Mis-match Album Covers and Details ...
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Report bugs here
Forum Description: Help us improve the site from a tech standpoint
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=74352
Printed Date: February 18 2025 at 14:54 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Mis-match Album Covers and Details ...
Posted By: Keewee
Subject: Mis-match Album Covers and Details ...
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 05:56
Gidday ![Smile Smile](smileys/smiley1.gif)
Just used following URL - http://www.progarchives.com/top-prog-albums.asp?ssubgenres=&salbumtypes=1&syears=&scountries=&sminratings=0&smaxratings=0&sminavgratings=0&smaxresults=250&x=0&y=0#list - to display top 250 prog-rock albums and noticed a mis-match between album cover and artist details ![Shocked Shocked](smileys/smiley3.gif)
It first occured with album 35, then again (as far as I can tell from cover details) at 38, 43, 48, 49, 50 and so on until then end of the list ... confusing when one knows the cover and then checks details and they mis-match ![Confused Confused](smileys/smiley5.gif)
Anyway ... great stuff ... keep up the good work ![Clap Clap](smileys/smiley32.gif)
PS ... now, how many albums do I need to complete top 250 ![Cry Cry](smileys/smiley19.gif)
|
Replies:
Posted By: Keewee
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 05:59
PPS ... any chance of increasing the number to 500 or even 1,000
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 06:12
It looks fine to me.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 06:14
Looks Ok to me too.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Keewee
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 06:21
This is what I see ...
![](file:///P:/Temp/moz-screenshot.png) ![](uploads/32128/x.png)
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 06:38
Have you tried a different browser?
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 06:45
He's using FIrefox and that's working okay for me on that list.
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 06:46
Maybe he caught a virus. It's the season...
|
Posted By: Keewee
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 07:08
Hahaha ... more likely sunstroke !
Anyway ... cleared cache etc etc and restarted PC ... still getting same problem, but started from album 30 this time ... also, got the 'submit' button image appearing as an album !!!
Probably a bug with browser ... but, damnit, I like firefox.
Have not tried with any other as I have cleaned them off my PC.
Ah well ... it's not a biggy, but would be nice to know how to fix.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 08:37
chopper wrote:
He's using FIrefox and that's working okay for me on that list.
|
I know he is. I see the pic he posted too! ![Smile Smile](smileys/smiley1.gif)
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: M@X
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 10:25
------------- Prog On !
|
Posted By: Jörgemeister
Date Posted: December 23 2010 at 10:59
I followed OP's link and didnt find any mismatch
|
Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: December 24 2010 at 06:03
Keewee wrote:
PPS ... any chance of increasing the number to 500 or even 1,000
|
probably that would be a heavy load for the server to run such a query - maximum is 250 ![Smile Smile](smileys/smiley1.gif)
btw - I've played a bit but couldn't find any mismatch using Firefox too
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow">
![](https://srv.progfreak.com/api/sig/Rivertree/6-120/recently-played-covers.jpg)
|
Posted By: Keewee
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 04:03
Gidday
Many thanks to those who responded ... I found the culprit ... Internet Download Manager ... with this program NOT running, all lists displayed correctly ... but somehow, when IDM is running, it appears to cause Firefox to throw a wobbly after 30 of so albums in the list.
True, expanding this list to 500 / 1,000 would cause some extra load on the server, but 100 entries today was processed in .45 seconds and 250 in 1.39 ... so, 500 / 1,000 would not be too much extra ... if the album art was not provided, then I can't see the problem ... server has to chew thru hundreds of entries anyway to find top 250 of them!
As to whoever said that 'prog-related' and 'proto-prog' are NOT progressive enough, well, that is your opinion, these artists and their albums are all over progarchives.com, so must be progressive enough ... anyway ... I'd still like the opportunity to include these genres in MY selection.
Cheers
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: December 25 2010 at 12:33
You CAN make a selection that includes Proto and Related.
Bands that are added in Proto and Related aren't added for being progressive in a certain degree (if they were "progressive enough" like you say, they would be added to the full-blown prog categories), but for being relevant to the bigger picture.
|
|