Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29607
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 01:37 |
Duke has about 39 minutes of brilliant music but suffers from 3 or 4 lack lustre ballads that drag it down. I still voted for it as I hardly ever listen to that Rush album.
|
 |
JediJoker7169
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 05 2009
Location: West Coast, NA
Status: Offline
Points: 195
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 02:01 |
I like Duke, though I'll take Caress of Steel over it most of the time. Genesis might have the better album, but my vote goes to Rush.
|
 |
LSDisease
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 494
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 04:19 |
Caress Of Steel by 1000 miles. If Duke is Mariana Trench, CoS is Mount Everest. Serioulsy, why comparing these albums?
|
"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"
|
 |
Chimaera
Forum Groupie
Joined: February 04 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 87
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 08:20 |
Duke was also from a band going down like a ski jumper at Sochi.
Caress of Steel was from a band going up like a Saturn V.
|
 |
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 10:10 |
Chimaera wrote:
Duke was also from a band going down like a ski jumper at Sochi.Caress of Steel was from a band going up like a Saturn V. |
Although not commercially. COS didn't do well at all. It was panned by the critics, sold badly on its release and the band were on the verge of being dumped by their record company.
Duke sold over 500,000 copies in the UK alone within a very short time after release. It went on to sell millions. That said, I'm sure COS would have caught up dramatically after 2112 was released and re-ignited interest in Rush.
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
 |
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 10:24 |
Horizons wrote:
Caress of Steel.
Great album. |
|
 |
ole-the-first
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 10:38 |
Okay, gotta go with Rush.
Genesis died for me after 'And Then There Were Three'.
|
This night wounds time.
|
 |
smartpatrol
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 11:20 |
LSDisease wrote:
why comparing these albums? |
Xonty wrote:
both around the 3.50 rating on PA |
|
 |
genbanks
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 08 2010
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 956
|
Posted: February 24 2014 at 18:26 |
Duke, no doubts, Duke's Travels, Behind the lines and Duchess are enough to win.
|
 |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29607
|
Posted: February 25 2014 at 01:52 |
When I think about it there is only one track on Rush's first 3 albums that I care about (By-Tor). As Blacksword mentions they were on the verge of giving up and so decided to do an album to suit them . 2112 was not the album the record company wanted .. well not initially anyway. I remember at school around about 1977 and 1978 , Rush were THE BAND, They were everything to a lot of spotty 15 year old kids. Genesis were on the verge of change by 1980 and Duke was in a way a sort of hedging their bets type album. It still had some prog but quite obviously it has some pop stuff aimed at radio. By 1981 they had made up their mind and moved away from prog. Better to have nice young women in the audience than a bunch of spotty teens. 
Edited by richardh - February 25 2014 at 01:54
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.