Fascism for Freedom

There's also a surprising amount of philosophical overlap in the ideologies' theoretical underpinnings between the anarchist left and the libertarian right, with it being technical issues why the former prefer a socialist sharing economy and the latter a free market when it comes to practical implementation. This is something that the libertarians have started actively downplaying from the mid-1970s onwards, though, as a key plank of building coalitions with the rest of the political right. The Mitrailleuse, a libertarian webzine I sometimes read, had a very informative two part article about how that split happened.

Outside of semantics, which sometimes don't explain absolutely anything, fascism for freedom is impossible because to enforce it you would need a gigantic (or at least big) government apparatus. Even if the dictator him/herself would be an angel with pure intentions, to make this happen he would need hundreds, thousands of bureaucrats, enforcers, soldiers, policemen, etc. It's contradictory but you would need it. You would even need a thought-police. So it's gradually becoming less free. And when so many people have power, the chance that many, MANY of them abuse it and see for their own interest is not even high: it's certain. 

^ It is fictitiously feasible, or I should say plausible.   Existentially feasible?; Harder to see.