Print Page | Close Window

What kind of music do you improvise to and how?

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: Music and Musicians Exchange
Forum Description: Talk with and get feedback from other musicians on the site
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=91028
Printed Date: November 23 2024 at 04:13
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: What kind of music do you improvise to and how?
Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Subject: What kind of music do you improvise to and how?
Date Posted: December 12 2012 at 15:27
A few years ago I would just improvise to ADII's "Soap Shop Rock" (what a dumb idea on my part 'cause there is not much room for me to stretch out on the electric guitar) and Floyd's "Echoes" and "I'm A King Bee". Nowadays, I would just improvise on the electric guitar to mostly classic rock and classic prog. So far, I'm a failure, although I do think I've stumbled on some intriguing ideas while playing over the same chords from the middle of Yes' "Astral Traveller" (where Mr. Peter Banks gets to stretch out), Gm and C (although I think that on the track it's not actually a C but something else).

Are you a guitarist? A keyboardist? An oboist? A tubist? What tracks do you improvise to? By whom?

EDIT: I've extended the premise of the thread a little bit. Given that I struggle with improvisation, I want to know what the people here think about when they improvise. (It really is a shame that I haven't put that in my OP early on. Damn me. )



Replies:
Posted By: Ambient Hurricanes
Date Posted: December 12 2012 at 15:30
I improvise without accompaniment a lot when I'm practicing or just messing around on the guitar.  When I really want to practice my soloing skills, I will usually record myself playing the chords to whatever jazz song I'm learning at the time and then solo over that.

-------------
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: December 12 2012 at 15:48
When it comes to straight up improv.,  I don't listen to anything I just give into it and play alone.  I usually make more interesting music that way on keyboard than guitar.  I can't do chords for sh*t.  But I like to pick up the acoustic and play along to whatever I'm hearing.  I don't try to mimic or riff off of guitar parts necessarily.   Keyboard and synth I usually just improv solo.  I love keyboard synth because how you play the keyboard is dependent on the patch set you are using.


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Sumdeus
Date Posted: December 12 2012 at 16:06
I pretty much always improvise, or rather 'jam' when playing guitar so anything. if there's other music or sounds going on i will improvise to them but if not i will still jam.

-------------
http://sumdeus.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - Sumdeus - surreal space/psych/prog journeys


Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: December 12 2012 at 16:08
I don't know how to play any instrument, but I like to grab the guitar and "improvise" alongside jazz guys like Benson, Green and Montgomery. It's fun, but for those who listen, it's a piece of crap hehe.


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: December 12 2012 at 16:21
I like to jam along to Phish, because some of their jams can go on for 40-50 minutes sometimes, though they're usually 10-20 minutes tops. Some Zappa jams, or funk bands are good too. I also, if in the mood, will improvise along with jazz like post-bop, cool, and hard bop stuff.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: awaken77
Date Posted: December 13 2012 at 05:12
I love to jam on keyboards (mostly Hammond simulation)

My common play list:

Boston - Foreplay
Procol Harum - White Shade Of Pale
Pink Floyd - parts from Shine On You Crazy Diamond, Have A Cigar, Great Gig In the Sky (piano)
Transatlantic - Rose Colored Glasses
Santana - Soul Sacrifice
Booker T and the MGs - Green Onions
Niacin - everything (just cool to jam with)
Manfred Mann's Earth Band - Father of day (Moog/organ) 
Jon Lord & Hoochie Coochie Men - Back at the chicken shack





Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: December 13 2012 at 07:04
I never thought of jamming something else. I always just jam by myself. Sometimes I'll loop a chord progression on my delay or use my Electro-Harmonix Freeze or a drum machine.


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: December 13 2012 at 08:05
I'll sometimes practice guitar while listening to something else, and it's usually some drifting Krautrock kind of stuff, like Agitation Free.   I prefer to explore different modes over a single chord.  I don't have much ability to do more than that.

-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: zerothehero76
Date Posted: December 13 2012 at 08:25
I usually loop my bass and jam with myself. And sometimes I record everything.


Posted By: awaken77
Date Posted: December 13 2012 at 08:47
there is an e-store karaoke-version , which provide customizable and downloadable cover tracks to play with
when you buy one track, you can download unlimited versions of it, creating your own "minus-guitar" or "minus-keyboard", "minus-vocal" or other version 







Posted By: Polymorphia
Date Posted: December 13 2012 at 09:02
I improv over loops all the time. It's part of how I write. 


Posted By: Negoba
Date Posted: January 03 2013 at 12:43
Long ago, I would just put on blues albums and do my best to jam along. The two "Best of Chess Blues" are great intro samplers.
 
Also many hours to the Black Crowes first two albums just improving solos.
 
Now with a looper in virtually every multi-pedal, it's so easy to jam to chord progressions. That's my main tool now. (Sir Duke by Stevie Wonder is my current jam)


-------------
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.


Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: January 04 2013 at 11:12
I improvise to Miles Davis Bitches Brew, Jean Luc Ponty;s "Don't let the World Pass You By" with the band or Gypsy Queen where I get more into improvising reflections of John McLaughlin than Santana.I tend to play almost everything note for note for examples a daily routine is to play along with Echidna's Art (of you)....Don't you ever wash that thing? by Zappa. I'm always learning George Duke piano solo's on the guitar and adding his vocabulary to my improvisation. I tend to learn Pat Metheny pieces and I believe he might be a huge influence on my playing. I am not the greatest at playing outside the melody off the top of my head and my level of performance depends on the chord progression chosen by the band. I still have an influence of Steve Hillage in my playing or maybe Frank Marino. I like to think for myself when I improvise and over the years I have released or disregarded various approaches to my reflections of other players. Some days I spend hours playing Classical guitar or learning 14th century Asian music to escape the craft.


Posted By: Pawned Heart
Date Posted: January 15 2013 at 02:55
The radio! 
I also like taking my guitar to the early Dylan records and do fills and such, like whoever recorded the 12 string on Mr Tambourine man. 


-------------
What I see I know is real, what I touch I know I feel
If I don't care for what you say, it won't mean much to me today

http://www.proga


Posted By: Terra Australis
Date Posted: January 16 2013 at 23:36
Something that hasn't been mentioned is open night Jams. I spent many years going to blues open nights and jamming with other musicians, it helps a lot especially when there is an audience to drive your concentration. 

Jamming by yourself is good too. 


-------------
Allomerus. Music with progressive intent.

http://allomerus.bandcamp.com" rel="nofollow - http://allomerus.bandcamp.com


Posted By: Ludjak
Date Posted: January 17 2013 at 06:25
I prefer improvising with a group (which very often turns into hours of jamming, leaving us no time to work on any of our compositions). When alone, I improvise on the guitar usually around folk melodies, it has a very calming effect on me.


Posted By: mecindylewis
Date Posted: January 28 2013 at 06:01
If you really believe in marriage, then stop fighting gay marriage and start fighting straight divorce.


Posted By: jasonofthestorm
Date Posted: February 21 2013 at 03:03
I haven't been practicing improvising very much, but sometimes I like to pop in Miles Davis' Live-Evil and jam along to the first couple tracks. It has some really relaxed, slow grooves with plenty of room to noodle around, and the progressions are easy enough to experiment over without sounding 'off.'

...and then John McLaughlin shreds my face off and I throw my guitar out the window... Confused


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: February 21 2013 at 10:14


Posted By: Fox On The Rocks
Date Posted: March 24 2013 at 11:14
Lately I've been jamming to this:


Not too hard. I think it stays in one key throughout the whole song, so no biggie there. You can get some nice Lydian in there as well.


-------------


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: March 24 2013 at 16:30
I've started improvising to peyote music


Posted By: Stool Man
Date Posted: March 24 2013 at 18:04
I don't improvise to anything - I just make it up as I go along

-------------
rotten hound of the burnie crew


Posted By: Larree
Date Posted: March 24 2013 at 18:31
When I was learning guitar I jammed along with everything.  But the album I jammed with the most was...

Allman Brothers Band Live at Fillmore East






-------------
http://larree.ws" rel="nofollow - The Larree (dot) Website


Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: April 03 2013 at 09:42
I jam a lot with the drummer in our cover band. He plays a Chad Wakerman/Chester Thompson kind of style ..yet he's never listened to Zappa. When the 2 female vocalists are taking a break, we attempt to play instrumental Jazz/fusion and it's flowing nicely with our bassist who works the orchestra pit part time. I have this "Chamber Rock" piece I've been working on for years and some new material in the Jazz/Fusion vain, a band member owns the studio/rehearsal room in his mansion, I could be laying these tracks down, but time won't allow it. It's a cover band and I need the money. We have between 3 to 4 different light shows, 5 P.A.'s, trucks, and the gigs are already booked for 2 months. Every musician/vocalist in the band has 30 years experience in the business. It's high pressured and so..we sometimes jam at practice, but it's half work which requires you to tow the line for other people's high ideals and half play time with instrumentals. We jam on "Scatterbrain" , but it's boring as hell and I'm jaded with it because it's been in my face the whole of my life. Now we are playing Jean Luc Ponty instead of jamming or "Birds Of Fire", "Steaming Pipes" by Happy the Man..which is what Im luring the bass player and drummer into doing. I play the violin parts and Kit Watkins keyboard parts on guitar, the drums and bass are spot on, but where is this all going? Even if the 3 of us sounded like the Brand X trio on Manifest Destiny ..who would care? Why would people, generally speaking, care anything whatsoever about music like this? It takes from my time needed to compose ..except it's worse today because you're walking on egg shells to slip in an instrumental progressive piece between juke box garbage. Years ago you had the freedom to play something obscure in a venue and people ate it requesting more. Shocked 


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: April 03 2013 at 10:07
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

I jam a lot with the drummer in our cover band. He plays a Chad Wakerman/Chester Thompson kind of style ..yet he's never listened to Zappa. When the 2 female vocalists are taking a break, we attempt to play instrumental Jazz/fusion and it's flowing nicely with our bassist who works the orchestra pit part time. I have this "Chamber Rock" piece I've been working on for years and some new material in the Jazz/Fusion vain, a band member owns the studio/rehearsal room in his mansion, I could be laying these tracks down, but time won't allow it. It's a cover band and I need the money. We have between 3 to 4 different light shows, 5 P.A.'s, trucks, and the gigs are already booked for 2 months. Every musician/vocalist in the band has 30 years experience in the business. It's high pressured and so..we sometimes jam at practice, but it's half work which requires you to tow the line for other people's high ideals and half play time with instrumentals. We jam on "Scatterbrain" , but it's boring as hell and I'm jaded with it because it's been in my face the whole of my life. Now we are playing Jean Luc Ponty instead of jamming or "Birds Of Fire", "Steaming Pipes" by Happy the Man..which is what Im luring the bass player and drummer into doing. I play the violin parts and Kit Watkins keyboard parts on guitar, the drums and bass are spot on, but where is this all going? Even if the 3 of us sounded like the Brand X trio on Manifest Destiny ..who would care? Why would people, generally speaking, care anything whatsoever about music like this? It takes from my time needed to compose ..except it's worse today because you're walking on egg shells to slip in an instrumental progressive piece between juke box garbage. Years ago you had the freedom to play something obscure in a venue and people ate it requesting more. Shocked 
I feel your frustration.  I've been in a band for 8 years, but we're only just starting to seek "real" gigs, i.e. ones that pay money.  I'm learning that for the most part, people only will pay for you to play if you're going to "entertain", that is, play Margaritaville for a pool party or Mustang Sally for all the baby boomers.  We've been playing obscure covers for fun for years, and have had a couple of good gigs playing new original material, but most of the offers we get are to basically provide background music for a party.  If we're playing for free (which we're trying to minimize, as it's a huge undertaking to lug all our gear and PA there), then we can feel free to play whatever we want, but if we're getting paid.... it somehow behooves us to play the kind of show the person with the money wants.  Like you, I have some fairly unusual new material bubbling around in my head, but in the end, who cares?  Why am I doing this?


-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: April 04 2013 at 04:40
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

I jam a lot with the drummer in our cover band. He plays a Chad Wakerman/Chester Thompson kind of style ..yet he's never listened to Zappa. When the 2 female vocalists are taking a break, we attempt to play instrumental Jazz/fusion and it's flowing nicely with our bassist who works the orchestra pit part time. I have this "Chamber Rock" piece I've been working on for years and some new material in the Jazz/Fusion vain, a band member owns the studio/rehearsal room in his mansion, I could be laying these tracks down, but time won't allow it. It's a cover band and I need the money. We have between 3 to 4 different light shows, 5 P.A.'s, trucks, and the gigs are already booked for 2 months. Every musician/vocalist in the band has 30 years experience in the business. It's high pressured and so..we sometimes jam at practice, but it's half work which requires you to tow the line for other people's high ideals and half play time with instrumentals. We jam on "Scatterbrain" , but it's boring as hell and I'm jaded with it because it's been in my face the whole of my life. Now we are playing Jean Luc Ponty instead of jamming or "Birds Of Fire", "Steaming Pipes" by Happy the Man..which is what Im luring the bass player and drummer into doing. I play the violin parts and Kit Watkins keyboard parts on guitar, the drums and bass are spot on, but where is this all going? Even if the 3 of us sounded like the Brand X trio on Manifest Destiny ..who would care? Why would people, generally speaking, care anything whatsoever about music like this? It takes from my time needed to compose ..except it's worse today because you're walking on egg shells to slip in an instrumental progressive piece between juke box garbage. Years ago you had the freedom to play something obscure in a venue and people ate it requesting more. Shocked 
I feel your frustration.  I've been in a band for 8 years, but we're only just starting to seek "real" gigs, i.e. ones that pay money.  I'm learning that for the most part, people only will pay for you to play if you're going to "entertain", that is, play Margaritaville for a pool party or Mustang Sally for all the baby boomers.  We've been playing obscure covers for fun for years, and have had a couple of good gigs playing new original material, but most of the offers we get are to basically provide background music for a party.  If we're playing for free (which we're trying to minimize, as it's a huge undertaking to lug all our gear and PA there), then we can feel free to play whatever we want, but if we're getting paid.... it somehow behooves us to play the kind of show the person with the money wants.  Like you, I have some fairly unusual new material bubbling around in my head, but in the end, who cares?  Why am I doing this?
 
 
I think we are both doing this because we have nothing else in life to substitute the pain/agony we feel when we deprive ourselves of playing live..whether that may be doing covers or originals it does not matter. The numbness or jaded affect it can have compares to the feeling one gets when he/she is past the point of starvation and their stomach has shrunk...Yet who wants to wake up every day and have the same routine?  If I perform till 3:00 Am ..at least it changes reality around me and when I wake up the next day, it doesn't feel like life has a rope around my neck. I would rather mow the lawn Sunday morning remembering that a few drunks liked my playing the night before than to have spent my evening channel surfing through garbage on T.V....I know it is pathetic to enjoy lame credit or gratification , but sometimes it's better than staring at the 4 walls or working toward a goal which is not practical and ending up in the same swamp in Hell as Vincent Crane.Shocked


Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: April 04 2013 at 05:22
I never played well enough to gig seriously so when I played with my friends it was only for our personal fun and enjoyment, no pressures.
We did not jam much, we tended to work on clearly structured covers with little if any improvisation, but when we did jam it was mostly on the background progressions of some prog classic such as the soloing sections of Floyd's Time or Comfortably Numb, Rush's Xanadu, Yes Hold On, Marillion's Script or Jigsaw and stuff like that. We just went into the soloing section and kept extending it until nothing decent came out anymore or we burst into laughter or exhaustion.


Posted By: HolyMoly
Date Posted: April 04 2013 at 07:23
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

I jam a lot with the drummer in our cover band. He plays a Chad Wakerman/Chester Thompson kind of style ..yet he's never listened to Zappa. When the 2 female vocalists are taking a break, we attempt to play instrumental Jazz/fusion and it's flowing nicely with our bassist who works the orchestra pit part time. I have this "Chamber Rock" piece I've been working on for years and some new material in the Jazz/Fusion vain, a band member owns the studio/rehearsal room in his mansion, I could be laying these tracks down, but time won't allow it. It's a cover band and I need the money. We have between 3 to 4 different light shows, 5 P.A.'s, trucks, and the gigs are already booked for 2 months. Every musician/vocalist in the band has 30 years experience in the business. It's high pressured and so..we sometimes jam at practice, but it's half work which requires you to tow the line for other people's high ideals and half play time with instrumentals. We jam on "Scatterbrain" , but it's boring as hell and I'm jaded with it because it's been in my face the whole of my life. Now we are playing Jean Luc Ponty instead of jamming or "Birds Of Fire", "Steaming Pipes" by Happy the Man..which is what Im luring the bass player and drummer into doing. I play the violin parts and Kit Watkins keyboard parts on guitar, the drums and bass are spot on, but where is this all going? Even if the 3 of us sounded like the Brand X trio on Manifest Destiny ..who would care? Why would people, generally speaking, care anything whatsoever about music like this? It takes from my time needed to compose ..except it's worse today because you're walking on egg shells to slip in an instrumental progressive piece between juke box garbage. Years ago you had the freedom to play something obscure in a venue and people ate it requesting more. Shocked 
I feel your frustration.  I've been in a band for 8 years, but we're only just starting to seek "real" gigs, i.e. ones that pay money.  I'm learning that for the most part, people only will pay for you to play if you're going to "entertain", that is, play Margaritaville for a pool party or Mustang Sally for all the baby boomers.  We've been playing obscure covers for fun for years, and have had a couple of good gigs playing new original material, but most of the offers we get are to basically provide background music for a party.  If we're playing for free (which we're trying to minimize, as it's a huge undertaking to lug all our gear and PA there), then we can feel free to play whatever we want, but if we're getting paid.... it somehow behooves us to play the kind of show the person with the money wants.  Like you, I have some fairly unusual new material bubbling around in my head, but in the end, who cares?  Why am I doing this?
 
 
I think we are both doing this because we have nothing else in life to substitute the pain/agony we feel when we deprive ourselves of playing live..whether that may be doing covers or originals it does not matter. The numbness or jaded affect it can have compares to the feeling one gets when he/she is past the point of starvation and their stomach has shrunk...Yet who wants to wake up every day and have the same routine?  If I perform till 3:00 Am ..at least it changes reality around me and when I wake up the next day, it doesn't feel like life has a rope around my neck. I would rather mow the lawn Sunday morning remembering that a few drunks liked my playing the night before than to have spent my evening channel surfing through garbage on T.V....I know it is pathetic to enjoy lame credit or gratification , but sometimes it's better than staring at the 4 walls or working toward a goal which is not practical and ending up in the same swamp in Hell as Vincent Crane.Shocked
I think you're right.  I feel kind of listless when we don't have a gig we're working towards.


-------------
My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran


Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: April 04 2013 at 10:02
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

I jam a lot with the drummer in our cover band. He plays a Chad Wakerman/Chester Thompson kind of style ..yet he's never listened to Zappa. When the 2 female vocalists are taking a break, we attempt to play instrumental Jazz/fusion and it's flowing nicely with our bassist who works the orchestra pit part time. I have this "Chamber Rock" piece I've been working on for years and some new material in the Jazz/Fusion vain, a band member owns the studio/rehearsal room in his mansion, I could be laying these tracks down, but time won't allow it. It's a cover band and I need the money. We have between 3 to 4 different light shows, 5 P.A.'s, trucks, and the gigs are already booked for 2 months. Every musician/vocalist in the band has 30 years experience in the business. It's high pressured and so..we sometimes jam at practice, but it's half work which requires you to tow the line for other people's high ideals and half play time with instrumentals. We jam on "Scatterbrain" , but it's boring as hell and I'm jaded with it because it's been in my face the whole of my life. Now we are playing Jean Luc Ponty instead of jamming or "Birds Of Fire", "Steaming Pipes" by Happy the Man..which is what Im luring the bass player and drummer into doing. I play the violin parts and Kit Watkins keyboard parts on guitar, the drums and bass are spot on, but where is this all going? Even if the 3 of us sounded like the Brand X trio on Manifest Destiny ..who would care? Why would people, generally speaking, care anything whatsoever about music like this? It takes from my time needed to compose ..except it's worse today because you're walking on egg shells to slip in an instrumental progressive piece between juke box garbage. Years ago you had the freedom to play something obscure in a venue and people ate it requesting more. Shocked 
I feel your frustration.  I've been in a band for 8 years, but we're only just starting to seek "real" gigs, i.e. ones that pay money.  I'm learning that for the most part, people only will pay for you to play if you're going to "entertain", that is, play Margaritaville for a pool party or Mustang Sally for all the baby boomers.  We've been playing obscure covers for fun for years, and have had a couple of good gigs playing new original material, but most of the offers we get are to basically provide background music for a party.  If we're playing for free (which we're trying to minimize, as it's a huge undertaking to lug all our gear and PA there), then we can feel free to play whatever we want, but if we're getting paid.... it somehow behooves us to play the kind of show the person with the money wants.  Like you, I have some fairly unusual new material bubbling around in my head, but in the end, who cares?  Why am I doing this?
 
 
I think we are both doing this because we have nothing else in life to substitute the pain/agony we feel when we deprive ourselves of playing live..whether that may be doing covers or originals it does not matter. The numbness or jaded affect it can have compares to the feeling one gets when he/she is past the point of starvation and their stomach has shrunk...Yet who wants to wake up every day and have the same routine?  If I perform till 3:00 Am ..at least it changes reality around me and when I wake up the next day, it doesn't feel like life has a rope around my neck. I would rather mow the lawn Sunday morning remembering that a few drunks liked my playing the night before than to have spent my evening channel surfing through garbage on T.V....I know it is pathetic to enjoy lame credit or gratification , but sometimes it's better than staring at the 4 walls or working toward a goal which is not practical and ending up in the same swamp in Hell as Vincent Crane.Shocked
I think you're right.  I feel kind of listless when we don't have a gig we're working towards.
 
What I find interesting is how some of the higher paying gigs are landed through sexual activity between a band member and an agent, manager, or club owner. There is networking, production, radio promotion and yet so many important gigs are landed that way. People want to touch another body just to reassure themselves they are not phantoms and they are vampires in the music business. Mofia and corporate criminal activity got the best of me. Maybe Tibet has the answer. Maybe we should all save our money and invest in an island where proggers meet for the weekend, playing prog through a huge sound system.


Posted By: cstack3
Date Posted: April 09 2013 at 11:02
Originally posted by jasonofthestorm jasonofthestorm wrote:

I haven't been practicing improvising very much, but sometimes I like to pop in Miles Davis' Live-Evil and jam along to the first couple tracks. It has some really relaxed, slow grooves with plenty of room to noodle around, and the progressions are easy enough to experiment over without sounding 'off.'

...and then John McLaughlin shreds my face off and I throw my guitar out the window... Confused

Ain't it the truth!!  I've had Holdsworth make me want to fling my Les Paul....

When I first was learning to play lead, I would put on a jazz-rock LP like Stanley Clarke's first solo album.  As you said, there was plenty of room to noodle around.  I don't improvise on bass much, mostly try to learn the songs note-for-note.  


Posted By: RyanElliott
Date Posted: April 16 2013 at 09:06
I pretty much improvise along with anything, I've done an array of different blues, Jazz gigs and have over the years tried broadening out my skills to deal with all the idioms required for each style. I guess the way to do it is just research every guitarist you like and incorporate it into your personal bag of improvisational tricks. 

When I do the prog gigs with my band, the majority is structured but when we do improvised sections it's all very organic and I try different things out every gig, incorporating jazz ideas, make a noise with effects pedals, shamelessly shred whilst trying to create a melody...it's all part of the fun!

Particular songs I have always loved improvising too though are Hendrix songs, The Pump by Jeff Beck/Larry Carlton/Lukather is a great one and any of Guthrie Govan's solo album is always a mind boggling challenge, that leaves you coming out of the other side feeling quite dizzy!  




Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: April 21 2013 at 17:03
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

...
Are you a guitarist? A keyboardist? An oboist? A tubist? What tracks do you improvise to? Are they other artists' tracks? What are those tracks?
 
NOTE: Very long and detailed rehearsal techniques! If you don't care for theater/film and how to possibly expand this to music, please do yourself a favor and skip it!
 
Gonna try this from a writing, and acting design. Acting, I have a lot of experience with working with actors and I can easily tell you I specialize in improvisation with them ... guided or ungiuded. As a writer, because everything I have tried has helped me write and change what I write and HOW.
 
Exercise: (Couple hours needed for a short script!) (For actors in a scene of two - let's say) ... (and then I will adjust this for musicians!)
 
Find a dark space. Sit. Or lay down.
 
Go through the whole scene/act by just reading the lines ... do not worry about anything else.
When done relax.
 
Now, go quietly in your head through the movement that you can do with each line as you go through the whole scene. Stay in order and focused on the continuity ... usually takes a little "discipline" ... in your notes later you will find that you wanted to get around and do something else when you had to go here or there and say X.  When finished relax.
 
Now go through the script with your partner -- in character -- but concentrate on the VISUAL side of things you are doing, so you can see yourself and your partner move on the stage. Concentrate on "watching" your partner (instead of yourself like you did the exercise before!). You are STILL siting down during this exercise ... this is about your "visual" part of things.
 
When done relax
 
Now go ahead, get up and do the whole scene/act with your partner ... silently ... just the physical motions all the way to the end of the scene. Concentrate on what you think might be the best expression now that you can not say a word of it! You are still siting in the corner!!!!!
 
When done shake it off ... relax and smile ...
   
Now, at the end of these two hours, doing a full rehearsal is counter productive, and you want to just go home, relax and come back fresh tomorrow ... and when you do the rehearsal tomorrow, notice how the concentration and attention to detail has gotten so very strong ... that it makes the whole thing better all around ...
   
For writing, for me, the only problem I might have is that any "writer's block" for me is more about ... I want to do something else, and I feel trapped. Thus free forming it, is best ... and I have a lot of things that I have no idea what to do with ... and sometimes they meet something else, and sometimes they don't ... every artist has that problem ... so I'm quite ok with that.
  
Music ... a guitarist ... I do this with my bass, btw.
 
I have DIFFERENT aptitude in music that I can not describe. So I will accept that it is possible that some of this might not work, but I have tried it a couple of times with a few people and parts of it worked.
   
Music, just like writing, to ME, is less about my "mechanics", so conversely, in a musician it would be less about the notes and the chords. Ex: ... a lot of music is "pre-defined" as sad or happy. But did you know that Bach intentionally composed things in different keys to disprove that? Like wise ... this is the strongest and most important premise in this exercise ... to define that detail FOR YOURSELF ... not about music, not about notes ... or ideas ... and hopefully, you will find a thread that helps you "listen" so deeply, that you automatically KNOW what to do and use all the time ... and this, inadvertantly or not, is usually the differentce between the great ones and the rest ... they have learned to "fly" (it really is that!) with their sight and vision and thoughts ... and this is not something that you can define in "notes and chords" until AFTER you did it ... it's sort of like the pretention of class room composing that you will compose a small piece on the piano that shows you crying from beginning to the end ... you can't do it ... until "after" it happens and you lived through it.
   
Requirements: 25 different sound effects, one each from the 3rd track of each LP from the BBC sound effects library. Or the 4th. Or the 5th!
   
Now here comes the pudding! You arm your guitar ... no effect needed ... and play the 1st sound effect ... and try to blend the guitar playing to it. Try it again ... You're gonna get frustrated. Try it again ... STOP. Put the guitar down and go take a walk around the block. Have your smoke -- avoid drugs for these exercises! Now try it again, and you will find a few notes and sounds to go with it. Ok ... now you can create some sequences around that vacuum cleaner sound. Cool ... that was fun ... Do it again! Now play the 2nd effect. Oops ... a saw? ... and you will have the same problem.  Keep it going as much as you can.
   
The essence, you will soon find, is that you are "listening" to what is OUTSIDE YOU, and this will make you a much better musician in a group ... because you now can see/know what others are doing, and it will make it easier for you to accentuate and define a moment with the folks you play with.
   
Do the next exercise ... and as time goes by, these become fun and a challenge ... but you can NOT know what the next effect is ... it has to be a surprise -- which works best.
    
Next day, in silence, start playing something that you might have remembered that you did with a sound effect ... and it will feel like you "know" that part ... and you will be able to develop it some. You might even distort and break apart the exercise sound and speed it up and down and drop it on the ground or slow it down to a halt! ... and guess what ... you stayed with it the whole time.
   
In the end, what all these exercises do is help you pay attention to YOURSELF even better than you thought you might have been able to, or understood. It also takes away the "self-consciousness" that goes with the majority of actors on stage and 85% of all the musicians I have ever seen in my life ... even Damo Suzuki, was not "free" on stage doing what he is good at ... he was "trapped" in a time warp! And musicians that could not help him, and take an idea out of town and create something new!
   
My problem about improvising around sceles or songs? ... WTF ... is like telling me to go improvise around Prufrock ... or Shakespeare ... and that's stupid ... you either have an idea of what you want to do in an improvisation or it is NOT an improvisation ... and too many musicians have this strange notion that they can find more "hidden chord" and one more "hidden note" somewhere behind the song you are improvising on ... and that's -- in my book -- a waste ... why? ... it's not your song, and you can't change it!
    
So, create your own ... improvisation. Anything is a good enough start to help you figure it out ... but the only thing that matters is how much you stick to it and how much you learn from it ... and in general for me ... I do not improvise on "Prufrock" ... because there is nothing to find over there that matters anymore!
    
Hope this helps ... and this whole write up is ... a "do" thing ... and not a material thing that can be discerned in the mind, as parts of it might have to be adjusted while doing it ... which we did in the acting exercises, and I would help with the guitar examples.


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: April 21 2013 at 17:09
Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

I've started improvising to peyote music
 
This would work great if you were at the big pow wow's that got us the early Amon Duul stuff ... or a really good Grateful Dead powow ... that the members themselves used to join in for fun!
 
Hehe!
 
Actually , this is still done, and I know 2 folks in California that still do these meditations and exercises, although one of them is vehemently against the drugs and would throw you out and not give you your money back within 5 minutes!
 
You don't need it. Your own body produces the best Lysergic there is via your Pineal Gland ... so why do you need substitutes?
 
But yeah ... I've had some good trips a lot of mescaline and acid in those days ... but I'm a veteran ... I quit it a long time ago, and I'm crazier now without it, than I was then with it!
 
Can't you tell?
 
BTW ... you can induce this in your dreams and meditations ... EASILY!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: ProgMetaller2112
Date Posted: April 24 2013 at 03:20
This thread should be renamed and called "What music do you jizz to" Tongue. On the subject of improvising, I always try to improvising while jamming with the guitar in an attempt to catch a new sound. I don't use any music to improvise to, I just play whatever comes to mind. That's when improv is good  Wink

-------------
“War is peace.

Freedom is slavery.

Ignorance is strength.”

― George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four



"Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk Hand in Hand"- Neil Peart





Posted By: Eduardito
Date Posted: May 01 2013 at 06:25
This music is very rare. In fact it is our first test with some loops.

http://www.tav.net/acustica-musical/rivel-rivel.mp3" rel="nofollow - http://www.tav.net/acustica-musical/rivel-rivel.mp3 .
We want to make music with you ....


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: May 01 2013 at 14:54
Originally posted by ProgMetaller2112 ProgMetaller2112 wrote:

This thread should be renamed and called "What music do you jizz to" Tongue. On the subject of improvising, I always try to improvising while jamming with the guitar in an attempt to catch a new soun. I don't use any music to improvise to, I just play whatever comes to mind. That's when improv is good  Wink
 
Some of the rehearsals I did with folks got funny and weird ... but it really helped. So, if you caught me walking through the middle of your rehearsal with a vacuum cleaner ... you better not drop the ball! ... and that was the point ... you do not have to drop anything, and in fact, you can actually bend it to accomodate a different step or two or funny second or two that fits!
 
And, generally, for me, this is the part that a lot of "new music" is missing ... it is soooooooooo hogtied ... ooopppsss dawtied that the folks playing it don't even realized how jailed they are to that meter, instead of the reality, beauty, ugliness, and whatever other feelings you had in that specific second of time ... which is where the majority of creativity comes from ... but you end up learning more about "continuity" and "musicality" than sometimes we give ourselves credit for ... but I guarantee you that it will take you away from the DAW and help the band tremendously!
 
Well, at the very least we wold have a Faust a la Faust now! But I think we would be better than them!
 
Many folks improv themselves on a sound ... The Edge does ... Robert Fripp does ... and many others ... but even then, working off sound effects, after a while you tell yourself some damn thing like ... the next time I hear that saw, that pedal with this much ___________ is gonna get a workout! And at that point, it is fun to play around with things!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: twseel
Date Posted: May 18 2013 at 04:14
Originally posted by mecindylewis mecindylewis wrote:

If you really believe in marriage, then stop fighting gay marriage and start fighting straight divorce.
^ Is anyone seeing this too?Stern Smile


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 18 2013 at 11:04
^ That's why, if you look carefully, it was marked as spam.


Posted By: twseel
Date Posted: May 18 2013 at 11:07
I just looked again, and I can't find the word 'spam' added anywhere...


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: May 18 2013 at 11:09
^ It's in the user info section of his post, under five stars "not as bright as ... spam".


Posted By: twseel
Date Posted: May 18 2013 at 11:11
Ooooooooohhh, ah, I see now, sorry.
She does make a valid point though.


Posted By: twseel
Date Posted: May 18 2013 at 11:12
Back to topic


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: May 25 2013 at 17:20
Originally posted by cstack3 cstack3 wrote:

Originally posted by jasonofthestorm jasonofthestorm wrote:

I haven't been practicing improvising very much, but sometimes I like to pop in Miles Davis' Live-Evil and jam along to the first couple tracks. It has some really relaxed, slow grooves with plenty of room to noodle around, and the progressions are easy enough to experiment over without sounding 'off.'

...and then John McLaughlin shreds my face off and I throw my guitar out the window... Confused

Ain't it the truth!!  I've had Holdsworth make me want to fling my Les Paul....

When I first was learning to play lead, I would put on a jazz-rock LP like Stanley Clarke's first solo album.  As you said, there was plenty of room to noodle around.  I don't improvise on bass much, mostly try to learn the songs note-for-note.  
 
You know what? .... that's sad!
 
You should be inspired, and not compare your ability to his ability ... and you feeling inferior, only tells you that the majority of music teachers you ever had were idiots that only knew how to put down people, not help them love and understand and appreciate the beauty in music ... which has nothing to do with what Jon does, and you don't!
 
Except that (I don't think) you believe in yourself enough to become ... music! With no self in between, which is what someone like Jon does so well! It's the nature of his studies, btw!  But that's too mystical a discussion that most folks would not appreciate here!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 04 2013 at 20:51
Just been improvising to Soft Machine's "As If" ... in this heat. Jesus, maybe improv ain't my thing. I know all the basics, but I guess I haven't been doing it enough.


Posted By: faviovilla
Date Posted: October 24 2013 at 22:41
I started jammin over miles davis recordings and charlie parker, but now i knnnow something more about changes and that they weren't just playing scales haha


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: October 25 2013 at 09:17
Standards normally, or my own stuff

-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: The.Crimson.King
Date Posted: October 25 2013 at 15:19
I spend hours playing along with the chord progression from King Crimson's Exiles...D  C  Bm  Am Bowdown

-------------
https://wytchcrypt.wixsite.com/mutiny-in-jonestown" rel="nofollow - Mutiny in Jonestown : Progressive Rock Since 1987


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: October 25 2013 at 15:42
Thumbs Up ... Something like:

D C D C Bm Am
D C D C B [coda]


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: October 25 2013 at 17:04
Giant Steps is always a good laugh as well

-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: The.Crimson.King
Date Posted: October 26 2013 at 18:28
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Thumbs Up ... Something like:

D C D C Bm Am
D C D C B [coda]

Ya, I just set up my Motif to play the bass/drums/mellotron of the D C D C Bm Am indefinitely then quit when I start repeating my solo too much...sometimes I last 5 minutes, sometimes an hour LOL


-------------
https://wytchcrypt.wixsite.com/mutiny-in-jonestown" rel="nofollow - Mutiny in Jonestown : Progressive Rock Since 1987


Posted By: coffeeintheface
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 00:51
One fun way to improvise is when you're sitting on the couch with the TV on and hear a random commercial's music, or the soundtrack to a movie or show. I've had random moments of spontaneity like that that have been really awesome


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 01:58
^ Ooh, there's no way I'd be able to improvise to commercial tunes. Not much to go on to. I need to feel the chords. Maybe the chord progression needs to sound great before I pick up my guitar.

By the way, I've changed something in the thread's OP:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

EDIT: I've extended the premise of the thread a little bit. Given that I struggle with improvisation, I want to know what the lads here think about when they improvise. (It really is a shame that I haven't put that in my OP early on. Damn me.


Posted By: PC-72
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 01:59
Launch analog sequencer, have the polysynth hold a relevant minor chord. Either that or put multitracks of some old thing of my own and mute all the leads. I avoid improvising to pieces of music I haven't at least been involved in, both out of principle and out of extreme paranoia of accidental plagiarism down the road.

-------------
A negative number was raised to a power that is not an integer.


Posted By: coffeeintheface
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 02:03
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

^ Ooh, there's no way I'd be able to improvise to commercial tunes. Not much to go on to. I need to feel the chords. Maybe the chord progression needs to sound great before I pick up my guitar.

By the way, I've changed something in the thread's OP:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

EDIT: I've extended the premise of the thread a little bit. Given that I struggle with improvisation, I want to know what the lads here think about when they improvise. (It really is a shame that I haven't put that in my OP early on. Damn me.


Ever tried looking up the commercial on Youtube? Changes are you'll find it.

I think it may have been an infomercial I improvised on - like a long 30 minute one haha. More to chew on there!


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 02:04
Originally posted by PC-72 PC-72 wrote:

Launch analog sequencer, have the polysynth hold a relevant minor chord. Either that or put multitracks of some old thing of my own and mute all the leads. I avoid improvising to pieces of music I haven't at least been involved in, both out of principle and out of extreme paranoia of accidental plagiarism down the road.
Nice. But what are you thinking about while you are improvising? I've skimmed through an article about a saxophonist who has a lot of chords burned into his brain so that he knows what chord is coming next in a composition before he determines how to solo over it. What little technical things do you think about?


Posted By: coffeeintheface
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 02:05
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

By the way, I've changed something in the thread's OP:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

EDIT: I've extended the premise of the thread a little bit. Given that I struggle with improvisation, I want to know what the lads here think about when they improvise. (It really is a shame that I haven't put that in my OP early on. Damn me.


I try and enter whatever emotion is boiling underneath at the given moment, whether it's rage at a sh*tty day, sadness from something I read, etc. I really just try and let it seep out musically.

I try and be honest about those feelings too, as I'm playing


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 02:10
^ So, basically it's noodling without any knowledge about the music, correct? ... I tried doing that.

What technical concepts do you use when you improvise? Do you know scales?


Posted By: coffeeintheface
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 02:14
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

^ So, basically it's noodling without any knowledge about the music, correct? ... I tried doing that.

What technical concepts do you use when you improvise? Do you know scales?


I mess around until I find a note that sounds right, then I either noodle some more or mess around with scale/mode patterns. I have basic knowledge of scales/modes but I mostly mess around and do it by ear


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 02:17
^ Have you ever tried playing dyads (two-note chords) in your solos every now and then? Like:

--------0----2----3---5------
--------0----------------------


Posted By: coffeeintheface
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 19:33
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

^ Have you ever tried playing dyads (two-note chords) in your solos every now and then? Like:

--------0----2----3---5------
--------0----------------------


Sometimes. More likely I just hit random chords


Posted By: PC-72
Date Posted: July 10 2014 at 21:07
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by PC-72 PC-72 wrote:

Launch analog sequencer, have the polysynth hold a relevant minor chord. Either that or put multitracks of some old thing of my own and mute all the leads. I avoid improvising to pieces of music I haven't at least been involved in, both out of principle and out of extreme paranoia of accidental plagiarism down the road.
Nice. But what are you thinking about while you are improvising? I've skimmed through an article about a saxophonist who has a lot of chords burned into his brain so that he knows what chord is coming next in a composition before he determines how to solo over it. What little technical things do you think about?


None! I'm usually just trying to think how I can put whatever story/image that is at hand in notes without making it so complicated I can't play it twice. Either that or trying to see what images come out of whatever I'm playing, again without making it so complicated I can't play it twice. Just musical brainstorming, in other words!

-------------
A negative number was raised to a power that is not an integer.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: July 11 2014 at 17:30



This tune is quite tough, but the changes are a dream to improvise over once you get your head around them. I'll post a video of my modest attempt at some point Embarrassed


-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 27 2014 at 17:52
^ Wow, I really don't know why my phone wouldn't fetch me the notification of your post; sorry I'm replying so late.

I find a lot of traditional, legendary jazz (and by this clumsy choice of words I mean avant-, modal, cool, hard bop, bebop - basically 'Trane and Miles' stuff) hard to follow. So much improvisation going on that it's hard to see a tune in a piece.  Embarrassed


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 27 2014 at 18:12
I'm going to say something that might be a lot of help to my fellow improvisers around here:

1) I think that it's important for a player first to figure out what style he is going to improvise in at any given time. If it's jazz, is it hard bop or traditional modal or fusion? ("Sub-genre" is the keyword here.)
2) Figure out the cliches that identify that style. Play something mannerist, imitative.
3) Pick a chord progression and get into its character/feel, even if it does sound boring, because you are going to make it more interesting.
4) If you can't play the instrument, start off with something simple. Your playing style will evolve over time. Don't get too ambitious.
5) Figure out the notes in a chord you see most effectiveI know blues and jazz musicians usually recommend relying often on the 1st (root), 3rd, and 7th tones, but there are times when they just don't work for me. I want to use something like b5th, 6th, b6th. A 5th sometimes works for me because it can extend the flow of a solo.
6) Resolution is important when you have to close a solo (you land on the root note or maybe even a 5th).
7) I've noticed that nearly all solos are made of separate phrases that are later on put together, and every phrase has its own character to it, its own rhythm, timing, pace, set of effective notes - a character, basically.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 27 2014 at 18:33
Here's a link to a clip (that was recorded about a year ago) that I think demonstrates perfectly how the life of a solo can be extended - just by adding distinctive phrases, i.e. where each phrase has a distinctive character to it (as mentioned in my previous post under no. 7). No one has ever told me that. All those pro's give you those little tools and methods that you can use to write a phrase. They will tell you what a chord is, what a scale is, what modes there are out there, what an arpeggio is, but they never told me how to just keep writing a solo, how to make it stand out, how to give it a character, how to breathe life into it.

Unfortunately, this is just an idea on how to write a solo. The challenge of improvisation seems like a much tougher beast to handle. I guess in this case I have to figure out the most effective notes for every chord and play around with them rhythmically.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: July 28 2014 at 04:59
I disagree with points 6 and 7 unfortunately Dayvenkirq. Resolution, for me, sounds a lot better on the 3rd or 7ths. But that's only if you want a bebop sound. If you want a more modern and colourful sound, resolving on a 9th, 11th (natural on a minor chord, sharpened on a major chord) or a 13th sounds really hip if you're playing something like a Kenny Wheeler tune. Also, with the separate phrases thing... It's true, phrases have their own identity, but I think it's important for the phrases to be a developing thing, so phrase 2 is a development or a result of phrase 1. I might add stress to the fact that the only difference I see between improvisation and composition is time boundaries. Improv is on the spot, whereas composition is over however much time you want to put into it. From this I deduce that a good improvisation has all the qualities that a good composition has, two of those qualities being unity and development.

The other 5 I definitely agree with however

-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 28 2014 at 11:55
^ I'll keep some of your points in mind.

So, you would argue that in addition to unity and development, ideally every solo should have phrases working in the call-and-response fashion.

I like messing around with that idea. E.g., call (in a bar), call (in a bar), response (in a bar), ... , response, response, call, response, ... . That actually may prompt for repeating a chord for another bar. But I guess for the beginner level you would have to stick with something simpler (call, response, call, response) so as not to confuse the other players and stay on the same page with them. Fortunately, I'm the only writer and player at my home, so I can stretch the context (the backing chord sequence) a little.

As you can see, my main concern here remains to be this: how not to waste every second of my solo time.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 09:02
Bill Evans covers some really good points in this video. I found it really helpful, maybe you will too.




-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 12:40
^ It appears that Bill is discussing the matter of perceiving the musical information in a solo from a player-as-a-listener point of view. This is covered within the framework of a piece written by somebody else. That's not my case. If I come up with a chord progression and play over it, I care about what I have to say, not what somebody else said. I'm not interested in repeating what someone else said. Bill's case seems to be how accurately you copy someone's solo. Correct me if I'm wrong.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 18:40
This is the eternal improvisation and composition debate, but I will ask you to give an example of any musical cell somewhere within Western music that isn't derivative somehow. In other words, everything anyone plays ever is copied from something, whether consciously or not. Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.

-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 19:12
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style? Like someone heard a collection of phrases that have a common character, grouped them, and gave them a genre name.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 19:19
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?


Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.


-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: SteveG
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 19:28
Usually by trying to copy something I heard and playing it wrong but liked what I came up with, so I would loop it and then play along to that with my guitar or keep the loop going and switch to bass.  Nothing serious, just for kicks.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 19:59
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?
Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.
Oops ... we've almost made this a conversation based on a different question - the question of style.

So, going back to my original question (or argument) of how to compose a phrase. The way I weave a solo is I string different phrases together, each phrase based on its own chord and placed in its own bar. One bar would feature a phrase that is a fast ascending scalar run. The bar after it would rely only on the root and 5th notes with an octave slide-up (since I play an electric guitar), executed economically, slowly. Two different phrases, each one has its own character. I don't know how other guys do it, but that's the gist I got.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: July 29 2014 at 20:05
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Usually by trying to copy something I heard and playing it wrong but liked what I came up with, so I would loop it and then play along to that with my guitar or keep the loop going and switch to bass.  Nothing serious, just for kicks.
So, as I understand, you come up with a chord progression (or a bass line) derived from somebody else's work. When you solo, do you just play random notes?


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: August 06 2014 at 22:46
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?
Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.
Oops ... we've almost made this a conversation based on a different question - the question of style.
So, going back to my original question (or argument) of how to compose a phrase. The way I weave a solo is I string different phrases together, each phrase based on its own chord and placed in its own bar. One bar would feature a phrase that is a fast ascending scalar run. The bar after it would rely only on the root and 5th notes with an octave slide-up (since I play an electric guitar), executed economically, slowly. Two different phrases, each one has its own character. I don't know how other guys do it, but that's the gist I got.
Very interesting. I've never caught on to chord based leads. It sounds like a burdensome approach to me. I just use scales and explore aspects of tension and resolution in a very free-form fashion. I know my scales very well, but thinking about chords is something I never do aside from throwing in an arpeggio here and there. Interestingly, I like to create rather complicated chord progressions, yet I've always been more successful soloing over more simple progressions. I ought to try incorporating some of your approach.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: August 07 2014 at 00:52
^ I believe any line is chord-based. Otherwise, where do you get your arpeggios from? Also, if you have an audio mix with a progression for the background and a solo for the foreground, can we hear it and see how you go about things? Many of my arpeggios sound boring. I don't know why. Even though Steve does make arpeggios sound complicated in execution on "... Moonlit Knight", I want to try something else, something even more challenging. I hear all those guitar players (Neil Young; Danny Whitten; Bruce Springsteen; Steely Dan-, Steven Wilson-, and Scott Walker- recruited guitar players) not relying on arpeggios and pulling some really good phrases. I might have not mentioned that I tend to use scalar runs, octave jumps, slides, reliance on principial notes (root, 3rd, and 5th), etc. I don't think about technical stuff like that, actually. For right now I don't want to let music theory replace my musical intuition, that channel of inspiration that tells me in my head what phrases would sound good against the given chords. I tend to think about how would another guitar player, a pro, do it. I'm an imitator, a listener, really. For the time being, I don't want to bother in trying to sound even 90% original, or anything close to that. I'll just imitate.

Below is a little taste of something that I've written in my Book of Phrases. Note that I have my own tab-writing style. I don't want to remember frets and strings. I want to remember what notes I'm playing. I want to know what my head is trying to tell me. I'm looking for patterns, the commonalities that my phrases share, the things that make those phrases sound so good.

(These are lines that were already played by the Steely Dan guitarists, Baxter and Dias, or one or the other. They are not mine.)

http://s360.photobucket.com/user/Armanaeus/media/2014-08-06223422.jpg.html" rel="nofollow">



This one has "LVS" in the upper right-hand corner. Guess what it stands for.

http://s360.photobucket.com/user/Armanaeus/media/2014-08-06223410.jpg.html" rel="nofollow">



These two sets of phrases are based on Wishbone Ash's chord changes from "Time Was", only they are a semitone down. I want to be able to get into the vibe, the mood of something different and boring and try on my own to breath life into it.

http://s360.photobucket.com/user/Armanaeus/media/2014-08-06223332.jpg.html" rel="nofollow">

http://s360.photobucket.com/user/Armanaeus/media/2014-08-06223340.jpg.html" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: August 07 2014 at 07:23
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?
Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.
Oops ... we've almost made this a conversation based on a different question - the question of style.

So, going back to my original question (or argument) of how to compose a phrase. The way I weave a solo is I string different phrases together, each phrase based on its own chord and placed in its own bar. One bar would feature a phrase that is a fast ascending scalar run. The bar after it would rely only on the root and 5th notes with an octave slide-up (since I play an electric guitar), executed economically, slowly. Two different phrases, each one has its own character. I don't know how other guys do it, but that's the gist I got.


Of course every phrase has its own character, but at the same time each phrase can be broken down and analysed. It has to be really, otherwise how could you even begin to develop on it? Development is important. It's how music grows. If one were to just play unrelated phrases in sequence, then there is no unity and it just sounds like someone vomiting the different tricks they know onto the instrument. It doesn't sound musical. If you're Sonny Rollins, then you can take two, even three phrases, and develop them alongside each other, which is a skill that completely blows my mind.


-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: August 07 2014 at 07:26
Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?
Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.
Oops ... we've almost made this a conversation based on a different question - the question of style.
So, going back to my original question (or argument) of how to compose a phrase. The way I weave a solo is I string different phrases together, each phrase based on its own chord and placed in its own bar. One bar would feature a phrase that is a fast ascending scalar run. The bar after it would rely only on the root and 5th notes with an octave slide-up (since I play an electric guitar), executed economically, slowly. Two different phrases, each one has its own character. I don't know how other guys do it, but that's the gist I got.
Very interesting. I've never caught on to chord based leads. It sounds like a burdensome approach to me. I just use scales and explore aspects of tension and resolution in a very free-form fashion. I know my scales very well, but thinking about chords is something I never do aside from throwing in an arpeggio here and there. Interestingly, I like to create rather complicated chord progressions, yet I've always been more successful soloing over more simple progressions. I ought to try incorporating some of your approach.


Chords and scales are the same thing. Scales emerge from chords. If you were to just play the chord tones (so the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th), then there would be no tension. However, the tension comes from the 9th, 11th and the 13th, and so when you incorporate them, you've essentially got a scale. Every scale functions this way. To say that you think in scales and not chords is actually to disregard where the idea of a scale comes from. This whole concept is known as Chord-Scale Relationships.


-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: August 07 2014 at 07:32
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Of course every phrase has its own character, but at the same time each phrase can be broken down and analysed. It has to be really, otherwise how could you even begin to develop on it? Development is important. It's how music grows. If one were to just play unrelated phrases in sequence, then there is no unity and it just sounds like someone vomiting the different tricks they know onto the instrument. It doesn't sound musical. If you're Sonny Rollins, then you can take two, even three phrases, and develop them alongside each other, which is a skill that completely blows my mind.
Right, absolutely. That's what I meant - playing in the same style to the same background with the same chord progression (unless it changes in the given piece of music) with the same pace (unless it changes in the given piece of music).


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: August 07 2014 at 15:17
Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:


Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?
Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.
Oops ... we've almost made this a conversation based on a different question - the question of style.
So, going back to my original question (or argument) of how to compose a phrase. The way I weave a solo is I string different phrases together, each phrase based on its own chord and placed in its own bar. One bar would feature a phrase that is a fast ascending scalar run. The bar after it would rely only on the root and 5th notes with an octave slide-up (since I play an electric guitar), executed economically, slowly. Two different phrases, each one has its own character. I don't know how other guys do it, but that's the gist I got.
Very interesting. I've never caught on to chord based leads. It sounds like a burdensome approach to me. I just use scales and explore aspects of tension and resolution in a very free-form fashion. I know my scales very well, but thinking about chords is something I never do aside from throwing in an arpeggio here and there. Interestingly, I like to create rather complicated chord progressions, yet I've always been more successful soloing over more simple progressions. I ought to try incorporating some of your approach.
Chords and scales are the same thing. Scales emerge from chords. If you were to just play the chord tones (so the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th), then there would be no tension. However, the tension comes from the 9th, 11th and the 13th, and so when you incorporate them, you've essentially got a scale. Every scale functions this way. To say that you think in scales and not chords is actually to disregard where the idea of a scale comes from. This whole concept is known as Chord-Scale Relationships.
You're not wrong, of course. But I would turn it around and say chords come from scales. And historically that's my the order of operations in my discovery process. I'll learn Hungarian minor or the half diminished scale, then I'll say, hey look what chords I can play, or look at the odd interval between these two minor chords. Some people discover new scales through complex chords or combinations of chords. I don't. I look at intervals I like and expand from there. For instance, I was playing in Hungarian Minor quite awhile back, and was falling in love with the place where there's a half step—whole step—half step sequence of intervals. Further fascinating because there's no such sequence of intervals in the traditional major scale. So, I think, well, what if I repeat this same interval sequence, and presto! something I later learned was a diminished scale. The scale can be thought of as (a) sets of diminished chords one half step apart, (b) Major and Minor chords neutralized over the same root note, then repeated one and a half steps apart, or (c) two adjacent notes one half step apart with all proceeding notes following a minor third ahead, or (d) the recurring set of intervals I used to discover it.   So, yeah, it's kind of whether you're seeing things as concave or convex, but that's the crux of the challenge. This difference in orientation has real implications, I would tend to think. I concentrate on the character of the scale, not chords. I know my approach well, but Dayvenkirk's made me interested in sampling a bit of his approach, if I can manage it. It might be helpful over some complex chord sequences. I'm not sure how it would work with a diminished scale in which one can play, for instance, either an A Major or an A minor, both are valid with respect to the scale.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: August 07 2014 at 19:13
Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:


Originally posted by HackettFan HackettFan wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Adapting it to your style is what makes a phrase/progression individual, not the actual architecture or content of the thing.
Don't the architecture and content of a phrase determine its style?
Not at all. The five notes 2 - b3 - 7 - 2 - 1, in a minor key going from dominant to tonic (the tonic note landing on the tonic chord), can be found in Baroque, Bebop, Folk, Heavy Metal, Hip-Hop, Funk, Prog Rock and Jewish Klezmer music. I can say the same about a million different cells or phrases.
Oops ... we've almost made this a conversation based on a different question - the question of style.
So, going back to my original question (or argument) of how to compose a phrase. The way I weave a solo is I string different phrases together, each phrase based on its own chord and placed in its own bar. One bar would feature a phrase that is a fast ascending scalar run. The bar after it would rely only on the root and 5th notes with an octave slide-up (since I play an electric guitar), executed economically, slowly. Two different phrases, each one has its own character. I don't know how other guys do it, but that's the gist I got.
Very interesting. I've never caught on to chord based leads. It sounds like a burdensome approach to me. I just use scales and explore aspects of tension and resolution in a very free-form fashion. I know my scales very well, but thinking about chords is something I never do aside from throwing in an arpeggio here and there. Interestingly, I like to create rather complicated chord progressions, yet I've always been more successful soloing over more simple progressions. I ought to try incorporating some of your approach.
Chords and scales are the same thing. Scales emerge from chords. If you were to just play the chord tones (so the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th), then there would be no tension. However, the tension comes from the 9th, 11th and the 13th, and so when you incorporate them, you've essentially got a scale. Every scale functions this way. To say that you think in scales and not chords is actually to disregard where the idea of a scale comes from. This whole concept is known as Chord-Scale Relationships.
You're not wrong, of course. But I would turn it around and say chords come from scales. And historically that's my the order of operations in my discovery process. I'll learn Hungarian minor or the half diminished scale, then I'll say, hey look what chords I can play, or look at the odd interval between these two minor chords. Some people discover new scales through complex chords or combinations of chords. I don't. I look at intervals I like and expand from there. For instance, I was playing in Hungarian Minor quite awhile back, and was falling in love with the place where there's a half step—whole step—half step sequence of intervals. Further fascinating because there's no such sequence of intervals in the traditional major scale. So, I think, well, what if I repeat this same interval sequence, and presto! something I later learned was a diminished scale. The scale can be thought of as (a) sets of diminished chords one half step apart, (b) Major and Minor chords neutralized over the same root note, then repeated one and a half steps apart, or (c) two adjacent notes one half step apart with all proceeding notes following a minor third ahead, or (d) the recurring set of intervals I used to discover it.   So, yeah, it's kind of whether you're seeing things as concave or convex, but that's the crux of the challenge. This difference in orientation has real implications, I would tend to think. I concentrate on the character of the scale, not chords. I know my approach well, but Dayvenkirk's made me interested in sampling a bit of his approach, if I can manage it. It might be helpful over some complex chord sequences. I'm not sure how it would work with a diminished scale in which one can play, for instance, either an A Major or an A minor, both are valid with respect to the scale.


It wholly depends on what kind of music you're playing. If you are playing modally, then chords emerge from scales. However, I was presuming we were talking about cadential harmony, and thus scales can only emerge from chords that way as cadential harmony relies entirely on voice leading. It's not a chicken and egg situation really. If you are playing over a ii-V-I and you think of it via each scale starting on its root (dorian, then mixolydian, then ionian/lydian), then it's only going to get incredibly confusing. Even using synthetic harmony like the octotonic scale and the whole tones scales, they are mostly used in the context of cadential harmony, and can only really be thought of as the product of the respective chords used (the octotonic scale is normally over a 13b9/13#9 and the whole tone can only work over a 9#5/9b5).


-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: Meltdowner
Date Posted: October 31 2014 at 13:50
I'm looking for a cool scale to learn, what do you guys recommend me? I know the major, minor, pentatonic minor, blues minor and byzantine scales.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: October 31 2014 at 14:32
^ I can recommend a few things:

1) If you look at page 4 of this thread, you'll notice by looking at the images I've embedded that I have this inclination to use b3's, #4/b5's (the blue note), p5's (perfect fifths), b6's, 7's, and b7's, depending on the mood. Evidently, most of the time I'll take the blues minor.

2) Otherwise, you can come up with one discovered by some culture. Modal scales are of curiosity to me, which are basically a major or minor scale with any tone/pitch taken as the root of that scale.

3) Be creative. You can come up with one on your own. Remember that in music theory some scales sound better when they ascend rather than descend, some vice versa, and others sound good when they descend and ascend.

4) Don't forget to mix scales.

5) Scat-sing. See what your head tells you. That's what I'd do.


Posted By: Meltdowner
Date Posted: October 31 2014 at 16:34
^ I'm more of free improvising like Steve on the previous page: don't think at all of the note progressions I'm playing, mix scales, and that's how I think its fun. Smile
My problem is that there are so many scales and cultures that I don't know what I should learn next and also my music theory knowledge is not very good. Ermm
I do scat-sing sometimes but didn't know the term.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: October 31 2014 at 18:27
^ I scat-sing for notes. I can't do a decent improv. for crap, so I listen to what the "backing band" is doing harmonically, figure out the chords, and just sing/vocalize random notes based on every chord, but in a way that the phrases melodically and harmonically "make sense" to me. I find it more rewarding when a solo is at least functional within the given musical context.

Do you really find it rewarding whenever you play random stuff?

On additional note: there are so many scales out there (whole-tone, octatonic, etc.; just Google your brains out), but I can't say I would recommend any of them, except the blues minor, as I've already mentioned. Play what you like. A scale is "lifeless" unless you figure out for yourself how to work with it.

OK, this already sounds like I'm trying to convert you to my own thoughts.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: October 31 2014 at 18:40
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_musical_scales_and_modes" rel="nofollow - I would bet a dollar that you might have seen this page already. Care to try them all?


Posted By: Meltdowner
Date Posted: November 01 2014 at 08:24
^ I have some phrases that I repeat sometimes but I never think about it, it's probably not that random, I know what I'm doing, but I don't "theorize" much. Tongue

For my recordings, I improvise over the backing tracks and choose the better phrases I come up with.

There was some scales that I played but it sounded so bad, I didn't know "how to work with it" as you say.

Seems like you won a dollar LOL




Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: November 23 2014 at 21:38
I've been getting some informal coaching from a local jazz student and aficionado. The second time we met up in a rehearsal room I've been pulling some pretty slick jazzy imitations. We did a bebop chord progression (2-5-1):

ii(6) V7 IΔ7 IΔ7
Dm(6) G7 C(Δ7) C(Δ7)
in D Dorian whole-tone in C Ionian in C Ionian

Today I went to a rehearsal room, noodled with some modes, and remembered the importance of the 3rd and the 7th notes. Turns out I like the R-5-3 voicing a lot (where the 3rd is on top). And if it's a 7th chord, the 7th better be on the bottom (the bass); so you would have 7-R-5-3.

(Also, I've been screwing around with clusters and came up with a sweet jazzy-poppy chord progression, but that's closer to the composition side of things, not improvisation.)


Posted By: Polymorphia
Date Posted: November 23 2014 at 23:38
I love my clusters. I usually write them for two or three guitars so I can make them nice and dense.


-------------
https://dreamwindow.bandcamp.com/releases" rel="nofollow - My Music


Posted By: Xonty
Date Posted: November 24 2014 at 02:26
I'm a guitarist and now I improvise to all kinds of stuff. Led Zeppelin, especially "In Through The Out Door" is a great one to start off on, because most of the songs are in A minor but they're modally quite flexible, so you can practice stuff like D dorian and E phrygian, etc. 

Nowadays, I'm even improvising (or trying to) over Gentle Giant and VDGG, but my favourite stuff is Genesis and Rush. When you get a Steve Hackett kind of tone, everything sounds great as long as you stick to the right scale, and there's quite a big range you can play over Lifeson's guitar stuff.

I'm not too sure how to say I improvise over everything apart from obviously starting off with the scales the song/chord is in, but then you really do what you want. It helps you to master your own sound(s), so no-one can really direct you where to go with it, apart from giving a few templates to work around (or a lot in jazz).


Posted By: HackettFan
Date Posted: December 03 2014 at 00:34
Most typically I improvise to nothing at all. When I do improvise to something, it will normally be a short passage that I've recorded on a looper. I've done some experimenting lately with playing along with Peyote music, but I need a lot more practice getting the right feel with that.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: December 07 2014 at 21:04
So, last Friday me and my guy Shawn tried getting around Miles' "Tune-Up". Of course, things didn't work out since I had poor count (I'd lose count and couldn't keep up with Shawn) and poor timing of ambidextrous synchronicity. You know, the usual amateur problems.

Today I've spent some time playing the chords of the tune, and as rewarding as the things my right hand played were, I'm not a fan of anything that employs the Coltrane changes, following the same pattern over and over again. The things that modal/bebop jazz pianists pull off with their right hand is what I like. Maybe I'll have to try something less predictable in form and with greater variety of chords/types of chords along with a number of modulations, and improvise to that.


Posted By: Star_Song_Age_Less
Date Posted: December 21 2014 at 22:33
Wow.  It looks like I'm the odd-man-out, I improvise to other people's music all the time but I do so vocally.  I make up new backing-vocal tracks.  I do play guitar and keyboard, but while I've learned to play others' songs on them I don't think I've ever even tried to improvise (as in solo parts?) to other people's music.  I'm usually too busy trying to fudge the guitar playing so that I can actually manage it with my short stubby hands. :)

The chords vs. scales discussion is interesting - historically the western scale (well, as far as we know) came first (thanks, Pythagoras), but I don't usually think of either of them as the result of the other.  Each pitch is its own pitch and reacts a certain way with other pitches in my brain.  You all seem much more fluent in various types of scales than I am, though, which probably means you guys put together connections that I don't make.  Fun to read, though.


-------------
https://www.facebook.com/JamieKernMusic


Posted By: TeleStrat
Date Posted: December 31 2014 at 10:13
When I first decided to try lead guitar I played along with some blues LPs like early Fleetwood Mac, Chicken Shack, Savoy Brown, etc. It was a lot easier than trying to learn Jimi Hendrix or Jeff Beck which were my favorite guitarists at the time.
More recently I have put together a 'various artists' blues CD and a hard rock CD that I jam to.
If I want to practice faster riffs I will put on some Jazz/Rock/Fusion which can be embarrassing.
I'm glad no one is listening.
I try to play a little every day just to keep the old fingers in shape.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: January 02 2015 at 19:59
So, I went to the Guitar Center, with a single aim of figuring out the chords to Tully's "Sea of Joy, pt. 1". Instead of playing something jazzy, I wound up playing something rocksy. I don't why, or what has changed. I wanted to play something jazzy.

I remembered the importance of the 1st, 4th, and 5th notes (contrary to the popular belief that the 3rd's and 7th's are more important ... at least that's what works in jazz). Maybe it's just how rock music works. I remembered the importance of rhythm and what rhythms are cool enough for rock phrases when improvising over two chords.

Not a very good/productive day, overall.


Posted By: TeleStrat
Date Posted: January 16 2015 at 11:24
My earlier post refers to playing lead guitar along with an album or CD.
When it comes to improvising, I guess you could say I improvise with myself.
I am a self taught guitarist and I do not read or write music so the songs I have created have been improvised (made up).
I record songs on a Boss BR864 digital recorder playing two, three or four guitar parts (I do not sing).
I start out with a rhythm track (chords) which I basically make up. When I'm satisfied with it I will go to track two and add lead guitar. Track three is usually a slide guitar or second lead guitar and I put this track in the background to support the lead guitar track. Sometimes track four will be bass guitar.
I recorded the first group of songs using the same acoustic/electric guitar on all tracks.
The BR864 has a built in effects section with over ninety different guitar sounds including six or seven different sounds for the bass guitar. The end result sounds like three or four musicians playing different guitar/amp set ups.
So, basically, that's how I improvise with myself.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: January 16 2015 at 19:16
^ Yeah, it's really hard to improvise lead without any rhythm back-up. In that case I'll just keep playing the root note on one of the three low (bass) strings of the six-string in my hands ... or just play something on my phone and try to come up with something to that track.


Posted By: Dayvenkirq
Date Posted: January 16 2015 at 19:25
Dear diary,

I suck. I swang by the local Guitar Center store picked a guitar and a Marshall amp, tried to get some gain out of it, and hasn't really come up with anything solid. I'm tired of improvising for the riffs on the 6th, 5th, and 4th strings. That's too easy. Plus, I didn't get any sound I liked, and it was really hard to concentrate and keep the musical space in my head clean of dissonance since the kids around me were playing something else. I tried jamming to Steely Dan's "Your Gold Teeth", but nothing good came out of it. Then I remembered that my head has this habit of coming up with lines on the fly, and I have to record myself singing them and try to play them with rubato. I tried that with Tully's "Sea Of Joy, pt. 1", but my head couldn't come up with anything solid. I remembered that chord changes are important, but I wasn't getting anything out of "the 3rd and 7th notes are very important". Maybe in jazz they are, but that doesn't always seem to be the case with rock music.

Don't say anything if you have nothing to say. And Guitar Center is by far not an ideal place to practice at, but hey, I gotta get the gear and practice somewhere, right?



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk