Is Radiohead prog?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=744
Printed Date: December 02 2024 at 14:42 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Is Radiohead prog?
Posted By: necromancing
Subject: Is Radiohead prog?
Date Posted: May 09 2004 at 21:41
How 'bout it ? Radiohead - prog or not prog?
|
Replies:
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 09 2004 at 23:51
Prog' is not the exact term, I believe it's an overrated band.
Iván
|
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 02:31
'Paranoid Android' is about as prog as you get but Radiohead don't really fit the 'prog' label musically most of the time although they are experimental in approach.I think of them as being a modern day Pink Floyd so given that PF are often regarded as Prog then the answer to the question must be YES!
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 03:18
Radiohead have certainly written music that IS prog - all of OK Computer (not just Paranoid Android), and some of The Bends and the Iron Lung EP), but find it difficult to consider them a prog band.
Before OK Computer they were essentially a "progressive Indie rock band" that wrote some stunning hit singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Iron Lung, High and Dry, Just), but they then went through a deeply experimental period. I think they realised that this was such a strong album that they had to completely smash apart everything they wrote or fall into the trap of writing "more of the same". Kid A and Amnesiac are albums I am still struggling to "get", as there would seem, on the surface, to be little musical craftsmanship in the same way as OK Computer. Hail to the Thief is a welcome return to the form of Pablo Honey - ie prog indie.
OK Computer is only overrated in the same way that Dark Side of the Moon or Abbey Road are overrated, IMO
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 05:30
I don't think they're prog, but they ARE very experimental. Let's call them a VERY GOOD pop/rock band. But if you'd say that they ARE prog, I think I can live with that!
|
Posted By: The Analog Kid
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 07:31
They are I think In the same corner as Pink Floyd and Porcupine Tree.
Strange, PT should be at least as big as Radiohead. PT is much better and more accesible as well, yet Radiohead has commercial succes.
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 07:56
I'm not sure if PT want commercial succes...
|
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 12:31
Four Chords That Made a Million
------------- Billy Connolly
Dream Theater
Terry Gilliam
Hagen Quartet
Jethro Tull
Mike Keneally
|
Posted By: alonsin
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 15:31
Shure has a lot of elements of what is consider "prog", other bands have had similar beginigs... from "hard rock" (Rush)"jazz", (Soft Works) or "alternative" ...Radiohead... any way the are a great band...........
------------- ...Begin with the posible and move towards the imposible
|
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 16:25
I like Radiohead. Until someone said they were prog, I never really saw them in that light. Still don't... I thought we covered this earlier, Fringe-Prog. Good Band- Fringe Prog.
|
Posted By: headboy
Date Posted: May 10 2004 at 16:28
Posted By: necromancing
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 01:54
The articles that I've read, make it seem that the band is shy about fielding the whole "prog" rock question. I have a magazine where the interviewer asked Jonny Greenwood if he was familiar with the Peter Gabriel-era Genesis, and he mentioned he was to some extent, but that the band doesn't reference classic prog music directly. However, there seems no doubt that some of the band's music is heavily influenced by Brian Eno. Also, Thom Yorke has said that Miles Davis "Bitches Brew" influenced the choatic horn part at the end of "The National Anthem".
"OK Computer" is very prog in nature - "Exit Music (For A Film)", "Paranoid Andriod", "Subterranean Homesick Alien", "Climbing Up the Walls", etc. IMO, Radiohead are VERY experimental, but they don't play "shredder" guitar or 10+ minute songs. So I don't know if that qualifies as prog in the classis sense. Though they do use Moogs and Mellotrons with creepy sound effects, which to me is prog enough. Like someone already said, "OK Computer" is the 90's "Dark Side of the Moon" in a sense.
"Cuttooth" (Kid A/Amnesiac B Side) is very Krautrock and reminds me of the 70's German band Neu! (David Bowie fans will be familair with this influence on the Berlin Trilogy (Low/Heroes/Lodger). And if you listen to "2+2+5" or "Everything In It's Right Place", it sounds prog to me. If "prog-rock" means "progressive rock music", than I think by today's standards, Radiohead should at least be considered on the boderline of "prog" and "alternative".
|
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 02:04
The boundaries of "prog" are amorphous, semi-permeable, and subjective.
This type of question has no real answer, but could be voted upon....
------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
Posted By: Marcelo
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 11:21
A prog fan couldn't resist the "progressive rock death" idea. So, any prog fan tries to keep alive the beloved genre, trying to hear "progressive" any kind of music a little bit different from the FM radio hits. Radiohead is a good alternative band, or we must consider Coldplay, Anathema, Oasis, etc etc as prog bands too?
|
Posted By: raggy
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 11:54
I can certainly see why prog fans appreciate RH, but Marcelo has a good point. Anyway, if RH are Prog, then Kula Shaker can definitly lay claim to a place in the archive. Their sound is much closer to what I call prog!
------------- Now is tomorrow afternoon
|
Posted By: Joren
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 13:26
Peter Rideout wrote:
The boundaries of "prog" are amorphous, semi-permeable, and subjective.
This type of question has no real answer, but could be voted upon....
|
Yes, maybe we should make a poll?
EDIT: oops, there is one!
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 14:02
Marcelo wrote:
A prog fan couldn't resist the "progressive rock death" idea. So, any prog fan tries to keep alive the beloved genre, trying to hear "progressive" any kind of music a little bit different from the FM radio hits. Radiohead is a good alternative band, or we must consider Coldplay, Anathema, Oasis, etc etc as prog bands too?
|
There is not much that I can hear that is progressive about Oasis or Coldplay - Coldplay, particularly, adhere to a fairly rigid formula, although the formula itself has developed since Parachutes. Oasis are little better, progressively speaking (although I like their music). I haven't heard Anathema so can't comment.
I believe Radiohead are different because they deliberately try to push the boundaries and know that they abhor formula. This is apparent in most of their material, even the singles. There's not many "cookie-cutter" chord sequences here, although the earlier material did stick to the ABABCAB form on the whole.
OK Computer is a different ball game - it's in a class of its own, IMO.
|
Posted By: Marcelo
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 14:53
Another point (very subjective this time) is the fact that I would love to see my favorite bands on TV... but I can't imagine VDGG (i.e.) beside a Britney Spears clip, even in case of success. Thinking about characteristics of progressive music, surely, comes to my mind the non-commercial but artistic intentions. So, when I see Radiohead in MTV, I'm glad because their music isn't so bad like most of the "TV bands", but prog? No way!
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 15:39
Ah - that explains it - if you've only seen the videos on MTV, then you've only seen the "commercial" side of Radiohead - although "Paranoid Android" does get some airing, and I've even seen the video for "No Surprises" and "Karma Police" a few times.
Both the latter are deceptive in their simplicity and commercial appeal - especially "Karma Police", which has that wonderful "For a minute there I lost myself" section at the end. The lyrics to "Karma Police" are very different to the norm as well, as they paint very vivid pictures. The videos make absolutely no attempt to bring the words to life in Radiohead's typically obtuse fashion. The rest of the OK Computer album is worth exploring no matter what your tastes.
On a final note; Other prog bands have made singles - and videos (Marillion, Genesis, Pink Floyd, etc.), but that does not stop them being prog. I think that Marillion lay claim to being the only prog band ever to get a true prog song (Garden Party) into the charts. But that's another debate
|
Posted By: landofcake
Date Posted: May 11 2004 at 18:04
Thats an interesting question ... i dont know if i would call Radiohead
prog ... because i personally think they're more of an indie band. But
bearing this in mind O.K. Computer is a very experimental album
(considering they're an indie band) and a good album too. I wouldn't
personally classify them as Prog myself.
|
Posted By: The Analog Kid
Date Posted: May 12 2004 at 06:43
There are so many cross-overs/combined styles/ or whatever, since back when The Beatles arrived. I'm aware that there's a difference in 'Prog' as a genre and 'Progressive Music'. Radiohead might as well be a combination of Prog, Progressive music, Indie and maybe Spacerock. Other 'Alternative' bands like Smashing Pumpkins and even Soundgarden have made a few hints at Prog. And BTW, most good bands do combinations, have their own style and progress within themselves until some point.
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 12 2004 at 07:01
The "prog" element is the elusive part that is missing from the Beatles as not one of their albums truly deserves the tag "prog", even Sergeant Pepper.
Try this experiment: Listen to DSOTM, then a prog album of your choice (using one of the 5000+ listed here as a guide) then OK Computer, then an album by any of the bands you have mentioned. I'm confident you will then understand why many believe Radiohead are a special case. They certainly don't deserve the straight "Indie" tag, IMO.
If not, you will have had a superb chill-out session - particularly when armed with the tipple of your choice
BTW, if you can track down a copy of the video of the set they performed at Glastonbury in 1997, I almost guarantee you will be "converted". There is something magical about it - Q Magazine recently voted it the #1 live set of all time. Not sure I'd agree, but it's up there with the very best!
|
Posted By: Gaston
Date Posted: May 12 2004 at 15:18
Peter Rideout wrote:
The boundaries of "prog" are amorphous, semi-permeable, and subjective.
This type of question has no real answer, but could be voted upon....
|
My thoughts exactly. While Radiohead are one of my favourite bands, their musci cannot be described as prog because there really is no such thing anymore. Older music, maybe from 60s - early 80s is considered to be labeled as "prog" but nothing recent should be in that category. I created a thread about this a few weeks ago but not too many people responded. Radiohead is more political now than anything, and that's what separates them from Porcupine Tree et al. Thom has too much to share about current world events and such. I could see them being an art rock band, or even post modernist political rock, but not prog, since the term is oversimplified anyways. If anything, Paranoid Android, yes, kind of proggish, but Kid A would be considered the prog album, if there was one. They often rely on thematic visuals within their albums, such as Pink Floyd, but since the songs are shorter, there isn't enough room for exploration. This may change soon though, so I hear. The next album is sheduled for next year. I hope it is more along the lines of Floyd, but I fear that if this happens, the mundane Radiohead listeners (you know, the one's who bought OK computer for Karma Police lol) won't really like them anymore, and they therefore would not be reaching as many people. Oh, and these same people disliked Kid A too. That's a pretty good explanation, I guess.
Gaston
-------------
It's the same guy. Great minds think alike.
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 13 2004 at 02:15
Gaston:
Aren't Porcupine Tree a 1990s-2000s band? And what about Spock's Beard and all the other modern prog bands you seem to be overlooking?
Marillion are definitely prog - and still going strong - and much of the Fish-era material is highly political, touching on the troubles in Northern Ireland, the record industry, and social politics.
Forgotten Sons:
You're just another coffin on its way down the emerald aisle When your children's stony glances mourn Your death in a terrorist's smile The bomber's arm placing fiery gifts on the supermarket shelves Alley sings with shrapnel detonate a temporary hell
Radiohead are much less political than Marillion - and "Karma Police" has incredible lyrics, not to mention the wonderful coda;
Karma police arrest this man, he talks in maths, he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio.
Karma police arrest this girl, her Hitler hairdo is making me feel ill and we have crashed her party.
Finally, "Paranoid Android" is over 7 minutes long - longer than, for example "Garden Party". "Supper's Ready" is in fact 5 pieces, each around the 3-4 minute-mark. 2 of those 5 pieces are repeated, and thematic material is used from the 1st to give continuity.
|
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: May 13 2004 at 08:00
OK Computer definitely contains some heavily prog-influenced tracks; the use of the Mellotron in 'Exit Music', and the whole feel of 'Lucky' (if ever there was a song where the guitar solo at the end should just go on, and on.....)
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
Posted By: necromancing
Date Posted: May 13 2004 at 23:48
Well, I think Radiohead qualifies as prog.
Let's face it, if Marillion does a live cover of "Fake Plastic Trees", I think it's safe to say they have some important fans in the prog world.
|
|