Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What to think of "subject(ive)" and "object(ive)"?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

What to think of "subject(ive)" and "object(ive)"?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Message
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2024 at 07:11
I don't think anyone but you was interested in this thread at this point. xD

But since you bumped it, I might as well get on topic. IMHO reviews should be subjective (that's also why I think the numeric/star rating requirement on PA is nonsense) but good argumentation and research will always give them more weight.

Edited by Hrychu - June 22 2024 at 07:15
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Valdez Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2024 at 08:16
The 5 star system is a good one . The only way to really tell if the reviewer enjoyed the ride... or not. 

Opinions may vary. It's left up to the individual reviewer. But I would urge reviewers and critics to avoid reviewing genres they know they don't like.  I would never review a Bette Midler or Taylor Swift album. How can you be objective reviewing music that you know will not please you in any way.

I've seen reviews where the reviewer is purposely gunning for the artist out of a personal disdain... Not a good thing.


Edited by Valdez - June 22 2024 at 08:18
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2024 at 08:34
I don't have a grudge against the 5 star system but IMHO it should be purely optional.
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Valdez Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2024 at 08:46
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I don't have a grudge against the 5 star system but IMHO it should be purely optional.

Optional would be good too.  The 15 star rating they had at Gnosis was interesting.  Is Gnosis still operational?
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5347
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2024 at 08:52
Originally posted by Valdez Valdez wrote:

Is Gnosis still operational?
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15087
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2024 at 04:10
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I don't think anyone but you was interested in this thread at this point. xD

I just wanted to recommend Andrew Sayer's book Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (2nd edition, 1992). Tongue



Edited by David_D - July 05 2024 at 04:12
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17487
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2024 at 06:59
Originally posted by Valdez Valdez wrote:

...
I would never review a Bette Midler or Taylor Swift album. How can you be objective reviewing music that you know will not please you in any way.
...

Hi,

For me, this is difficult ... it doesn't matter what kind of music, and who the people are ... some can do this and that ... and are good the way they are. Taylor Swift climbed Mt. Everest, and when she comes down, it's probably going to hurt. But is she as good as she thinks? I'm not sure I can get excited about trying to find this out ... I've outlived the teenage crush and hormones. Bette Midler is very different ... Her original material way back when was fun to watch and hear. Her stuff with the mermaid and wheelchair was nice and very satirical ... extremely so. 

I'm not a country fan at all, but I would be a hypocrite to say that Tammy or Dolly did not have really good voices, and they had a very good feel for how they sang and felt ... that is a gift, and it doesn't matter what any of us say ... and then ... well ... 

You got to remember that music is music, and likes and dislikes, will only threaten your ability to define music and how it is worked by so many different people. There are hundreds of thousands of expressions, and it really isn't fair to decide that some are right, and better, than the others. Which only defines the level of ethnocentricity within ourselves. 
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Jacob Schoolcraft View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 22 2021
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 1066
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jacob Schoolcraft Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2024 at 10:55
Between 2010 and 2019 I witnessed a lot of controlling people buying musicians to play a specific style of music to supposedly appeal to the majority of people who drink and dance to what we once knew as Country Music but is now a big invention called Modern Country.

It's liking is of course subjective to people but because of its investment by business tycoons or the local tri state vicinity Middle class Federal Express guy wants to back his wife to sing Country and by doing so attempts to bargain with seasoned musicians by paying them extra out of his pocket as opposed to even considering a bar owner someone who is willing to pay a fair price for talented musicians playing Modern Country.

Most musicians are thinking about the money. With this guy paying more out of his pocket than any band you could sit in with in the tri state area then why consider anything else?

Business and music are not a healthy combination. People today will invest in Modern Country music on a lower scale like bars, rodeos and festivals and present it as something way better than what it's real value is...regardless if music is subjective or not. In a very persistent and pushy narcissist way they will promote that music and overate it's value.

Musicians may get the offer and quit the band they're in just for better profit. They were perhaps playing in a band that covered some Dance Music but also a few Fusion instrumentals to make the gig more interesting but the Modern Country gig pays a hundred dollars more. They tell the Modern Country band..."I don't like this guy...he plays old sh*t" "How much does it pay?" " A hundred more?..I'll be there"

This made me feel ill...and I walked away from it in 2019 . First of all...in that business it's like putting music in a grinder. Music is subjective and if you are a seasoned player and you play music which you personally dislike for great money...and if you have a heart...you will eventually turn your back on it. Turn away from it...otherwise be miserable for years. Spiritually unhappy. Following instructions from narcissist band leaders who invest in one path. A limited path...and in that environment people tend to act egocentric because they want to sugarcoat product . Then the music suffers. The music suffers anyway. It's bad enough..we don't need more dictatorship with manipulative concepts.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21121
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2024 at 13:57
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I don't think anyone but you was interested in this thread at this point. xD

But since you bumped it, I might as well get on topic. IMHO reviews should be subjective (that's also why I think the numeric/star rating requirement on PA is nonsense) but good argumentation and research will always give them more weight.

I think that whenever a reviewer realises that they're about to submit an unusually high/low rating (compared to the typical ratings for the given release), they should think twice about submitting that rating. Of course in these situations the BEST option by far is to abstain from submitting the rating, which unfortunately isn't an option at PA, but it is possible on other websites (Tongue). For example, if you do not like growling vocals you are free to submit a one star rating to Opeth - Blackwater Park, but it's kind of idiotic. All you're really saying is that you hate the style of music, but that's not a good reason for "punishing" the release like that. On the other side of the spectrum, you could submit a 5 star rating to Metallica - St. Anger because that release is one of your "guilty pleasures" - you know it's crap, but you really like it. Again, nobody is stopping you from doing so, but it's not the most useful thing either.

The most "grown-up" choice IMHO is to abstain from submitting a rating. This is the strongest-possible signal to others that you are aware of your own biases, and it shows respect to those who are in a better position to enjoy these releases.


Edited by MikeEnRegalia - July 17 2024 at 13:58
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2024 at 14:29
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Many years ago someone on PA posted that the appreciation of music was objective.

Music itself is objectively music (tones arranged in deliberate patterns) unless it is objectively not music (un-deliberate patterns, noise).

But I would say an argument could be made that music appreciation is both sub- and objective.   Unfortunately I don't have the time to do that at present.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2024 at 14:30
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

I don't think anyone but you was interested in this thread at this point.


Demonstrably incorrect.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.