b.o.c.
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Welcome newbies!
Forum Description: Introduce yourself and tell us what prog music you listen to
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=22748
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 10:30
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: b.o.c.
Posted By: 42ndAGE
Subject: b.o.c.
Date Posted: May 03 2006 at 00:06
|
I might be repeating myself but what do you expect from a "newbie". I have been reading reviews and discussions on Progarchives for a few years now. Since I decided to join in, I've always had a few
things to ask other progheads about. I already tried once to ask this 1st question but I have no idea where it went; so I'll ask again.....
I've always felt that Blue Oyster Cult should be included in the archives. They were more progressive than other bands of there peers (often linked to Black Sabbath, Zappa and even Deep Purple (who are here)). Astronomy could definitly be considered progressive, as well as Monsters, Nosferatu, Golden Age of Leather, etc....
Anyway, any opinions???????????????
Just the place to hopelessly incounter time...... and then can"t leave
|
Replies:
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: May 03 2006 at 01:15
 If I remember correctly B.O.C. were considered for inclusion and rejected. Enjoy the site and the forum. -------------  |
Posted By: A'swepe
Date Posted: May 03 2006 at 10:11
|
Welcome to the forum. BOC may have had some Prog elements but they are pure Hard Rock. Plain & Simple. ------------- David - Never doubt in the dark that which you believe to be true in the light. http://www.myspace.com/aardvarktxusa - Instrumental rock http://www.soundclick.com/aardvarktxusa |
Posted By: Flyingsod
Date Posted: May 10 2006 at 19:33
| Welcome to the forum side. I'd go along with BOC considering some others that were not rejected. |