Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > Just for Fun
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Pre-89 Music is Dead
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPre-89 Music is Dead

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
Message
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2011 at 14:18
^Mozart doesn't approve this post.
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8581
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2011 at 14:49
Avians sang songs millions of years prior to human emergence. So no to post-Miocene melodies. All else is derivative buffoonery.   
Back to Top
Cosmiclawnmower View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2010
Location: West Country,UK
Status: Online
Points: 3718
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 06:12
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Rockjf1 Rockjf1 wrote:

Is there someone in this forum who's ever listen to the beatles? pre-89 music is not sh*t what is music to you mainstream bullsh*t common, those people who played music back then paved the way for us they did miracles with crappy sound recording systems I totally disagree with this forum.
 
Had Beatles in our house in Brazil before you were born ... we're talking 1964 and 1965 ... we already could sing "She Loves You" yeah, yeah, yeah!
 
The point is not that music before 89 was better, or worse ... I really think that the point was that music has become a very commenrcial excuse for creating music, and that tends to dilute the ability to tell what is better or worse, or listenable. And when new "sub-genre's" are created for neo-CDshops, that will never be selling that stuff anyway ... gotta love the irony there! ... it makes it look like some of the music since then is better, because it is more widely seen because of the internet.
 
The date basically says ... before Internet ... After internet. And 45 years ago, there was no Internet ... and hearing things like the Beatles, or Rolling Stones was amazing and totally different ... and original and creative -- because there was nothing else out there that was visible, or heard! Today, that is not an issue!
 
And with the internet, everyone can have their website and everyone can sell and everyone is a star! ... and I really think that is what the whole hooplah is about. It is a very valid comment ... but also one that is going to be mis-represented and mis-understood because everyone says something ... in their own language and no one is interested in anyone else's point, except to trash them ... how post 89 that is, btw!

Back to Top
Cosmiclawnmower View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2010
Location: West Country,UK
Status: Online
Points: 3718
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 06:16
Sorry.. ahem...Confused
Anyway... we had beetles in our house in 1964.. the little so and so's destroyed the timber framework and... oh, sorry i see now..Embarrassed Ah that would explain where they were during 64-65.. laying low out in Brasil trying out their new songs!Wink

Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 06:18
Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Avians sang songs millions of years prior to human emergence. So no to post-Miocene melodies. All else is derivative buffoonery.   


LOLLOLLOL

Brontosaurus death metal band Grunt recorded the seminal Death to Hippy Mammoth Scum album eons before the pussy winged critters appeared on the scene.

The single from the album was Walter Digs Fossils

LOL
Back to Top
irrelevant View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 07 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 13382
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 06:21
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Avians sang songs millions of years prior to human emergence. So no to post-Miocene melodies. All else is derivative buffoonery.   


LOLLOLLOL

Brontosaurus death metal band Grunt recorded the seminal Death to Hippy Mammoth Scum album eons before the pussy winged critters appeared on the scene.

The single from the album was Walter Digs Fossils

LOL

LOL
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 12:46
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by Tapfret Tapfret wrote:

Avians sang songs millions of years prior to human emergence. So no to post-Miocene melodies. All else is derivative buffoonery.   


LOLLOLLOL

Brontosaurus death metal band Grunt recorded the seminal Death to Hippy Mammoth Scum album eons before the pussy winged critters appeared on the scene.

The single from the album was Walter Digs Fossils

LOL


I always prefered the Precambrian music ensembles.
Back to Top
Luna View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 28 2010
Location: Funky Town
Status: Offline
Points: 12794
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 12:51
^ Preacmbrian was made in 2007:
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=19045
I just got it yesterday, not bad.


Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2011 at 14:21
Originally posted by SolarLuna96 SolarLuna96 wrote:

^ Preacmbrian was made in 2007:
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=19045
I just got it yesterday, not bad.




Pfff, it's only a reissue.
Back to Top
thehallway View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 13 2010
Location: Dorset, England
Status: Offline
Points: 1433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 10 2011 at 13:50
Originally posted by AtomicCrimsonRush AtomicCrimsonRush wrote:

This thread is a trolling thread obviously.
 
 
With the classic prog album of the 70s, the golden era of prog, the argument does not exist. 70s prog paved the way for the prog era we have now. No 70s prog = no pre 89 prog at all.
 
 End of discussion.
 
Don't worry, not everyone understands sarcasm these days LOL


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.