Prog and the state of the music business
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=83371
Printed Date: November 23 2024 at 02:07 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Prog and the state of the music business
Posted By: zumacraig
Subject: Prog and the state of the music business
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 08:17
hey friends,
been lurking for years, finally registered. i've been fascinated and concerned with the music business and the digital revolution over the last 10 years. mp3's, pirating, deluxe editions, etc. personally, what i find interesting is that the prog scene hasn't been hit to hard by all this turmoil. prog fans like physical product (and lots of it) so the artists we love can make a living off selling CDs. this is in contrast to the indie and corp. scene that has all but imploded as a result of pirating and the need to play live to make money. any thoughts? i'm thinking in particular of artists like roine stolt and neal morse. they keep putting stuff out every 6 months because we will buy it. neal doesn't even play live that much. anyway, wondered what y'all thought :-)
c
|
Replies:
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 09:21
I think it's true that prog fans like to 'collect' albums, complete with packaging, but the MP3 revolution is a very welcome development in my opinion.
I still buy CD's, although I'm not on the bandwagon of having to own every re-edition or re-master of every album by my favourite bands. But, when I buy CD's they get ripped to my Itunes immediately, and I listen from there. I only play the CD's in my car.
Welcome, BTW..
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 09:32
I love the digital revolution, especially since there are no decent record stores about any more. I just download from amazon, rip to a blank CD and my MP3 player, and off I go.
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 09:38
lazland wrote:
I love the digital revolution, especially since there are no decent record stores about any more. I just download from amazon, rip to a blank CD and my MP3 player, and off I go. |
Yeah, the demise of the physical stores is a loss but at the same time the ability to get stuff that wouldn't have been stocked at those places has been enhanced. I still have difficulties with the pay to download as it now exists. I don't mind making my own hard copy or transferring it into my computers and players. I don't even mind having to print out my own cover or booklet art too much.
Sometimes it seems the portability that we have these days isn't fully appreciated by some.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: CloseToTheMoon
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 11:42
It's a double-edged advancement. The convenience is nice, but the sentiment of going to the record shop is gone.
It's just so much easier to surf itunes or amazon and find a great new band instead of paying for a whole album and getting burned. There's about 1-2 fantastic bands for every 5-10 bands that should never have gotten a recording contract.
------------- It's funny how the colors of the real world only seem really real when you viddy them on the screen.
|
Posted By: aprusso
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 12:29
There are no more decent record shops because there has been the bloody digital revolution....
|
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 12:39
Long story short I am a supporter of the "revolution" and maybe...(though in my opinion not terrible) it would impact some older/established artists, but newer or upcoming prog artists benefit greatly in my eyes. It's easier to get your name out there, and if you choose to DIY that means you are not restrained by pressures. Pressures to make a hit and all that.
Also if you DIY that means even if you charge less than the standard for album...you still get more money since you dont have to pay others. I see it as a good thing for music and especially prog, and I would agree the prog fanbase is more inclined to buy CDs/collect so there is still that.
edit: I am upset at the slow extinction of the local record store, mine seems to support itself on air because there is no one ever there, but while this isn't a popular answer (even for me) that's progress.....and you can't stop progress. Especially when it is best for the hundreds of millions of music fans out there.
|
Posted By: tamijo
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 13:17
Back when you had to go to the record store, it was very hard to get prog, expt for the top selling names (floyd yes genesis jethro tull ect.) Im from small Denmark
When i started collection King Crims (about 76-77) took me 10 years or so to get them all.
Offcourse that was also fun, but remember KC is by far unknown, with less known acts, you had to be very luck'i.
Today i can by my music from online stores, having access to almost everything.
------------- Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
|
Posted By: Progosopher
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 15:23
I still do not like mere downloads - I am 51 and definitely like to have something in my hands even though the important thing is the music itself. Nor do I care to jump on the re-release bandwagon. I will buy if it is something I do not already have or if the price is really low. And since I buy a lot of older recordings, that is a distinct possibility. Fortunately, there are still a few good record stores in my town, but they are not that reliable when it comes to Prog. Still, I can almost always find something of interest. And I can special order almost anything. There are also a couple of mail order outfits I go to. Despite how it may sound here, I think the digital revolution to be progress - it enables more artists to produce their music less expensively. The risk there is, of course, that there are fewer checks and balances to help guarantee quality. For the most part, though, I have not found this to be a problem. It seems to me that the brick and mortar store fell to the wayside due to digital downloads. The biggest blow there was the demise of Tower Records, one of the giants of the industry, and since I live in their hometown, their flagship store was not too far away from me. This particular store was second only to famous Sunset Blvd. store where big stars often came in after hours and shopped away. I think Bruce Willis set the record for spending $30,000 in one night. I think a lot of us on this site could do that too if we had the money. I know I could.
------------- The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
|
Posted By: AlexDOM
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 16:41
Mp3s are nice and convenient for songs, not albums. And for prog, albums define a band not a song. Therefore I love the cd or vinyl. There's something about the physicality of them. You can touch them, feel them, smell them, and read along with the lyrics. Some artists do a fantastic job with the lyric booklets as well. I am someone that buys a lot of Morse since he's my favorite. He packages stuff very well and all his booklets are awesome, filled with pictures, notes, lyrics that are in cool fonts, and such ha ha. I mean yeah I rip them to my computer and put them on my sony walkman, but I still enjoy the physical cd. And recently I got into vinyls which I've grown to love. This is dorky, but I love taking them out of the giant sleeve in a giant case. Then put the needle on it and watch it spin. It's part of the whole experience. Plus the sound quality is so organic. It's vintage. Sure I like to buy an mp3 here or there of some song or something. I sometimes get mp3 albums (but not often). But I will always support the physical any day. And used cds are always cheap. Or I buy from the artist or record company site giving them 100% support.
|
Posted By: AlexDOM
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 16:43
But the revolution has had advantages and brought many artists into the light. I will say that.
|
Posted By: zumacraig
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 18:42
my main point was that lots of pop/rock artists have to play live to make money because no one buys music anymore. the 'good' prog bands can still make money selling CDs.
i always wonder how these guys do it. i mean, does neal mores have a day job?
i'm down with the digital revolution. i still like physical product though...liner notes, art, etc. one thing i am concerned about is with all these reissues and new releases is the loudness wars.
thanks for the comments.
|
Posted By: Ytse_Jam
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 19:42
AlexDOM wrote:
Mp3s are nice and convenient for songs, not albums. And for prog, albums define a band not a song. Therefore I love the cd or vinyl. There's something about the physicality of them. You can touch them, feel them, smell them, and read along with the lyrics. Some artists do a fantastic job with the lyric booklets as well. I am someone that buys a lot of Morse since he's my favorite. He packages stuff very well and all his booklets are awesome, filled with pictures, notes, lyrics that are in cool fonts, and such ha ha. I mean yeah I rip them to my computer and put them on my sony walkman, but I still enjoy the physical cd. And recently I got into vinyls which I've grown to love. This is dorky, but I love taking them out of the giant sleeve in a giant case. Then put the needle on it and watch it spin. It's part of the whole experience. Plus the sound quality is so organic. It's vintage.Sure I like to buy an mp3 here or there of some song or something. I sometimes get mp3 albums (but not often). But I will always support the physical any day. And used cds are always cheap. Or I buy from the artist or record company site giving them 100% support. | Totally agree with you. I'm a vinyl fan and I usually buy music in this format. LPs (and CDs) are much better, i mean the sound quality, the packaging, the cover art in front of you and so on. With mp3s it's all faster and easier, but I usually use them to discover new artists
|
Posted By: TheLastBaron
Date Posted: December 10 2011 at 22:52
What's interesting to see is the prog bands that jump to bigger labels after some time such as Dream Theater, Opeth, Between The Buried and Me just to name a few. Its good in some ways and bad in others, moe exposure for some yet a change in style or lack of innovation in others.
I don't mind mp3's, when I download though I look for high quality lossless, I stil buy cds and copy them on to Ipod in uncompressed format.
------------- " Men are not prisoners of fate, but prisoners of their own minds." - FDR
|
Posted By: Fox On The Rocks
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 09:35
I've always bought, and will always buy CD's. I would buy Vinyl, but I don't have record player. Hopefully I get one soon. I don't really like downloading because I like to have actual,physical copies of my music. Plus CD's come with the album cover art,lyrics, liner notes, photos and a poster if your lucky! Also the quality of sound from a CD is much better then a file from the internet.
-------------
|
Posted By: Fox On The Rocks
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 09:38
AlexDOM wrote:
Mp3s are nice and convenient for songs, not albums. And for prog, albums define a band not a song. Therefore I love the cd or vinyl. There's something about the physicality of them. You can touch them, feel them, smell them, and read along with the lyrics. Some artists do a fantastic job with the lyric booklets as well. I am someone that buys a lot of Morse since he's my favorite. He packages stuff very well and all his booklets are awesome, filled with pictures, notes, lyrics that are in cool fonts, and such ha ha. I mean yeah I rip them to my computer and put them on my sony walkman, but I still enjoy the physical cd. And recently I got into vinyls which I've grown to love. This is dorky, but I love taking them out of the giant sleeve in a giant case. Then put the needle on it and watch it spin. It's part of the whole experience. Plus the sound quality is so organic. It's vintage.
Sure I like to buy an mp3 here or there of some song or something. I sometimes get mp3 albums (but not often). But I will always support the physical any day. And used cds are always cheap. Or I buy from the artist or record company site giving them 100% support. |
Totally agree as well.
-------------
|
Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 09:57
Profit and worldwide marketing with it's internal destruction caused misfortune for the future of progressive rock. Due to the moronic move the industry took to close the doors on it completely. It was promoted selectively by promoting prog bands like Jethro Tull and Yes who were signed to huge internationally known record labels. Bands like Gong, Guru, Guru, Amon Duul II, were signed to labels that were subdivisions of the larger ones. All or most of their domestic releases ended up in the bargain bins for a $1.99
This prog audience of today is a devoted one. There are cities in the U.S. were this so called prog following dominates the music scene. The bands played Nearfest and several other gatherings over the years which is positive input. However something is dead wrong with this picture when a prog vendor/promoter can't possibly make any profit for himself. When the promoter is only making enough money to pay the bands, the fan should feel lucky. Not a very long list of people in general would gamble on something that is business wise....a mouse trap. This whole entrie circus of events I find unjust.
|
Posted By: tupan
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 14:38
lazland wrote:
I love the digital revolution, especially since there are no decent record stores about any more. I just download from amazon, rip to a blank CD and my MP3 player, and off I go. |
Don't forget the free releases! Some of them even have booklets in pdf or jpeg format.
------------- "Prog is Not Dead and never has been." (Will Sergeant, from Echo And The Bunnymen)
|
Posted By: lazland
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 14:40
tupan wrote:
lazland wrote:
I love the digital revolution, especially since there are no decent record stores about any more. I just download from amazon, rip to a blank CD and my MP3 player, and off I go. |
Don't forget the free releases! Some of them even have booklets in pdf or jpeg format.
|
And you, my friend, have done more than most to alert us to these goodies!!
------------- Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
Posted By: tupan
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 15:10
^
I think the "fan devotion" thing also applicates to the free releases. The prog bands create a solid fanbase with their free offerings too, and many of them download and REALLY buy a physical copy later, or even donate. But, the lesser known bands still needs gig everytime to make some profit.
------------- "Prog is Not Dead and never has been." (Will Sergeant, from Echo And The Bunnymen)
|
Posted By: Earendil
Date Posted: December 11 2011 at 16:49
Indie music probably sells just as many (if not more) records compared to mp3s than prog does. Personally, I don't buy mp3s but I listen to most of my music ripped from CDs.
|
Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 07:47
tupan wrote:
^
I think the "fan devotion" thing also applicates to the free releases. The prog bands create a solid fanbase with their free offerings too, and many of them download and REALLY buy a physical copy later, or even donate. But, the lesser known bands still needs gig everytime to make some profit.
|
The gigs are not very easy to obtain. It's not quite like Ian Anderson hiding under his manager's desk ...so he could get all the good gigs, but it is very much like a private community in this day and age more so than the 70's. The high financial risk that promoters take to promote prog and a few guys like Michael Piper, and ? from a long termed estabished prog label just about sums up the value of the bone that is thrown to young prog bands. As a musician...every penny is taken from your savings due to the lack of promotion. Some wealthy promoter should force prog back into the media represented as a style of music to be taken seriously. More people would be aware of prog and then all the members of this site who complain that their girfriend's misunderstand prog would be content. The industry has the money to at least place prog in history for the mass and not just the minority. What about other styles? Jazz has a global following, the Jazz festivals are sold out, and it's a progressive style of music. Decades before prog obviously that is the first answer as to why. But it is still a progressive style of music that is promoted through some huge labels today. Bands like White Willow and Steve Wilson himself ......you wouldn't believe what these musicians go through and running a tight ship.
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 08:20
That's a pretty ambitious suggestion, TODDLER, and would take a real dreamer given the bad rep prog goes. The question is why do people who do listen to progressive music like jazz restrict themselves to just jazz and why not progressive music within rock? From the time I got into Western music, I have never understood the obsession with formats nor understood how one could get through being exclusively focused on one format because I never could. I would get very bored, very quickly of listening to one kind of music all the time. To that extent, I feel a bit disappointed with those audiences who only listen to classical or jazz or even musicians who restrict themselves to specific formats? Why shut doors and why not open your mind instead? If I could go from listening to complacent Indian music to, um, grindcore, I really cannot fathom jazz snobbery at all. What's the big deal? It would hand in hand give all sorts of musicians a bigger audience rather than having to carefully cultivate fragmented niches.
|
Posted By: MarkOne
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 08:32
First off gigs. How many prog gigs from new bands have you been to recently? Only a handful seem to pull huge crowds, and I've seen several bands this year where the numbers are only 50-100 people. Not much cash flows back to the band from that!
Merch desks at the gigs are the best opportunity to sell CDs, and these are often not very busy. I guess for every 100 people at the gig, maybe 5 or perhaps 10 buy the CDs.
CD sales - Unless you are lucky to get signed to a label with a half decent marketing budget (almost none of them) good luck being in any store, getting any airplay, etc.
The fact is, that many of our favourites have to be in more than one band, and often hold down a day-job to pay the mortgage.
The only reason they do it is... THEY LOVE THE MUSIC.
And fortunately for us that is the case
Prog is, even with the recent resurgence still very much a niche market. Albeit a loyal one that still recognises the value of the album format.
Just a final anecdote. I noticed a tweet from John Mitchell of It Bites, Arena and Frost, The new Arena album has only been available from the band directly on their recent europe mini-tour, not being released properly until this week
During that time a 'fan' had bought the album and uploaded it to a torent site for free downoad. The band were of course, far from impressed - I suspect the 'fan' thought they were being really clever.
------------- Debut Album FANTASY BRIDGE http://www.markonemusic.co.uk/Site/Shop.html" rel="nofollow - Available Now on CD
http://www.markonemusic.co.uk" rel="nofollow - MyWebsite
|
Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 09:28
rogerthat wrote:
That's a pretty ambitious suggestion, TODDLER, and would take a real dreamer given the bad rep prog goes. The question is why do people who do listen to progressive music like jazz restrict themselves to just jazz and why not progressive music within rock? From the time I got into Western music, I have never understood the obsession with formats nor understood how one could get through being exclusively focused on one format because I never could. I would get very bored, very quickly of listening to one kind of music all the time. To that extent, I feel a bit disappointed with those audiences who only listen to classical or jazz or even musicians who restrict themselves to specific formats? Why shut doors and why not open your mind instead? If I could go from listening to complacent Indian music to, um, grindcore, I really cannot fathom jazz snobbery at all. What's the big deal? It would hand in hand give all sorts of musicians a bigger audience rather than having to carefully cultivate fragmented niches.
|
You are correct about the fragmented niches being cultivated. I feel like I know why from my personal experience in the business and on the other hand I'm still not sure.
|
Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 09:57
Blacksword wrote:
I think it's true that prog fans like to 'collect' albums, complete with packaging, but the MP3 revolution is a very welcome development in my opinion.
I still buy CD's, although I'm not on the bandwagon of having to own every re-edition or re-master of every album by my favourite bands. But, when I buy CD's they get ripped to my Itunes immediately, and I listen from there. I only play the CD's in my car.
Welcome, BTW.. |
Wow!!!! I just found a clone of me. I do exactly what you do, including listening to the CDs in my car. Nice to know I'm not alone.
|
Posted By: himtroy
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 10:10
More than anything this "digital revolution" has effected me in the way of jam bands. So many jams bands now upload every concert they play either for free or for a small fee. That is the best part of modern technology's impact on the music business in my opinion.
------------- Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance.
|
Posted By: Warthur
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 11:30
zumacraig wrote:
my main point was that lots of pop/rock artists have to play live to make money because no one buys music anymore. the 'good' prog bands can still make money selling CDs.
i always wonder how these guys do it. i mean, does neal mores have a day job? |
My guess would be is that most active prog musicians have day jobs of one kind or another. The exceptions would be:
- People in very successful bands who can afford to be professional musicials. Even then I think they'd have to play live regularly to sustain themselves but I actually think this is no bad thing. - People whose "day jobs" essentially consist of being a musician in some other context. Session musician, writer of TV/radio jingles, that sort of thing. - People whose "day jobs" involves serving the prog economy. For instance, Mick Pointer of Arena fame is Clive Nolan's business partner in Verglas and spends a lot of his time handling the paperwork and logistics side of running the label.
|
Posted By: zumacraig
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 11:57
AlexDOM wrote:
Mp3s are nice and convenient for songs, not albums. And for prog, albums define a band not a song. Therefore I love the cd or vinyl. There's something about the physicality of them. You can touch them, feel them, smell them, and read along with the lyrics. Some artists do a fantastic job with the lyric booklets as well. I am someone that buys a lot of Morse since he's my favorite. He packages stuff very well and all his booklets are awesome, filled with pictures, notes, lyrics that are in cool fonts, and such ha ha. I mean yeah I rip them to my computer and put them on my sony walkman, but I still enjoy the physical cd. And recently I got into vinyls which I've grown to love. This is dorky, but I love taking them out of the giant sleeve in a giant case. Then put the needle on it and watch it spin. It's part of the whole experience. Plus the sound quality is so organic. It's vintage.Sure I like to buy an mp3 here or there of some song or something. I sometimes get mp3 albums (but not often). But I will always support the physical any day. And used cds are always cheap. Or I buy from the artist or record company site giving them 100% support. |
ditto. morse is a great example of the prog niche. he puts stuff out all the time b/c people will buy it. he really doesn't have to play live that much :-)
|
Posted By: zumacraig
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 12:00
TheLastBaron wrote:
What's interesting to see is the prog bands that jump to bigger labels after some time such as Dream Theater, Opeth, Between The Buried and Me just to name a few. Its good in some ways and bad in others, moe exposure for some yet a change in style or lack of innovation in others.
I don't mind mp3's, when I download though I look for high quality lossless, I stil buy cds and copy them on to Ipod in uncompressed format. |
right. since dream theater has gone to a bigger label, their music is way too compressed and clipped. too bad.
|
Posted By: Hercules
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 15:08
aprusso wrote:
There are no more decent record shops because there has been the bloody digital revolution.... |
Too right. There used to be a brilliant record shop about 15 miles from me in York - Track records, it was called. It had every type of music and a large vinyl selection, with many 180g special repressings which were awsome in their sound quality. They'd get you anything you wanted.
It closed down about 4 years ago because it couldn't sell enough albums against the competition from a combination of piracy, the big stores and digital downloads. From the York Evening Press Jun 2007:
"IT'S the end of the track.
Track Records, the independent York shop on which three generations of youth have converged for their top-of-the-charts hits, is to close its doors in Goodramgate - defeated by the internet downloading revolution.
"People simply are not passing through the doors," said owner Keith Howe, who in January closed his Doncaster branch with the loss of five jobs after sustaining a year's losses.
Now he will make another six redundant, including himself.
He plans to call in the liquidators within six weeks to formulate the exact extent of debt, but reckons he owes about £100,000.
His house in Boroughbridge Road, put up as collateral on a loan, is already on the market.
Mr Howe said he hoped insolvency would mean the personal guarantees to suppliers would be honoured.
Only last May, ten truckloads of stock and office equipment were transferred to the Goodramgate shop from High Ousegate, where it was based for 15 years.
It is a particular tragedy for 47-year-old Mr Howe, who said: "This business has been my whole life."
He first sold jukebox seconds on York's Newgate Market in his schooldays, before opening his shop, aged 19, in a dry cleaner's premises, in Fossgate, in April 1979.
Track Records then moved to the Coppergate Centre, in 1985, and High Ousegate, in May 1992.
The boom for Track Records and other record shop retailers reached its peak in 1996, but now, said Mr Howe, the industry was on its knees as websites and supermarkets undercut dedicated record retailers.
He said: "Anyone downloading a top album from play.com does not have to pay VAT, because it is based in the Channel Islands.
"Customers can get it, postage paid, for about £8.97, whereas it costs me about £9, that is £7.68 plus VAT, before I can think about making a profit - and that amounts to pennies.
"Most kids are downloading. Our student population in York is expanding, but I see very little evidence of it. There seems to have been a massive exodus of younger people aged from 12 to 24."
Mr Howe claimed, he was not alone, with many of the high street stores suffering, including HMV which had announced 100 redundancies after profit warnings.
The likes of Amazon, play.com and Tesco supermarket were taking their toll, he said. "It's the new reality of the market place," he said."
------------- A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
|
Posted By: 7headedchicken
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 16:35
AlexDOM wrote:
Mp3s are nice and convenient for songs, not albums. And for prog, albums define a band not a song. Therefore I love the cd or vinyl. There's something about the physicality of them. You can touch them, feel them, smell them, and read along with the lyrics. Some artists do a fantastic job with the lyric booklets as well. I am someone that buys a lot of Morse since he's my favorite. He packages stuff very well and all his booklets are awesome, filled with pictures, notes, lyrics that are in cool fonts, and such ha ha. I mean yeah I rip them to my computer and put them on my sony walkman, but I still enjoy the physical cd. And recently I got into vinyls which I've grown to love. This is dorky, but I love taking them out of the giant sleeve in a giant case. Then put the needle on it and watch it spin. It's part of the whole experience. Plus the sound quality is so organic. It's vintage.
Sure I like to buy an mp3 here or there of some song or something. I sometimes get mp3 albums (but not often). But I will always support the physical any day. And used cds are always cheap. Or I buy from the artist or record company site giving them 100% support. |
Albums do define bands moreso than songs, especially with prog... and I'm right there with you also on the vinyl thing. Hopefully, enough people will retain their appreciation for the album as a physical art form, so that all bands can continue to sell records and CD's.
|
Posted By: fuyuakiworld
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 16:57
I've a mixed opinion. I only buy Records and Tapes when I'm at a Half Priced Books. And I only get MP3s if thats the only medium it's on, but that's quite rare. I buy all else on CD because of the quality and availability.
|
Posted By: fuyuakiworld
Date Posted: December 12 2011 at 16:59
I prefer CDs above all else. I only buy Records and Tapes if I'm at a Half Priced Books or a record shop and only buy MP3s on the rare occasion that it's not available on anything else.
|
Posted By: JS19
Date Posted: December 13 2011 at 07:03
I try to only buy CDs, but really at the moment the albums I'm looking for are usually 2-3 times more expensive on Cd than MP3 or simply not available in a physical format. It's a shame, but I'm not rich right now, so downloads are my main source of music at the moment.
|
Posted By: thehallway
Date Posted: December 13 2011 at 10:14
Warthur wrote:
zumacraig wrote:
my main point was that lots of pop/rock artists have to play live to make money because no one buys music anymore. the 'good' prog bands can still make money selling CDs.
i always wonder how these guys do it. i mean, does neal mores have a day job? |
My guess would be is that most active prog musicians have day jobs of one kind or another. The exceptions would be:
- People in very successful bands who can afford to be professional musicials. Even then I think they'd have to play live regularly to sustain themselves but I actually think this is no bad thing. - People whose "day jobs" essentially consist of being a musician in some other context. Session musician, writer of TV/radio jingles, that sort of thing. - People whose "day jobs" involves serving the prog economy. For instance, Mick Pointer of Arena fame is Clive Nolan's business partner in Verglas and spends a lot of his time handling the paperwork and logistics side of running the label.
|
You are correct. There are plenty of ways for musicians to earn money if they try, and they can all involve music. Writing and sending songs to people, doing session work, private tuition, arranging jobs, touring with established acts..... these are the ways you earn money while you wait for your own music to make or break you. Fans in general just aren't aware of day-to-day survival in the music industry, because these are normal, practical jobs that don't need publicising. So it's really not as bleak as being either a totally rich prog icon or a complete nobody with a ton of debt. You work your way up, as in any job, and no..... it isn't easy!
------------- http://www.thefreshfilmblog.com/" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: December 13 2011 at 19:11
The thing that bothers me the most about the MP3 becoming more commercial than CD's is that we are taking a step backwards as far as sound quality is concerned. I'm afraid I do listen on my Ipod very often because of it's portability, but I like much better to buy CD's. I'm not yet into SACD or such things, but I want at least CD quality. Now, if the hard drives of Ipods, and even computers could carry without problem the hundreds or thousends of songs on WAV files (as well as internet being fast enough for downloading such files instead of MP3), it wouldn't bother me so much to buy my music online.
|
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: December 14 2011 at 05:34
^^^ That depends on what rate they are ripped at. I would ideally like to listen to my CDs on the speakers at home but since that is not always possible, I rip them at 320 kbps to mp3 and copy it to the ipod. I am quite satisfied with the quality I get and it is discernibly better than, say, the sound quality on youtube links of the same songs.
|
Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: December 14 2011 at 11:04
thehallway wrote:
Warthur wrote:
zumacraig wrote:
my main point was that lots of pop/rock artists have to play live to make money because no one buys music anymore. the 'good' prog bands can still make money selling CDs.
i always wonder how these guys do it. i mean, does neal mores have a day job? |
My guess would be is that most active prog musicians have day jobs of one kind or another. The exceptions would be:
- People in very successful bands who can afford to be professional musicials. Even then I think they'd have to play live regularly to sustain themselves but I actually think this is no bad thing.
- People whose "day jobs" essentially consist of being a musician in some other context. Session musician, writer of TV/radio jingles, that sort of thing.
- People whose "day jobs" involves serving the prog economy. For instance, Mick Pointer of Arena fame is Clive Nolan's business partner in Verglas and spends a lot of his time handling the paperwork and logistics side of running the label.
|
You are correct. There are plenty of ways for musicians to earn money if they try, and they can all involve music. Writing and sending songs to people, doing session work, private tuition, arranging jobs, touring with established acts..... these are the ways you earn money while you wait for your own music to make or break you.
Fans in general just aren't aware of day-to-day survival in the music industry, because these are normal, practical jobs that don't need publicising. So it's really not as bleak as being either a totally rich prog icon or a complete nobody with a ton of debt. You work your way up, as in any job, and no..... it isn't easy! |
I agree with this. I have many musician friends who worked their way up. but it's just that I recall when we were all taken care of and provided for by a corporation. Then we all went downhill and started up again with a new vision that we were to provide for ourselves. I found it a strange realization that all my studio time and touring was financed by big wigs for 10 years and I still hit rock bottom. You can truly get used to that kind of treatment and then one day it is gone. Start your engine for another round.
|
Posted By: mono
Date Posted: December 14 2011 at 11:20
technology, development, industry.... we all know the game, what we gain, what we lose, as we move forward.
------------- https://soundcloud.com/why-music Prog trio, from ambiant to violence
https://soundcloud.com/m0n0-film Film music and production projects
https://soundcloud.com/fadisaliba (almost) everything else
|
Posted By: 7headedchicken
Date Posted: December 14 2011 at 13:09
Dellinger wrote:
The thing that bothers me the most about the MP3 becoming more commercial than CD's is that we are taking a step backwards as far as sound quality is concerned. I'm afraid I do listen on my Ipod very often because of it's portability, but I like much better to buy CD's. I'm not yet into SACD or such things, but I want at least CD quality. Now, if the hard drives of Ipods, and even computers could carry without problem the hundreds or thousends of songs on WAV files (as well as internet being fast enough for downloading such files instead of MP3), it wouldn't bother me so much to buy my music online. |
That's another reason I prefer Cd's, besides the physical aspect. Supposedly, the higher quality mp3's sound as good or better, but I haven't heard any myself that sound as good... maybe technically they are higher quality, but something is missing. I've noticed that even some radio stations today are playing mp3's now, which is a step in the wrong direction, I think. Not all, though - there are still a few around that play real CD's, and believe it or not, there are a select few that still play vinyl.
|
Posted By: JS19
Date Posted: December 14 2011 at 13:35
7headedchicken wrote:
Dellinger wrote:
The thing that bothers me the most about the MP3 becoming more commercial than CD's is that we are taking a step backwards as far as sound quality is concerned. I'm afraid I do listen on my Ipod very often because of it's portability, but I like much better to buy CD's. I'm not yet into SACD or such things, but I want at least CD quality. Now, if the hard drives of Ipods, and even computers could carry without problem the hundreds or thousends of songs on WAV files (as well as internet being fast enough for downloading such files instead of MP3), it wouldn't bother me so much to buy my music online. |
That's another reason I prefer Cd's, besides the physical aspect. Supposedly, the higher quality mp3's sound as good or better, but I haven't heard any myself that sound as good... maybe technically they are higher quality, but something is missing. I've noticed that even some radio stations today are playing mp3's now, which is a step in the wrong direction, I think. Not all, though - there are still a few around that play real CD's, and believe it or not, there are a select few that still play vinyl. |
Higher quality mp3s do sound as good, but your output source does not. An iPod will never be as good a source as a CD player hence poorer audio quality, it's not the actual MP3s that are the problem...
|
Posted By: TODDLER
Date Posted: December 18 2011 at 12:56
rogerthat wrote:
That's a pretty ambitious suggestion, TODDLER, and would take a real dreamer given the bad rep prog goes. The question is why do people who do listen to progressive music like jazz restrict themselves to just jazz and why not progressive music within rock? From the time I got into Western music, I have never understood the obsession with formats nor understood how one could get through being exclusively focused on one format because I never could. I would get very bored, very quickly of listening to one kind of music all the time. To that extent, I feel a bit disappointed with those audiences who only listen to classical or jazz or even musicians who restrict themselves to specific formats? Why shut doors and why not open your mind instead? If I could go from listening to complacent Indian music to, um, grindcore, I really cannot fathom jazz snobbery at all. What's the big deal? It would hand in hand give all sorts of musicians a bigger audience rather than having to carefully cultivate fragmented niches.
|
You could say that Jeff Beck neglected practicing guitar as he spent long hours working on cars. On the guitar he seems to desire staying on the same playing level and allowing his talents of progression to evolve slowly INSTEAD of some over the top player who practices feverishly between 12 to 15 hours a day. The serious Jazz musicians who vary in different sections of the world and it's highest numbers in population being in the United States for sure.......would look down upon this and express that snobby Jazz mentality There are no inbetween's with this and it depends on what particular music college you choose.
Jazz music presents an observation for me. It derives from the "Black Community" and was developed through their bloodline. Their bloodline into the creation of new music....Blues, "Rock N' Roll", Jazz, Gospel and to minus all that inventive music from the western culture ....it would be scary to imagine what would have developed instead. I am very thankful they developed this music in America.
So many positives and negatives in music culture and obviously within all walks of life...but more extreme with the emotional side to being a musician and struggling for that serious life. I believe that an ego should shut itself down every so often like hitting a switch. Musicians who struggle with their lack of talent to master something new...yet are talented enough to be great writers often become discouraged over themselves and desire to be egotistical for power. A great player who is humble will struggle with a difficult piece of music and not think of themselves and only focus on the art. I'm not sure why great musicians have ego's. There is a personal history of composers centuries ago who were put under extreme pressure to write the perfect composition. They seem to have a different upbringing where the evidence of ego driven ideas begin at age 13. One kid who is multi talented tells the other kid (who is quite talented at only one particular instrument)....that he must be a moron because he does not know what a rudiment is. Every child or teenager travels through the identity crisis ...but one day they will be sitting in music college hearing some devoted musician playing the most inferior pieces in the world. They either have to wake up then and realize that the possibilities are endless in music and that the smart thing to do would be to remain humble or become a nasty ego inflated baby. Which is how a lot of great musicians turn out because their parents were not musicians yet forced a macho attitude upon them that doesn't work well in the development of an instrument.
You already have hours of hard devotion on an instrument.....letting your ego stand in the way is the last thing on earth you want. Parents will force the wrong kind of encouragment or support to the child. My dog is better than your dog or my son can pitch a baseball finer than yours. Then the kid is excepted into music college at 18 and some respected music professor teaches him a thing or 2 about music and about what dedicated musicians define as practices. Now the kid thinks to himself...."Why was my father teaching me all this nonsense?" Why do that to your kid? Why not tell them the truth in the beginning and then prepare them for the trials in music college Parents do not want their children to lack confidence yet their macho method of raising them will shatter into pieces when their child is faced with the realization that he/she must study more..... and that alone is quite a larger blow to a full blown ego well developed at age 18 than any honest step in life they could have taken to prevent the nightmare itself.
|
Posted By: Jbird
Date Posted: December 21 2011 at 17:47
MarkOne wrote:
Merch desks at the gigs are the best opportunity to sell CDs, and these are often not very busy. I guess for every 100 people at the gig, maybe 5 or perhaps 10 buy the CDs. |
If I care enough about a band to pay the bucks to see them in concert, chances are I own at least all of their studio albums at least. I'm by no means a collector of even my favorite bands. I don't own all the special editions, special live albums, singles w/an unreleased B-side, etc unless I find it for cheap, but I'll have all of their 'standard' releases almost guaranteed.
Therefore, I almost never buy cd's at concerts. I'd bet alot more are like me, too.
|
Posted By: MarkOne
Date Posted: December 21 2011 at 17:58
Jbird wrote:
MarkOne wrote:
Merch desks at the gigs are the best opportunity to sell CDs, and these are often not very busy. I guess for every 100 people at the gig, maybe 5 or perhaps 10 buy the CDs. |
If I care enough about a band to pay the bucks to see them in concert, chances are I own at least all of their studio albums at least. I'm by no means a collector of even my favorite bands. I don't own all the special editions, special live albums, singles w/an unreleased B-side, etc unless I find it for cheap, but I'll have all of their 'standard' releases almost guaranteed.
Therefore, I almost never buy cd's at concerts. I'd bet alot more are like me, too. |
I guess I was thinking of a different kind of gig, the kind of cellar club with a couple of bands, each with one or two indie releases, each scaring up 20 or so mates and hoping that their leafleting of the area and hopefully the noise on the street outside will entice in some extra punters, as might the happy hour bar prices. I'm really talking the long-tail end of the business not the 1000 seat city venue tour with trucks and a tour bus. But where you can have a beer with the bass player and lead vocalist...
I go to quite a few of these type of gig, bands with tiny followings who have outlaid several grand of personal money to get their music recorded, who might get some positive noise on sites like this and are trying to get heard.
And as far as I can tell much of the prog scene is exactly like I describe.
------------- Debut Album FANTASY BRIDGE http://www.markonemusic.co.uk/Site/Shop.html" rel="nofollow - Available Now on CD
http://www.markonemusic.co.uk" rel="nofollow - MyWebsite
|
Posted By: SMSM
Date Posted: December 23 2011 at 14:38
Thank God for internet applications like Youtube, Prog Archives etc where we can be exposed to this music, where before we were dependent on a few DJs, record stores and friendswho may or may not have played prog,
TS if you were out in the boondocks where the only music played was country or greatest hits music
|
Posted By: wjohnd
Date Posted: December 23 2011 at 15:35
i've pretty much embraced the digital revolution - although I own hundreds of CDs most of the music i buy now is on MP3 or listened to via Spotify. CDs were a poor substitute for the joy of a double gate-fold sleeve anyway and I don't really miss them. LPs were great until they scratched or had a poor quality or filler track that you couldn't easily ignore.
-------------
|
Posted By: Ben Enochian
Date Posted: January 13 2012 at 15:54
I'd say I'm with most people here...it's a double edged sword.
I'm in the business...but I am also, of course, a music lover...and as such, will go to great ends to get something I want.
I like the artwork and I like the physical product that an artist delivers.
The effort the band put into creating a product needs to be acknowledged, one feels.
I know how difficult it is to create something like that, the time it takes and nights lost fearing about your business future...so why would you want just collection of O's and 1' bleeping on your laptop, when you can have a glorious colour booklet to peruse, while you spin the CD?
Sure, by all means...rip to your computer or I-monkey (whatever)...but I insist on lossless copying or I reject it out of hand. Hell, I even get annoyed about having to share 320kps, 44'100 Hz MP3's with people as a means of promo. I miss the older days for sending a CD in a slipcase...but convenience and money rule now.
For a band in the position we are in, we NEED sales or we get dropped, simple as that....and thus, here is a my argument AGAINST piracy and such. If you buy the MP3's, then great...cheers, you're a pal. If not, then you're kind of scummy really.
It is theft and there isn't any other way to argue the case. I discuss this subject quite a lot with people I meet on the road and it's always interesting to hear poeple opinions.
The fact the industry took SOOOOOO long to embrace the 'digital age' is their own fault and as such, a lot of labels have gone down the drain or 're-structured'.
I could go on for hours about this subject...but alas...it's hometime from work and I have a bottle of beer to consume.
------------- www.enochiantheory.co.uk
www.myspace.com/enochiantheoryband
"Direction...what we need to achieve..."
|
Posted By: AmbianceMan
Date Posted: January 14 2012 at 09:34
I always heard it said tht CD's aren't very big money makers for the artist. With the digital revolution, I could see how some artists may actually BENEFIT by recording/releasing their own material with less overhead. Merchandise (T-shirts, posters) have traditionally provided some income, but let's face it, prog bands don't get a lot of adult money for t-shirts and posters. Gigs used to be the big moneymaker for average to wel-known bands. I dunno, I'm not an industry whiz, but i do miss the Album/CD art that seems to be faing away.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: January 14 2012 at 10:34
wjohnd wrote:
i've pretty much embraced the digital revolution - although I own hundreds of CDs most of the music i buy now is on MP3 or listened to via Spotify.CDs were a poor substitute for the joy of a double gate-fold sleeve anyway and I don't really miss them. LPs were great until they scratched or had a poor quality or filler track that you couldn't easily ignore.
|
I'll never get on board for the pay to download express. Cds came a long way since their inception when often they were just duplications of music that was mastered for LP had just a single page insert and the back/sides thingy for cover art. The LPs I hang on are mostly kept for either their cover art or being not available on CD.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: bernZ
Date Posted: January 14 2012 at 20:40
Hi, I,m new to the site, but can so relate to the prog lovers need to physically have the music. Just recently obtained the amazing Ammerland by Fuhrs and Frohling and my immediate reaction upon receipt was to copy 5 times and hide the original...seems crazy, but i am so afraid this kind of music will disappear that i have to hoard it.....!
|
|