Fantômas’ avatar
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Report abuse here
Forum Description: Let us know about inappropriate reviews, posts, PMs, etc.
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6277
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 20:51
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Fantômas’ avatar
Posted By: Guests
Subject: Fantômas’ avatar
Date Posted: May 17 2005 at 10:16
|
He should change his unpleasant avatar.
Username: Fantômas Real Name: Shaw Joined: 2005 15 April Location: Brazil Date of Birth: 1989 30 January MSN Messenger: [email protected] |
Replies:
Posted By: maani
Date Posted: May 17 2005 at 22:05
|
Fide: Actually, it depicts a scene from the movie Scanners; in fact, one of the best, if most gruesome. It may or may not be unpleasant, but I don't think it rises to the level of ejectable. Perhaps you should keep in mind that it is only "special effects" from a movie, and not the real thing... Peace. |
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: May 18 2005 at 15:08
|
It's still distasteful Maani, even if you consider it art. No suggestion was made re ejection, just a request for something more tasteful. The clip is pretty graphic, special effect or not (I think most of us would have realised it wasn't for real). Are you suggesting it would only have been unacceptable if it was for real? Personally, I wouldn't watch that sort of sick film, and I don't wish to see images from it here. Yours prudely. Mary Whitehouse (Mrs.)
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 18 2005 at 15:18
Maybe I'm jaded and insensitive - but it doesn't bother me. 
|
Posted By: Harlequin
Date Posted: May 18 2005 at 15:31
|
I'm with Cert there. to be honest its usually how I feel by 5pm on Friday afternoons. ------------- Information is not knowledge Knowledge is not wisdom Wisdom is not truth Truth is not beauty Beauty is not love Love is not music Music is the best... |
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: May 18 2005 at 15:55
He's not the first to use that avatar, it doesn't annoy me, but I don't like it I prefer mine. ------------- I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT |
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 02:57
|
Strange, I've no problem with that avatar, but the one Crimson Prince uses.... Yes, it's only animation, but I still find it a little distasteful.
Sorry CP.  ------------- 
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 04:44
|
Despite having used it myself,in my forum youth,so to speak-I dont like it.Fantomas will change it when he realises that nobody takes his posts seriously because of it. Sometimes the need to be perceived as cool overrides one's objectivity. |
Jim Garten wrote:
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 15:34
You mean like when Genesis made Abacab Tony? |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 17:15
|
Great seminal movie. Avatar doesnt really bother me, but I dont really like it. Its not the spirit of the site somehow. Its obviously intended to shock too. BTW where does one find these animated Avatars? ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 18:08
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 18:09
Best way is to search other forums and then copy and paste them. |
Posted By: FloydWright
Date Posted: May 19 2005 at 18:09
I have to admit, I wish there was a way for me not to have to look at it. I don't do very well with violent/bloody stuff...kinda makes me queasy...
|
Posted By: greenback
Date Posted: May 22 2005 at 15:22
I'm glad to see i'm not the only one to disapprove such avatars: just think about anyone (could be jon anderson or neal morse themselves) who come here in the forums and see those avatars....mmmmm.....i don't think that it would make the unanimity! this exploding head is very popular, i have seen it on many sites, and i always wondered if it was not real! what is the point to IMPOSE us such distaseful animated avatars? i think we do not need this to attract interesting people. The same goes for Crimson King's fratricide avatar. humour, yes, but porn & death representation, NO! ------------- [HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!> |
||||||
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 00:35
|
I agree, it's disgusting but not a crime. Iván ------------- 
|
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 03:36
|
I solved that problem by being lazy and not chosen an avatar. Fantomas's avatar is tasteless and Bob/Easy's remark about prudery is one to make me ponder! How can one not offended by this sheer horror scenes and gruesome killings in most films (US or others) and sits fine with most censors(on the account that it is fiction and fake/trickery) but the slightest hint of pornography/nudity (i.e. the Janet Jackson tit ) creates havoc (because it is real and no reconstitution?!?). Most people offended by nudity and a bit of erotism should get psychiatrist's help. Do not get me wrong , I did not even see the slightest pornographic picture posted by this Belva character and certainly condemn the use of those in a site such as this. But if pornography is to be banned (hurray to that in the Archives) Bloody, gruesome gore shopuld also be banned. ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: FloydWright
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 11:46
|
I don't think you should say that anybody "offended by nudity should seek help".
Consider this: there are probably children under the age of consent in their respective nations who are reading this site. Even if you are not offended, don't you think the parents of said children would have a right to be angry that someone chose to expose them to those things in a way that the parents did not want? And not everybody gets off on porno, anyway. I mean, I personally don't want to see it and don't appreciate it when people sneak it into a site where I don't expect it to be. That doesn't mean I need help. It means I think this site is the wrong context for nudity and erotism, and there IS a proper context for it. But not here. I DO think you are right about needing to treat violence the same way as pornographic images, though. |
Posted By: The-Bullet
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 16:57
As a Tottenham Hotspur fan I find Trotsky's Avatar :-
offensive and painful   ------------- 
"Why say it cannot be done.....they'd be better doing pop songs?" |
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 21:24
|
Sean, the one on the Phil Collins after Genesis thread was repulsive and taken from a porn site, the a$$hole did't even took the time to erase the web page of the porn site. Iván -------------
|
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 04:35
|
Floyd Wright and Ivàn: I will make absolutely no comment on those threads since I did not see any posting (nor have I really looked for them either) from this Belva character. However , I trust that the uproar created by the members is completely justified. I condemn the use of pornography on this site because it is out of place and not the subject/scope of the Archives. FW, I said that comment about getting psych help in context of my entire posts: people getting offended by nudity or erotism (there is a difference with pornography) but not by gruesome killings, gorry murders and general bloodshed as so often graphically shown in War Movies or Horror movies. There is a solid problem here. By the time a kid is 14 , he will have seen 10000 murders on TV without anyone saying anything , but if he saw once the very act that drives not only human life but every kind of Earthly animal life, the very essence of the sentiment so warmly sung in every possible manner , the act of love-making, then there is major havoc. Is there not a huge hypocrisy? The uproar at the view of Janet Jackson's tit was another source of world laughter at American prudery (no offence meant at US or at anyone else) and would've gone unnoticed in the world if such a scandal was not made. As for kids not seeing pornography on the Archives , you are right. But kids are not likely to be shocked by a slight nudity unless their parents induce in their minds that nudity is dirty/evil , so we end up repeating/reflect/pass-on our hang-ups on future generations. However , the other risk is that nudity/erotism is used at commercial ends to sell us cars , food , soaps etc.... is problematic but on a different scale. No uproar of that because it is business. Read your response with interest. Hugues ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: Heptade
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 09:43
|
If I might add, this is not a site about violence OR pornography, so these
things have no place here, other than in some people's attempts to rile up the membership (successfully). It seems that to people like BELVA the internet is a place where they can irritate people without consequences. Hence, this site will always be plagued by them, as there are a lot of lonely freaks out there with nothing better to do. Whether porn is right or not is not really at issue here, it's whether it belongs on progarchives, for humour's sake or not. I think most would agree that it does not! There are millions of websites out there for those that are interested. Of course, it is a sad statement that children are exposed to all kinds of dramatized violence on TV, in movies and in video games, but the site of nudity or sexuality is considered taboo. At the same time, sex is used to sell every item under the sun to us. No wonder so many people are messed up over sexual issues, what with the mixed messages we are bombarded with by the media and entertainment industries. |
Posted By: FloydWright
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 12:10
|
I think what's wrong is that our whole culture's got a very warped view of the human body, in general, and both extremes (the commercializing/pornography and the uproar you refer to) are really two sides of the same coin. I think what's gone wrong is that the body--most especially the female body, but the male one to some extent as well--has been commercialized and exaggerated to a point where it's no wonder you get people perceiving it as something grotesque. Just take a look at a beer commercial, for instance...you'd think a woman wasn't worth anything unless she had breasts so large they have to be fake and/or give her tremendous back pain to live with. Or look at Britney Spears (if you can!). I really don't appreciate the use of sex to sell.
If you look at how the human body is depicted in art (that includes both commercial and fine art), it's very rare to see something now like the Statue of David or some of Storm Thorgerson's artwork (Shine On box set, PULSE, Broken China) where the body is not exaggerated or excessively sensualized (in an exaggerated, distorted way), but rather respected for what it is. The thing with pornography is, I don't think that in many cases the people who make it are going for realism...they're in more of a commercial, selling mindset that ends up distorting what should be treated with much more respect. Plus, I really doubt the emotion sought after is love, with all its spiritual, emotional, intellectual, AND physical components that go into a mature relationship--but mere arousal. Therefore I think it's perfectly understandable that parents would rather choose for themselves how they want to introduce kids to sexuality...it's not like the media is providing any real guidance. It's not an issue of parents teaching kids that nudity is evil (well, I imagine there are some, but that wasn't the case with my growing up), but of explaining what is and what is not a proper context. As for me, I probably found out in the best place of all: a medical book, where there was no agenda other than explaining the facts. |
Posted By: ita_prog_fan
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 12:42
|
His avatar is not... elegant, to be polite... but, as we say in Italy, "every head is a tribunal..." |
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 21:50
|
Dont know what you are getting Mr Bullet..??? |
Posted By: The-Bullet
Date Posted: May 25 2005 at 22:21
|
You're a wiz on that image thing T -------------
"Why say it cannot be done.....they'd be better doing pop songs?" |
Posted By: FloydWright
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 00:12
| Tony--I think that's a goal being scored against his favorite soccer/football team, if I'm not mistaken. |
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 10:24
|
No,it was a legitimite goal scored against my team,Man Utd, by his team Tottenham (Spurs).The "linesman" failed to do his job properly and award a goal because the ball had gone well past the goal line.The match finished 0-0.I have altered the image to depict what the assistant referee "saw".
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 15:07
|
Let me inform you Tony R that if the second picture is the real one, that's not a goal. The whole 100% of the circunference of the ball has to pass the goal line and in this case obviously hasn't because a small part is covering the linel, or even if it's goal, thepicture doesn't define it. If the left photo is true, well somebody should javascript void0;" target=_blank onclick="replaceText' :hangit:', document.postmodify.message; return false;"> Football is my second passion of course the real football, not the USA sport where the ball is kiked only a few times in a game. Iván -------------
|
the referee and the linesman.Posted By: gdub411
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 15:11
| I find it a tad tasteless and disconcerting, but to each there own. It certainly doesn't cross any lines IMO. |
Posted By: Trotsky
Date Posted: May 26 2005 at 22:17
|
Yikes ... who knew the football avatar would be more irritating than the hammer and sickle! I believe The Bullet, Floydwright, Tony R and Ivan all commented on this. First off, my avatar is a genuine picture of a "goal" that was scored by Tottenham Hotspur (the team that The Bullet and I both support) against Manchester United (a team that I loathe). However the linesman was too far behind the play and the keeper scooped it out before he arrived and it was not given as a goal. As a long time Tottenham fan surrounded by Manchester United fans (including my father, most of my friends and relatives ... in fact, Malaysia has the largest number of MU fans outside the UK) I was particularly outraged since I have long mantained that Manchester United gain a distinct advantage when playing at their home ground (in league matches from 1993 to 2003 penalties were awarded at a rate of 17 in favour of Manchester United and 1 in favour of whichever opposition they happened to be playing! At the time of the incident I had already been quite annoyed by a match a few weeks earlier when Arsenal (Spurs' historical arch-rivals) lost to Manchester United in a match filled with dubious refreeing decisions and had a record-breaking 49 game unbeaten run snapped. It takes some doing to annoy a Spurs fan over an injustice to Arsenal, but I've always preferred to see my team lose in a fair game, rather than win deceitfully. (can someone get me an emoticon with a halo?) Tony R, as a die-hard MU fan has accordingly found a misleading picture (which I just realised he admitted to having manipulated) By the way, Ivan, aside from supporting an EPL, the international football side I support, after my own no-hoper Malaysia of course is Colombia! ------------- "Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.” "No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present." |
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 03:14
|
Funny how a morally incorrect avatar discussion disgresses into a politically incorrect football thread. ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: Trotsky
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 04:29
|
Yes I must apologise for my part in that ... it is interesting discussion ... I do feel strongly that it is ridiculous that violence is far less censored than sex/nudity. As parents of three young kids, my wife and I have banned toys celebrating violence, and try and present sex/nudity in as open and honest a manner as possible. I think most societies have strong religious (in US's case its Christianity, in Malaysia its Islam) sensibilities that try and suppress an open and honest acceptance of what human sexuality is ... yet violence is widely accepted ... By the way, the ban on weapons still didn't work ... my son started school and now he's dancing around the house pretending a broom is a light sabre ... which is no different from what I was doing 20 something years ago! ------------- "Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.” "No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present." |
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 08:06
|
I was kidding about the football thing but this football violence (and not just the fans) will make it one day like the Roman Circus games. Is there not a solid Chinese/Buddhist minority in Malaysia? I read a long time ago 55% Muslim , 35% muslim and the rest Hindus and Christians. However the religions seems to live together fairly quietly in Malaysia. Not so true in Indonesia (ie the Bali and East Timor incidents), but there the Muslims are some 85%, I think! ------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
Posted By: FloydWright
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 11:47
That really depends on which variant of Chrstianity you're looking at...if it's the conservative kind, I can definitely see there being a problem. But if it's a more levelheaded kind, the only way I can see anybody thinking there's something wrong with it is if they have objections to waiting to actually DO something until marriage. |
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 17:26
|
When I look at fantoma's avatar,it seems to slow down.....
It's so scary |
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 17:34
|
see???? Stare at it long enough and it gets slower and slower!!!
|
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: May 27 2005 at 21:57
|
Nice
------------- I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT |
Posted By: Borealis
Date Posted: May 28 2005 at 15:14
|
I think that this avatar is f***ing awful, but well, on a site where people talk about sex, drugs, and the worst, music, there should not be problem with violence... ------------- Vive le Québec libre!... |
Posted By: Hangedman
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 00:37
|
Not that i had a problem with the old one, but I love his new avatar
|
Posted By: nacho
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 04:11
|
Yep, much better...
|
Posted By: abyssyinfinity
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 12:50
Yes, much much better...
|
Posted By: Cluster One
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 17:01
|
Agreed, I love his new avatar! Better go wake the wifey up
------------- Marmalade...I like marmalade. |
Posted By: nacho
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 17:48
|
Maybe we should ask Tony to play it faster for us?
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 18:42
|
|
Posted By: nacho
Date Posted: May 31 2005 at 18:46
|
Thanks Tony, now it seems we are getting somewhere... |
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: June 01 2005 at 00:57
I like it a bit slower myself ------------- I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT |
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: June 01 2005 at 17:28
|
Fantomas evil spirit is infecting his avatar...it is taking over my computer..........it will take over the site......fantomas is trapped inside........he...he...
|
Posted By: nacho
Date Posted: June 01 2005 at 17:36
|
Good thing at least you reduced the size of those two beauties in your signature, Tony. I was about to report you!!!
|
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 03:03
Now that's scary! -------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 08:20
|
I sent him a private message asking for an appropriate avatar, but what
a new 'gift',... at least it is a bit less annoying.
|
Posted By: Dan Bobrowski
Date Posted: June 02 2005 at 10:47
|
Reminds me of a the old washing machine in my parents basement. My girlfriend loved that thing. Kinda made me jealous.
Reminds me of a joke...
Why don't Wisconsin girls use vibrators?
It chips their teeth. |
Posted By: Gentle Ronnie
Date Posted: June 27 2005 at 05:55
|
New avatar is goood. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: June 28 2005 at 21:24
Gosh... I only came to see this topic today... Strange, uh? Next time you guys plan to talk about me, call me! 
------------- And above all, is punk 
|
Posted By: Hangedman
Date Posted: June 28 2005 at 23:46
|
I was hoping youd comment on this thread sooner or later! its mostly positive as you can see |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: June 29 2005 at 10:14
Yeah... It's a funny thread, I liked it... I don't like my avatars to be very "normal", hope that this didn't cause problem to anyone... I'm glad I see that people liked it... Hell yeah! ------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 14:59
 ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm |
Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 15:16
|
One of the best avatars yet!! ------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on! |
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 15:45
|
Great avatar ------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 15:47
|
funky avatar,but I doubt it will stay too long...
------------- 
|
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 15:50
|
It's hilarious if you ask me ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm |
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 15:51
|
It's getting overused by *cough* BJ *cough*
-------------
|
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 15:52
|
true ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm |
Posted By: Bj-1
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 16:43
|
I DONT KNoW WAHT YOU GUYS ARE TALKING ABoUT!!!
------------- RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on! |
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 16:49
|
Ok, now you're ruining this serious thread ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm |
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: October 01 2005 at 22:35
|
I don't like it.I have recommended this site to some of the kids I give drum lessons to and I think it is in BAD taste. -------------  |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 01:24
|
YEAAH! Sorry if my avatar inconveniences any of you, well, if I must change, then I will, no problem... But I just don't find anything wrong with it... ------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Eetu Pellonpaa
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 04:20
|
^ I understad the Mario-avatar maybe distasteful in a public forum with little kids.... But I liked it lots and quickly downloaded it for my own amusement!
|
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 05:00
|
All your avatars that I have seen so far are offensive. Can't you use a non sex related avatar? This is a music forum, in case you haven't noticed. You should realize that most people here are annoyed by your avatars, even if nobody PMs you about it. They simply are much more polite than you.
------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Mike" rel="nofollow">Recently listened to: 
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 10:42
Then we should ask Fantomas if he is willing to change it. |
Posted By: The Doctor
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 11:03
|
I like it. I think it really makes a statement about modern society and the struggles of man against nature. ------------- I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you? |
Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 11:18
I think an admin should ask Fantomas to change the avatar to anything which isn't related to sex. ------------- https://awesomeprog.com/users/Mike" rel="nofollow">Recently listened to:
|
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 12:37
|
OK, ok, little Mike, I changed it to something that isn't related with sex (well, kind of)...
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 12:38
|
Now, how Scanners are related to sex is something to be find yet...
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: October 02 2005 at 12:50
|
Now that's better
|
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 14:08
|
yeah i think Fantomas should change his avatar ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 17:11
Should I? What's the problem with Michael Jackson? He is even innocent to the law! 
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 17:23
|
Horza: we were talking about this avatar:
The new one is fine ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm |
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 17:23
i'm joking i was referring to the origin of the thread ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 17:31
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 18:52
|
Fantomas should really consider why nearly all his graphics involve violence or humiliation to women. We all acknowledge that he is still very much a child,but you have to wonder.... |
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 18:59
i checked your profile to see what age YOU were
you share the EXACT same date of birth as my wife 
i find that ....... almost unbelievable ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 19:00
oh ...... right ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 23 2005 at 19:19
Nah, you'll never offend me or bore me. I know you're only too shy to ask me to give you a hug!  ------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: October 24 2005 at 14:57
|
Yeah,I'm a real shy and retiring guy!
|
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 24 2005 at 15:26
You're getting old, ain't ya? So sorry. However, one day I'll too... 
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: October 24 2005 at 17:38
|
age is a state of mind ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 24 2005 at 17:41
|
Yeah, I just tried to have my revenge, since Mr. R always calls me a
child just to hide that he wants to give me a hug, after all...
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: October 25 2005 at 03:23
|
I must say that my 2 year-old daughter finds your sig gif incredibly amusing, Fanty...
|
Posted By: horza
Date Posted: October 25 2005 at 17:30
i like the psycho/duck too  ------------- Originally posted by darkshade: Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot. |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 25 2005 at 17:42
|
Thanks...
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: October 30 2005 at 10:28
|
psycho/duck gone...
-------------
|
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 30 2005 at 15:34
Yeah, unfortunately, all things must change. Even a duck... But someday I'll put it back. ------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: October 30 2005 at 15:40
|
i hope so
-------------
|
Posted By: Eetu Pellonpaa
Date Posted: October 31 2005 at 02:11
|
^^ If Fantômas inserts emoticons in his post with few empty lines before them, Mr. Pac will eat them! |
Posted By: Fantômas
Date Posted: October 31 2005 at 10:18
|
------------- And above all, is punk
|
Posted By: Trotsky
Date Posted: November 15 2005 at 21:15
|
This latest Lord Of The Rings one ... is pretty hilarious Fantom ------------- "Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.” "No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present." |
Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: November 15 2005 at 21:25
|
Indeed, Fanto I downloaded it for my gif collection ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm |
Posted By: NutterAlert
Date Posted: November 16 2005 at 08:54
|
Its very good indeed. I had no problem with exploding heads, but this is very funny. ------------- Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005 |
Posted By: The Wizard
Date Posted: November 17 2005 at 17:13
|
Now look what we got.................. -------------  
|
Posted By: Andrea Cortese
Date Posted: November 17 2005 at 17:20
... disgusting Aragorn, awful Boromir! |
