Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - ...And Then There Were Three...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed...And Then There Were Three...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Poll Question: Do you think it shares similarities to Wind and Wuthering?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
27 [56.25%]
21 [43.75%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
fudgenuts64 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 17 2013
Location: NY
Status: Offline
Points: 470
Direct Link To This Post Topic: ...And Then There Were Three...
    Posted: August 14 2014 at 23:48
So, most seem to think that And Then There Were Three was Genesis's first album where they went pop. To my ears, it sounds like a more condensed Wind and Wuthering. I feel bad for those who haven't given it a listen but liked Wind and Wuthering. I feel as if most would really like this album as well.
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2014 at 23:53
No because Wind and Wuthering at least has a couple passable songs on it
Back to Top
Mirror Image View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2014 at 23:58
I like ...And Then There Were Three, but I would be only fooling myself if I claimed to love it. Down And Out, Undertow, Deep In The Motherlode, and Snowbound are my favorites, but little else has touched me. For me, Hackett's departure is where I personally step foot off the grand ship Genesis and bid farewell to one of my favorite bands.

Edited by Mirror Image - August 14 2014 at 23:59
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov
Back to Top
Progosopher View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 12 2009
Location: Coolwood
Status: Offline
Points: 6472
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 00:23
It shares similarities, sure, it is the same band, sort of, but the two are very different albums. Genesis has nothing in their catalogue that sounds quite like ATTWT. Without Hackett, the remaining three were exploring new sounds, and soon opted for the more commercial sound we hear the first inkling of on this album.
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 01:03
A big YES without question. Short-song format notwithstanding, (most of) these songs fit the Prog bill quite nicely.....
Back to Top
twosteves View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4095
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 01:14
It's a good album but lacks the Hackett magic---and Hackett could have made this a great album by adding his thing to it had he still been in the group. So, it doesn't sound like WandW --which I think is a great album.
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 01:34
Voted NO

W&W is quite messy and disjointed . ATTWT is a very nicely ordered album with some very punchy (if short) prog tracks mixed in with commercial ballads that were pointing the direction they were going in. I prefer it to W&W which was an attempt to cling on to former glories and only succeeded with One For The Vine and Blood On The Rooftops. Hackett leaving brought the best out of the others I believe. Collins drumming went up a notch compared to his generally uninspired efforts on W&W and Banks synth work is amongst his very best..


Back to Top
fudgenuts64 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 17 2013
Location: NY
Status: Offline
Points: 470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 02:13
An interesting perspective, richardh. I will agree the drumming on this album is absolutely stellar and if you like Banks keyboards, this album is absolutely essential. 
Back to Top
snowsnow View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 09 2011
Location: Belper, England
Status: Offline
Points: 555
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 02:21
Originally posted by twosteves twosteves wrote:

It's a good album but lacks the Hackett magic---and Hackett could have made this a great album by adding his thing to it had he still been in the group. So, it doesn't sound like WandW --which I think is a great album.


+1
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 02:25
I always thought that regarding Phil's drumming on this album, he injected a bit of that Brand X technicality to the proceedings. Not to mention that Banks is on fire.....that ARP of his may well have packed it in after this album......
Back to Top
JesusisLord View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: Hawaii
Status: Offline
Points: 320
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 02:31
Lacked the Hackett Magic for sure, but a very good album ….. The follow up, Duke was even better…After Duke, I lost all interest…..

And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father. Phillipians 2:11
Back to Top
Tom Ozric View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 02:40
^ After Duke, most Proggers must've been up the creek without a paddle (so they say). Coming into this whole Genesis-Prog affair after the fact (late 80's), I do respect these crossover attempts during their later career, but nothing compares to their 70's output.
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24636
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 03:09
I'd say yes, though W&W is way better and Steve Hackett's departure is a sore loss. But there are some similarities in atmosphere.
Back to Top
Hercules View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 03:19
Wind and Wuthering marked the start of the decrease in prog content of albums by Genesis - the start of the slippery slope, so to speak.

ATTWT just carried it on. The main difference is the much lower quality of the guitar playing, but in other areas, it's pretty similar - just a bit worse.

After that, the wheels came right off the Genesis juggernaut for me and it ploughed completely out of control into pop rock territory.
Back to Top
Xonty View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 23 2013
Location: Cornwall
Status: Offline
Points: 1759
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 05:19
I see what you mean and I put yes. You can track the band's change with each album really (except maybe the debut to Trespass), and on ATTWT, they sounded a bit lost without Hackett... Couple of good songs though, but on the whole weak for a Genesis album and I much prefer Duke!
Back to Top
PrognosticMind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 05:47
Originally posted by Triceratopsoil Triceratopsoil wrote:

No because Wind and Wuthering at least has a couple passable songs on it
Back to Top
Michael678 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 07:22
not familiar with it as much, though i like Down and Out and am a big fan of the hit (you know it, now don't make fun of me lol). so no vote here.

Edited by Michael678 - August 16 2014 at 08:08
Progrockdude
Back to Top
Mirror Image View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 07:22
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Voted NO

W&W is quite messy and disjointed . ATTWT is a very nicely ordered album with some very punchy (if short) prog tracks mixed in with commercial ballads that were pointing the direction they were going in. I prefer it to W&W which was an attempt to cling on to former glories and only succeeded with One For The Vine and Blood On The Rooftops. Hackett leaving brought the best out of the others I believe. Collins drumming went up a notch compared to his generally uninspired efforts on W&W and Banks synth work is amongst his very best..



I highly disagree that Wind & Wuthering is messy and disjointed. I think it's one of their best post-Gabriel attempts along with A Trick of the Tail. Two very fine albums. Sure, Wind & Wuthering isn't perfect, but no album is actually perfect. I could do without All In A Mouse's Night and Your Own Special Way, but even these songs have their redeeming qualities. The 'trilogy' of Unquiet Slumbers for the Sleepers/...In That Quiet Earth/Afterglow is one of the greatest things they've done IMHO.

Anyway, like I said, I lost interest once Hackett abandoned ship.
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 07:30
Voted yes, with a little reluctance. It's closer to WAW in feel than it is to Duke imo. In places at least. Both albums have weak points..

However, ATTWT is still one my favourite Genesis albums.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Rick Robson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 03 2013
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Status: Offline
Points: 1607
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2014 at 08:19
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Voted NO

W&W is quite messy and disjointed . ATTWT is a very nicely ordered album with some very punchy (if short) prog tracks mixed in with commercial ballads that were pointing the direction they were going in. I prefer it to W&W which was an attempt to cling on to former glories and only succeeded with One For The Vine and Blood On The Rooftops. Hackett leaving brought the best out of the others I believe. Collins drumming went up a notch compared to his generally uninspired efforts on W&W and Banks synth work is amongst his very best..


 
I'd illustrate your comment pointing out that the three W&W instrumentals (Wot Gorilla?, …in That Quiet Earth and Unquiet Slumbers for the Sleepers…) clearly show their 'conservative' attempt. I like these three pieces but I think ATTWT more clearly shows Phil's new ideas.


Edited by Rick Robson - August 15 2014 at 08:20


"Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy." LvB
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.238 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.