How Should Singles Be Rated/Reviewed?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: I Have A Question For You......?
Forum Description: Ask any question on any subject: if the admin team or any of our members can answer it we will.
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=69056
Printed Date: December 03 2024 at 21:42
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: How Should Singles Be Rated/Reviewed?
Posted By: Conor Fynes
Subject: How Should Singles Be Rated/Reviewed?
Date Posted: July 09 2010 at 20:05
|
In terms of reviewing an actual full-length work, I don't have much of a problem with it... However, in terms of actually reviewing singles and small EPs, how does that work?
Do I review it 'as it is,' or do I review (and rate it) as I would a studio album?
|
Replies:
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: July 09 2010 at 20:18
Depends on whether it was made in a studio or live. An EP if of original material should be reviewed as an original album. I'd say the same for a single. Still you must come up with the minimum amount words. 
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened... 
|
Posted By: Conor Fynes
Date Posted: July 09 2010 at 20:48
| Well... say for example, a song is just a single off of an album... but the song is absolutely amazing. Do I review the 'single' for the song, or the actual 'single' product? |