly and is one reason why I don't like Yes.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:10
Dean wrote:
Show me one case where we as a species has learnt from their mistakes. We are all arrogant. Empires still rise and fall, we still wage pointless wars, people still die of starvation. History has taught us nothing.
I'd say it's taught, we've just refused to listen.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:12
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
Sounds nothing like politics, though the philosophy of politics has some bearing considering that politics are based upon some philosophical idealism and are modified and corrupted by other philosophical idealisms and are enacted by people subscribing to some philosophical idealism.
OK. What kind of damage has philosophy done to us (besides that on political grounds)?
Where would you like to start? Religion,Idealism, Dogma, Politics, Economics, War, Eugenics, Ethnic Cleansing and Racism?
I don't see how philosophy has to do with any of it. Many of the things you've mentioned are based on ill motivations, not on healthy ways thinking.
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
That sounds more like politics than philosophy. Isn't philosophy supposed to expand our understanding of the world and its nature (besides science)?
However, do you want to give a nice concise example where philosophy that has been a positive expansion of our understanding of the world?
I wouldn't know anything about that. I've never ever heard or read anyone telling the public that this philosophical quote has changed his/her/its way of thinking. For all I know, philosophy has the potential of helping us improve our lifestyles.
Everyone assumes that philosophy does nothing but good, yet there is little evidence of that. In its basic form, philosophy does nothing and gives us nothing, it has never produced anything of value, for every philosophical thought there is an counter train of thought that states the opposite view. One man's philosophical panacea is another man's anathema.
1) Who is everyone? 2) The form of philosophy as we know it is far beyond basic, last time I checked. 3) "One man's philosophical panacea is another man's anathema." What is this, a universal thing? How can you prove that?
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Dean wrote:
We will repeat the same mistakes regardless of how much we know it is destined to failure because we are an arrogant species who denies its past mistakes.
1) What kind of failure is it destined to? 2) Not all of us are arrogant. 3) We don't deny our past mistakes ... that's what history classes are for.
Show me one case where we as a species has learnt from their mistakes. We are all arrogant. Empires still rise and fall, we still wage pointless wars, people still die of starvation. History has taught us nothing.
[/quote]If there is anything history has taught us, it's what not to do.
Posted By: Prog Sothoth
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:12
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Anyway, back to the brass tacks: The only sound things I can think of off the top of my head are only some of those penned by Mr. Hammill and Mr. Rogers Waters.
(I know this one is not prog, but here it goes:) "Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine" - don't mean jack s%$t to me, especially since the time of Jesus was rather very poorly documented, and I don't freaking know whether he has ever really existed. PG's "Biko" has brought the cruelty in the Apartheid-stricken corners of the world to the attention of the rest of the world, but had not done much else (at least to my knowledge, especially since my knowledge I find rather feeble, let alone in the history of the world).
I want lyrics that can change a person. I, as a songwriter, want to develop a brand of lyric-writing that can help improve a person's lifestyle and worldview (of course, that depends how I would define the word "improve", but that's a topic for another day).
Geez, what else do you want the song to do, flip your pancakes?
Sorry, just a weird thing to read.
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:12
sleeper wrote:
Dean wrote:
Show me one case where we as a species has learnt from their mistakes. We are all arrogant. Empires still rise and fall, we still wage pointless wars, people still die of starvation. History has taught us nothing.
I'd say it's taught, we've just refused to listen.
+1, though I'd say that we refuse to listen to a lot of things.
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:14
Prog Sothoth wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Anyway, back to the brass tacks: The only sound things I can think of off the top of my head are only some of those penned by Mr. Hammill and Mr. Rogers Waters.
(I know this one is not prog, but here it goes:) "Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine" - don't mean jack s%$t to me, especially since the time of Jesus was rather very poorly documented, and I don't freaking know whether he has ever really existed. PG's "Biko" has brought the cruelty in the Apartheid-stricken corners of the world to the attention of the rest of the world, but had not done much else (at least to my knowledge, especially since my knowledge I find rather feeble, let alone in the history of the world).
I want lyrics that can change a person. I, as a songwriter, want to develop a brand of lyric-writing that can help improve a person's lifestyle and worldview (of course, that depends how I would define the word "improve", but that's a topic for another day).
Geez, what else do you want the song to do, flip your pancakes?
Sorry, just a weird thing to read.
You are taking this way too close to heart (I'm just judging by the tone of it). It's one thing to report on the state of humanity. Actually doing something with the state of humanity through a song is a whole another matter, a feat that demands immense lyric-writing mastery, though I can't think of a person who would be capable of that.
Still a weird thing to read?
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:16
Monadology wrote:
Either Dean's attitudes toward philosophy rest of some dogmatic set of values by which the consequences of philosophy are judged, or Dean's attitudes toward philosophy rest of some set of values which was derived from philosophical thinking about what is good and what are bad, by which the consequences of philosophy are judged. In the first case, I think it's safe to say that dogmatically held values have done far more harm than philosophy ever has. In the second case, Dean is sawing the branch supporting him. Either way, there's not much use debating with him.
Yeah, I get that argument a lot and it bounces off me like a bouncy thing hitting a hard thing. Lovers of Philosophy as an academic discipline do get a little prickly when someone dismisses their passion as a mere frippery.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:23
Dayvenkirq wrote:
sleeper wrote:
Dean wrote:
Show me one case where we as a species has learnt from their mistakes. We are all arrogant. Empires still rise and fall, we still wage pointless wars, people still die of starvation. History has taught us nothing.
I'd say it's taught, we've just refused to listen.
+1, though I'd say that we refuse to listen to a lot of things.
If the lesson taught is ignored then we may have learnt something but we have not learnt anything from it and therefore it has taught us nothing.
This is more than just being smart with words.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:26
^ Therefore, if not all of us, then some of us have to do something about ourselves. I bet that there are some people out there who act on philosophical principles for greater good. I don't know when, I don't know where, I just can't prove that there is absolutely no one doing that. Otherwise, we might just as well throw the whole damn thing overboard.
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:34
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Maybe we are being monitored by aliens who are waiting for the right time to invade Earth.
Oh...now you did it.....
Do you want Dean to philosophize ...er make a pronouncement on how there ain't no such things as space aliens.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:37
Dayvenkirq wrote:
I don't see how philosophy has to do with any of it. Many of the things you've mentioned are based on ill motivations, not on healthy ways thinking.
Philosophy is not "a healthy way of thinking" - though it is often used to justify a way of thinking into making it appear to be healthy.
Dayvenkirq wrote:
1) Who is everyone? 2) The form of philosophy as we know it is far beyond basic, last time I 1)
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Who is everyone? 2) The form of philosophy as we know it is far beyond basic, last time I checked. 3) "One man's philosophical panacea is another man's anathema." What is this, a universal thing? How can you prove that?
1) mankind is everyone, unless you want to sit this one out.
2) There is no one form of philosophy, there are many, many different philosophies, all different, many of them contradictory.
3) Of course I can prove it. Pick a philosophy then look for the opposite philosophy - you can guarantee that one will exist, even if it is shoruded in gobbledygook languag e- existentialism is opposed by determinsitic fatalism for example.
[QUOTE=Dayvenkirq]If there is anything history has taught us, it's what not to do.
Yet we still do it. Ergo, the lesson taught is not learnt.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:37
dr wu23 wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Maybe we are being monitored by aliens who are waiting for the right time to invade Earth.
Oh...now you did it.....
Do you want Dean to philosophize ...er make a pronouncement on how there ain't no such things as space aliens.
I don't know much about space, I can give you that much.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:41
dr wu23 wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Maybe we are being monitored by aliens who are waiting for the right time to invade Earth.
Oh...now you did it.....
Do you want Dean to philosophize ...er make a pronouncement on how there ain't no such things as space aliens.
Oh ffs. Hardy har har. I have never made such a claim. In fact I have said the exact opposite - the existence of "space aliens" is perfectly reasonable and quite probable.
You should try reading long posts occasionally instead of skimming them.
------------- What?
Posted By: progbethyname
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:41
Ohhhhhhhh 'for the greater good' a term that has been vastly manipulated to do harm. Sorry, I'm just thinking of all the wars fought in the name of god like the crusades and so forth. Yikes!
Anyway
------------- Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:44
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
I don't see how philosophy has to do with any of it. Many of the things you've mentioned are based on ill motivations, not on healthy ways thinking.
Philosophy is not "a healthy way of thinking" - though it is often used to justify a way of thinking into making it appear to be healthy.
That's a very pessimistic and unjustified (or maybe even nihilistic) way of thinking I have no much use for. Let's nuke the world.
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
1) Who is everyone? 2) The form of philosophy as we know it is far beyond basic, last time I 1)
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Who is everyone? 2) The form of philosophy as we know it is far beyond basic, last time I checked. 3) "One man's philosophical panacea is another man's anathema." What is this, a universal thing? How can you prove that?
1) mankind is everyone, unless you want to sit this one out.
2) There is no one form of philosophy, there are many, many different philosophies, all different, many of them contradictory.
3) Of course I can prove it. Pick a philosophy then look for the opposite philosophy - you can guarantee that one will exist, even if it is shoruded in gobbledygook languag e- existentialism is opposed by determinsitic fatalism for example.
1) You are saying that everyone assumes the same thing? Damn, what a coincidence. 3) Thomas Malthus: Get rid of some inhabitants of the same niche so that there would be enough resources for everyone left in the said niche. How would you oppose to that?
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
If there is anything history has taught us, it's what not to do.
Yet we still do it. Ergo, the lesson taught is not learnt.
We still do what? Are you saying that Turks are still committing genocide against Armenians?
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:50
Andrey with respect, this is without doubt the least interesting conversation I have had today since we are talking at tangents, not only to the thread topic, but to what each other is saying, therefore, I'm out.
------------- What?
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:51
Sounds good.
Back on the horse: like I said, look to Mr. Hammill. There may be more to the lyrics than meets the eye.
How can I be free? How can I get help? Am I really me? Am I someone else?
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 13:53
btw...the second post in that thread is very enlightening.
Yeah, just read that. This is the second time (the first time being cstack3's post here) that I find someone being (deeply) influenced by Jon Anderson's lyrics.
Posted By: Second Life Syndrome
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:08
It guess it depends on what you feel is important. Philosophy tries to tackle the human experience, metaphysics, the problems of sin and pain and death, and other deep reflections. How can rumination on these topics be a waste of time? If anything, pondering them can at least sharpen your mind or stabilize you as a thinking person. As someone else stated, if philosophy is a waste of time and mind; then stories, art, and even just listening to other people are all wastes of time. Philosophy asks "Why are we here?", and I think one of the answers is "For other people". That said, I definitely can listen to great music without powerful or well-written lyrics (Seventh Wonder's cliche poetry comes to mind). I also love a good instrumental album, but I find I like it more when the music is highly emotive. Some of my favorites in this category are Lunatic Soul (the last album), Hostsonaten (the Season Cycle), and Joseph Magazine.
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:22
progbethyname wrote:
Oh the battle is done. Peace is a lovely way to get back on track. Anyway, whose up for some Subterrenea?? What an album that is.
Good album but imho Dark and Frequency are better.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:23
^ Do they have any lyrical profundity?
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:29
btw...the second post in that thread is very enlightening.
Yeah, just read that. This is the second time (the first time being cstack3's post here) that I find someone being (deeply) influenced by Jon Anderson's lyrics.
I've always thought his lyrics presented 'mind images' for me while listening to Yes music and that was enough for me.
But many lyrics over the years from various types of music have led me to other ideas and material to read about on multiple levels. So I pay attention to them to see what they have to offer. Of course many are just surrealistic word play and that's ok.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:32
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ Do they have any lyrical profundity?
Not sure if you were talking to me but...I think they do at times. I guess it depends on how one wants to interpret lyrics also.
I think the songs Sacred Sound and Harvest Of Souls....and .Frequency and Ryker Skies are very interesting lyrically.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:33
dr wu23 wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ Do they have any lyrical profundity?
Not sure if you were talking to me but...I think they do at times. I guess it depends on how one wants to interpret lyrics also.
I think the songs Frequency and Ryker Skies are very interesting lyrically.
But nothing serious or enlightening to offer?
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:39
Dayvenkirq wrote:
dr wu23 wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ Do they have any lyrical profundity?
Not sure if you were talking to me but...I think they do at times. I guess it depends on how one wants to interpret lyrics also.
I think the songs Frequency and Ryker Skies are very interesting lyrically.
But nothing serious or enlightening to offer?
Serious...in what way?
Enlightening..? If you mean allowing me to reach nirvana...then no.
But I think many of his lyrics on those 2 cd's point out some interesting aspects of the human condition....and I like the way he does it within the context of the song. If , as some have already mentioned, they were merely love lyrics etc, I would not enjoy the overall effect as much. I like the mix of some meaning to the words as well as a good 'melody'.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:43
I meant: anything that could potentially change a person's way of thinking about life ... or something in the spirit of that.
Posted By: progbethyname
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:47
True, but the strongest philosophical messages are highlighted a bit more in Subteranea. Really, all of IQ's albums are saturated with philosophic quandaries. :) ^
------------- Gimmie my headphones now!!! 🎧🤣
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 14:54
Dayvenkirq wrote:
I meant: anything that could potentially change a person's way of thinking about life ... or something in the spirit of that.
Well.....that would depend completely on the person but imo yes if someone were receptive.
I can't give you specifics but people are certainly affected by what they hear and read and lyrics in prog songs or any other are no exception.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 15:13
In defense of Philosophy, I believe that Philosophy both shapes and
reflects upon the patterns of thought held by a society. If we rewind
back to Aristotelian times, his exhaustive and methodical segmenting of
the natural world eventually gave birth to our entire study of science
and the standards of logic. We take for granted that these laws of
nature, these logical truths have always been there, but if so, where
were they? It's all based upon a set of analogs, the logos of our
Western thought, that originated from Philosophy. This is why cultures
so different from our own seem so alien and (sometimes, crassly put),
"stupid", because they don't adhere to the basic "truths" that we take
for granted. But their systems work too -- their reality is based on a
different set of analogs, a different philosophy.
I would
probably agree with Dean that Philosophy has done more harm than good -
but not because it's useless and empty, but because the Philosophy
itself is the basis for everything good and bad. It's the whole
thing. Great sea changes in civilization (Renaissance, Major Scientific
advances, etc), the growing pains of mankind, all originate from new
developments in Philosophy. I think it behooves us to want to
understand what is at the very roots of our belief system, if progress
is to be possible.
Plus, I majored in Philosophy biyyaaatch
------------- My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 15:19
Prog Sothoth wrote:
Geez, what else do you want the song to do, flip your pancakes?
Sorry, just a weird thing to read.
------------- My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 15:23
I find most lyrics (especially in prog) to be banal & trite, and those are the good ones. I'm not looking to be uplifted by lyrics, I looking for them to work well with the music to provide an overall effect. If I'm listening to lyrics in English it's usually Leonard Cohen, Neil Young, Bob Dylan or the like.
Two of the few prog bands whose lyrics I connect with are Thinking Plague & Sleepytime Gorilla Museum. For someone to make life decisions based on Jon Anderson lyrics I frankly find bizarre but hey each to their own, whatever works for you.
This is probably why I primarily listen to instrumental music or lyrics in languages I don't understand, which is basically all of those that aren't English. Give me Magma, Uz Jsme Doma & Polite Refusal for vocal based bands.
------------- Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 15:28
Back to the question though -- sometimes I will be very impressed by an image or a story set forth in a prog song, or just with very poetic use of language. It's not so much the ideas themselves that impress me, but the author's success in employing them - do they MOVE me or not.
For some reason, the "Blue Tail / Tail Fly / Luther / In time /etc" section of Siberian Khatru really affects me emotionally, even though I don't really know what he's singing about. Married with the music, it conjures an image of spiritual awakening that really works wonders.
------------- My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 15:39
HolyMoly wrote:
Back to the question though -- sometimes I will be very impressed by an image or a story set forth in a prog song, or just with very poetic use of language. It's not so much the ideas themselves that impress me, but the author's success in employing them - do they MOVE me or not.
For some reason, the "Blue Tail / Tail Fly / Luther / In time /etc" section of Siberian Khatru really affects me emotionally, even though I don't really know what he's singing about. Married with the music, it conjures an image of spiritual awakening that really works wonders.
I agree....there are several sections on CTE that seem to create a strong feeling.....
several of the earlier KC songs do that to me also.
From In The Wake of Poseidon:
"Heroes hands drain stones for blood To whet the scaling knife. Magi blind with visions light Net death in dread of life. Their children kneel in jesus till They learn the price of nails; Whilst all around our mother earth Waits balanced on the scales."
To me very evocative stuff.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 16:11
A song change a person's life? I'm not too clear on the possibilities of that.
-------------
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 16:19
Not exactly life-changing, but changing the person's thinking.
Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 16:24
dr wu23 wrote:
"Heroes hands drain stones for blood To whet the scaling knife. Magi blind with visions light Net death in dread of life. Their children kneel in jesus till They learn the price of nails; Whilst all around our mother earth Waits balanced on the scales."
To me very evocative stuff.
Whereas to me it reads as complete bollocks and I'm a huge KC fan. I guess mileage varies.
------------- Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com
Not exactly life-changing, but changing the person's thinking.
You mean like Charles Manson and Helter Skelter?
------------- What?
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 17:02
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Not exactly life-changing, but changing the person's thinking.
If a 4-minute rock song (or 10, it's prog after all) managed to change one person's mind, I'd be wary of trusting that person with... Anything.
-------------
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 17:04
HolyMoly wrote:
In defense of Philosophy, I believe that Philosophy both shapes and reflects upon the patterns of thought held by a society. If we rewind back to Aristotelian times, his exhaustive and methodical segmenting of the natural world eventually gave birth to our entire study of science and the standards of logic. We take for granted that these laws of nature, these logical truths have always been there, but if so, where were they? It's all based upon a set of analogs, the logos of our Western thought, that originated from Philosophy. This is why cultures so different from our own seem so alien and (sometimes, crassly put), "stupid", because they don't adhere to the basic "truths" that we take for granted. But their systems work too -- their reality is based on a different set of analogs, a different philosophy.
I would probably agree with Dean that Philosophy has done more harm than good - but not because it's useless and empty, but because the Philosophy itself is the basis for everything good and bad. It's the whole thing. Great sea changes in civilization (Renaissance, Major Scientific advances, etc), the growing pains of mankind, all originate from new developments in Philosophy. I think it behooves us to want to understand what is at the very roots of our belief system, if progress is to be possible.
Since Aristotle's time we have managed to separate out the disciplines of Science, Philosophy and Alchemy - one of these permits the major advances we have experience, one of them we have discarded as charlatan, the other hangs on by the skin of its teeth because...
HolyMoly wrote:
Plus, I majored in Philosophy biyyaaatch
------------- What?
Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 17:18
Dean wrote:
HolyMoly wrote:
In defense of Philosophy, I believe that Philosophy both shapes and reflects upon the patterns of thought held by a society. If we rewind back to Aristotelian times, his exhaustive and methodical segmenting of the natural world eventually gave birth to our entire study of science and the standards of logic. We take for granted that these laws of nature, these logical truths have always been there, but if so, where were they? It's all based upon a set of analogs, the logos of our Western thought, that originated from Philosophy. This is why cultures so different from our own seem so alien and (sometimes, crassly put), "stupid", because they don't adhere to the basic "truths" that we take for granted. But their systems work too -- their reality is based on a different set of analogs, a different philosophy.
I would probably agree with Dean that Philosophy has done more harm than good - but not because it's useless and empty, but because the Philosophy itself is the basis for everything good and bad. It's the whole thing. Great sea changes in civilization (Renaissance, Major Scientific advances, etc), the growing pains of mankind, all originate from new developments in Philosophy. I think it behooves us to want to understand what is at the very roots of our belief system, if progress is to be possible.
Since Aristotle's time we have managed to separate out the disciplines of Science, Philosophy and Alchemy - one of these permits the major advances we have experience, one of them we have discarded as charlatan, the other hangs on by the skin of its teeth because...
HolyMoly wrote:
Plus, I majored in Philosophy biyyaaatch
So that's it, then? We've got the world figured out, and there's no need to question our systems of thought any more? I just have a strong feeling that we're not done explaining stuff yet - science has so little to say about what "life" actually is, or how the brain really works, for example. Some stuff can't be reduced to atoms.
I will, however, tip my hat to you for cleverly using my own postscript as the exclamation point on your argument. That was pretty cool. . I'm probably in over my head, advancing what must sound like a load of mystical BS, but what the hey. It's a topic that interests me.
------------- My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 17:26
Dean wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Not exactly life-changing, but changing the person's thinking.
You mean like Charles Manson and Helter Skelter?
Don't know anything about that.
The T wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Not exactly life-changing, but changing the person's thinking.
If a 4-minute rock song (or 10, it's prog after all) managed to change one person's mind, I'd be wary of trusting that person with... Anything.
What if it's an ambient piece ... or a series of ambient pieces?
Oh, wait ... now we are not talking lyrics. ... What about just something of Waters or Hammill type?
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 17:30
"Geez, what else do you want the song to do, flip your pancakes?"
Yes! And fry up some bacon, too!
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 17:33
I like the lyrics of Robert Hunter.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 18:17
HolyMoly wrote:
So that's it, then? We've got the world figured out, and there's no need to question our systems of thought any more? I just have a strong feeling that we're not done explaining stuff yet - science has so little to say about what "life" actually is, or how the brain really works, for example. Some stuff can't be reduced to atoms.
Philosophy does not answer any of those, nor does it even attempt to get close to explaining any of them. In 3000 years of documented Philosophy we've not one single philosophical explanation of anything that has any practical application. In fact philosophy has been so self-absorbed it has managed to confuse itself on exactly what an explanation is such that it is impossible to give an explanation on what actually constitutes an explanation. Philosophy is never going to tell us what "life" actually is no matter how many philosophers we put onto the problem, we will never arrive at an explanation - an infinity of philosophers pounding at an infinity of typewriters for an eternity will result in precisely nothing... So Mr Kant, we arrive at the end of the Universe so it is time to see what you have produced in that eternity on your trusty Remington Model No.5, so let us look at what have you written here? "To be is to do", Right. Is that it? Really? The sum total of an infinity of years of work is six words that we in the trade call 'taking the piss'... you do realise that people will be making jokes about this in the future; anything else? "Happiness is not an ideal of reason, but of imagination"... right, I see, you managed a few more random words there that almost make sense... if you'd spent a night at the tavern on cheap wine that is; any other pearls of wisdom you wish to share? "Science is organised knowledge. Wisdom is organised life" .. okay, two nights in the tavern and a pipeful of wacky-baccy; one more before I throw you out? "I had therefore to remove knowledge, in order to make room for belief" ... somehow that doesn't surprise me one bit, you mind that door doesn't swing back and hit you on your arse as you leave... "Ingratitude is the essence of vileness." Oh, go home and annoy someone else.
Philosophy has never figured anything out and I honestly don't expect that it ever will, the process of looking for the answer is not the goal... that's like firing randomly at a wall, drawing targets around where the bullets didn't hit and feeling smug about it. "These aren't the droids you're looking for."
------------- What?
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 18:44
^Dean, today I can't agree more with you.
Though it actually has a purpose, as I have said before: to ensure that there are future generations of philosophers who teach philosophy so there can be schools where new philosophers are trained to be the future professors.
Wow, philosophy has a life of its own. It's self-sustaining.
-------------
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 19:37
If we had no philosophy, history, fictional stories, poetry, or music - yes, music (Because we would not have music either if we did not have the other stuff.) - we would not be conscious of anything except the here and now. Nothing wrong with here and now, but like I said... if we only had the here and now that would put us on the same level as farm animals. We would simply be some other creature's food.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 19:41
False. We could still have music, history, and all the rest without philosophy. All the rest have an specific objective/purpose/matter/whatever. Only philosophy concerns itself with answering unanswerable questions. History tells us what happened. Music entertains us. So does poetry. Philosophy asks obvious questions and poses no real answers. I'm not seeing the connection you make. Music, history, poetry, is the here and the now (or "then" in history). Philosophy is the "what the hell".
-------------
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 19:48
^ Actually true. Because it's all connected. All art has connections to philosophy. We would be robots without it. Our art would suck.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:17
What?
-------------
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:38
All great artists have their own philosophies that are the fiber that makes their art breath life. No philosophy. No breath.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:57
The T wrote:
A song change a person's life? I'm not too clear on the possibilities of that.
Not sure who it was here but someone said Revealing Science of God by Yes made him think about going into a different carreer.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 20:58
Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:
dr wu23 wrote:
"Heroes hands drain stones for blood To whet the scaling knife. Magi blind with visions light Net death in dread of life. Their children kneel in jesus till They learn the price of nails; Whilst all around our mother earth Waits balanced on the scales."
To me very evocative stuff.
Whereas to me it reads as complete bollocks and I'm a huge KC fan. I guess mileage varies.
Well...you just don't understand it then.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:01
The T wrote:
Wow, philosophy has a life of its own. It's self-sustaining.
Yes..just like politics and progressive rock websites.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: dr wu23
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:03
Larree wrote:
^ Actually true. Because it's all connected. All art has connections to philosophy. We would be robots without it. Our art would suck.
Spot on......but the material reductionists simply don't get that,,, or don't want to.
To them it's all just hardwired brain cells, etc etc....nothing to see here move on.
------------- One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:04
And music does a lot more than "just" entertain me. If all I wanted was entertainment I would watch one of those music star game shows.
------------- http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website
Posted By: progbethyname
Date Posted: May 17 2013 at 21:15
Larree wrote:
If we had no philosophy, history, fictional stories, poetry, or music - yes, music (Because we would not have music either if we did not have the other stuff.) - we would not be conscious of anything except the here and now. Nothing wrong with here and now, but like I said... if we only had the here and now that would put us on the same level as farm animals. We would simply be some other creature's food.
Exactly. f**king boring coputers with meat. I'd say it would be pretty hard to reach Into that inspiration bag and pull out something decent if we had no philosophy. Philosophy is the 'logos' and epistemology of how we disect our beings as a whole. What could be more interesting other than prog of course!?