Quality of the threads revisited
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5861
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 10:40
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Quality of the threads revisited
Posted By: tuxon
Subject: Quality of the threads revisited
Date Posted: May 04 2005 at 19:58
|
Nice, someone added a poll about the quality of the threads, but made it Poll only, When you consider the quality of the threads to be low, than maybe it's a wise thing to do. But if it is low, I think it's better to discuss it, and see what we can do to possible improve the quality.
Personally I think the quality is pretty decent. I like some fun and humour, and an occasional serious thread, though I'm not good in serious discussions, I like to read them sometimes(I'm not a master of comedie also, so actually I should just lurk in the corner feeding from you guys). If someone feels the quality of the threads is low, do respond and try to make this forum better. ------------- I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT |
Replies:
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 03:24
Well said m'man  ------------- 
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
Posted By: Velvetclown
Date Posted: May 05 2005 at 03:33
Well said Mum 
------------- Billy Connolly Dream Theater Terry Gilliam Hagen Quartet Jethro Tull Mike Keneally |