Print Page | Close Window

Picked up "The Bedlam in Goliath" today.

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=45903
Printed Date: February 23 2025 at 10:09
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Picked up "The Bedlam in Goliath" today.
Posted By: JLocke
Subject: Picked up "The Bedlam in Goliath" today.
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 18:50
I'm sorry, but how can anyone think this is any good? It seems I dislike this album for the same reason that I dislike anything I have heard from Zappa; it's just, well, frankly, too much.
 
I am fond of music that leaves space and really let you take in the movement that you have just heard (much like an orchestral arrangement), and I have found none of that here.
 
Now, I'm not trying to be mean about this, blease don't bash me, I really am trying to like it, but as of right now, I feel like I have wasted a good $15. :(  Maybe I should give it time to grow on me...? I can always change my mind, but with these guys, I feel it will take quite a while.
 
Anyone else agree? Dissagree? Please, any TMV lovers out there, help me to try and look at this from another perspective; you see, I don't want to hate The Mars Volta, but I am fearing that I will end up doing just that.



Replies:
Posted By: laplace
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 18:51
Their new album is already causing controversy. =)

Is this the first Mars Volta album you've heard?

-------------
FREEDOM OF SPEECH GO TO HELL


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 18:54
Yessir. It's really quite a shame too, alot of the more modern bands I like has cited them as influences. :(


Posted By: laplace
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 19:10
Perhaps you started with the wrong CD =) I've been of teh Volta since the first E.P. and I'm currently struggling not to give this a bad review, partially for the reasons you mentioned, and also because they've moved away from their noise/psyche moments, which I miss. The first two albums are much more varied than "Bedlam" although they still reach fever pitch in each song, and frankly they can still be demanding due the sheer amount of ambient downtime. (this part doesn't phase me because I love noise more than I do rock.)

I'd understand if you didn't go back further after such a disappointing experience, but maybe you should - "De-loused" and "Frances the Mute" are the CDs which will have influenced your favourites. =)

-------------
FREEDOM OF SPEECH GO TO HELL


Posted By: cookieacquired
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 19:13
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I'm sorry, but how can anyone think this is any good? It seems I dislike this album for the same reason that I dislike anything I have heard from Zappa; it's just, well, frankly, too much.
 
I am fond of music that leaves space and really let you take in the movement that you have just heard (much like an orchestral arrangement), and I have found none of that here.
 
Now, I'm not trying to be mean about this, blease don't bash me, I really am trying to like it, but as of right now, I feel like I have wasted a good $15. :(  Maybe I should give it time to grow on me...? I can always change my mind, but with these guys, I feel it will take quite a while.
 
Anyone else agree? Dissagree? Please, any TMV lovers out there, help me to try and look at this from another perspective; you see, I don't want to hate The Mars Volta, but I am fearing that I will end up doing just that.
 
I think you just started with the wrong album to start with.
 
I'd recommend trying De-Loused before you give up on the band (it seems like it fits the bill of what you're looking for, and if you don't like it, probably won't like the band itself).
 
Good luck!


-------------





Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 19:30
most people hate the vocals and as soon as they hear them they immediatly turn the song off. but i love them, I love the fact that they are different. Try listening to the album again and maybe you will like it. I also like them because they are one f the few good prog band out now. If they were formed in the 70s then people might not like them as much,but compared to todays prog they are awesome imo.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 19:35
Okay, thanks guys. I'll try out a different album before I abandon all hope. :)


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 20:50
I also picked this up today.  So far I've listened to the first two or three cuts (my wife cares not at all for these guys and I haven't felt like putting on the headphones today).  I find it real accessible compared to Frances the Mute.  I actually hear hooks and song structure (again, based on first two cuts).  Give it a chance.  It is certainly a full-frontal sonic assault on first listen.  But for that matter so was "You Really Got Me" in its original incarnation. 


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 22:27
Well, "accessible" I hear everyday. Progressive is what I was hoping to hear. Such a letdown, :(
 
However, I plan on giving it at least another spin before I write it off, as the fifth song I actually really liked once it got into the groove a bit. But one good song does not a good album make, so if I still find myself not understanding what the big deal is, then I'm picking up their first album. Then if that too dissapoints me then I'm done buying TMV albums for good, I feel.


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 23:17
Dunno, for me Bedlam is about as progressive as music gets these days.  Agreed they don't exactly let the listener up for air.  But looking back to the original post, if you don't like Zappa then MV may not be a good choice.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 02 2008 at 23:54
Meh, maybe you're right. Because I absolutely dissagree with what you said regarding the album's prog-ness. Maybe this aspect of prog is just too convoluted and wacky for me to get into. Either way, I'm still gonna give the first album a listen before I make my final judgement on them. :)


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 02:10
Okay, so, I have listened to the "Take the Veil Cerpin Taxt" song available on here about five times in a row now, and love it even more each time I do. I have a feeling I will like the early Mars Volta stuff; I just wish they could have progressed in that direction rather than a completely different one as evident on the new album. Very tragic.


Posted By: MusicalSalmacis
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 02:11

I'm not too fond of the album myself yet, but I on the other hand enjoy FTM and Deloused alot!



Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 03:11
I really don't get it... There are lots of bands around I don't like, even if people praise them to high heaven.  I'll give you a  personal example: many members here consider Scenes from a Memory by Dream Theater an absolute masterpiece. I bought it, listened to it once, and was so underwhelmed I never wanted to put it on again.

Is there anything wrong with me?  Of course there isn't.... It's called individual taste, and trying to force ourselves to like something that goes against the grain is useless. Liking TMV (or DT for that matter, or Genesis, or whatever) is not mandatory, far from that. I do love them, but I also recognize they are not for everyone.

@ Laplace: perhaps you should write that bad review. It may be that the album grows on you with time, but then again it may not.... I rarely write bad reviews, but if you check my 2-star reviews, half of them at least are of albums many consider to be masterpieces.


Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 03:34
I like the new album, but not for the same reasons I love the first two. If you don't enjoy nonstop high-energy music, their newest album probably isn't for you. To the original poster, their first album seems to be just what you're looking for - there's a perfect balance between agressive parts and calm parts, IMO.


Posted By: The Pessimist
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 12:29
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I'm sorry, but how can anyone think this is any good? It seems I dislike this album for the same reason that I dislike anything I have heard from Zappa; it's just, well, frankly, too much.
 
I am fond of music that leaves space and really let you take in the movement that you have just heard (much like an orchestral arrangement), and I have found none of that here.
 
Now, I'm not trying to be mean about this, blease don't bash me, I really am trying to like it, but as of right now, I feel like I have wasted a good $15. :(  Maybe I should give it time to grow on me...? I can always change my mind, but with these guys, I feel it will take quite a while.
 
Anyone else agree? Dissagree? Please, any TMV lovers out there, help me to try and look at this from another perspective; you see, I don't want to hate The Mars Volta, but I am fearing that I will end up doing just that.


I think the whole idea of the album is the intensity. I've said it once and i'll say it again: different music for different moods. Next time you feel very angry about something, listen to this album again, i think it will go down a lot better. I'm practically furious all the time so its always good for me Wink


-------------
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg


Posted By: moreitsythanyou
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 13:22
The Mars Volta is certainly not for everyone. If you didn't enjoy TBiG, I'd say go for something more inline with your tastes. Nothing is for everyone.
However, I personally feel it's their weakest yet, but still great. It's been growing on me. If you want space, go for Frances. Lots of more ambient passages there that many see as a flaw but you might enjoy.


-------------
<font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR]



Posted By: GoldenSpiral
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 13:23
Yeah, dude, it's pretty much a matter of taste.  If you don't like their kind of music, you don't like it, you just have different priorities in music.
  There is very little 'space', as you say, in TMV's music.  Basically what they do it throw a ton of music in your face and make you deal with it.  The new album is particularly aggressive, so you might want to try earlier stuff.... but the basic style is the same.  I fully recognize that what TMV does is 'too much', but I think that's what they're aiming for.

like kibble_alex said, maybe try putting it on when you're ready to just rock out with abandon.  It's what they do, and I for one think they do it well


-------------
http://www.myspace.com/altaic" rel="nofollow - http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon


Posted By: laplace
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 14:14
Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:

Yeah, dude, it's pretty much a matter of taste.  If you don't like their kind of music, you don't like it, you just have different priorities in music.
  There is very little 'space', as you say, in TMV's music.  Basically what they do it throw a ton of music in your face and make you deal with it.  The new album is particularly aggressive, so you might want to try earlier stuff.... but the basic style is the same.  I fully recognize that what TMV does is 'too much', but I think that's what they're aiming for.

like kibble_alex said, maybe try putting it on when you're ready to just rock out with abandon.  It's what they do, and I for one think they do it well


lol

I love The Mars Volta but my "rock-out-with-abandon" music is noise, or doom played as low and as slow as possible. There are other reasons to like this band, and I think that what the original poster was looking for is among them. ;)


-------------
FREEDOM OF SPEECH GO TO HELL


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 03 2008 at 18:47
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

I really don't get it... There are lots of bands around I don't like, even if people praise them to high heaven.  I'll give you a  personal example: many members here consider Scenes from a Memory by Dream Theater an absolute masterpiece. I bought it, listened to it once, and was so underwhelmed I never wanted to put it on again.

Is there anything wrong with me?  Of course there isn't.... It's called individual taste, and trying to force ourselves to like something that goes against the grain is useless. Liking TMV (or DT for that matter, or Genesis, or whatever) is not mandatory, far from that. I do love them, but I also recognize they are not for everyone.

@ Laplace: perhaps you should write that bad review. It may be that the album grows on you with time, but then again it may not.... I rarely write bad reviews, but if you check my 2-star reviews, half of them at least are of albums many consider to be masterpieces.
 
No, no. You misunderstand. I am just wanting to give this band a fair chance to grow on me.  Laplance descirbed exactly what I was looking for in TMV:
 
 
 
Originally posted by laplace laplace wrote:

Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:

Yeah, dude, it's pretty much a matter of taste.  If you don't like their kind of music, you don't like it, you just have different priorities in music.
  There is very little 'space', as you say, in TMV's music.  Basically what they do it throw a ton of music in your face and make you deal with it.  The new album is particularly aggressive, so you might want to try earlier stuff.... but the basic style is the same.  I fully recognize that what TMV does is 'too much', but I think that's what they're aiming for.

like kibble_alex said, maybe try putting it on when you're ready to just rock out with abandon.  It's what they do, and I for one think they do it well


lol

I love The Mars Volta but my "rock-out-with-abandon" music is noise, or doom played as low and as slow as possible. There are other reasons to like this band, and I think that what the original poster was looking for is among them. ;)
 
Yeah, exactly. I mean, I'm not trying to simply 'force' myself into liking something that goes against my personal taste, but simply listening to something once and disregarding it is also not good. Most of the bands I now consider to be essential to my collection was a band that at one point or another I didn't like at first, but guess what? I allowed the music to grow on me, and now I love it. So me simply wanting to find something to like in TMV is not going against anything I wouldn't normally do in the first place. It's what I do alot, and usually I find something to like in a band, but sometimes I don't. Seems I have already done the former with TMV, even though no one seems to have noticed my last post yet:
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Okay, so, I have listened to the "Take the Veil Cerpin Taxt" song available on here about five times in a row now, and love it even more each time I do. I have a feeling I will like the early Mars Volta stuff; I just wish they could have progressed in that direction rather than a completely different one as evident on the new album. Very tragic.
 
See? I LIKE what I'm hearing from the first record. Had I just moved on after disliking TBIG like you suggested, Ghost Rider, I may have not given that song a chance, and now I'm glad I did. :)
 
Of course I'll listen to the whole album once I can find it and then that should determine for good whether or not TMV is for me. AT that point, if I dislike De-Loused as well, I will indeed do as you have suggested, GR, and simply accept that this band isn't something I can relate to. But I wanna give them a fair shot before I just write them off based on a first impression.


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 02:17
I apologise for misunderstanding your point... You see, after almost three years here, I'm used to seeing people trying to 'force' themselves to like a band as if it was something mandatory. That said, I'm happy you gave them a second chance and found something to like on De-Loused... (which is still my favourite from them).

I do agree with those who wrote here than the band don't give you a lot of respite, which of course can be a problem with people who, like you, need some sort of 'airier' feel in their music. You probably started with the wrong album... I think Frances the Mute would be much more to your liking, and possibly even Amputechture. Personally, as much as I love the band,  I recognise they are not suitable for listening in any occasion... If I need something a bit more relaxing for my ears or my brain, I'll pick, say, Camel or Caravan. 


Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 02:28
I'm not quite sure why anyone is saying TMV don't give you a lot of breathing room, when that really only describes their most recent album..


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 12:06
Well, if this is the case, then I am happy, because I enjoyed the song from "De-Loused" that I heard, and if there is more like that in store for me, then I am looking forward to it.


Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 12:16
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I'm sorry, but how can anyone think this is any good? It seems I dislike this album for the same reason that I dislike anything I have heard from Zappa; it's just, well, frankly, too much.
 
I am fond of music that leaves space and really let you take in the movement that you have just heard (much like an orchestral arrangement), and I have found none of that here.
 
Now, I'm not trying to be mean about this, blease don't bash me, I really am trying to like it, but as of right now, I feel like I have wasted a good $15. :(  Maybe I should give it time to grow on me...? I can always change my mind, but with these guys, I feel it will take quite a while.
 
Anyone else agree? Dissagree? Please, any TMV lovers out there, help me to try and look at this from another perspective; you see, I don't want to hate The Mars Volta, but I am fearing that I will end up doing just that.


The question is: Why did you pick it up then? They had Wax Simulcra on their myspace for several weeks ...

My advice: Even if you really don't like the music ... give it some time. Listen to other stuff which you like, and put on the CD every now and then and listen to a few tracks. If you still don't like it after a few months, you can still sell it.Smile


-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls

Listened to:


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 12:16
what song was that?

-------------




Posted By: jmcdaniel_ee
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 12:29

I mentioned it, and someone else did too in another post: the drums and vocals are almost all you hear.  It's really hard to pick out the guitars, keys, and sax.  They have their moments, but for the most part they're buried.  Usually I don't care about the details of a mix (a lot of people didn't like the production aspects of Rush's Vapor Trails, but it never bothered me), but the mix makes it very hard to listen to.



Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 12:43
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I'm sorry, but how can anyone think this is any good? It seems I dislike this album for the same reason that I dislike anything I have heard from Zappa; it's just, well, frankly, too much.
 
I am fond of music that leaves space and really let you take in the movement that you have just heard (much like an orchestral arrangement), and I have found none of that here.
 
Now, I'm not trying to be mean about this, blease don't bash me, I really am trying to like it, but as of right now, I feel like I have wasted a good $15. :(  Maybe I should give it time to grow on me...? I can always change my mind, but with these guys, I feel it will take quite a while.
 
Anyone else agree? Dissagree? Please, any TMV lovers out there, help me to try and look at this from another perspective; you see, I don't want to hate The Mars Volta, but I am fearing that I will end up doing just that.


The question is: Why did you pick it up then? They had Wax Simulcra on their myspace for several weeks ...

My advice: Even if you really don't like the music ... give it some time. Listen to other stuff which you like, and put on the CD every now and then and listen to a few tracks. If you still don't like it after a few months, you can still sell it.Smile
 
Damn dude, can I have my head back now? I bought it because at the moment I don't have access to hgih-speed net, so listening or downloading any portion of the new album was not possible, and I didn't feel like waiting when the newest CD from a highly acclaimed prog band was right in front of me in the store. I took a risk, forgive me. Ouch
 
As for your advice, if you would read the entire thread, you would already know what I am planning to do. Hopefully I won't look like an idiot as much to you now because I actually decided to wait for like an hour for "Take the Veil Cerpin Taxt" fully load on here.


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 12:44
Well, if you like that song then you're probably more likely to like De-loused then

and also, give Bedlam another chance, if you see past the mixing, it definitely grows on you


-------------




Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 13:37
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

I'm sorry, but how can anyone think this is any good? It seems I dislike this album for the same reason that I dislike anything I have heard from Zappa; it's just, well, frankly, too much.
 
I am fond of music that leaves space and really let you take in the movement that you have just heard (much like an orchestral arrangement), and I have found none of that here.
 
Now, I'm not trying to be mean about this, blease don't bash me, I really am trying to like it, but as of right now, I feel like I have wasted a good $15. :(  Maybe I should give it time to grow on me...? I can always change my mind, but with these guys, I feel it will take quite a while.
 
Anyone else agree? Dissagree? Please, any TMV lovers out there, help me to try and look at this from another perspective; you see, I don't want to hate The Mars Volta, but I am fearing that I will end up doing just that.


The question is: Why did you pick it up then? They had Wax Simulcra on their myspace for several weeks ...

My advice: Even if you really don't like the music ... give it some time. Listen to other stuff which you like, and put on the CD every now and then and listen to a few tracks. If you still don't like it after a few months, you can still sell it.Smile
 
Damn dude, can I have my head back now? I bought it because at the moment I don't have access to hgih-speed net, so listening or downloading any portion of the new album was not possible, and I didn't feel like waiting when the newest CD from a highly acclaimed prog band was right in front of me in the store. I took a risk, forgive me. Ouch
 
As for your advice, if you would read the entire thread, you would already know what I am planning to do. Hopefully I won't look like an idiot as much to you now because I actually decided to wait for like an hour for "Take the Veil Cerpin Taxt" fully load on here.


I'm deeply sorry.


-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls

Listened to:


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 04 2008 at 23:11
I know I should let this thread die, but...
 
Now I'm going to have to go out a get Deloused, which I've not heard.
 
Bedlam is the first one from MV I liked the first time I heard it (I knew it was good because my wife said, "What's that white noise"), but she's never heard Frances. 
 
I still find Frances to be far more of an aural challenge and would have never imagined suggesting that as a better alternative to Bedlam for someone not familiar with the band.
 
 


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 05 2008 at 01:18
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:



I'm deeply sorry.
 
Oh no, it's okay. I just wanted to make sure you understood where I was coming from. I admit, I did jump the gun a bit with Bedlam, but luckily I wasn't dissapointed with my second TMV venture; I bought De-Loused this evening, and I LOVE IT! LOVE IT, LOVE IT, LOVE IT!
 
Makes me wanna write a loving review about it! How the hell did this band get so bad? This is great, great psychedelic stuff! It sounds like Pink Floyd meets King Crimson to me, and it rules! My God, the slower, more atmospheric parts were just goregous! I truly can't believe that this is the same band, truly wonderfull. It has what I love about prog rock: space! Room to breath! Which was sorely lacking from TBIG. Yep, I must say I haven't been this happy with a purchase since Porcupine Tree's FoaBP last year. ClapClapClapClapClap


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: February 05 2008 at 09:20
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:



I'm deeply sorry.
 
Oh no, it's okay. I just wanted to make sure you understood where I was coming from. I admit, I did jump the gun a bit with Bedlam, but luckily I wasn't dissapointed with my second TMV venture; I bought De-Loused this evening, and I LOVE IT! LOVE IT, LOVE IT, LOVE IT!
 
Makes me wanna write a loving review about it! How the hell did this band get so bad? This is great, great psychedelic stuff! It sounds like Pink Floyd meets King Crimson to me, and it rules! My God, the slower, more atmospheric parts were just goregous! I truly can't believe that this is the same band, truly wonderfull. It has what I love about prog rock: space! Room to breath! Which was sorely lacking from TBIG. Yep, I must say I haven't been this happy with a purchase since Porcupine Tree's FoaBP last year. ClapClapClapClapClap
 
well it seems you're not alone in the camp of not liking Bedlam though it seems to be better recieved than their last album LOL for closeness to Deloused (if at all) look up Frances the Mute....although there is a lot of ambience that some people find difficult to digest


-------------




Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: February 05 2008 at 23:55

Wow.. you sure let 'em have it with that last review, eh p0mt3? Ouch



Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 00:52
Originally posted by Sckxyss Sckxyss wrote:

Wow.. you sure let 'em have it with that last review, eh p0mt3? Ouch

 
LOL Glad to see someone is reading my work, Tongue 
 
Yeah, well, I was a little harsh I admit, but I suppose I was waiting on reviewing it until I could sit down and listen to "De-loused" all the way through and compare the two. The absolute perfection that was ''De-loused" gave me enough insentive to never listen to "Bedlam" again. I mean, why listen to that when I can enjoy a far superior record from the same band? It's like choosing between CTTE and Union in terms of Yes albums; the choice is clear.
 
Ya never know, years from now I may give it a spin and completely change my mind, completely contradicting every bad thing I said about it in that review, but as of right now, I don;t see myself listening to it in any forseeable future.


Posted By: MikeEnRegalia
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 02:09
^ I read the review ... almost every point you make I see completely different, as do the various reviews I read in magazines. For example the drummer - he receives nothing but praise from most reviewers.

Well, it's surely amazing how different the same thing can appear for different people.Smile


-------------
https://awesomeprog.com/release-polls/pa" rel="nofollow - Release Polls

Listened to:


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 14:13
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I read the review ... almost every point you make I see completely different, as do the various reviews I read in magazines. For example the drummer - he receives nothing but praise from most reviewers.

Well, it's surely amazing how different the same thing can appear for different people.Smile
 
Absolutely. Well, I think it really depends on what aspect of the record you focus on. I'm sure a certain aspect of this drummer (probably his hopped-up-on-speed style playing) seems great to some poeple, while others (like myself) miss the old guy, who seemed (at least based on what I've heard on this record) to have a much more creative take on rhythm and backbeat.
 
Same thing with everything else; one could argue that the different style of singing Cedric is doing here is fantastic, but I certainly don't feel that way.
 
Meh...I'm probably being too hard on it Disapprove.


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 14:47
Can anyone who feels that "De-loused" is still the best work from the Mars Volta comment on how the new album compares?  I'll be honest, I haven't been terribly thrilled with the past two releases and I'm hesitant to drop another $12 on this band if it's more of the same.


Posted By: dpedal1
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 15:03
Originally posted by NaturalScience NaturalScience wrote:

Can anyone who feels that "De-loused" is still the best work from the Mars Volta comment on how the new album compares?  I'll be honest, I haven't been terribly thrilled with the past two releases and I'm hesitant to drop another $12 on this band if it's more of the same.
 
For me Bedlam takes the best of FTM, the best of Amputechture, throws out any type of filler and adds more focus to the compositions.  That's saying alot seeing as how The Mars Volta don't ever really sound like they have a focus.
 
Ilyena is tightly written and performed.
Metatron and Goliath are two epics with shifting time changes and rhythms.
Soothsayer is very hypnotic
Even Tourniquet Man is great in my opinion.
 
Bedlam will have to grow on you, but then again all TMVs stuff needs time to grow.  I have been listening to it non-stop since I picked it up and I am still uncovering little details.


Posted By: Real Paradox
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 15:13
DO NOT, say Mars Volta are not good....
 
Realy it is one of the most creative bands in terms of Progressive Rock...They are great in terms of new sounds and odd signatures...By the way...They have 70's spirit in concerts and you can realy feel they're albums are Progressive and Hypnotic at the same time, as well thay have great solos and the vocals are amazingly worked out on the studio...Man ,Mars volta are pure and true...Not that alternative rock mixed up with prog you hear now a day...Although I love that kind of Neo-Prog...I guess we needed a band like THE MARS VOLTA a long time past the seventies, but that is just my opinion. 


-------------
What is This?
It is what keeps us going...


Posted By: Padraic
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 15:15
Originally posted by dpedal1 dpedal1 wrote:

For me Bedlam takes the best of FTM, the best of Amputechture, throws out any type of filler and adds more focus to the compositions.  That's saying alot seeing as how The Mars Volta don't ever really sound like they have a focus.
 


But in my opinion, this is what sets De-loused higher than the other two - a "structured chaos", if you will.
Your description is exactly what I'm after, and it tells me that it might be worth me picking up the album.  Thanks.


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 15:49
I love the new one and Deloused is my favorite
then again I love all their albums
a;lksdjflksdjfldksj


-------------




Posted By: dpedal1
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 15:51
Originally posted by NaturalScience NaturalScience wrote:

Originally posted by dpedal1 dpedal1 wrote:

For me Bedlam takes the best of FTM, the best of Amputechture, throws out any type of filler and adds more focus to the compositions.  That's saying alot seeing as how The Mars Volta don't ever really sound like they have a focus.
 


But in my opinion, this is what sets De-loused higher than the other two - a "structured chaos", if you will.
Your description is exactly what I'm after, and it tells me that it might be worth me picking up the album.  Thanks.
 
Give it whirl then.  If you can, try and find the songs I mentioned on the internet to get a taste for the structure of the songs.  I know you can find the Goliath and Ilyena videos on YouTube.  Let me know what you think.


Posted By: Snipergoat
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 17:02
Im listening to this album now... I really don't know what to think yet.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 17:09
Ah, laplance, I see you have decided to go through with writing that review! I must say, it is much better than mine, because it at least gives the band credit where credit is due. Smile I also see that you went ahead with the two star rating afterall. I would be lying if I said I wasn't slightly happy about this, as now the album's overall rating has regressed to a much more realistic rating of 3.7-something, instead of the 4.00 and beyond is was getting only a few days ago.


Posted By: laplace
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 17:24
Well, I didn't do it to attack the rating. I realised that I'd gotten to the point with the album that I never want to listen to it again, so there was no reason to hold back. =P

Going by my ratings, it looks like I'm not a fan of the band, so there are four star reviews in Comatorium and Frances' future.


-------------
FREEDOM OF SPEECH GO TO HELL


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 17:35
Oh no! I hate to say this, but Bedlam isn't growing at all. I hate it. It's not without, merit (wax simulacra) but... well, almost! It doesn't "rock" at all, it's just disjointed and stupid, with a very irritating atmosphere, and Cavalettas is truly an abomination of nature.

I'm off to listen to Primal Scream...


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 21:41
Wow, I'm surprised how many don't like Bedlam.  I realize its in-your-face barrage is not for everyone, but to me it's not all that different from some of the more recent Crimson releases (which, granted, many old-time Crimson fans hate).  I hear a lot of the melodicism of FTM in the Bedlam songs -- it's just abstracted, sped up, and played at 10 times the volume.  What I don't miss a lot is the electronic noodling found on FTM, e.g., take a stunningly beautiful song like 'The Widow' and tack 2 minutes of noise onto the end of it.
 
I haven't reviewed any MV albums yet, because I've only been listening to the band for about a year and their music is so dense and multi-faceted (more of the former, less of the latter on Bedlam) that I've not been able to get a real handle on it, to the point where I could post an intelligent review.  But then that's why I listen to this stuff.  If I wanted something non-challenging I'd pick up Rod Stewart's latest album and be done with it.  (By the way, that last comment is not meant as a knock on those who don't like Bedlam...it's just why I'll continue to listen to Bedlam and reserve final judgment on it for a later date.)


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: February 06 2008 at 21:43
I don't get the reaction either- it's not THAT different than their other releases (one of my complaints with it actually) and yet people are reacting like its Love Beach


-------------




Posted By: Sckxyss
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 00:38
Originally posted by NaturalScience NaturalScience wrote:

Can anyone who feels that "De-loused" is still the best work from the Mars Volta comment on how the new album compares?  I'll be honest, I haven't been terribly thrilled with the past two releases and I'm hesitant to drop another $12 on this band if it's more of the same.
 
Be wary, as it really doesn't compare with their first album (that isn't to say it's bad, though). It all depends on what you didn't like about the last two. If you didn't like the ambient noise, then this album might be for you, since there is little to no ambient sections. If, however, you didn't like the unfocused, ongoing nature of the songs, you might not like this album. Same goes for Cedric's voice - if you thought it was annoying on Amp, it's probably even worse this time around.
 
That said, I love the basslines, drumlines, and complex layering of the music, but I do wish it was a bit more focused.


Posted By: ProgBagel
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 01:17
Can't we just view this album without comparing it to De-Loused or anything else for the matter. I think that is what the band is trying to achieve.

Excellent album by the way.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 01:32
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

I don't get the reaction either- it's not THAT different than their other releases (one of my complaints with it actually) and yet people are reacting like its Love Beach
 
Well, I've only listened to "De-loused" additonally, but from what I heard on there I have to say, yeah, "Bedlam" really is THAT different.


Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 08:49
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Ah, laplance, I see you have decided to go through with writing that review! I must say, it is much better than mine, because it at least gives the band credit where credit is due. Smile I also see that you went ahead with the two star rating afterall. I would be lying if I said I wasn't slightly happy about this, as now the album's overall rating has regressed to a much more realistic rating of 3.7-something, instead of the 4.00 and beyond is was getting only a few days ago.
 
Remember that ratings malipulation is a SERIOUS breach of site rules here.


-------------




Posted By: Jared
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 08:56
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

I really don't get it... There are lots of bands around I don't like, even if people praise them to high heaven.  I'll give you a  personal example: many members here consider Scenes from a Memory by Dream Theater an absolute masterpiece. I bought it, listened to it once, and was so underwhelmed I never wanted to put it on again.

Is there anything wrong with me? 
 
...absolutely, Raff...Shocked
 
get help...seek counselling..or talk to others on PA about your problems before its too late...LOL


-------------
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson


Posted By: Soldier_Of_Fortune
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 11:16
It certainly has it's moments, but falls a bit short. You are right, it's simply TOO much.

It would make a good 55 minute album,  rather than an average 75 minute album which it is.


Posted By: Philéas
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 11:24
I don't like the new album. It sounds almost like som generic radio rock band trying to copy TMV. Omar's latest solo album (Calibration) is much better. I like all the other TMV albums, but this latest one was a bit of a let down. They can do much better.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 13:13
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Ah, laplance, I see you have decided to go through with writing that review! I must say, it is much better than mine, because it at least gives the band credit where credit is due. Smile I also see that you went ahead with the two star rating afterall. I would be lying if I said I wasn't slightly happy about this, as now the album's overall rating has regressed to a much more realistic rating of 3.7-something, instead of the 4.00 and beyond is was getting only a few days ago.
 
Remember that ratings malipulation is a SERIOUS breach of site rules here.
 
Oh, no I didn't, but either way that wasn't what I was implying Laplace was doing, or even I wanted to do, I was just commenting that now that the hysteria over this album is appearing to die down a bit, the ratings are beginning to balance out, and we now have a much more realistic overal number for it, that's all.
 
Hope I made myself clearer this time around, as I don't want anyone to think I am trying to break the rules.


Posted By: ProgBagel
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 14:48
It's a better version of the past two attempts minus the bullsh*t that was thrown in. Like uncapturing ambience and useless noodling. It was a tight album indeed.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 15:35
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Ah, laplance, I see you have decided to go through with writing that review! I must say, it is much better than mine, because it at least gives the band credit where credit is due. Smile I also see that you went ahead with the two star rating afterall. I would be lying if I said I wasn't slightly happy about this, as now the album's overall rating has regressed to a much more realistic rating of 3.7-something, instead of the 4.00 and beyond is was getting only a few days ago.
 
Remember that ratings malipulation is a SERIOUS breach of site rules here.
 
Oh, no I didn't, but either way that wasn't what I was implying Laplace was doing, or even I wanted to do, I was just commenting that now that the hysteria over this album is appearing to die down a bit, the ratings are beginning to balance out, and we now have a much more realistic overal number for it, that's all.
 
Hope I made myself clearer this time around, as I don't want anyone to think I am trying to break the rules.


probably not.... there is a basis for those who manipulating the ratings....some do it for spite... others...to 'see  the overall rating adjusted to what one thinks is realistic overall number'.  Can't blame him or others  for being suspicious..personally I think  your review was shotty and half ass, a real hatchet job...  count how many times you said....horrible.  LOL  I don't care either way or not. I'm not a fan of the group. Just so that much is clear.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:11
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Ah, laplance, I see you have decided to go through with writing that review! I must say, it is much better than mine, because it at least gives the band credit where credit is due. Smile I also see that you went ahead with the two star rating afterall. I would be lying if I said I wasn't slightly happy about this, as now the album's overall rating has regressed to a much more realistic rating of 3.7-something, instead of the 4.00 and beyond is was getting only a few days ago.
 
Remember that ratings malipulation is a SERIOUS breach of site rules here.
 
Oh, no I didn't, but either way that wasn't what I was implying Laplace was doing, or even I wanted to do, I was just commenting that now that the hysteria over this album is appearing to die down a bit, the ratings are beginning to balance out, and we now have a much more realistic overal number for it, that's all.
 
Hope I made myself clearer this time around, as I don't want anyone to think I am trying to break the rules.


probably not.... there is a basis for those who manipulating the ratings....some do it for spite... others...to 'see  the overall rating adjusted to what one thinks is realistic overall number'.  Can't blame him or others  for being suspicious..personally I think  your review was shotty and half ass, a real hatchet job...  count how many times you said....horrible.  LOL  I don't care either way or not. I'm not a fan of the group. Just so that much is clear.
 
Ouch Why do you enjoy hurting me? You've done this in two threads now.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:15
LOL  not picking on you personally... none of this is personal.  Just understand where the site comes from.. you may not have.. but others have played games with the rankings or ratings.  When you put as much venom into a review then harp about how the album is grossly over-rated as you say. You invite suspicion.  My advice.. it is much more productive to stick to what you like.... surely there is stuff you like.. makes you a bit more interesting..  and beneficial to have around.

my two cents.. take it or leave it Clap


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:21
Are you saying to not review anything I dislike? Why then is the one star option even available? If everyone did what you are suggesting to do, every album on here would be considered masterpieces.
 
Possibly I missunderstood your meaning, as I am feeling personally attacked at this point and could be missunderstanding what you meant.
 
You say it wasn't personal, but rather than simply giving me constructive advice from the getgo, you went out of your way to insult my review, then laugh about my writing abilities (or lack thereof). You have taken shots at me twice now that I can remember, and all I was doing on both occasions was voicing my own opinion. If I seemed like I was being rude or unfair in either case, I am truly sorry; can you please be a little less of a bully to me? I don't think I deserve to be insulted and jumped on for voicing an opinion.


Posted By: laplace
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:26
don't worry, p0mt3. Micky even gives five stars to things he hates. o:)

-------------
FREEDOM OF SPEECH GO TO HELL


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:31
it is constructive criticism....  saying a album is horrible... more times that one with ADD can count does not refect a good ....or a particularly creative review. IMO.. of course which is all this is... and if you get tired of my opinion.. just ignore me.. you won't be the first.  You can review an album you hate.. or dislike... and sometimes they can be the best of reviews... but they are not easy to do without coming across just mean-spirited or spiteful

As far as shots... not shots... just explaining things for you.  First off.. what you said could be interpetated as manipulation and your review fed straight into that. Second... you insulted a poster here ..whether you intended it or not.. .by implying that they were not smart enough to see the subtle differences between Opeth and PT.  That is why I have taken in interest in you.  If you want to pick on others opinions.. you will have yours similarly picked at.  Again..it's not personal... it's life. 




-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:39
Originally posted by laplace laplace wrote:

don't worry, p0mt3. Micky even gives five stars to things he hates. o:)


err... 4 stars... I dropped it a star LOL


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:39
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

it is constructive criticism....  saying a album is horrible... more times that one with ADD can count does not refect a good ....or a particularly creative review. IMO.. of course which is all this is... and if you get tired of my opinion.. just ignore me.. you won't be the first.  You can review an album you hate.. or dislike... and sometimes they can be the best of reviews... but they are not easy to do without coming across just mean-spirited or spiteful

As far as shots... not shots... just explaining things for you.  First off.. what you said could be interpetated as manipulation and your review fed straight into that. Second... you insulted a poster here ..whether you intended it or not.. .by implying that they were not smart enough to see the subtle differences between Opeth and PT.  That is why I have taken in interest in you.  If you want to pick on others opinions.. you will have yours similarly picked at.  Again..it's not personal... it's life. 


 
Well, I truly did not mean to insult anyone. As far as I can recall, I simply told the person on the Opeth thread that he can have his opinion of what he hears in them, and that was fine, but at the same time, Opeth and PT's leaders have stated in the past that there are similarities. Personally, I think it depends on one's interpretation of that statement to conclude on what I meant by it, and while I admit after having it pointed out to me that it could have been taken as if I were insulting that person, I assure you I was not. I don't that, at least not intentionally, because I know what it feels like to have it done to me (especially on forums, and by people like you). So, again, I explained myself in that forum, and I have explained myself here, yet you seem to be getting a real charge out of picking on me, and frankly, I think I will take your advice and ignore you from now on, because you are clearly a mean-spirited bully who looks for excuses to throw out personal insults to people. While what I said was merely a misinterpretation, the things you have said to me were clearly meant in a hateful way. So, as far as I am cocnerned, I consider the matter closed; I know what kind of person you are now, and know how to react to whatever you may say. Have a nice life.
 
Again, don't missunderstand me on this, either: I'm not wanting to sound like a prick to you, but I am simply saying that I have pretty much summed up the situation: I can't win, even if I explain that my intentions were not to be mean to others, because you want to keep scouting out posts I make and insult them.
 
If I am making an unjust claim about you, then I guess all I can say is: prove me wrong. If we run into one another on another thread at another time and you actually aren't hostile towards me, maybe then I'll take back my judgement about you, but as of right now, I feel like you are someone who I can only ignore, because making peace won't work, and I am sorry for ever making that post back in the Opeth thread, because I sure didn't want to make enemies on this place, but I guess that can't be stopped now. Disapprove


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:44
Clap  good.. glad that is settled.. now back on topic.  

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:46
thing is, pomte, Raffaela (ghost rider) is micky's sweetheart, so he gets very defensive (and possibly jealous, hehe) when people are bad to her, but he usually does not go out of his way to me an asshole (unless you start a DT-bassist thread, in which case you may actually deserve it). :)

Also, he does have a point about your review, i realise it was one of your first reviews, and of course you can review anything you want, but many times people review albums they hate only out of frustration, and it is usually reflected in the writing, plus an all-negative review is hard to take seriously, just like raving about an album you just heard without even mentioning any flaws it might have is not very useful.

I like, however, that you seem to put some time into reviewing, even if there is room for improvement in the writing itself, many people just give a five-word review saying "amagad, this is rock, and i love it the most", that's the worst kind as far as i'm concerned. We all have different styles of reviewing, i tend to talk a lot about irrelevant issues and use strange metaphores, and some do a song by song review and then use some sort of mathematical division to calculate the amount of stars to give. All styles are needed and practice makes perfect!


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 16:57
Originally posted by Evans Evans wrote:

thing is, pomte, Raffaela (ghost rider) is micky's sweetheart, so he gets very defensive (and possibly jealous, hehe) when people are bad to her, but he usually does not go out of his way to me an asshole (unless you start a DT-bassist thread, in which case you may actually deserve it). :)

Also, he does have a point about your review, i realise it was one of your first reviews, and of course you can review anything you want, but many times people review albums they hate only out of frustration, and it is usually reflected in the writing, plus an all-negative review is hard to take seriously, just like raving about an album you just heard without even mentioning any flaws it might have is not very useful.

I like, however, that you seem to put some time into reviewing, even if there is room for improvement in the writing itself, many people just give a five-word review saying "amagad, this is rock, and i love it the most", that's the worst kind as far as i'm concerned. We all have different styles of reviewing, i tend to talk a lot about irrelevant issues and use strange metaphores, and some do a song by song review and then use some sort of mathematical division to calculate the amount of stars to give. All styles are needed and practice makes perfect!
 
My reviews suck, and I know it. That really isn't the point, although I already admitted to laplace that the one for TBiG was especially horrible, and I also admited that I probably gave it too hard of a time.
 
Now that you have explained why micky got the way he did with me, I suppose I now understand why he jumped to conclusions as to what I meant by the comment I made (He must be one of those overely-protective, jump-the-gun types). I thank you for explaining in an intelligent, flame-free manner exactly what the problem was with my review, it is much appreciated, and I will make sure to do better the next time I give something a negative review. Smile


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 17:02
I think we'd all be a little over-protective if we had a girl who liked Opeth and Deep Purple Wink


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 17:07
she is not my sweeheart.. but my wife to be....  so yes...I do react strongly.  If an apology is needed.. I'll give one.. with again.. more unwanted advice... be careful who's toes you step on.  There are real people behind these screen names.. with real feelings.  There are several people here..who have established close personal relationships with others here. That is the reason this forum is so special.. it isn't simply about the music... it is life.  People here come here to be with friends and be safe from the cruel naure of life.  Remember that next time you want to step on someone's opinion.  If you disagree... watch how you say it.

end of unwanted advice. and again.. back on topic.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 17:08
There is a fine art to giving a negative review that most do not have the ability to pull off.  It is hard to be negative without offending the artists (which keep in mind artists do have access to the internet as well) and more likely their fans.  And although Micky likes to stomp out DT, PT, and Genesis fans, for the most part the attempt is to try and keep things on this forum and site in a positive light instead of a negative light.  My advice is that if you don't want to be flamed for making negative comments or negative reviews but you want to have your opinion heard then frame your comments constructively.  I haven't read your review and I know that the "insulting" post was unintentional, but just something to keep in mind. 
 
 
 


-------------


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 17:12
But she IS a sweetheart though, isn't she? Wink
And you are very right, micky, it is a great forum, with unusually friendly people (i've frequented a few forums, and none is as friendly as PA). We should try to keep it that way. : )

And to stay on topic, i ask those who LIKE the album in general, what are your feelings about Cavalettas? Isn't it strange that such a long song, whoch could easily have been a centerpiece, just becomes such an irritating mish mash?


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 17:29
Originally posted by Evans Evans wrote:

But she IS a sweetheart though, isn't she? Wink
And you are very right, micky, it is a great forum, with unusually friendly people (i've frequented a few forums, and none is as friendly as PA). We should try to keep it that way. : )

And to stay on topic, i ask those who LIKE the album in general, what are your feelings about Cavalettas? Isn't it strange that such a long song, whoch could easily have been a centerpiece, just becomes such an irritating mish mash?


oh she is... a sweetheart Heart

as far as the album.. have only listened to it twice. I had a real good general impression of it.

as far as Cavalettas... it isn't really that strange... I  think the best example of that happening is VDGG's Plague of Lighthouse Keepers.  It can be quite easy for such a long song, if not well done.. to become sexactly that.. an irratating mish mash.  It isn't automatically good if it is long.  I am going to put that one and listen to that one specifically again though.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: heyitsthatguy
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 19:31
The only problem I see with Cavalettas is there's that one riff that repeats too often- I like the fadeouts though, they're cool

-------------




Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 07 2008 at 19:32
damn... got sidetracked before I got to listen closely to that...




-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 03:59
I am very happy this is ending up in a peaceful, friendly way.  You see, P0mt3, I am someone who does a lot of writing for professional reasons, and have learnt the hard way that you can express the same opinion in a number of different ways. I can be as direct and abrasive as Micky is, and even worse (there are lots of people around who would NEVER for a second think I am anywhere near a sweetheartLOL), but when I write something that is going to appear somewhere - be it a journal, a book, or a website - I try to be as objective as possible. I have never written a one-star review so far, because I don't like demolishing albums, and usually try to find some saving grace in everything I listen to.
 
However, sometimes giving one star is fully justified. You bought the latest album by a highly praised, modern prog band, with whom you weren't yet familiar, and were badly disappointed. This means your reaction is perfectly understandable - nevertheless, your review came across as extremely virulent, as if the band had hurt you personally. If you use the adjective 'horrible', I think once is enough to convey your meaning - seven times is, in my humble opinion, overdoing things just a little bitWink.
 
That said, I do understand where you're coming from in your response to the album. TMV are definitely not for the faint-hearted, and TBiG is their densest album to date. If you want breathing space, you're not going to get much there - and I do agree with those who wrote that it is perhaps a bit too long. Anyway, I know I want to listen to it again and again, which is always a good sign, even if I don't think it will become my favourite TMV album (that is still De-loused..). There is something about the bandt that captured my attention from the first time I listened to Frances the Mute, and I still believe they are the best modern prog act around. They are young, they have a lot of ideas, and even if TBiG may be considered as a relative failure by someone, I think the best for them is yet to come.


Posted By: barney63
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 04:22
Pretty accessible I think -it's got some tunes - and made me want to listen again unlike the last one, I forget the title at the moment.  But a change of pace  would make it easier for me to get through the whole album in one shot, as it can be tiring going 100mph all the time. 
 
I'm I the only person who thinks they're a bit of a poor-man's Ephel Duath...? Copyists....?


Posted By: jmcdaniel_ee
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 09:50
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

she is not my sweeheart.. but my wife to be....  so yes...I do react strongly.  If an apology is needed.. I'll give one.. with again.. more unwanted advice... be careful who's toes you step on.  There are real people behind these screen names.. with real feelings.  There are several people here..who have established close personal relationships with others here. That is the reason this forum is so special.. it isn't simply about the music... it is life.  People here come here to be with friends and be safe from the cruel naure of life.  Remember that next time you want to step on someone's opinion.  If you disagree... watch how you say it.

end of unwanted advice. and again.. back on topic.
So are we all invited to the wedding?  Big%20smile  I expect to hear and exerpt from "And You And I" or something.  (I actually requested it to be played in the background at my reception.)  We definitely at least need to start a wedding thread for you guys, so we can wish you luck, and I can give advice on what NOT to do in a marriage.
 
But, to contribute to the topic at hand (and repeat myself): All I seem to hear is vocals and drums!  It drives me crazy trying to hear the other instruments.  Are my ears going crazy?  Do others agree, or is my taste just off?  I find it incredibly odd that the album could get released like that--as if Cedric and the new drummer were the only people who attended the mix sessions.  "Yeah, turn me up some more in the mix.  Turn us both up...yeah...yeah, that sounds good."


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 13:00
Thanks a lot for the offer! Smile I'll probably need your advice more than Micky, since I'm a first-timer (I like to call myself a former 'professional old maid'LOL). Hopefully the wedding will be soon.. .We've just sent in our petition for a fiancée visa for me, and I hope that by the end of the summer I'll be able to move to the Land of the Free. When that date draws near, we'll tell you, so you can start that thread!Wink

Back IT, I have noticed the drums are rather prominent in the mix, but I have been able to hear the other instruments too. Anyway, I'll pay more attention the next time I'll listen to the album.


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 13:06
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

I am very happy this is ending up in a peaceful, friendly way.  You see, P0mt3, I am someone who does a lot of writing for professional reasons, and have learnt the hard way that you can express the same opinion in a number of different ways. I can be as direct and abrasive as Micky is, and even worse (there are lots of people around who would NEVER for a second think I am anywhere near a sweetheartLOL), but when I write something that is going to appear somewhere - be it a journal, a book, or a website - I try to be as objective as possible. I have never written a one-star review so far, because I don't like demolishing albums, and usually try to find some saving grace in everything I listen to.
 
However, sometimes giving one star is fully justified. You bought the latest album by a highly praised, modern prog band, with whom you weren't yet familiar, and were badly disappointed. This means your reaction is perfectly understandable - nevertheless, your review came across as extremely virulent, as if the band had hurt you personally. If you use the adjective 'horrible', I think once is enough to convey your meaning - seven times is, in my humble opinion, overdoing things just a little bitWink.
 
That said, I do understand where you're coming from in your response to the album. TMV are definitely not for the faint-hearted, and TBiG is their densest album to date. If you want breathing space, you're not going to get much there - and I do agree with those who wrote that it is perhaps a bit too long. Anyway, I know I want to listen to it again and again, which is always a good sign, even if I don't think it will become my favourite TMV album (that is still De-loused..). There is something about the bandt that captured my attention from the first time I listened to Frances the Mute, and I still believe they are the best modern prog act around. They are young, they have a lot of ideas, and even if TBiG may be considered as a relative failure by someone, I think the best for them is yet to come.
 
LOL Yeah, I realize that seven 'horrible's in a row is a bit much, but since I'm not a pro, I didn't really think anyone would care, Tongue. Hopefully based on my other reviews, however, you can see that when I want to take the time to review something in detail, I do so. I love "De-loused", so it isn't that TMV are bad in my eyes, it's just that they are headed in a direction now that I don't particularly care for.
 
Anyway, I hope everything is cool with Micky now; don't wanna have bad blood with anyone on the forums, Smile


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 13:20
Don't worry at all, Micky is a lot like me... His bark is much worse than his bite, and he's got a heart of gold. SmileUnfortunately, the medium can lend itself to misunderstandings of every kind - the essential thing is to realise they are nothing but misunderstanding, and that no one is out for anyone else's blood.Wink

As to the 'horrible', well, I told you I do a lot of writing in my work, but I didn't tell you I am a former teacherLOL...


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 13:48
Ah! Now it makes sense, lol.


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 13:52
Hey Raff, what is your opinion on Cavalettas? It is my pet peeve of the album, along with Askleios.. actually, i don't hold the album in very high regard at all.. ah well. :)

Also, keep spreading the word about Kate Bush's Aerial. I heard you got Micky into it, but i listened to disc 2 again today and i realised that it is simply masterliness. It deserves more attention.


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 13:57
I'd have to listen to the album carefully once again... Now it's been a few days I haven't given it a spin, and with good reason. I've gone back to full-time work, and adjusting to a new schedule is making me very tired in the evenings. When I am so tired, I can't concentrate too much on music, especially when it is as demanding as TMV's.

Anyway, I don't remember "Cavalettas" being a bad song, though perhaps a bit too long. Tomorrow I'll give it a proper listen, and report here!Wink

Aerial is a fantastic album, and Kate has been one of my musical idols since I was in my early 20s. Micky will try to get her into Xover to keep her good friend Peter Gabriel company.... which I think she highly deserves.


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 14:03
Oh, i have only heard Hounds of love and Aerial, but Aerial is truly ... crossover, or whatever it's called nowadays :)
Hounds of love isn't void of prog elements either, the second half is at least conceptual in theme, even if less so musically. Haven't heard much else, but it is clear that she is a very artistic person, and as far as i know, she never overdoes it.

Ah, Aerial is the perfect summer album. It's so warm, somehow. Maybe the artwork that goes with it ha something to do with that as well :)

Edit: i just posted a review of "Aerial", and since noone will ever see it due to the new rules discriminating non-collaborators (just kidding... or am i?), i was thinking i'd say it here instead, maybe you could take a look at it? :) I try to do my best with all reviews, and i know i sometimes go too far with the metaphors and all that, but.. well. :) Aerial is a great album and it deserves attention..


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:01
Originally posted by Evans Evans wrote:

Oh, i have only heard Hounds of love and Aerial, but Aerial is truly ... crossover, or whatever it's called nowadays :)
Hounds of love isn't void of prog elements either, the second half is at least conceptual in theme, even if less so musically. Haven't heard much else, but it is clear that she is a very artistic person, and as far as i know, she never overdoes it.

Ah, Aerial is the perfect summer album. It's so warm, somehow. Maybe the artwork that goes with it ha something to do with that as well :)

Edit: i just posted a review of "Aerial", and since noone will ever see it due to the new rules discriminating non-collaborators (just kidding... or am i?), i was thinking i'd say it here instead, maybe you could take a look at it? :) I try to do my best with all reviews, and i know i sometimes go too far with the metaphors and all that, but.. well. :) Aerial is a great album and it deserves attention..


I love Ariel... love that album... and saw your review.. great review Clap

p0mt3- all is good Clap Always was with me... you have to be a real asshole to get and stay on my bad side hahhaha


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:15
A clappie from the clappie man himself! Thanks, Micky, i try my best. I should probably get around to it more often if i ever want any title under my name, though, haha! :)




-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:23
damn... I did only give you one... that deserved another... that was my first Bush album... Raff suggested it to me and I picked it up.  Enthralling album.  Have some clappies..

ClapClap

Reviewing does help but not necessarily essential...  we have had some who were promoted with less than 5 reviews... hell I think I only had two or three and they weren't that good.  I'm not a reviewer.. but a forward thinker I guess.... though I'd bet my paycheck my sponsor regrets the day he suggested me for promotion hahhaha


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:28
Forward thinker indeed.. you gave five stars to SFAM and then spent a few hundred pages explaining why it was such a pain in the ass to listen to.. : ) Strange.. but VERY prog.

-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:32
Originally posted by Evans Evans wrote:

Forward thinker indeed.. you gave five stars to SFAM and then spent a few hundred pages explaining why it was such a pain in the ass to listen to.. : ) Strange.. but VERY prog.


Wink that is how to review an album you don't like LOL As far as the ratings.. .admittedly I do rank them differently.. and give multiple ratings... one of the site since let's face it... few honestly care if I like an album or not.. but when you have heard... 100's ...scores of 100's of prog albums...  you do.. or should.. have some measure of what people should be listening to... for a sense of prog.  I hated it... but man alive...  too many think it is a classic album.. and a great one... for it to be stamped with 1 star.. or 0 if I remember right hahhah.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:37
Have you tried any DT since you discovered Opeth and Mastodon? Not that they are alike or anything, and i really only like A change of seasons by them, but maybe you had some sort of anti-metal barrier which was torn down by Opeth.. but who cares, really. It's just one band anyway..
Ah well. I'm going to bed. In a poor attempt to appear on topic i will say that i still don't get Bedlam at all. Goodnight.


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:45
Raff has all the DT but Octavarium so I've heard them all but that one.... and since I really took more of an interest in PM since last summer ... I have heard SC.  I bought it for Raff as sort of a gag gift for Xmas... and funny thing is.... we both sort of enjoyed it.  LOL  Just softening in our old age I guess.

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:52
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Raff has all the DT but Octavarium so I've heard them all but that one.... and since I really took more of an interest in PM since last summer ... I have heard SC.  I bought it for Raff as sort of a gag gift for Xmas... and funny thing is.... we both sort of enjoyed it.  LOL  Just softening in our old age I guess.
 
The ironic thing is, I just got through reviewing a DT album, then I come on here and read this LOL
 
Well, with me (as I say in the review, actually), it's alwaysbeen a double-edged sword with me when it comes to DT. At times they can really move me, and others it just seems like they are keeping score amongst themselves as to how many notes they each played within a milisecond. Truly a love-hate relationship for me. Confused


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 20:56
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Raff has all the DT but Octavarium so I've heard them all but that one.... and since I really took more of an interest in PM since last summer ... I have heard SC.  I bought it for Raff as sort of a gag gift for Xmas... and funny thing is.... we both sort of enjoyed it.  LOL  Just softening in our old age I guess.
 
The ironic thing is, I just got through reviewing a DT album, then I come on here and read this LOL
 
Well, with me (as I say in the review, actually), it's alwaysbeen a double-edged sword with me when it comes to DT. At times they can really move me, and others it just seems like they are keeping score amongst themselves as to how many notes they each played within a milisecond. Truly a love-hate relationship for me. Confused


DT has always been a bit of an enigma to me ...face it... what is the one band you can really say DT are very...very similar to.... yes... one of the bands I absolutely ADORE most... Emerson, Lake, and Palmer.  Much  of the same sh*t that is slung at DT... could..and has been thrown at ELP.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: JLocke
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 21:06
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Raff has all the DT but Octavarium so I've heard them all but that one.... and since I really took more of an interest in PM since last summer ... I have heard SC.  I bought it for Raff as sort of a gag gift for Xmas... and funny thing is.... we both sort of enjoyed it.  LOL  Just softening in our old age I guess.
 
The ironic thing is, I just got through reviewing a DT album, then I come on here and read this LOL
 
Well, with me (as I say in the review, actually), it's alwaysbeen a double-edged sword with me when it comes to DT. At times they can really move me, and others it just seems like they are keeping score amongst themselves as to how many notes they each played within a milisecond. Truly a love-hate relationship for me. Confused


DT has always been a bit of an enigma to me ...face it... what is the one band you can really say DT are very...very similar to.... yes... one of the bands I absolutely ADORE most... Emerson, Lake, and Palmer.  Much  of the same sh*t that is slung at DT... could..and has been thrown at ELP.
 
Yeah . . . Dream Theater's biggest error I think is that they wear their influences too close to the surfece of everything. If they were a bit better at burying their influences and losing them within the music itself, it would be fine, but more often than not I will hear something in their songs that completely leaps out of the music and beats me over the head with the name of whatever band that EXACT riff was originally from. Pink Floyd and Yes are the two bands that I hear the most when I listen to them, but I know there are more.


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 21:17
for me... DT came to encapsulate what I don't like about modern prog.  Especially Patrucci's playing. Too clinical... overproduced.. and lacking the fire...passion... the warts that older recordings do have... modern groups with the  digital recording....effects out the wazoo make for good 'sounding' albums.. but in the end, in some cases... DT in particular though... they suck the life out of the music.  It may sound  strange ..but that is how I see it and explain why I can love the hell out of band like ELP that were similar in many ways to  DT.  King Crimson is a good example of that as well... great music.. with with a few notable exceptions... a very cold... clinical band. Music is life...life is about passion.  I like that in music.. ELP had it in spades.. DT does not.  That is probably the biggest reason for me not liking.. what is indeed an incredible collection of musical talent. 

-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 08 2008 at 23:31
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

for me... DT came to encapsulate what I don't like about modern prog.  Especially Patrucci's playing. Too clinical... overproduced.. and lacking the fire...passion...
 
Amen.  DT for me is, to paraphrase Shakespeare, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
 
Some will argue that's true of TBiG, but that's another thread, or actually this thread.  I've actually listened to TBiG a few times now.  I swear there's one passage that just reeks of Crimson's Sailor's Tale, mellotron (or whatever passes for that these days) and all.
 
One other point: I don't get why posters rush to be the first to review any given album.  Particularly for progressive music, I find it often takes weeks/months to come to terms with what's being presented.  If I dismissed any album based on a handful of listens, man, there would have been a lot of great music I would have missed out on.  But then I'm an old fart still trying to write a decent review of Another Green World...


Posted By: micky
Date Posted: February 09 2008 at 00:59
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

 
One other point: I don't get why posters rush to be the first to review any given album.  Particularly for progressive music, I find it often takes weeks/months to come to terms with what's being presented.  If I dismissed any album based on a handful of listens, man, there would have been a lot of great music I would have missed out on.  But then I'm an old fart still trying to write a decent review of Another Green World...


amen to that in return...  prog of ALL things needs to be 'heard' not listened to.  It isn't pop for god's sake hahaha. 

and you aren't an old fart.. just blessed with what my Granny used to call.. good old fashioned common sense. If you haven't listened to a prog album at least 7 times.... you are wasting bandwidth with a review.


-------------
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip


Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: February 09 2008 at 03:40
I'll get round to reading that Aerial review ASAP... I've just got back from the grocery store, and now I am relaxing with TBiG and PA!LOL

As I promised Evans, I've been listening to whether the drums and vocals really overwhelm everything else in the mix. So far, I don't really have that impression at all... The guitar sound is quite clear and audible, and Cedric's voice is not mixed higher than the other instruments. In my opinion, there a lot of vocal parts on this album, which is the main reason why the voice seems to be more prominent.

A very intriguing aspect of this album are the song titles, which seem to have been taken from both mythology and fantasy literature (two things I'm very much into). "Metatron" is a character from Philip Pullman's The Amber Spyglass (which I've started reading very recently), "Ilyena" from Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time series, "Ouroboros" from a novel by R.E. Eddison called The Worm Ouroboros. Then, "Goliath" comes from the Bible, and "Asklepios" is the Greek god of medicine. However, I'm still at a loss as to what "Aberinkula" means...


Posted By: Evans
Date Posted: February 09 2008 at 06:11
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

I'll get round to reading that Aerial review ASAP... I've just got back from the grocery store, and now I am relaxing with TBiG and PA!LOL

As I promised Evans, I've been listening to whether the drums and vocals really overwhelm everything else in the mix. So far, I don't really have that impression at all... The guitar sound is quite clear and audible, and Cedric's voice is not mixed higher than the other instruments. In my opinion, there a lot of vocal parts on this album, which is the main reason why the voice seems to be more prominent.

A very intriguing aspect of this album are the song titles, which seem to have been taken from both mythology and fantasy literature (two things I'm very much into). "Metatron" is a character from Philip Pullman's The Amber Spyglass (which I've started reading very recently), "Ilyena" from Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time series, "Ouroboros" from a novel by R.E. Eddison called The Worm Ouroboros. Then, "Goliath" comes from the Bible, and "Asklepios" is the Greek god of medicine. However, I'm still at a loss as to what "Aberinkula" means...
Actually, it wasn't me, but i suspect whoever it was will be happy :)
No, i don't think they are any louder than they were on Amputechture. They're just not as good as they were on De-loused, is all.


-------------

'Let's give it another fifteen seconds..'



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk