Print Page | Close Window

Canterbury Scene and fuzz pedals

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: Music and Musicians Exchange
Forum Description: Talk with and get feedback from other musicians on the site
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=118183
Printed Date: November 26 2024 at 13:04
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Canterbury Scene and fuzz pedals
Posted By: Polymorphia
Subject: Canterbury Scene and fuzz pedals
Date Posted: January 13 2019 at 16:35
Does anyone know what fuzz pedals were used in the Canterbury Scene? For the organ sounds, but also for the guitar and bass sounds. In particular, the bass fuzz on Moving Gelatine Plates' The World of Genius Hans. 

-------------
https://dreamwindow.bandcamp.com/releases" rel="nofollow - My Music



Replies:
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: January 14 2019 at 06:28
I've sorta been wanting to know this too... 



-------------
https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album!
http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385


Posted By: Guldbamsen
Date Posted: January 14 2019 at 07:35
You guys may already have familiarised yourselves with this thread: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=26649
In case you haven’t then read on fine gents!

A lot of Canterbury sounding bands from all over used a guitar amp for the organ so as they could use wah-wahs, flangers and other such tomfoolery.
The specific pedal in use on Genius Hans? Go fish

Edit: the above as well as lowry organs, farfisa through a fuzz box and fuzz pedals (no specifics!) were the things I picked up from that thread

-------------
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams


Posted By: Polymorphia
Date Posted: January 14 2019 at 17:27
I'm looking for the specific fuzz box. Is it a fuzzface? Is it the superfuzz?

-------------
https://dreamwindow.bandcamp.com/releases" rel="nofollow - My Music


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: January 15 2019 at 18:45
Originally posted by Polymorphia Polymorphia wrote:

I'm looking for the specific fuzz box. Is it a fuzzface? Is it the superfuzz?

I would probably check the websites for some of these bands, since at times they list the equipment for various members ... hopefully you will find it, but I caution you about one thing ... don't try to emulate ... create your own sound, even if you have to use a kitchen pot! For the most part it is some of the crazy stuff that many of them did to help create an identity.


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Polymorphia
Date Posted: January 15 2019 at 20:45
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Polymorphia Polymorphia wrote:

I'm looking for the specific fuzz box. Is it a fuzzface? Is it the superfuzz?


I would probably check the websites for some of these bands, since at times they list the equipment for various members ... hopefully you will find it, but I caution you about one thing ... don't try to emulate ... create your own sound, even if you have to use a kitchen pot! For the most part it is some of the crazy stuff that many of them did to help create an identity.
Thanks for the tip, but if you listen to my music you'll hear there's little danger of it sounding like Caravan.

-------------
https://dreamwindow.bandcamp.com/releases" rel="nofollow - My Music


Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 16 2019 at 05:05
Always difficult to tell, as a lot of distortion can come from the amp as well. 

That's from 1972, so you've got everything from Fuzz Face's to Electro Harmonix's Big Muff. I'd personally bet on it being the Big Muff Pi, they were used a lot by bassists, but - well, difficult to tell. 

I tend to build my own pedals - usually Fuzz Dog ones - quite a few to chose from here if you're feeling experimental and have a soldering iron. ;-)

https://shop.pedalparts.co.uk/Fuzz/cat847125_2465698.aspx" rel="nofollow - https://shop.pedalparts.co.uk/Fuzz/cat847125_2465698.aspx


-------------



Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: January 16 2019 at 06:20
Originally posted by Polymorphia Polymorphia wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Polymorphia Polymorphia wrote:

I'm looking for the specific fuzz box. Is it a fuzzface? Is it the superfuzz?


I would probably check the websites for some of these bands, since at times they list the equipment for various members ... hopefully you will find it, but I caution you about one thing ... don't try to emulate ... create your own sound, even if you have to use a kitchen pot! For the most part it is some of the crazy stuff that many of them did to help create an identity.
Thanks for the tip, but if you listen to my music you'll hear there's little danger of it sounding like Caravan.
 

CARAVAN, is probably the most "classical" sounding band of them all, and also the one that stood out … however, the really far out stuff is buried and out there … and I would probably spend more time listening to National Health, Matching Mole, Richard Sinclair (try Caravan of Dreams! (much later!)), and so many others around that time … they are really different and fun to enjoy. And the creative efforts are … totally out there somewhere in the galaxy, sometimes, but always fun! I did not keep up with Soft Machine after the 5th or 6th album to tell you more.

(BTW, I'm probably the only Caravan person you know that has at least 15 of their albums) … (I forgot how to count in my old age to tell you more about the Canterbury folks!)

(BTW2 … I find sounds in the strangest of places! So I went to the food bank and someone dropped … whatever it was … let me tell you that sound was … too late for a recorder, and I did not have my smartphone!) … I like walking down the street and record the sounds haphazard for 5 minutes … (and NOT LISTEN to it for several days) … then get in the car, go somewhere else … do it again … by the time you turn that stuff over, and goof around with it forwards, backwards, and different speeds, you have created a new sound effect, that you can use … for a lot of … who knows … ohh, by the way, try bathroom sounds backwards … they sound great!


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 16 2019 at 08:17
I thought I'd include a picture of a tangent at this point. ;-) (Sorry. Mosh. ;-) )




-------------



Posted By: Gerinski
Date Posted: January 16 2019 at 12:08
I would also put my bet on the Big Muff and the Fuzz Face.


Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 17 2019 at 02:18
They're the most likely. However, remember that this is an era where decent pedals and amps are scarce in the UK. You can get bassists using guitar pedals, there are obscure manufacturers coming up with a few designs which are only manufactured by the handful - you also get bassists using guitar amps, so unless you get an equipment list or a photo, you can never be completely sure. 

My money would really be on a Fuzz Face or Big Muff Pi. That covers most of the possibilities. However, of course, without knowing what the amp was, you're never going to absolutely replicate the sound. And even if you found an old bass valve amp, which it just might be, modern valves will sound different. And a modern one is probably biased correctly as well. Then there's the bass and string choice. ;-)

You may get close, but you probably won't get *exact*. Although that may not matter. 

-------------



Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 17 2019 at 02:23
Oh yes, another point. Polymorphia was talking about what might have been used for the organ and guitar as well. The answer is "probably the same pedal that the bassist was using". Equipment was pretty scarce in the early 70's. 

Even bands like Hawkwind would only have, say, a couple of Binson echo units, a couple of Dunlop wah pedals and a couple of generic "fuzz" pedals. That would be the lot, apart from some WEM / Marshall / Sound City / Vox amps. Amps in the UK were generally British made, getting something heavy shipped from the US was a bit of an expensive proposition, then. Matter of fact, even American guitars and basses were by no means universal, either. 

-------------



Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 17 2019 at 02:26
This may help. Searchable pedals and effects made from 1960 - 69. Just alter the link to get it to, say, 1972. 

https://reverb.com/marketplace/effects-and-pedals?year_max=1969&year_min=1960" rel="nofollow - https://reverb.com/marketplace/effects-and-pedals?year_max=1969&year_min=1960


-------------



Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: January 17 2019 at 07:16
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

I thought I'd include a picture of a tangent at this point. ;-) (Sorry. Mosh. ;-) )



Sorry Dave ... the picture is not funny ... where are the laughs? (spoken through a space whisper thing that Gilly used!)


-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 17 2019 at 09:59
Well, perhaps the thread is actually about "do you know what equipment was used" rather than "let's all go off on a tangent and no we don't", Mosh........ ;-)

-------------



Posted By: Polymorphia
Date Posted: January 17 2019 at 16:57
In most cases, it doesn't quite sound like a big muff to me. It sounds a little more "congested." I've been watching some Univox Superfuzz demos and I thinks that's definitely what the MGP bass player is using. 

-------------
https://dreamwindow.bandcamp.com/releases" rel="nofollow - My Music


Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 18 2019 at 04:43
That's interesting ! Could be. 

I was looking up the price of Fuzz Faces yesterday - ha haaaa, thousands for a pedal because it has the original germanium transistors in it. World's gone mad, a bipolar transistor junction transistor is basically a voltage controlled high speed switch. It's like saying a vintage car handles differently due to the wind resistance of the original paint. 

Just found this, a schematic for a Univox Superfuzz. The original transistors are 2SC828's - you can get new old stock ones for 99p each. There are six of them, standard NPN ones. You could actually use BC547's and save a few quid, there wouldn't be much of a difference. Pretty simple to build this on stripboard or design a simple PCB for it. Not that I'm volunteering, too much work to do on the modular synth !!! 



-------------



Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 18 2019 at 04:46
DA-90 germanium diodes, just use 1N4148's instead. Nothing else in there is unusual, all off the shelf bits. Modern resistors and capacitors are built to better tolerances than the 60's stuff as well. 

The schematic above would cost about £20-30 to build using a Chinese made PCB, including the price of a Hammond enclosure, foot switch, jacks, pots, knobs and a power inlet (I'd ditch the battery.) Nothing to it, this is "pre integrated circuit" days, of course. 

Quick PS, it'll be well out of copyright. ;-)

-------------



Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 18 2019 at 04:49
And Polymorphia may be happy to know that clones are indeed available. ;-)

https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index.php?threads/what-are-my-options-for-a-univox-super-fuzz.1796015/" rel="nofollow - https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index.php?threads/what-are-my-options-for-a-univox-super-fuzz.1796015/


-------------



Posted By: Davesax1965
Date Posted: January 18 2019 at 05:24
Here's a clone in action..... 




-------------



Posted By: Polymorphia
Date Posted: January 18 2019 at 09:34
I was looking at the two Wattson clones earlier. Apparently, they're the most accurate. (They've even been sued by Univox - good sign).

-------------
https://dreamwindow.bandcamp.com/releases" rel="nofollow - My Music


Posted By: handwrist
Date Posted: May 21 2019 at 04:55
I don't have specifics, but the key to the Canterbury organ sound from my experience, comes not so much from a specific pedal or amp, but from cheapness. If you have a cheap keyboard and a cheap amp with incorporated distortion, or a cheap fuzz pedal, you will get pretty close. The cheaper the better actually.

With VSTs you can explore more, but in the end, remember that the sound grew from the bands having no money to buy proper equipment. Necessity is the mother of invention as they say, or something to that effect.


-------------
http://handwrist.bandcamp.com" rel="nofollow - My Music

http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=9405" rel="nofollow - PA Page


Posted By: Magmatt
Date Posted: July 19 2019 at 09:04
It is well documented that Chris Squire from Yes used a Maestro Brassmaster fuzz device. No longer made.
There is actually a modern version of this made by Mallekko Heavy Industries and it's called  The (B)Assmaster.
it's not cheap as far as effect pedals go and it is well built. I obtained one when I played with a Deep Purple tribute. Our keyboard player tried it on his Hammond with success also. I love that it comes with a set of rubber teeth inside and the control pot read " More Ass ".  Best fuzzy organ sound has to be Wakeman on Strawbs "The Hangman and the Papist ' . 


Posted By: hugo1995
Date Posted: January 15 2020 at 16:11
Surprisingly this is yet to be mentioned in the thread.

Mike Ratledge and Dave Stewart 100% used the https://reverb.com/item/440825-shaftesbury-duo-fuzz-late-60s" rel="nofollow - Shaftesbury Fuzz pedal.  There is a photo archive with Dave using it, and he had it to the left of him on a stand instead of using it with his foot.

Throw this on a Hammond or Lowrey, and you have a 1:1 Canterbury sound. https://heroic.academy/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/EMT-140-plate-reverb.jpe" rel="nofollow - Now if only you could afford the massive plate reverb they used in the studio for the Psychedlic stuff back then... 


-------------
interests: Moon Safari, Gilgamesh, Egg, ELP, Soft Machine, Gong, Opeth (Everything pre watershed), Brighteye Brison, The Flower Kings


Posted By: derickgtwk
Date Posted: April 09 2024 at 13:16
reading this topic, I wanted to make my contribution.

i've been researching the equipment used by the bands in the canterbury scene, not just the pedals, but also the amps and cabinets.

about the fuzz pedal used by MGP's bass player: based on the photos I've seen of the band's gigs, I believe it to be the "elka dizzy tone".

in the case of EGG, KHAN, Hatfield and the North, National Health: all the organ sounds consist of the harmmond l100 through a superfuzz/duo-fuzz and a wah pedal called "schaller bow-wow yoy-yoy."

both Dave Stewart and Mont Campbell used the same model of amplifier and cabinet, each had a pair of 100w hiwatts with wem starfinder cabinets, which from the sound of it, I'm sure they didn't have Fane Crescendo, I believe the starfinders they used had rare goodmans power audiom 50w speakers.

In the case of some other bands like Supersister, Quiet Sun, Cos, STUBBS: they all used electric organs with fuzz.

Quiet Sun and STUBBS used vox organs.

Supersister's keyboard player: Robert Jan Stips used a farfisa compact series at first and then switched to a farfisa vip series organ, and I can see from the band's pictures that they used london city amps.

Cos keyboard player Marc Hollander used a Farfisa Professional Duo.


Posted By: moshkito
Date Posted: May 15 2024 at 05:52
Hi,

I was kinda thinking ... that above all ... you really had to have a FUZZY mind first ... to end up doing all kinds of funny/funky/farout stuff. 

Nice break down of things derickgtwk. Enjoyed reading that, however, I have to admit that for me, many times the sound was more indicative of a specific feeling/idea to move the piece along differently than the commons ways and styles. Always thought this was one of the special things about the Canterbury folks ... and sometimes it was for fun. I have a hard time thinking that people did it simply for the sake of using something different ... and new ... however, the non-stop proliferation of ideas on how to use anything is neat, and far out to read. An organ through a wah pedal ... hmmmm ... but it reminds me of Edgar Froese i his book describing their experiments with echo chambers, before they became electronic, and it is crazy and then some, but they made it work and you can hear the sound in the early LP's, if you can identify them, which TD was really clean on that part more often than not .. and then ... the incredible use and constant development of sequencers, which Christopher Franke had to do manually for a long time!!!!



-------------
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com


Posted By: Jacob Schoolcraft
Date Posted: May 20 2024 at 20:40
Phil Miller sounds like he's using the "Big Muff" but you never know. Distortion or a fuzz tone which was built into guitar amps back then was rather impressive sounding. I believe guitarist Jeff Beck was using Orange Amps at the time. A good example is on Rough And Ready where his guitar is singing...rather crying..A good example of that particular guitar sound would be present on Camel recordings.

Camel sometimes had similarities to what one would hear from Canterbury bands. "Supertwister" from Mirage, Several tracks from Moonmadness and Rain Dances and of course CAMEL A LIVE RECORD. With Richard Sinclair on vocals and Mel Collins on sax it has definite similarities to what exists in the Canterbury style. Andrew Latimer's guitar sound is more like Jeff Beck and far from sounding like Phil Miller.

Phil Miller ...in some cases captured the fuzz tone that Bob Fripp used on Larks Tongues In Aspic Part 1. The same fuzz tone is heard on Matching Mole recordings. On National Health albums the fuzz is less and the sustain is more.

In some cases Phil Lee from Gilgamesh captured that fuzzy tone during improvisation on electric guitar. He was a brilliant Classical guitarist as well.

Steve Hillage didn't have a fuzzy tone. He produced a full sounding tone where the treble of his high pitched notes and the bass of his lower sounding notes were pronounced with clarity. Even though he used Distortion it sounded off quite differently and sophisticated not unlike Frank Marino or Ronnie Montrose playing Jazz Rock.Gong were thought to be Canterbury and Hillage contributed immensely on their important albums.

Mike Oldfield was briefly affiliated with Canterbury musicians and he sounded like he was using a Big Muff on Tubular Bells. The distorted sound that Hillage used in Gong was eventually reproduced with an MXR pedal. For a while though it seemed as if you could only produce that sound through a Marshall Amp that had built in Distortion...or an Orange Amp. I might be wrong..but I believe the only way to get that sound was by turning up the amps along with using the Distortion dial.

In some cases guitarists with Steely Dan often produced that driving energetic affect on "Reelin' In The Years" or "Bodhisattva ". I remember in 68' there wasn't a pedal for it. ..but there was "The Big Muff"




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk