Pink Floyd versus King Crimson
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Polls
Forum Description: Create polls on topics related to progressive music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53423
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 07:40
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Pink Floyd versus King Crimson
Posted By: Treasure
Subject: Pink Floyd versus King Crimson
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 23:45
|
I slapped this together so yeah pick already jeez
------------- 
http://www.last.fm/user/YertGuy - http://www.last.fm/user/YertGuy |
Replies:
Posted By: Drew
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 23:49
|
Floyd is an easy choice for me!
------------- |
Posted By: peskypesky
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 00:04
|
King Crimson for me... ------------- Prog fan since 1974. |
Posted By: ProgBagel
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 00:08
| I might go with Floyd on this one. I got into their early stuff recently and it all seems to be good. |
Posted By: someone_else
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 03:42
|
Pink Floyd got me definitely into prog 36 years ago, so it's easy for me to vote for Pink Floyd without writing anything against King Crimson... |
Posted By: Roj
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 04:50
| Easy for me. It's Floyd by a mile. |
Posted By: Petrovsk Mizinski
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 05:17
| Floyd. |
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 05:25
| King Crimson. No doubt whatsoever. |
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 07:02
|
Pink Floyd is consistently good. King Crimson is like a musical shapeshifter- you're never sure what you're going to get. ------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays |
Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 08:02
|
Cant choose!
A few years back I would have gone with Floyd, but my liking for Crimson has grown considerably in that time, so it's pretty much a tie.. I've been enjoying Floyd longer, and in many ways they are more in tune with my overall prog tastes, but Crimson really do it for me right now, as I'm still getting know their material. I also think that in many of their manifestations Crimson were better musicians, more eclectic and more innovative, especially in more recent years. |
Posted By: Thandrus
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 08:11
|
Crimson King!!! They've always been in front of their time... and still they are! Pink Floyd... Yeah... maybe... a good band... but there's always something in their music that repels me. |
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 08:34
|
Don´t mess with the King
------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?" 
|
Posted By: JROCHA
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 08:38
| King Crimson by far |
Posted By: Kapitan_Mrok
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 08:42
floyd... band of my life 
------------- Terra Tegit Terram |
Posted By: poslednijat_colobar
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 09:09
| Pink Floyd is my favourite band! Easy Choice! |
Posted By: Abstrakt
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 09:15
|
At the moment i prefer King Crimson, but tomorrow it could be Pink Floyd. Both are absolutely fantastic! |
Posted By: febus
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 09:21
Mr Abstrackt said it all!!
  |
Abstrakt wrote:Posted By: LanceFortune
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 10:20
| Talking of Prog? King Crimson. In retrospect, Floyd soon became (more blatantly with Dark Side), much more of a pop music thing to me. |
Posted By: Moatilliatta
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 10:21
------------- www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph  
|
Posted By: Alberto Muñoz
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 10:28
I cant vote, sorry both are my favourites bands -------------  |
Posted By: jimidom
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 10:30
I cannot vote either!  ------------- "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST |
Posted By: Hercules
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:32
|
Barrett Floyd would be close, but from Meddle to Animals, Floyd are so far ahead of King Crimson, it's a simple choice. Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts. ------------- A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life. |
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:39
 |
Posted By: Alberto Muñoz
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:41
So, you base your vote in popularity????
 Madonna would beat both... ------------- |
Posted By: ModernRocker79
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 12:03
| This one is hard. I love both but I have to chose Pink Floyd. King Crimson were better instrumentally. Pink Floyd had the melodies and the songs. That in the end of the day is what matters to me. |
Posted By: trackstoni
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 12:35
|
not easy to choose between two Giants , but Pink Floyd got my vote this time //// ------------- Tracking Tracks of Rock |
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:02
But it's not like you see many kids around campus wearing Madonna shirts. That said, I think kids wear those because they think it's cool and iconic (as is wearing a Che Guevara shirt). Anyway, personally I wouldn't base quality on kids' fashion sense or what is popular. Shirts with the "Dark Side of the Moon" logo look cool, and Pink Floyd has long had cool cache. King Crimson is generally more challenging from a mainstream perspective, and would be harder for mainstream listeners to digest (I don't imagine that most of those kids are Proggers, and might be donning Nickleback or Slipknot tees when they aren't wearing their Floyd tees -- or Zeppelin, Hendrix, The Doors -- which I consider quality iconic bands/artist -- etc). When I was in college I didn't know King Crimson, and Pink Floyd was my favourite popular rock band, but King Crimson played an important role in this Prog journey that I'm still on. King Crimson for me, though I really do like Floyd too. I think Larks' Tongues in Aspic is a particularly terrific album One might ask, is it particularly because of quality that bands like Pink Floyd, Foreigner, Boston, Queen, Styx, Bon Jovi, and Kim Mitchell regularly play on my local classic rock radio station rather than bands such as King Crimson, Magma, Comus, The Soft Machine, and Henry Cow, or it because it's more accessible that it has become part of the standard classic rock radio format? Popularity breeds popularity. I do agree that Pink Floyd has withstood the test of time, and is "quality" music, however. ------------- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXcp9fYc6K4IKuxIZkenfvukL_Y8VBqzK" rel="nofollow - Duos for fave acts |
Posted By: mithrandir
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:29
this is a joke, correct?
|
Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:37
Right, it's because PF et. al. were more popular then, so for a "classic" rock station which hopes for a recall of "glory days" they play that music. Pink Floyd was sort of the ultimate crossover - in high school I could have counted on one hand the number of people I encountered who had a 70s Yes record (and King Crimson was worse, I think I met one person who had even the faintest clue who they were), yet everyone loved Floyd, all the normal "hard rock" guys and friends who loved Zep, Bad Company, and sort of your standard 70s classic rock fare were big Floyd fans, went to the concerts, etc. I mean, Magma and Henry Cow? Forget it, I didn't have any chance of discovering bands like that at the time. |
Posted By: TGM: Orb
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:44
| Preference goes to Crimson. Love both. |
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:58
And a terrible one at that...
Anyway, even though I disagree with that popularity-based point of view, I definitely like Pink Floyd 349837 times more than King Crimson. Only ITCOTCK is a real masterpiece in my ears, and maybe even Red. But PF gave me 4 absolute masterpieces (from DSOTM to TW) and a few near-masterpieces (Meddle) and great songs in between.
On the other hand, King Crimson gave me "Discipline"  ------------- 
|
Posted By: Alberto Muñoz
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:40
------------- |
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:43
| OK, how about Pink Floyd vs Madonna... Not that easy, Pink Floyd went downhill since Barrett left, Madonna has been going downhill since the release of Music ... |
Posted By: The Quiet One
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:43
|
Luckily I'm no huge fan of KC, so I can vote easily, Floyd it is. Though I do love Islands and Lizard by the King. Starless and Wake are very good too. |
Posted By: Alberto Muñoz
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:55
Madonna has been downhill ever... in prog terms...------------- |
Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 16:11
|
I pick Both...Sorry I can't vote... ------------- http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/ http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/ |
Posted By: Takeshi Kovacs
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 16:43
|
Floyd are one of my all time favourites, and two of their albums (Wish You were Here & Animals) would be in my top 10 of all time (if not the top 5). Respect to Crimson too, but only one winner for me!
-------------  Open the gates of the city wide....
Check out my music taste: http://www.last.fm/user/TakeshiKovacs/ |
Posted By: Mellotron Storm
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:16
|
This is one of the rare times i can't vote.Both are in my top 10 bands of all time,and there's not a clear cut favourite for me.Very evenly matched. ------------- "The wind is slowly tearing her apart" "Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN |
Posted By: dzx
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:23
Exactly. Absolutely no contest for me, the most innovative of all. Floyd are how can I say it easy listening in comparison ------------- was that just an Am augmented minor 9th i heard? nice! |
Posted By: Urs Blank
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:26
|
In a "progressive" point of view, I would have to choose KC. But I vote for Pink Floyd, probably "The" group that made me become a huge fan of music in general. ------------- Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it. Salvador Dali. |
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:40
|
If I had to choose a favorite band, I would have to choose Pink Floyd.They were my first step into prog a few years ago and I still love them. I really wish people would stop wearing t shirts with PF, Led Zeppelin, AC/DC etc logos on them when they have no idea who the band is. There should be a test before you buy it to see if they know the band's material. I would like to get this http://pinkfloydstore.co.uk/acatalog/PF103L.jpg - PF t shirt , although noone will know of the existance of the album |
Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 18:33
I know exactly what you are talking about because I had that t.sh*t once ( I don't know how I lost it  ) and none in absolute knew that album.------------- http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/ http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/ |
Posted By: Roj
Date Posted: November 20 2008 at 03:12
I voted for Floyd earlier.
For me The T has summed it up perfectly. However I like Floyd 349838 times more
.Much as I do like some KC, a lot of it does nowt for me, so it's an easy choice for me.
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: November 20 2008 at 03:34
|
Floyd were evolutionary whereas Crimson were progressive end of pompous statement |
Posted By: Aristilus
Date Posted: November 20 2008 at 04:37
| An easy one this. KC are boring and PF are not. |
Posted By: dzx
Date Posted: November 20 2008 at 18:05
I would put it the other way around ------------- was that just an Am augmented minor 9th i heard? nice! |
Posted By: skimess
Date Posted: November 24 2008 at 19:22
|
King Crimson for me hands down is the better, more experimental band. That's not to say that the Floyd are bad but rather that KC simply shows more virtuosity. ------------- " Life is like a beanstalk, isn't it ? " |
Posted By: Dr. Occulator
Date Posted: November 24 2008 at 20:06
KC is the sunshine band for me.
------------- My Doc Told Me I Have Doggie Head. |
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: November 24 2008 at 20:12
| I can't vote either, because some times I prefer PF, other times KC. |
Posted By: Bitterblogger
Date Posted: November 24 2008 at 20:39
|
A great case can be made for either; and several already have done so above. But since a vote is a vote, KC gets it. After all, they're still adding to the pool--and providing quality stuff. Floyd's done, and, you gotta admit, AMLOR and Division Bell had obvious filler. Does anyone really think that'd have been reversed? I didn't think so. |
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: November 24 2008 at 21:11
| I really just can't decide! I would vote K(entucky) C(hicken) now, (I'm rediscovering RED, Lks Tng In Asp), but next month I could come here and vote P(hoton) F(actory), I just can't be absolute about this. |
Posted By: kevdog
Date Posted: November 24 2008 at 21:25
|
Floyd
------------- I look at the world and see no understanding... DT |
Posted By: alerxst
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 13:31
I agree with everything Logan said. Young person here. I certainly know who King Crimson is and could pick a few people (non-proggers) my age who know who they are also. Granted I couldn't find anyone who knew who King Crimson is that doesn't know Pink Floyd but that's besides the point (not really but I'm just trying to make my argument more valid  ).I noticed more people wearing DSOTM shirts in high school than college and I can't tell you how many times I'd try to strike up a conversation about prog with someone in those shirts only to find out that person was completely ignorant of anything outside of DSOTM or The Wall. Those albums produced radio-friendly hits that still get played regularly on the local classic rock station and therefore are able to stand your test of time. So yes Logan, you are correct, they are far from proggers. Anyway, I voted for King Crimson because I'm a huge fan of all of their stuff up to Three of a Perfect Pair with the exception of Beat which is ok. I really like a few Pink Floyd albums (Animals, Meddle, Wish You Were Here in that order) but neither the quality nor the quantity match KC. Excuse the disjointedness of my post but I'm listening to The Talking Drum now so my mind is all over the place. |
Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 13:52
|
It's a tough call but I chose KC.
------------- "Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value." Arnold Schoenberg |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 14:35
|
Wow this is even tighter than the PA Battle to Stardom final I can't vote by the way |
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 15:28
Oh, vote already and tie it up. ------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays |
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 15:54
|
Pink Floyd was my first prog band. KC is the best prog band. |
Posted By: darksideone2003
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 16:51
|
I can't vote love both bands equally..
However,, I do love FLoyd more that KC only because PF never changed members...
|
Posted By: Anirml
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 17:03
|
KC made songs like "Song Of The Gulls" and "Lark's tongue in aspic". PF isn't up there with them in my opinion.
|
Posted By: skimess
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 20:12
|
ELP definitely had their place in prog history but personally while a great band they never really broke the Nice/ELP mold. Their music was pretty much the same with very few attempts to expand. KC and PF both started out one way and, in Crimson's case, were able to survive many personnel and stylistic changes and still continue to amaze. ------------- " Life is like a beanstalk, isn't it ? " |
Posted By: tszirmay
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 21:58
There are Starless Echoes here Both are primo stuff, OBVIOUSLY! Different moods though, non? ------------- I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth. |
Posted By: Treasure
Date Posted: December 22 2008 at 23:40
|
Wow this got revived and I didnt even know :D
-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/YertGuy - http://www.last.fm/user/YertGuy |
Posted By: Floydoid
Date Posted: December 23 2008 at 14:21
I'll go with that, tho Crimson did knock out some mighty fine tunes too. ------------- 'We're going to need a bigger swear jar.' |
Posted By: theblastocyst
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 05:09
| Pink Floyd has made 14 albums from '67-'94, and they've only had 5 people in their band throughout their entire career. King Crimson has 15 albums since '69 but has gone thru several major transformations as well as over a dozen different bandmates. My favorite PF album is Meddle, and my favorite Crimson album is Larks' Toungues. And if I had to choose between those two albums i'd go with Meddle. |
Posted By: crimhead
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 12:47
| Can't we all just get along. |
Posted By: darksideof
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 12:59
wow King crimson is winning!!!!
Love boths bands equally, but I think PF should win basically because King crimson isn't only Fripp the only member from the early days....and the band
had sooooo many members in the past ( and still do)
however Pink Floyd don't... ------------- http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/ http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/ |
Posted By: TheMiracle
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 18:51
|
Pink Floyd. Now it is 67 to 70. :) |
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 19:41
|
Funny how, although probably there are more Floyd fans, or Genesis fans... Crimson always seems to win these kind of polls ------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 19:42
NO!!!!!!!! ------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
Posted By: crimson87
Date Posted: December 29 2008 at 20:33
| That's called respect |
Posted By: annexusquam
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 10:49
|
King Crimson of course. Any comparison is ridiculous
------------- https://0a0wake0.bandcamp.com/releases |
Posted By: Lost Follower
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 15:55
|
I don't really see much of a link between the 2. King Crimson were really twiddly dee stuff compared to Pink Floyd. Dark side of the moon is almost a pop album in comparison to most Crimson stuff!
------------- ~Jump you f**ker jump~ |
Posted By: Bitterblogger
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 19:45
I fail to see much of a link between King Crimson and "twiddly dee stuff".
 |
Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 20:28
|
Both are my fav...
But absolutely KC is my life. ------------- http://www.facebook.com/damoxt7942" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: AlbertMond
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 20:29
| Floyd. |
Posted By: A Person
Date Posted: December 30 2008 at 23:17
I have always wondered if PF meant to become a popular band by making DSotM. 
|
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 03:11
|
Hey, I voted and I don't remember who I voted for! I guess that means something besides me having a lousy memory. Come to think of it, this all thing is nonsense, but funny tough. I mean, they're both great! Each has it's place in music history AND in MY CDiscoteck!!! If I'd ever have to go to a desert island and take only one, i'd throw a coin to pick but oh boy, wich one ever came out, I surely would miss the other one a lot, and sometimes regret the choice (and blame the coin, of course). Sure they can live side by side. My final vote is GOOD MUSIC! |
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 03:13
| And after all we're only ordinary beings... |
Posted By: AlbertMond
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 03:19
Kinda doubt it. I mean, even their first single "Arnold Layne" did pretty well. I think the popularity was just building up, really. ------------- Promotion so blatant that it's sad: 
|
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 03:20
|
Should I add they are a two of a perfect pair!!!
------------- And after all we're only ordinary beings |
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: December 31 2008 at 03:40
------------- |
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 20:16
"Originally posted by el böthy
NO!!!!!!!! progrock is not meant to be fun.
"WHAT THE F#%K?!?!?!? I'm suposed NOT to have a good time listening to Renaissance or Yes?!? ------------- And after all we're only ordinary beings |
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 20:27
|
Where's the "this endless music competition stuff is silly and juvenile -- I like both of those fine bands equally well, and never thought I'd have to choose one at the expense of the other" option?
No vote from me -- I'd pick either, both, or neither, depending on my mood at any given time. My moods vary. My tastes in music range far. I don't view my music collection as some sort of sonic "war zone."
Sorry, but I'll say it again: many pollsters here must be record company execs with limited budgets (and even more limited vision), accountant-types, or just plain lacking in original topics for polls and threads.  ------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
Posted By: TGM: Orb
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 20:31
He was being sarcastic, one assumes |
Posted By: spookytooth
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 20:40
|
Wow, this is a tough choice, because I love both bands a lot, but I think I'll go with King Crimson. I like their material just a bit more than Pink Floyd material. Plus, KC is much more consistent at putting out good music than Floyd...
------------- 
Would you like some Bailey's? |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 20:42
Peter, you're doing that patronizing thing again. ;-) AMG calls King Crimson "the thinking man's Pink Floyd" in the first sentence of their Bio, and I've never been able to figure out why.
|
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 23:09
I know, and I always feel a twinge of guilt afterward, but I guess I just don't get the popularity of these ubiquitous "VS" polls.
In all honesty, I think it's symptomatic of a rather child-like way to look at music. Perhaps it even points to a darker aspect of human nature: the lamentable tendency to reduce all human interaction and endeavor, even art, to competition -- to divide the world into only winners and losers.
As I indicated, this is the record company executive or radio programmer way to look at music -- as mere plastic product, with merit or "worth" exactingly measured according to popularity (that is, sales).
I guess I'd hoped serious "progressive" music fans might be deeper and broader-minded than that, and not fall for the "bean counter" mindset which saw their preferred music marginalized & denigrated by THE INDUSTRY in the first place, and which sees the airwaves swamped in countless sound-alike clone bands, and cutie-pie, flavour-of-the-month, manufactured instant "stars"....
American Idol syndrome. Who will be the next
Music is not sport, and emotion is not math -- or is it? ------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: January 01 2009 at 23:14
KFC?
 It can seem like a good idea, but it always leaves me feeling a little bit guilty and sick in the end....
------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 11:45
Nah, Peter, that's just people on the internet. Competitions and lists are the only pleasures we have. If they weren't, we'd be outside!
Going on the internet in general is like KFC, but at least it's non-fattening. ;-)
And can anyone figure out a relation between King Crimson and Pink Floyd's music? It's actually at the beginning of the review of ITCOTCK, not their bio, but I still don't see any connection. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 12:01
NO!!!!!!!! ------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
Posted By: Scoppioingola
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 18:36
|
I love Pink Floyd, they're great; but King Crimson is, IMHO, one of the most versatile and impressive bands, ever. Lizard and Larks' Tongues are enough for me to vote for them over any other bands. Not to mention they still release very good material. |
Posted By: Bitterblogger
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 19:10
Reminds me of Fripp's announcement before a set in September, 1973: "We're not to be enjoyed. We're an intellectual band." Whereas Floyd wouldn't have addressed the crowd at all.
|
Posted By: PJaypt
Date Posted: January 02 2009 at 22:06
|
You say we can't get along... Well, I say YES WE CAN! Plus, I don't care if Fripp thinks KC is not to be enjoyed because it's an intellectual band: he's just wrong! I' say KC is the proof that an intelectual band CAN be enjoyable... and Yes, Renaissance, Genesis, Gentle Giant, Van der Graaf (well, not so much)... Oh, and Zappa! And if you do think what you say, you should be listening to music you do not enjoy. Hey, listen to The Wall, then, bet you won't enjoy it  And have a bad time while at it (hey, just kidding! )------------- And after all we're only ordinary beings |
Posted By: Lost Follower
Date Posted: January 03 2009 at 05:05
Oh come on! I watched that Prog night on BBC4 last night and Fripp was 'Twiddly Deeing' like a goodun! It was a really funny show. That stuff all looks so bloody dated now. In fact it looked pretty dated by 1977 to be honest. LOADS od teiddly dee ------------- ~Jump you f**ker jump~ |
Posted By: Lost Follower
Date Posted: January 03 2009 at 05:09
I can only assume Fripp was being ironic after a particularly duff review or something. If he meant it, he deserves a slap, though I would imagine he'd be utterly red faced about it now. ------------- ~Jump you f**ker jump~ |
Posted By: easytargets
Date Posted: January 05 2009 at 06:28
|
pf ------------- The water rushes over all cities crash in the mighty wave; the final man is very small, plunging in for his final bathe |
Posted By: Q6
Date Posted: January 05 2009 at 07:18
|
I'm quite surprised that the vote is so evenly split.
------------- http://www.paulcusick.co.uk - www.paulcusick.co.uk |
Posted By: Noak
Date Posted: January 05 2009 at 17:23
| Both great bands, but King Crimson are slightly better. |
Posted By: Malve87
Date Posted: January 07 2009 at 12:50
|
Man, this is really hard....anyway my vote goes to Pink Floyd .... ------------- ] 
|
Posted By: tamijo
Date Posted: January 07 2009 at 13:42
|
Voted KC, due to the lack of varriation in P production, compared with KC's
------------- Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours |