queen. prog or not?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7407
Printed Date: December 02 2024 at 04:38
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: queen. prog or not?
Posted By: frippertronik
Subject: queen. prog or not?
Date Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:02
|
i think that the first 4 albums of queen are really prog, songs like march of the black queen or bohemian rhapsody are very complex and the vocals arrangements are incredibles.
------------- a plague of lighthouse keepers |
Replies:
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:03
 Don't forget to mention Hot Space, very symphonic also------------- I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT |
Posted By: AfanSpur
Date Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:12
|
Early Queen definitely progressive. There are many bands who have had patches of Progressive rock but generally are not considered as such? Radiohead? Porcupine Tree? The Smiths? Muse? Asia? ELO ? Super Furry Animals? Architecture in Helsinki? Bjork? Massive attack? The Orb? Most of these have had moments of being either progressive in setting new standards or have recorded tracks that have had elements of progressive rock in them. Good examples are In Absentia P. T., The Queen is dead by the Smiths, Vespertine by Bjork, Mwng by SFA,OK computer,Mezzanine by Massive Attack ------------- There stands Olias to outward to build a ship Holding within all we hope to retain The frame will be so built to challenge the universe Clasped with the skins of the fish of the plain |
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:47
|
All: This discussion has been had ad nauseam. The webmasters have made the decision that Queen is not prog, and thus will not be included on the site. So chat away, but you're fighting an uphill battle... Peace. |
Posted By: frippertronik
Date Posted: June 11 2005 at 21:54
hey maani it doesn't matters to me, i can't understand the reasons for tell me that queen is not prog and groups like radiohead yes, just give me one reason ------------- a plague of lighthouse keepers |
Posted By: bluetailfly
Date Posted: June 11 2005 at 23:24
|
Uh oh.....the red-faced icon!!!! ------------- "The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle." |
frippertronik wrote:Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: June 12 2005 at 10:00
|
Queen II is a progressive masterpiece ... but IMHO Queen decided after that that they would continue as a popular rock/pop act with an unique twist. I love them, they're extraordinary. They're not prog, they're ... QUEEN. ------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Mike" rel="nofollow">Recently listened to: 
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: June 13 2005 at 20:35
|
I really think the Queen albums should be archived, a lot of people
don't want them here because they're very known, and not necessarily
known as such for being prog giants, but there's no doubting it
in my opinion, they're a very unique type of prog, but it's DEFINITELY
prog. There are bands here that are less prog than Queen... |
Posted By: protec
Date Posted: June 20 2005 at 03:04
| I think they have prog elements but I wouldn't really consider them a prog band, more like pop or statdium rock :) |
Posted By: ldlanberg
Date Posted: June 26 2005 at 22:36
Love that willingness to compromise.
|