Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=73517 Printed Date: November 23 2024 at 05:36 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Clean Vocals or Death Growl? (Modern Prog)Posted By: Mushroom Sword
Subject: Clean Vocals or Death Growl? (Modern Prog)
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 18:31
What do you prefer? Extreme Metal with Heavy Growl's and screaming? Or Clean classic Vocals that don't scare me as much? Lol.
I prefer Clean. I'm a classic rock kinda guy. And I like modern prog, but I can't stand the Death Growl. It sounds really bad imo. I love to DT and Tool, (no screaming), I love Animals as Leaders (no words at all). But If I go anywhere else, Symphony X, Periphery, Cynic, I just have to shut it off as soon as they start... singing if you could call it that.
SO yeah, for you Modern Progressive Metal fans, what do you like?
P.S. I'm sure this question has been raised before.
Replies: Posted By: JonteJH
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 19:13
Posted By: TheOppenheimer
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 19:18
I like both, but I prefer them according to the setting. Some prog metal pieces would sound to calm or passive with clean vocals, while others may sound too harsh with growls.
But, I have to admit, I love Agalloch - mixing both for post-prog-folk-doom-metal pieces.
------------- ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
A veces es cuestión de esperar, y tomarte en silencio.
Posted By: rogerthat
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 19:26
All my favourite singers are clean but if you mean by clean the surfeit of masculine angels these days, then rather death growls than that.
Posted By: Mushroom Sword
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 19:47
JonteJH wrote:
Symphony X growling, wait what?
Early stuff, no. But have you heard there last album?
Yeah, even that annoys me. And I love the album (for the instrumental sections).
Boris the Spider by The Who makes me want to shoot myself.
Posted By: Wanorak
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 19:48
Clean all the way for me:) I think Opeth would be amazing if Akerfeld sang cleanly! I can't take the cookie monster growls seriously and it ruins the music.
------------- A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
Posted By: beebs
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 20:03
It took me quite awhile while listening to BTBAM, but I'm to the point where I'd rather hear a growling singer like Tommy Rogers than a screeching, high-pitched whine of a voice. And they're out there.
------------- "Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of one's own mind" * Ralph Waldo Emerson
Posted By: JonteJH
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 20:58
I really love growls, Periphery, Meshuggah and my favorite Devin Townsend.. damn i could kill for that voice.
Posted By: Mushroom Sword
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 21:38
Jake Kobrin wrote:
I don't think there's anyone that actually prefers one or the other... They each serve their purpose.
For example, Yes would sound AWFUL with growling, but Jon Anderson's vocals would probably sound out of place in Morbid Angel...
Well yeah, I actually do prefer clean over the growl. Can't stand it. And that's apples and oranges. One's soft classic symphonic rock. The other is extreme metal. Jon Anderson couldn't sing metal. Have you seen DT's cover of Time? LaBrie sings rock very poorly.
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:00
Wanorak wrote:
Clean all the way for me:) I think Opeth would be amazing if Akerfeld sang cleanly! I can't take the cookie monster growls seriously and it ruins the music.
Exactly this. There's some other bands, not so progressive, which I also like very much, but it's growling just ruins the experience for me.
Posted By: Jake Kobrin
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:03
Mushroom Sword wrote:
Jake Kobrin wrote:
I don't think there's anyone that actually prefers one or the other... They each serve their purpose.
For example, Yes would sound AWFUL with growling, but Jon Anderson's vocals would probably sound out of place in Morbid Angel...
Well yeah, I actually do prefer clean over the growl. Can't stand it. And that's apples and oranges. One's soft classic symphonic rock. The other is extreme metal. Jon Anderson couldn't sing metal. Have you seen DT's cover of Time? LaBrie sings rock very poorly.
Well yeah, that's what I'm saying. Apples and Oranges. I don't think anyone would want to growl in symphonic prog.
------------- http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Neil-Kobrin/244687105562746" rel="nofollow - SUPPORT MY FATHER AND BECOME A FAN
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:06
Jake Kobrin wrote:
I don't think there's anyone that actually prefers one or the other... They each serve their purpose.
For example, Yes would sound AWFUL with growling, but Jon Anderson's vocals would probably sound out of place in Morbid Angel...
O yes, I'm pretty sure there are lot's of people (me included) who not only prefer clean vocals, but even can't stand growling. On the other hand, there are many hardcore metalheads who just can't listen to music without growls, and even despise it as "too soft" or "music for girls" or whatever they may come to think.
Posted By: anoblesoul
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:10
I definitely prefer clean vocals. I can tolerate growls when there are other things to like, like Sirenia or Leaves Eyes, but I can't say I ever like it
Posted By: Mastosis
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:22
I prefer clean vocals only because they're easier to sing along to and I'm a sucker for a kick-ass melody, but growling definitely has a place, too. You gots to have the light & shade!
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:26
I like the midway point, filthy gruff vocals like the guy from Isis's "clean" vocals, or the guy from Baroness
Posted By: Lozlan
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 22:36
I've never, ever been capable of listening to growler vocalists. As a lyric-focused listener, it's usually pretty important to me that I can understand what's being warbled. Moreover, I find the deep, sepulchral snarls of most metal bands to be deeply unsettling. I feel like I'm plummeting through the earth's crust into some sort of Hieronymus Bosch-esque hellscape.
But seriously, no disrespect to the growl fanciers.
------------- Certified Obscure Prog Fart.
http://scottjcouturier.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow - The Loose Palace of Exile - My first novel, The Mask of Tamrel, now available on Amazon and Kindle
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 23:21
I don't like standardised things, Standards arethe countrary of progressive. I like Riverside's growling and I don't like too much the clean voice of Artension but what matters is that the two things are functional to the song, not to the genre. Can we consider Pink Floyd's One of These Days the first example of growling?
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: Mushroom Sword
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 23:44
octopus-4 wrote:
I don't like standardised things, Standards arethe countrary of progressive. I like Riverside's growling and I don't like too much the clean voice of Artension but what matters is that the two things are functional to the song, not to the genre. Can we consider Pink Floyd's One of These Days the first example of growling?
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 24 2010 at 23:47
Certainly a music period question...my kids listen to screamo and some growling but mainly screamo. The problem with both (mainly growling) is I have no clue what they are trying to convey in the song? . And when you go to a live show.....Holy No Comprendo Batman!!....that's even worse. The music is ok, but I like Lozlan prefer to understand what is going on in the music. Especially with progrock, one attribute of prog is the lyrics......
-------------
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 00:18
Mushroom Sword wrote:
octopus-4 wrote:
I don't like standardised things, Standards arethe countrary of progressive. I like Riverside's growling and I don't like too much the clean voice of Artension but what matters is that the two things are functional to the song, not to the genre. Can we consider Pink Floyd's One of These Days the first example of growling?
Great mention. I had totally forgotten this song. Sorry for Nick Mason who wasn't thr first...
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 01:14
Opeth wreck their songs with death metal growling
There i have said it.
Its true - Opeth's music is amazing but the growling caustic vocals are abysmal!
Clean vocals are the best, and take more skill.
i know some death head will get on here and spout on about how amazing death metal vocals are, and how it takes so much talent to scream your vocals raw - but it is not the case.
-------------
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 01:16
Old people.
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 01:18
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
Opeth wreck their songs with death metal growling
There i have said it.
Its true - Opeth's music is amazing but the growling caustic vocals are abysmal!
Clean vocals are the best, and take more skill.
i know some death head will get on here and spout on about how amazing death metal vocals are, and how it takes so much talent to scream your vocals raw - but it is not the case.
Over 30yrs of listening to all kinds of music......I have to agree.
-------------
Posted By: NecronCommander
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 01:23
Well it does require some skill to do good growls. You can't discredit them for that just because it's not your style.
I have no problem with people not liking harsh/growled vocals, but I don't like it when people discredit them entirelty or write it off as not being legitimate. Granted, I listen to a lot of extreme stuff and vocals rarely phase me anymore (be it death metal roars or zeuhl screeches, I'm on both ends of the spectrum), but some stuff wouldn't work without harsh vocals. A good amount of the time they're almost necessary to make the music more effective. It's hard to say if I prefer growled or clean because I think both are necessary at appropriate times.
-------------
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 01:56
Instrumental!
------------- https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album! http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385
Posted By: WalterDigsTunes
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 02:10
Modern prog is a bad joke, and growling only makes it more stupid. Ditch the new garbage and stick to the classics.
Posted By: NecronCommander
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 02:12
What took you so long, Walter?
-------------
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 02:24
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
Opeth wreck their songs with death metal growling
There i have said it.
Its true - Opeth's music is amazing but the growling caustic vocals are abysmal!
No, the application of growls in Opeth is wonderful and really embellishes the music.
Clean vocals are the best, and take more skill.
To some extent, maybe, although that's still incredibly shallow to say. There's a massive majority of singers who can't growl like Akerfeldt, just like a lot of singers can't sing like Jon Anderson. They're both skills which require some practice at least and a skill which is usually developed to a degree. In both the above cases, you can here a clear difference in quality on earlier albums where either vocalist appears. Because you don't like harsh vocals it does not mean that they take less skill.
i know some death head will get on here and spout on about how amazing death metal vocals are, and how it takes so much talent to scream your vocals raw - but it is not the case.
So if anyone disagrees they're wrong?
-------------
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 02:32
Clean guitar or fuzz? Church organ or stab the Hammond with knives? Trumpet voluntary or make the bugger scream and cry like Miles?
Clean vocals aren't exactly operatic or choir singing, most rock singing is head-singing anyway.
------------- What?
Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 03:07
For me, it's a mix of both. I get bored easily, mood changes through vocal and musical styling appeals to me very well. Maybe that's why I dig Into Eternity, Cynic and Opeth as much as I do.
-------------
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 03:13
Generally I prefer clean vocals, but I think the growl vocals are well placed in Opeth, and bring something really dramatic to the music. I can understand why some people find them comical, but interestingly no more comical than Geddy Lee's or Jon Andersons vocals seem to be, to most people who don't like prog...
------------- Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Posted By: Tapfret
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 03:22
I like a lot of heavy heavy stuff, but I have gotten to the point that I would rather listen to instrumental pieces than put up with Cookie Monsters. As a matter of fact, vocals in general, aside from a handful of true masters, (Di Giacomo, Mercury...) are more likely to wreck a listening experience than enhance it.
Posted By: JS19
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 03:42
I don't understand people who mark things down because they can't stand death growls. When I started out listening (mainly to Opeth), I found the growls incredibly difficult to listen to as they made me wince very time I heard them. No, however, there are fews things that create such an explosive level of tension than a well placed growl in a mostly clean vocal song. A song wholly in death growls, however, can get a bit tiring, so I definitely prefer it when they alternate or are used sparingly in a song.
-------------
Posted By: tamijo
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 04:14
As someone mention above, vocals are like other instruments, used right at the right time, is what works.
No way to set up a rule, can imagine how Jon Anderson could spoil quite a few good Rock albums whit his clean vocal. On the other hand, too much Grooooouuuwl and it get boring too.
The New Orphaned Land, would be a good example of how to use the right vocal at the right time, making the album, the vocaly best balanced albums i'we heard for a while.
Cynic quite good at it too.
------------- Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Posted By: The Sleepwalker
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 05:44
Black Metal shrieks > Death Metal growls
-------------
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 05:49
I prefer variation in my metal albums. That's why I like Opeth and Agalloch so much. Even Negura Bunget has variation, their recited parts compliment the music and the other vocals so much.
Posted By: Bonnek
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 06:09
At least growls ain't cheesy.
In the best examples (Opeth, Agalloch, Enslaved), it's the variation between both types of vocals makes them stand out so much. But there are also a number of bands that work perfectly with just growls (Dissection, Entombed, Death come to mind)
If they are just average or cliché, then growls can be as annoying as melodious cheese vocals. It all depends on the album.
Posted By: Bonnek
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 06:15
Is it just me or did my kitty grow larger?
Posted By: Darklord55
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 07:19
Definitely in the both camp.
Posted By: yanch
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 07:41
When used right the growls work. I think the best metal uses both.
Posted By: J-Man
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 08:21
Jake Kobrin wrote:
I don't think there's anyone that actually prefers one or the other... They each serve their purpose.
For example, Yes would sound AWFUL with growling, but Jon Anderson's vocals would probably sound out of place in Morbid Angel...
Exactly. It's all about context.
-------------
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime" rel="nofollow - http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Posted By: J-Man
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 08:27
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
Opeth wreck their songs with death metal growling
There i have said it.
Its true - Opeth's music is amazing but the growling caustic vocals are abysmal!
Clean vocals are the best, and take more skill.
i know some death head will get on here and spout on about how amazing death metal vocals are, and how it takes so much talent to scream your vocals raw - but it is not the case.
*facepalm*
Just because you don't like growled vocals doesn't mean they require no skill and "are abysmal". You just don't like it. Those are two different things.
-------------
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime" rel="nofollow - http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Posted By: CCVP
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 08:46
J-Man wrote:
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
Opeth wreck their songs with death metal growling
There i have said it.
Its true - Opeth's music is amazing but the growling caustic vocals are abysmal!
Clean vocals are the best, and take more skill.
i know some death head will get on here and spout on about how amazing death metal vocals are, and how it takes so much talent to scream your vocals raw - but it is not the case.
*facepalm*
Just because you don't like growled vocals doesn't mean they require no skill and "are abysmal". You just don't like it. Those are two different things.
Spot on Jeff. Growling actually require more technique than normal singing, such as Jon Anderson or Peter Gabriel do. If you do it wrong you can actually destroy your vocal chords, something that was not uncommon during the late 80's and 90's death scene.
Besides, there are a wide array of growls. I can say without much research that most people that claim they like this kind of singing here in PA didn't began to scratch through the surface of the death scene and some opinions I have seen about Atheist's latest albumshow that quite a lot.
-------------
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 09:04
To clarify: I like this kind of singing, as other kinds of singing, when functional to the song. I don't like when it's only to follow a standard and I mean it for every kind of singing.
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: Prog Geo
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 09:31
My favorite band is Opeth.I have said"I love the combination of growls and screams with clean vocals".
Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 10:35
No growling for me thanks.
Somebody has mentioned that different instruments sound also different, well for sure but if so, growling vocals sound like a badly-tuned and badly played instrument to me. It's as if a guitar would be so distorted and mistuned that you do not perceive a sensible timbre nor musical sound dynamics anymore.
But ok that's just my taste, nothing against them or against those who like them, I just think it's a pitty they sometimes ruin (to me) otherwise brilliant music.
Posted By: sleeper
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 10:42
As long as it works with the music I dont care, its when the vocals dont fit that I have a problem.
------------- Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
Posted By: Manuel
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 11:09
Dellinger wrote:
Jake Kobrin wrote:
I don't think there's anyone that actually prefers one or the other... They each serve their purpose.
For example, Yes would sound AWFUL with growling, but Jon Anderson's vocals would probably sound out of place in Morbid Angel...
O yes, I'm pretty sure there are lot's of people (me included) who not only prefer clean vocals, but even can't stand growling. On the other hand, there are many hardcore metalheads who just can't listen to music without growls, and even despise it as "too soft" or "music for girls" or whatever they may come to think.
That's how I feel too. One of the reasons I'm not really into metal is the growling, and a few other things too. I like to be able to understand the lyrics, and growling and screaming won't really inspire me.
Posted By: VanVanVan
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 11:11
sleeper wrote:
As long as it works with the music I dont care, its when the vocals dont fit that I have a problem.
To me, this is why Opeth is so good; because they can balance the growls and the really heavy parts with the clean, softer parts. Similarly, a band like Atheist would sound absolutely absurd if they didn't use their sort of harsh screaming style. Different styles call for different vocal types.
------------- "The meaning of life is to give life meaning."-Arjen Lucassen
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 11:50
The answer to this should be pretty obvious, it all depends on the music.
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 12:13
If I really liked the music I don't think growls would stop me enjoying it. No more than a really annoying "clean" vocalist at any rate.
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 13:03
I don't have a problem with being wrong....but how do you understand the growling?? I mean at least with screamo or plain screaming you can get the words...but with growling its all a jumbled mess of gerbling.....I'm not slamming growling I just simply don't understand the lyrics, content of the music.
I listen to a lot of genres.....I do enjoy some of the music but I get bored cause I am trying to understand the lyrics.
I guess I failed.......
-------------
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 13:08
Catcher10 wrote:
I don't have a problem with being wrong....but how do you understand the growling?? I mean at least with screamo or plain screaming you can get the words...but with growling its all a jumbled mess of gerbling.....I'm not slamming growling I just simply don't understand the lyrics, content of the music.
I listen to a lot of genres.....I do enjoy some of the music but I get bored cause I am trying to understand the lyrics.
I guess I failed.......
I don't understand a lot of growling.
Posted By: omardiyejon
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 13:18
actually i really like the experimental vocal try outs. for example maudlin of the well, especially their last album 'part the second'. vocals on the album can be considered as clean but in fact they are neither clean nor growly in my opinion.
or i can give deluge grander as an example to this. they do not really use vocals in their songs, but the short vocal partitions are highly experimental and works perfect when you get used to them.
also indukti can be an example of the experimental vocal users, especially with their last album.
moon safari, the dear hunter and ritual are the bands that i like as the users of clean vocals. on the other hand baroness, isis, devin townsend, opeth and (early) maudlin of the well are using growly vocals with perfection.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 16:13
So Prog in languages you cannot understand are off your play-list then? (Italian, French, German, Greek, Latin, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Czech, Russian, Japanese, Dutch... Kobaļan).
------------- What?
Posted By: Mushroom Sword
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 16:23
Dean wrote:
So Prog in languages you cannot understand are off your play-list then? (Italian, French, German, Greek, Latin, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Czech, Russian, Japanese, Dutch... Kobaļan).
They are for me...
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 16:45
So growling is now a language? I'll check Wikipedia...
-------------
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 16:52
Catcher10 wrote:
So growling is now a language? I'll check Wikipedia...
Deans point was not about languages but understanding lyrics........as you well know.
Mushroom Sword wrote:
Dean wrote:
So Prog in languages you cannot understand are off your play-list then? (Italian, French, German, Greek, Latin, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Czech, Russian, Japanese, Dutch... Kobaļan).
Posted By: Anthony H.
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 16:58
I like clean singing about a thousand times more. I don't dislike harsh vocals, but they really don't connect with me very well. There are certain exceptions, however.
-------------
Posted By: akaBona
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 17:07
Dellinger wrote:
Jake Kobrin wrote:
I don't think there's anyone that actually prefers one or the other... They each serve their purpose.
For example, Yes would sound AWFUL with growling, but Jon Anderson's vocals would probably sound out of place in Morbid Angel...
O yes, I'm pretty sure there are lot's of people (me included) who not only prefer clean vocals, but even can't stand growling.
Yep, exactly this.
Posted By: WyattEarp
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 17:31
There's a song by The Byrds called Turn,Turn,Turn in the line says"There's a reason of everything purpose under heaven" then it goes "A Time"
Just my opinion:The Time more than ever is to be Clean
Like they were back in the 60's
We're in "The Battle for Middle Earth"
One of the Hugest reasons why i love Prog is it's politicalness,what i mean is Concept Albums.
The Record Companies which are a extension of Wall Street and The owner of Wall Street who is The Rothschild Family,want to take back the control of the music thru shows like American Idol,America's got talent,thru Censorship,Copyright laws and Monpolizing the Internet
So to get back to anything that the Record Companies approve of folks get to listen,while if the Recording Industry doesn't approve of won't see the light of day
Which means this is a battle for also Preservation of the finest music,independance of the artists and musicians.
Why Clean now,because to clearly hit folks upside the head,get back to THE REAL BLUES
Except for a few artists(Robert Wyatt included in the few),musicians have lost THE BLUES.
I'd love for artists to touch on
*Bank of England and Wall Street robbing the Greek,Iceland and American People thru Speculation,Derivatives,Credit-Default Swaps,Sub-prime loans(If you want a clue read the Matt Taibbi articles in Rolling Stone and his blog at the Rolling Stone website,even get back issues with his articles on Goldman-Sachs and Wall Street)
Btw that's what Gong's 2032 album is about.
* why we're in war?It's not for Patriotism but to fill Wall Streets pockets and for land and oil for Israel.
And
Reason why i'm saying this is because your,your mom,dad,cousin etc.Taxpayer dollars flipping the bill for these wars.
So Aparteid Israel can murder and butcher innocent Gazians and Palestinians wholesale because their not the Chosen People of the Talmud(Hey Metalheads you wanted hardcore i just told the truth)
(Also btw Robert Wyatt's "For Ghosts within" is about this,also check the saxophone player's website http://www.gilad.co.uk - www.gilad.co.uk )
*Btw Americans,did you know that the American Soldier is over in Afghanistan for the worlds Opium because 92% of the world's Opium is in Afghanistan
and
In early 2000's The Taliban threw out the Opium Drugs Lords and The Drug Lords came to the US Government wanting to send the troops to Afghanistan to get back the Opium fields for the Drug Lords.
*Btw also the American Soldiers can been Thrill-killing(Which open-fire on) innocent and Unarmed Women and Children over in Afghanistan,Iraqi.
Ahh folks do yourself a favour read War is a Rackett by USMC Smedley Darlington Butler.
The book will make Crystal Clear why wars are fought.
We need to get back to the garden,back to the 60's where folks and musicians took a stand.
Hey
Robert Wyatt's For ghosts within and Gong's 2032 is a start.
People need a sledgehammer tooken to them or a boot up their rear because they need to be woken up.
Clear,Crystal Clear is the perffered technique right now!!!
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 17:39
Now that I have been face palmed and flamed with my last comment, may I continue? OK I will.
I just feel when you listen to an album, especially progressive, you expect a certain type of music, usually complex, multi instrumental perhaps, with a variation of styles and a certain atmosphere is generated. When those death metal grow vocals come on in short spurts, it works OK to bring a darkness to an atmosphere, and at times admittedly it can get too dark for my tastes but I can understand it's use. I detest evil lyrics and evil sounding vocalists; obviously black metal bands want to sound evil and dark and for that reason they shriek, growl and vomit their way through every song, such as Dark Throne, Emperor, Cradle of Filth, and I used to listen to Morbid Angel, Nalpalm Death and Exodus in my metal years. I still like some of Napalm Death's old stuff such as Suffer the Children and Cenotaph, great for a change of pace. Overall though, I have grown out of that now into more serious adult music; I believe the death metal scene is really for a teenage or pre 30s target audience, though there are always exceptions, and it is not virtuoso or complex, I have played and sung Cenotaph myself, and it is not difficult. A lot of people can growl a song, but try singing like Russell Alan or Neal Morse or Jon Anderson... very difficult.
The grindcore bands of course have to growl or they would sound stupid, but once agin that is fine for them if thats what floats your boat, indulge in Canibal Corpse, Jim Carrey's favourite band, and hear about having your entrails split, your body rots, you are repeatedly smashed to a pulp with hammers... the growling is so intense and inaudible they could be singing "my dog runs across the road and licks my neighbour's cat"... I read the lyrics to Hammer Smashed Face and the song was still impossible to follow. Is that talent to sing like that? Lyrics are so important to me and if you cannot understand them, why have lyrics? What is their purpose?
When growling vocals work it is when they are used in a certain context , not just growling non stop, that is really boring and irritating. They work when used for a purpose such as Devin Townsend albums (Ziltoid), Dream Theater (Black Clouds...) Haken (Aquarius) and Ayreon (Human Equation day 12). In these albums contexts the growling enhances the mood and makes sense even. I still do not prefer it but I can appreciate the effect that this has and it belongs there. However if there is a constatnt barrage of death vocals on every song it loses its impact for me and becomes very dull and unpleasant. This is why I mention Opeth. They are incredible musicians and I love Still Life, and Damnation especially. Damnation is a beautifully crafted melancholy Gothic work that has some of the best Opeth, influenced from Porcupine Tree admittedly but is great to hear very quiet vocals and virtuoso guitar riffing, not just a bunch of angry growls. In My Time Of Need is my favourite track on the album that features a melody that really captivates me and it haunts me, beautiful beyond anything on their other albums. When they use clean vocals and growling balanced out it is Ok with me, such as on Still Life, but when it is one incessant GREEEEEAAAAAAAOOOOOOORRRRRRRR - I mean, what good is that and especialy as Akerfeldt is such a damn fine singer on clean vocals, as good as i have heard. I was really moved by his work on Damnation and then was so appalled at Deliverance which sounded like he was possessed by demons he growled so much. I know it is only a style of music but it sounds so morbid and evil. OK, just leave the growling to Black Metal and grindcore type bands, they can have it and I wont go near that music again... already indulged in that realm 25 years ago, and then I discovered real music - PROG4EVER.
-------------
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 17:45
wtf incited provoked that exactly?
------------- What?
Posted By: Mushroom Sword
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:00
Snow Dog wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
So growling is now a language? I'll check Wikipedia...
Deans point was not about languages but understanding lyrics........as you well know.
Mushroom Sword wrote:
Dean wrote:
So Prog in languages you cannot understand are off your play-list then? (Italian, French, German, Greek, Latin, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Czech, Russian, Japanese, Dutch... Kobaļan).
They are for me...
That's a bit sad.
Well, TBH I've never ventured outside of english lyrics. I haven't heard any other language in prog. I'm sure it sounds amazing but i haven't heard it. So my above post isn't really valid... I'm sorry. I'll go cry in the corner.
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:04
Mushroom Sword wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
So growling is now a language? I'll check Wikipedia...
Deans point was not about languages but understanding lyrics........as you well know.
Mushroom Sword wrote:
Dean wrote:
So Prog in languages you cannot understand are off your play-list then? (Italian, French, German, Greek, Latin, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Czech, Russian, Japanese, Dutch... Kobaļan).
They are for me...
That's a bit sad.
Well, TBH I've never ventured outside of english lyrics. I haven't heard any other language in prog. I'm sure it sounds amazing but i haven't heard it. So my above post isn't really valid... I'm sorry. I'll go cry in the corner.
Sometimes for some people the language barrier can be a problem. If it doesn't bother you though there is amazing music out there not sung in English.
When I was young i don't think i would have bothered with non English music.
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:08
old people.
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:18
You weren't flamed for your last post, you posted a comment and people disagreed.
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
I just feel when you listen to an album, especially progressive, you expect a certain type of music, usually complex, multi instrumental perhaps, with a variation of styles and a certain atmosphere is generated.
So you expect and want prog to be samey and predictable?
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
When those death metal grow vocals come on in short spurts, it works OK to bring a darkness to an atmosphere, and at times admittedly it can get too dark for my tastes but I can understand it's use. I detest evil lyrics and evil sounding vocalists; obviously black metal bands want to sound evil and dark and for that reason they shriek, growl and vomit their way through every song, such as Dark Throne, Emperor, Cradle of Filth, and I used to listen to Morbid Angel, Nalpalm Death and Exodus in my metal years. I still like some of Napalm Death's old stuff such as Suffer the Children and Cenotaph, great for a change of pace. Overall though, I have grown out of that now into more serious adult music; I believe the death metal scene is really for a teenage or pre 30s target audience, though there are always exceptions, and it is not virtuoso or complex, I have played and sung Cenotaph myself, and it is not difficult. A lot of people can growl a song, but try singing like Russell Alan or Neal Morse or Jon Anderson... very difficult.
Death metal is quite often incredibly complex, that's like saying prog isn't complex because Tangerine Dream aren't. It's unfair to judge a genre on one artist, let alone one characteristic which you don't enjoy. Also, I personally believe prog is for old people who like to listen to men singing about elves with their high womanly voices.
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
The grindcore bands of course have to growl or they would sound stupid, but once agin that is fine for them if thats what floats your boat, indulge in Canibal Corpse, Jim Carrey's favourite band, and hear about having your entrails split, your body rots, you are repeatedly smashed to a pulp with hammers... the growling is so intense and inaudible they could be singing "my dog runs across the road and licks my neighbour's cat"... I read the lyrics to Hammer Smashed Face and the song was still impossible to follow. Is that talent to sing like that? Lyrics are so important to me and if you cannot understand them, why have lyrics? What is their purpose?
And there are plenty of prog lyrics which I don't like, but this is about VOCALS, not lyrical content. maudlin of the Well have some of the most poetic lyrics I've ever heard and they just so happened to be growled. Don't generalize.
-------------
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:21
It is perfectly ok to not like something especially when you explain your reasons why in a respectful manner...rather than just it sucks, it stinks, hate it with no reasons why.
I enjoy a lot of non-english music and I understand spanish, some portuguese and italian....but not growling.
But I don't think I would like growling in French, German, Greek, Latin, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, Finnish, Czech, Russian, Japanese, Dutch... Kobaļan.
-------------
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:36
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
OK, just leave the growling to Black Metal and grindcore type bands, they can have it and I wont go near that music again... already indulged in that realm 25 years ago, and then I discovered real music - PROG4EVER.
lol! I hate growling too, I find it silly when it's growling lyrics, although free form vocal hatred is ok, but this post is ridiculous.
One barrier for foreign language prog is import prices, the only RPI album I have is Area's Nazi Attack because it wasn't expensive, but I don't want to pay $20 for an album.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
Posted By: Triceratopsoil
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:36
joerly what are you talking about, TD is very complex
Posted By: progkidjoel
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:39
Triceratopsoil wrote:
joerly what are you talking about, TD is very complex
I was saying it's unfair to judge the complexity of music on the way that it immediately sounds, as someone who doesn't an album like Phaedra could say it's simply echoes and random noises.
-------------
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 19:41
Henry Plainview wrote:
One barrier for foreign language prog is import prices, the only RPI album I have is Area's Nazi Attack because it wasn't expensive, but I don't want to pay $20 for an album.
I got the remaster of NIN's Pretty Hate Machine at Best Buy yesterday for $7.99. I saw the price and though, "lol ok, for that price...sure."
Prog really can't compete with Trent Reznor either giving albums away literally, or having awesome stuff being dirt cheap.
------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 20:00
Henry Plainview wrote:
AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:
OK, just leave the growling to Black Metal and grindcore type bands, they can have it and I wont go near that music again... already indulged in that realm 25 years ago, and then I discovered real music - PROG4EVER.
lol! I hate growling too, I find it silly when it's growling lyrics, although free form vocal hatred is ok, but this post is ridiculous.
One barrier for foreign language prog is import prices, the only RPI album I have is Area's Nazi Attack because it wasn't expensive, but I don't want to pay $20 for an album.
Yea this thread got on a side bar......first the OP question was valid. Clean Vocals or Death Growl? Then it turned into...'.what you don't like music from non-english speaking regions?'
Anyhow I don't like Death Growl as the OP was asking.
-------------
Posted By: rod65
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 22:41
Like several of the posters above, I like both clean vocals and growls in their appropriate contexts. The point has been made often enough that I probably don't need to make it again here except in passing. One style that I have recently come to appreciate is the beauty-and-the-beast approach, as with Epica and After Forever. I think the death growl works really well with a beautiful, powerful, and highly trained female voice to balance it out, thus providing a range that neither could attain individually. There is a lot of power, emotionally and artistically speaking, in that combination if it is done well.
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 22:59
^ I do like both Epica and After Forever, but would like them even better if they didn't growl. As a matter of fact, I choose the songs I like from those without growling for my repeated listenings.
Now, some weird thing... I really dislike growing, but for some reason I love "Careful with that axe, Eugene" by Pink Floyd.
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 23:13
Dellinger wrote:
^ I do like both Epica and After Forever, but would like them even better if they didn't growl. As a matter of fact, I choose the songs I like from those without growling for my repeated listenings.
Now, some weird thing... I really dislike growing, but for some reason I love "Careful with that axe, Eugene" by Pink Floyd.
That's screaming.
------------- https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album! http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 25 2010 at 23:15
If I can't get a clean death growl then I'm going to stay away.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Posted By: goss19
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 01:28
I hate growling the vast majority of the time. Although in some instances, growling feels totally appropriate.
In my opinion, Opeth is one of the very best bands of today.
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 02:22
Dellinger wrote:
Now, some weird thing... I really dislike growing, but for some reason I love "Careful with that axe, Eugene" by Pink Floyd.
There's a big difference, I think, in screaming for effect and growling words to sound menacing. I find Opeth hilarious, but I like this song, except for the retching part.
Why? I don't know.
------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you
Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 02:28
Pig squeals anyone?
-------------
Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 03:42
-------------
Posted By: JayDee
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 03:45
Can't tolerate them either, in case someone dare ask.
How about http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKt59VOhABg - Death Metal Burps ?? Anybody up for it?
-------------
Posted By: rod65
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 10:50
irrelevant wrote:
Dellinger wrote:
^ I do like both Epica and After Forever, but would like them even better if they didn't growl. As a matter of fact, I choose the songs I like from those without growling for my repeated listenings.
Now, some weird thing... I really dislike growing, but for some reason I love "Careful with that axe, Eugene" by Pink Floyd.
That's screaming.
Well, now, as long as we're splitting hairs ...
Posted By: oddworld
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 11:15
I prefer clean vocals.
Posted By: Elderflower Man
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 12:02
This almost qualifies as a Trollin' Poll. :(
Anyhow, I like both, but there's a time and a place for each, and the key to using death growls or, equally, clean vocals in metal is to know when to use them. It's like asking whether you prefer a mandolin or an acoustic guitar.
------------- All your hearts now seem so far from me,
It hardly seems to matter now.
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 12:27
Careful With That Axe is Screamo, not growling...
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 12:37
Henry Plainview wrote:
but I like this song, except for the retching part.
Which part was the retching part??
This guy must have krapped his pants 14times while doing this.....or simply blew up.
-------------
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 14:16
Hi,
It depends on the work itself.
There is no reason for any of us to think that growls don't have their place in music, and that some folks can sing really well right through it. One can listen to Joe Cocker, or even catch Roger Chapman singing "Gypsy Moon" and then belting out "Chili Con Carne" or something else ...
In the end, it's not about the growl or the clean vocal ... it's about how it gets used, and that IS what "progressive" music is all about.
If I may ask, and this is totally weird to me ... progressive music was, AND IS, about breaking the traditions and creating new sounds and new voices and new music ... and why, WHY, are we trying to change things to a commercial aspect in music ... that has a lot less to do with its conception and vision, than it does the listener's desire and idea?
In the end, it's about the totality of it all ... or all you turkeys would have said a long time ago that Peter Hammill can't sing at all ... ! What's more ... he could careless what you think about his own voice and decisions on how to use it! That's the artist's prorogative ... not jail sentence!
Hard to believe some of these posts ... and how much we really do not respect music and expression, regardless of style.
It's sad! Really and totally sad!
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 15:06
^ Someone not liking growlers is not sad. Just a question of preference.
Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 15:42
Snow Dog wrote:
^ Someone not liking growlers is not sad. Just a question of preference.
Agreed ... but as long as you don't go around saying that is what music should be! Which distorts the definition of music that has been for the past 60 to 70 years more than anything else.
In the end, a growler or a clean vocal doesn't mean sheepdip if it is all it is ... and has little music behind it, and we can call it "metal", or something else.
------------- Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
Posted By: Catcher10
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 15:53
moshkito wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
^ Someone not liking growlers is not sad. Just a question of preference.
Agreed ... but as long as you don't go around saying that is what music should be! Which distorts the definition of music that has been for the past 60 to 70 years more than anything else.
In the end, a growler or a clean vocal doesn't mean sheepdip if it is all it is ... and has little music behind it, and we can call it "metal", or something else.
That's why I said as long as you represent your reasons why you don't like something with respect, there is no problem NOT liking an artist or style of music or whatever.
If someone simply states.."hate it" with no reasons why, then I generally don't pay attention.
Tell me why you don't like something......then I can understand better without making my own judgements.
-------------
Posted By: Elderflower Man
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 16:14
You're allowed to dislike death growls. But the endless, mindless bashing gets tiresome.
------------- All your hearts now seem so far from me,
It hardly seems to matter now.
Posted By: chrijom
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 17:41
Never really got the 'cookie monster' thing, just can't take it seriously.
Posted By: squirting
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 19:06
Growls are another colour on the palette of music and can be used for their own wonderful effects.
I also don't understand the need to hear the lyrics. Words are an entirely different medium to music, though their sounds can be used as the most timeless instrument (notably by Jon Anderson, who was often more interested in the sound words made than their meaning). Just google the title of a song + "lyrics" if you want to see what they're saying.
To be quite honest I find it hard to understand what clean vocalists are saying a lot of the time as well.
------------- "So that's it? After 12 years; so long, good luck?"
"Now I don't recall saying good luck."
Posted By: Dellinger
Date Posted: November 26 2010 at 22:17
rod65 wrote:
irrelevant wrote:
Dellinger wrote:
^ I do like both Epica and After Forever, but would like them even better if they didn't growl. As a matter of fact, I choose the songs I like from those without growling for my repeated listenings.
Now, some weird thing... I really dislike growing, but for some reason I love "Careful with that axe, Eugene" by Pink Floyd.
That's screaming.
Well, now, as long as we're splitting hairs ...
Ofcourse I know Careful with that Axe is not growling, but screaming. However, I guess it's somewhat a similar thing, I mean, surely someone not used to either would easily be turned away by either. However, I do like Carful with that Axe a lot (including the scream), while I find it difficult to tolerate growlings within songs. I guess that if a whole sub-genre of music had been created with such screams as those of Careful in just about every song, I would really get to hate that genre, but as a one song thing, I find it really cool.
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 27 2010 at 02:13
chrijom wrote:
Never really got the 'cookie monster' thing, just can't take it seriously.
You can start by not calling it "cookie monster"
------------- What?
Posted By: Prog Geo
Date Posted: November 27 2010 at 04:10
JayDee wrote:
Pig squeals anyone?
I listen to goregrind e.t.c.
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 27 2010 at 04:31
Dean wrote:
chrijom wrote:
Never really got the 'cookie monster' thing, just can't take it seriously.