Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Duke or Caress Of Steel?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDuke or Caress Of Steel?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Poll Question: Which is better?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
30 [58.82%]
21 [41.18%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29607
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 01:37
Duke has about 39 minutes of brilliant music but suffers from 3 or 4 lack lustre ballads that drag it down. I still voted for it as I hardly ever listen to that Rush album.
Back to Top
JediJoker7169 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 05 2009
Location: West Coast, NA
Status: Offline
Points: 195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 02:01
I like Duke, though I'll take Caress of Steel over it most of the time.  Genesis might have the better album, but my vote goes to Rush.
Back to Top
LSDisease View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 04:19
Caress Of Steel by 1000 miles. If Duke is Mariana Trench, CoS is Mount Everest. Serioulsy, why comparing these albums? 

 

"Du gehst zu Frauen? Vergiss die Peitsche nicht!"
Back to Top
Chimaera View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: February 04 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 87
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 08:20
Duke was also from a band going down like a ski jumper at Sochi.

Caress of Steel was from a band going up like a Saturn V.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 10:10
Originally posted by Chimaera Chimaera wrote:

Duke was also from a band going down like a ski jumper at Sochi.
Caress of Steel was from a band going up like a Saturn V.


Although not commercially. COS didn't do well at all. It was panned by the critics, sold badly on its release and the band were on the verge of being dumped by their record company.

Duke sold over 500,000 copies in the UK alone within a very short time after release. It went on to sell millions. That said, I'm sure COS would have caught up dramatically after 2112 was released and re-ignited interest in Rush.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 10:24
Originally posted by Horizons Horizons wrote:

Caress of Steel. 

Great album. 
Back to Top
ole-the-first View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 10:38
Okay, gotta go with Rush.

Genesis died for me after 'And Then There Were Three'.
This night wounds time.
Back to Top
smartpatrol View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 15 2012
Location: My Bedroom
Status: Offline
Points: 14169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 11:20
Originally posted by LSDisease LSDisease wrote:

why comparing these albums?

Originally posted by Xonty Xonty wrote:

both around the 3.50 rating on PA
Back to Top
genbanks View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 08 2010
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 956
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 24 2014 at 18:26
Duke, no doubts, Duke's Travels, Behind the lines and Duchess are enough to win.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29607
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 25 2014 at 01:52
When I think about it there is only one track on Rush's first 3 albums that I care about (By-Tor). As Blacksword mentions they were on the verge of giving up and so decided to do an album to suit them . 2112 was not the album the record company wanted .. well not initially anyway. I remember at school around about 1977  and 1978 , Rush were THE BAND, They were everything to a lot of spotty 15 year old kids.
Genesis were on the verge of change by 1980 and Duke was in a way a sort of hedging their bets type album. It still had some prog but quite obviously it has some pop stuff aimed at radio. By 1981 they had made up their mind and moved away from prog. Better to have nice young women in the audience than a bunch of spotty teens.Wink


Edited by richardh - February 25 2014 at 01:54
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.367 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.