Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - bad but heavily rated ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedbad but heavily rated ?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Thyme Traveler View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 12 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 164
Direct Link To This Post Topic: bad but heavily rated ?
    Posted: February 27 2006 at 21:06

Is it possible that a "bad" album could be reviewed enough times that it would end up on the "top albums" lists (albeit near the bottom ?

An example (and one of almost everyone's favorite albums to bash): Invisible Touch. It usually is around 2.5 stars, but has over 100+ ratings. Currently, the 100th album in the list of Symphonic albums is Tantra's Delirium with 4.83, but has only 6 ratings. Could there reach a point where it could get enough ratings, enough "good" or above ratings where it could end up on the list ?

True, I know the "math" behind it would prevent it from getting high on the list, still it seems enough 3 ratings could push it onto the list.

Just a thought.



Edited by Thyme Traveler
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2006 at 02:56
On my own website I modified the algorithm so that the bad ratings aren't considered for the "popularity" of an album. MAybe some day M@x will also modify the algorithm here ...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.