Print Page | Close Window

Key Albums coding

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4301
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 10:15
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Key Albums coding
Posted By: FloydWright
Subject: Key Albums coding
Date Posted: March 14 2005 at 18:46
I really don't understand this...

http://www.progarchives.com/Progressive_rock_discography_BAN D.asp?band_id=325

If you look at this listing for Symphony X, The Odyssey has way more reviews than the other albums, but is coming in with lower ratings than some other very good albums like Twilight in Olympus and The Damnation Game. Why is The Odyssey being featured when clearly the numerical ratings indicate that other albums are of higher quality? Is it just because a lot of people happen to have reviewed it? I hardly think THAT is a measure of quality!



Replies:
Posted By: goose
Date Posted: March 16 2005 at 14:04

It is the third featured album, and there are only four with higher ratings. Now two would be expected, since it's in third place. Of the two which aren't featured that do have higher ratings, is not Twilight in Olympus a compilation album? Even if it isn't, it has a rating of only 0.01 higher than the Oddyssey (and far fewer ratings; clearly the number must be used in some way to calculate the key albums, or an album rated once with 5 stars would win). The other album which scored higher is a live album, which I suppose can't be considered on the same grounds as a studio one.

 

And you say The Damnation Game has a higher rating? It says 3.88 compared to 4.32, doesn't it?



Posted By: FloydWright
Date Posted: March 16 2005 at 23:45
Twilight is NOT a compilation album at all...it's an ordinary studio release. And as for Live at the Edge of Forever, why should that be any different? If it's that good, it's that good.


Posted By: MorgothSunshine
Date Posted: May 12 2005 at 11:15
The Odyssey sucks!

-------------
For every truth even the contrary is true...


Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: May 12 2005 at 11:31





The Odyssey sucks!

__________________
For every truth even the contrary is true...

-------------
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT


Posted By: silvertree
Date Posted: May 12 2005 at 13:03

Originally posted by MorgothSunshine MorgothSunshine wrote:

The Odyssey sucks!

 

How constructive !



Posted By: JMCecil
Date Posted: May 15 2005 at 11:09
Originally posted by silvertree silvertree wrote:

Originally posted by MorgothSunshine MorgothSunshine wrote:

The Odyssey sucks!

 

How constructive !

Why waste words when those three explain it perfectly. I applaud the brevity.



Posted By: M@X
Date Posted: May 24 2005 at 00:37

Please refer here for more details about the CODING ALGORITHM

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4038 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4038

 

and in particular to Fitz lengthy posts on the third and fourth pages of that thread.



-------------
Prog On !



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk