Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - "Inception" film discussion (major spoilers)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed"Inception" film discussion (major spoilers)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Topic: "Inception" film discussion (major spoilers)
    Posted: July 31 2010 at 17:14
For those of you who have seen it
 
 
(everyone else DON'T READ)
 
 
 
 
 
The movie starring DeCaprio "Inception" was about dreams within dreams.
 
the ending showed that perhaps the DeCaprio's character, Cobb, was within a dream that he thought was reality.
 
the spinning top span indefinitely to signify a dream state. The top he span continued to spin at the end so perhaps it was a dream he had become locked into and reality no longer existed,
 
some thoughts
 
was Cobb dead and locked in a dream?
was Cobb within Michael Caines characters dream?
whose dream was it he was inside?
was it his wife's dream?
was Cobb trapped in a labyrinth and the girl sent in to get him out, therefore was in limbo from the first frame?
maybe Cobb was a danger to everyone and as a risk the dream team decided to lock in his own dream where he can do no more harm, a world he would be happy in with his kids and wife?
 
 
 
 
any thoughts?
 
 
 
 


Edited by AtomicCrimsonRush - July 31 2010 at 22:03
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 17:17
The top wavers a couple of times before the screen goes black. Which could indicate that it is in fact real. Wink I've had tops spin for much longer than that before ultimately stopping. 

Something to think about. 


Edited by JLocke - July 31 2010 at 17:20
Back to Top
NecronCommander View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal Team

Joined: September 17 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 16122
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 17:19

LOL
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 17:29
^ Funny LOL

But yeah, I don't really think it's the type of ending that's even meant to be interpreted. The whole point of it is to be ambiguous. But of course, we can always speculate. 

I'd like to think he did in fact get out, and the top was merely spinning for an unusually long time but would ultimately stop. However, if he WAS in a dream, I have no doubt that it was his own, and nobody else's. Mainly because the angle he sees his kids from is the exact same angle he saw them from the last time he saw them, which would indicate that it's merely imagery from within his own head, based on a memory. 


Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 17:32
nice one!
i saw this film last night. It really sticks with you doesnt it...
it would have been fun if after the credits when everyone had left cinema the top was seen again and fell off the table.
 
i read this on another forum
 
 
Does Cobb’s totem keep spinning at the end or is it about to fall off the table?
A: The fact that the film cuts away before we know for certain suggests that they want us to keep guessing. But we think it kept spinning. Here’s our reasoning: Note that at the end of the film Cobb’s kids haven’t aged. They match exactly his memory of them. A memory which must almost surely by now be out of date, since he’s been away from them for many months. Though he finally sees their faces, otherwise they look exactly as he envisioned them. They're even wearing the same clothes. In reality, his kids would now be older and different than his memories of them. This could suggest that Cobb is still in the dream and the top does indeed keep spinning after the credits roll.

Alternate Theory Aaron points this out in our comments section: "In the opening moments you get a glimpse of Leo's hand. Specifically, he's wearing his wedding ring. Now, if you follow the rest of the movie keeping an eye out for this you will notice that he only has the ring on when he's in the dream world. At the end of the movie he isn't wearing the ring." If the ring only appears when he's in a dream and he's not wearing at the end of the film, that could be confirmation that in fact, the top does stop spinning after the credits and Cobb is at last in the real world.
 
 
It certainly means the whole film could be a dream.
 
 
or this...
 
 
 
 
Ariadne was never in limbo...she and Cobb went into a fourth dream level to retrieve Fischer. Because the fourth dream level was not planned (Ariadne, the Architect, did not design a fourth level) and since they were in Cobb's dream, it was populated with the construct of his previous time in limbo.

Regardless of what dream level they died, Cobb and Saito can make it back from limbo once they realize they are in limbo and kill themselves...and at this point, the sedative had worn off so killing themselves would wake them up as usual. Since all the other dream levels had dissolved (Eames, Arthur and Yusuf were all awake), they woke up in "reality" on the plane.

The point is, unless Christopher Nolan comes out and says "it was all a dream" or "it was reality", etc., everyone is going to have their own OPINION as to what happened in the movie and that everyone's personal belief as to what happened can be correct.


Edited by AtomicCrimsonRush - July 31 2010 at 17:34
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 17:42
Originally posted by NecronCommander NecronCommander wrote:


LOL
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
ah dear, that was hilarious
i needed that
 
 
now for a serious discussion
 
its fascinating really
 
 
 
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 19:20
AngryThanks guys, have not seen it yet
Joking aside....just ignored the threads
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 19:27
Wait....does dumbledore die?
NO!
AngryCry

And for real, do kind of want to see this...so I shall ignore this thread like the plague
Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 20:04
It was a very entertaining movie. Though the ambiguous ending was incredibly easy to predict.
Back to Top
The Monodrone View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 21 2010
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4489
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 21:52
Great movie.  I see it as a movie whose ending is basically completely open-ended; any thoughts or ideas are applicable.
    
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 21:55
The film seemed pretty cut and dry to me, especially for its layers. It had a wonderful ending too.
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2010 at 22:02
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Wait....does dumbledore die?
NO!
AngryCry

And for real, do kind of want to see this...so I shall ignore this thread like the plague
LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 02:18
No more discussion? I guess its dying out now that the initial excitement over this is over.
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 03:19
Great film. Reminded me of both Gurdjieff and Castaneda.

(I think it looked like it stopped spinning.)
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 03:25
Great entertainment. I bit OTT and convoluted like the ending of Matrix 2. Good home movie stuff for future reruns.
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 04:23
That ending parody was hilarious, especially when it goes on the floor.
 
I dunno, I'm actually going off Nolan. It's kinda of a cop-put ending. Yes it's deliciously ambiguous and open ended but I think this was the kind of movie where actually giving some concrete would've been a real coup de gras, to present a definitive version of events. Instead it all sort of quietly dissolves into the director seemingly saying "Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, we'll never know... heck I dunno..." and it's hard to stifle a yawn really. It's a movie that requires you to do the hard work because it's a prompt for you to have conversations attempting to come up with your own kickass ending/explanation in order to justify everything. And I kinda thought that was the filmmaker's job.
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 04:53
^A commercial ending.................sequels make money.
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 04:55

A concrete ending hardly has to be a commercial ending.

Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 05:00
Forget it......you prefer debating. I am not interested, thanks.Pinch
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2010 at 05:10
Yes you are. Stern Smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.563 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.