Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=130791 Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 04:51 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Rachel's (for Post Rock)Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Subject: Rachel's (for Post Rock)
Date Posted: April 18 2023 at 03:00
I found them suggested to http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=22077" rel="nofollow - PA as early as in 2006 , but nothing came out of it.
To me http://https://rachels.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - Rachel's , formed in Louisville, 1991- are one of those groups with an almost flawless discography. Although occasionally experimental and dissonant, on their two first albums(Handwriting (1995)* and Music for Egon Schiele (1996)) they are almost purely an chamber music/modern classical ensemble. Both warmly reccomended, and I think many of you will love them just as much as what came after. But neither albums are the reason I'm suggesting them for PA-inclusion.
However their two next albums http://The%20Sea%20and%20the%20Bells%20https://rachels.bandcamp.com/album/the-sea-and-the-bells" rel="nofollow - The Sea and the Bells (also 1996) and perhaps even more http://https://rachels.bandcamp.com/album/selenography" rel="nofollow - Selenography(1999), begins what makes them highly relevant for Prog Archives. There's more frequent use of percussion, guitars and bass, and that immediately make the same music (pretty much) as before more "chamber rock". They could fit in Avant/RIO as well, but when they do "rock out" a little, they got more in common with other post-rock chamber music - than Univers Zero.
In the early 2000's they add more electronic elements to their music (not that unlike Tortoise' approach), and get slightly more experimental too. Or maybe not more experimental, but they do play around more with sounds and atmospheres...
I love the beautiful Systems / Layers (2003) - a commissioned piece for the Saratoga International Theater Institute ensemble - too. But it's got that typical soundtrack-feel (although this one's for the stage), where many of the pieces are short and underdeveloped themes - rather than fully fledged songs.
Also their two long EP's: a Rachel's / Matmos collaboration titled Full on Night (2000) + Significant Others (2002) and Technology Is Killing Music (2006) are all progressive in one way or another, but I've only listened to all three for the first time today on http://Bandcaahttps://rachels.bandcamp.com/musicmp." rel="nofollow - Bandcamp. Where you'll find everything they ever released.
*edit: I relistened to Handwriting and it's quite far from how I remembered it. It's very much "chamber/Post-Rock. A less sophisticated, more simplistic version of what was to come. Still not bad at all. Quite enjoyable really, but I think they got better.
Replies: Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 18 2023 at 03:07
None of my links seem to work (for me at least), so:
https://rachels.bandcamp.com/
+ longest part from their commisioned piece
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: April 18 2023 at 04:53
Lovely band, I was going to eventually suggest them myself!
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 18 2023 at 05:23
^Yes, lovely indeed.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 19 2023 at 22:31
Trying to get your attention here promoting this relatively well known, pioneering and highly influential Post-Rock band - that GY!BE simply must have been inspired by. -Here's another fine tune. The opening track from their third album The Sea and the Bells (1996).
Look, even Wikipedia the free encylopedia agrees that Rachel's were Post-Rock.
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: April 19 2023 at 23:21
Remember, as per the https://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=122381" rel="nofollow - Artist Submission Procedure thread , an original or band-approved biography is necessary for a team member to begin evaluation.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 19 2023 at 23:24
Gordy wrote:
Remember, as per the https://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=122381" rel="nofollow - Artist Submission Procedure thread , an original or band-approved biography is necessary for a team member to begin evaluation.
I can't remember something I wasn't aware of:) But ok. Now I know.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 20 2023 at 01:28
They haven't got any bio on their home page, so I guess there's nothing I can use. Does this mean that I have to write a biofor a band you might actually reject? If so, that seem backwards to me.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: April 20 2023 at 03:06
Saperlipopette! wrote:
They haven't got any bio on their home page, so I guess there's nothing I can use. Does this mean that I have to write a biofor a band you might actually reject? If so, that seem backwards to me.
There are more bands that are accepted than rejected, so it's not backwards.
Just compile some info on the band, where are they from, what do they sound like, similar artists. It does not even have to be long.
edit: your opening post is helpful, it's all fine.
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: April 27 2023 at 15:40
Saperlipopette! wrote:
They haven't got any bio on their home page, so I guess there's nothing I can use. Does this mean that I have to write a biofor a band you might actually reject? If so, that seem backwards to me.
It's the risk we take for love. Even I've had some of my suggestions rejected, and two of which were refused before they even reached the evaluation stage.
But I think Rachel's stand a strong chance for inclusion. And the best part is they have a fresh chance for evaluation: I distinctly recall they'd been suggested many years ago and were rejected by an old version of the team, but the record of that vote was erased when Progfreak was renovated recently.
Considering the team hasn't looked at this thread yet, I strongly encourage you to prepare a bio and I'll forward it directly to Keishiro and crew.
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: April 27 2023 at 19:36
Yep, I tried way back. Hope they make it this time.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: April 28 2023 at 02:33
TheProgtologist: Yesschizoid_man77: Movesnobb: Yesangelmk: Noharmoniumro: No
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: April 28 2023 at 12:12
^Interesting, I was certain the votes from the old chart disappeared but I'm glad to be proved wrong.
I still think they deserve a second shot with fresh (progressive) ears.
Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: April 28 2023 at 21:55
I understand why they have been rejected previously.
"Selenography" is a wonderful creation, my love. But I don't feel enough of progressive rock but neo-classical ambience via this opus. A great album nonetheless.
At any rate, the eval result by the older members cannot be reversed without any new release after that. Sorry.
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: April 28 2023 at 22:27
^while I'm sorry to hear Keishiro's opinion means they probably wouldn't stand another shot at inclusion, they are eligible, as they posthumously released a single track via Bandcamp in 2013, two years after their rejection: https://rachels.bandcamp.com/track/a-warm-body-2" rel="nofollow - https://rachels.bandcamp.com/track/a-warm-body-2
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 29 2023 at 03:33
I know you guys are not to blame, but that sucks. Back in the days it could be quite random what albums you managed to get a hold of/listen to for evaluation as well.
In my opinion Rachel's were an essential Post Rock band, and without them a part of the formative story is lacking. Parts of Handwriting, The Sea and the Bells (ranked 16th on Fact Magazine's "The 30 best post-rock albums of all time") is basically the birth and building blocks of what was to become the sound associated with Post Rock. Selenography is perhaps the icing on the cake. You'll hardly find a place online that doesn't use the term Post Rock about Rachel's.
-Anyway, I'm glad I didn't start writing their bio. It's extra timeconsuming as english is not my native language.
Posted By: DamoXt7942
Date Posted: April 29 2023 at 18:11
^ So, would you please let me know which album you recommend? I've listened only to "Selenography" (and enjoyed much) so far.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: April 30 2023 at 00:32
^If Selenography isn't Post Rock enough, I don't think an other album will convince you. But how about the one placed 16th place on Fact Magazine's 30 best post-rock albums of all time?
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: May 22 2023 at 22:40
Saperlipopette! wrote:
^If Selenography isn't Post Rock enough, I don't think an other album will convince you. But how about the one placed 16th place on Fact Magazine's 30 best post-rock albums of all time?
As this is in all likelihood the last chance Rachel's have at inclusion, it would be better for their chances if you listed specific listening links for Keishiro and team to follow. All their recorded work can be found streaming between Spotify, Bandcamp and YouTube.
Right now the band are in limbo with one vote (Unsure for Keishiro).
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: May 22 2023 at 23:14
Gordy wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
^If Selenography isn't Post Rock enough, I don't think an other album will convince you. But how about the one placed 16th place on Fact Magazine's 30 best post-rock albums of all time?
As this is in all likelihood the last chance Rachel's have at inclusion, it would be better for their chances if you listed specific listening links for Keishiro and team to follow. All their recorded work can be found streaming between Spotify, Bandcamp and YouTube.
Right now the band are in limbo with one vote (Unsure for Keishiro).
Haven't I already done exactly that in my opening post? However my links to places outside of PA doesn't work for me when I
try to use them. It always tells me something went wrong. If they do work
for others, I've included links to Rachel's official site, their
Bandcamp-account + their The Sea and the Bells & Selenography-albums spesifically (just press those words, I thought they all appeared as links). As you can see I've also already added three youtube-vids here with representative songs.
I've sort of given up by now. What else - or what more is there any point of doing?
Posted By: Gordy
Date Posted: August 29 2024 at 22:48
Rachel's have been cleared for addition in Post/Math.
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: August 29 2024 at 22:54
^ Wow. After suggesting them in 2007, it will be seventeen years in the making.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: August 30 2024 at 00:05
A nice, surprising turn of events:)
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: September 04 2024 at 06:02
...but we still need a bio in order to proceed with the addition
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: September 04 2024 at 06:06
There's an extended bio on the Italian site ondarock.it I can take some info from that. Just the essentials as I don't want to infringe any copyright
------------- I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Posted By: octopus-4
Date Posted: September 04 2024 at 06:27