Prog related definition updated
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Internal news
Forum Description: Stay informed about the latest updates regarding the site
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=70696
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 09:58
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Prog related definition updated
Posted By: Easy Livin
Subject: Prog related definition updated
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 14:18
|
Following feedback from our members and from the prog genre teams, we (the Admin team) have updated the definition of the category "Prog related". The revised definition can be found here: http://www.progarchives.com/subgenre.asp?style=38 - http://www.progarchives.com/subgenre.asp?style=38
We do not envisage any major change as a result of this, the objective was simply to make the definition clearer and to ensure it reflected the way bands are assessed for this wide ranging genre.
Our thanks go to John (Easy money) who led the project.
|
Replies:
Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 14:22
 Sounds good to me. (Still don't see why some bands are in there but, as I'm sure you know, I am a good forum member who never complains. About anything.)
------------- 
|
Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 14:56
 ... but that's not what we intend finally ... we welcome constructive criticism too  ------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow">  |
thellama73 wrote:Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 15:00
|
Pretty good definition. Could've used a werewolf though.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 16:14
Yeah, we welcome it with knives, swords, spears and such ------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu  Even my |
Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 16:19
delinquent please choose ...  ------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow"> |
Posted By: Rivertree
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 16:28
|
back to the topic .. the criteria list seems to be well thought out, thanks John ------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Rivertree" rel="nofollow"> |
Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 19:04
I like it  So, can we add Megadeth now?  |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: August 26 2010 at 23:18
|
That's a much better definition, but the rhetorical question at the end is missing the question mark! UNACCEPTABLE! Now can you guys please remove the text ad for vividseats.com at the top of the prog metal definition? I don't know how it got there but it's embarrassing. And EL, your review of Zeppelin IV from 2006 is still italicizing every other review after yours!
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: August 27 2010 at 02:52
Wow, nearly 4 years on and someone read it!
  Cheers HP, fixed.
PS - Should a rhetorical question have a question mark. Or not?
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: August 27 2010 at 03:29
|
yes IMO a question mark is called for at the end, and should probably read: A very good way to describe prog-related would be to imagine an
exhaustive book that covered the history of progressive rock. Would
such a book include references to Led Zeppelin's 'Stairway to Heaven',
David Bowie's 'The Man Who Sold the World' or Queen's 'Bohemian
Rhapsody'? Probably so. also Led Zeppelin reads 'led Zepplin', which I assume was a typo (or the English pronunciation  )an excellent def and a huge improvement-- kudos to all involved |
Posted By: Marty McFly
Date Posted: August 27 2010 at 03:39
|
OK, back on topic. It indeed is well said definition and I personally think that it's better than some Prog definitions :-D It's new, it's updated, it's carefully debated topic (so it's bulletproof, kind of). What are practical outcomes of this update ? How will this help to new Prog-related additions ? ------------- There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my |
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: August 27 2010 at 05:29
|
good work Admins!!! ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: August 27 2010 at 21:53
fixed ..anything else? ... (your asking me?) |
Posted By: Evolver
Date Posted: August 29 2010 at 08:24
 ------------- Trust me. I know what I'm doing. |
Posted By: jeffh
Date Posted: September 06 2010 at 22:26
|
Frankly, most of the definitions on this site read like they were written in a different language, then poorly translated.The new "Prog-related" one, on the other hand, is clear, well-written and interesting; good work. |
Posted By: Rune2000
Date Posted: October 05 2010 at 04:26
|
Great definition that creates many new posibilities!
The only thing that I reacted to was that Progarchives wasn't written with a capital letter. |
Posted By: ghost_of_morphy
Date Posted: June 18 2011 at 11:49
|
It would seem to me that, based on criteria 2, 4, 6 and 7, we should finally admit Boston. ------------- 
|