Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Plateaus of greatness
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPlateaus of greatness

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
yarstruly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Plateaus of greatness
    Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:01
There have many heated discussions about who is better than who (or more skilled, or talenetd, etc...) in recent times on the PA forums.  I have participated in some more than others, and even have a tournament going (Rush Eliminations) I'm sure they are inevitable on a site such as this, and if done all in good fun with respect for each others' opinions, then completely harmless....
 
HOWEVER, I'd like to propose a different perspective on these types of things.....
 
I often see very talented players (as most proggers are) as kind of being on various plateaus on a mountain.  For example, I see nothing wrong with saying, for example, that Chris Squire, Geddy Lee, and Tony Levin (along with others) are all on the same plateau of greatness, or that Neil Peart, Bill Bruford & Mike Portonoy are all on the same drumming plateau with several others.....now of course it is obvious to say that say Kurt Cobain was not on the same plateau as Steve Howe as a guitar player, but maybe Steve Hackett IS on the same plateau with Howe...
 
What does everyone think?  Is it possible to look at levels of greatness this way, or can we definitvely say that we can put each player in order of ability compared to all others?
Facebook hashtags:

#100greatestprogrockchallenge
#scottssongbysong
#scottsspotlight
Back to Top
mickstafa View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:28
I agree mostly. Why humans see the need to declare something as "the best" is beyond me. You can thank crap like the Grammy Award show for that.

I'm happy having Yes' Relayer and PRR's The Dark Third both being 5 star albums for me and coexsting.
Back to Top
Howe Protege View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:39
Yeah I guess that makes sense.  However, I don't really feel the need to catagorize the various plateaus of greatness.  If a musician is great, thier great.  Some have been doing it longer than others and have acheived more accolades. 
My favorite pasty faced British pal.
Back to Top
King Lerxt View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: August 15 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 28
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 12:26
How about Alex Lifeson a.k.a. "King Lerxt"... Isn't he at the same level also?
Back to Top
yarstruly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 12:30
Originally posted by King Lerxt King Lerxt wrote:

How about Alex Lifeson a.k.a. "King Lerxt"... Isn't he at the same level also?
 
I was just using some examples....not being all inclusive in those examples....
 
Lifeson is great....
Facebook hashtags:

#100greatestprogrockchallenge
#scottssongbysong
#scottsspotlight
Back to Top
Asphalt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 14:20
i think i understand what you're saying, but even this leaves place for certain hierarcy so i think that what best puts things in perspective is deciding upon skill, which is quite a lot of times pretty objective; thus, instead of saying that lifeson is on a totally different plateau then cobain, i'd say that lifeson is a very skillful guitarist, while cobain holds other qualities to his guitar playing
Back to Top
yarstruly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 14:29
Originally posted by Asphalt Asphalt wrote:

i think i understand what you're saying, but even this leaves place for certain hierarcy so i think that what best puts things in perspective is deciding upon skill, which is quite a lot of times pretty objective; thus, instead of saying that lifeson is on a totally different plateau then cobain, i'd say that lifeson is a very skillful guitarist, while cobain holds other qualities to his guitar playing
 
It does leave a certain amount of heirarchy, but doesn't split hairs...
 
Obviously Sid Viscious was not on the level of Chris Squire as a bassist!  But trying to decide between Squite, Lee & Levin is REALLY a matter of prefernce....
Facebook hashtags:

#100greatestprogrockchallenge
#scottssongbysong
#scottsspotlight
Back to Top
johnobvious View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 11 2006
Location: Nebraska
Status: Offline
Points: 1361
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 15:17
You have to break it down between technicality and soul (if you will).  Squire and Geddy may both be at the top of their games in what they can play, but each brings their own style to anything they touch.  This type of thing really shows up with the guitar.  It is very hard to quantify that type of thing and comes down to people's personal preference.  Thus the never ending "Who's better" discussions and threads.
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday
Back to Top
yarstruly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 15:29
Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

You have to break it down between technicality and soul (if you will).  Squire and Geddy may both be at the top of their games in what they can play, but each brings their own style to anything they touch.  This type of thing really shows up with the guitar.  It is very hard to quantify that type of thing and comes down to people's personal preference.  Thus the never ending "Who's better" discussions and threads.
 
My point exactly!
Facebook hashtags:

#100greatestprogrockchallenge
#scottssongbysong
#scottsspotlight
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 15:48
Originally posted by yarstruly yarstruly wrote:

There have many heated discussions about who is better than who (or more skilled, or talenetd, etc...) in recent times on the PA forums.  I have participated in some more than others, and even have a tournament going (Rush Eliminations) I'm sure they are inevitable on a site such as this, and if done all in good fun with respect for each others' opinions, then completely harmless....
 
HOWEVER, I'd like to propose a different perspective on these types of things.....
 
I often see very talented players (as most proggers are) as kind of being on various plateaus on a mountain.  For example, I see nothing wrong with saying, for example, that Chris Squire, Geddy Lee, and Tony Levin (along with others) are all on the same plateau of greatness, or that Neil Peart, Bill Bruford & Mike Portonoy are all on the same drumming plateau with several others.....now of course it is obvious to say that say Kurt Cobain was not on the same plateau as Steve Howe as a guitar player, but maybe Steve Hackett IS on the same plateau with Howe...
 
What does everyone think?  Is it possible to look at levels of greatness this way, or can we definitvely say that we can put each player in order of ability compared to all others?


Two things:

1. Sometimes an artist is capable of more (technically) than he shows on his albums. It's called understatement ... David Gilmour is a master of that, for example. So while I think it's possible to assign levels to the musicianship of artist performances, they might not properly reflect the artists' abilities.

2. Artists evolve ... when I first read the title of the thread, I assumed that you were talking about plateaus as periods of time during which an artist is on the peak of his abilities (well, a "peak" if it's rather short and a plateau if he maintains the level for several albums).
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28059
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 17:21
I think great musicians must have the 'balls' to do it first.(and that includes great female musicians as wellBig smile) .Perhaps there is nothing wrong with thinking about talent in terms of climbing 'mountains' rather than staying rooted on 'plateaus'.Who cares about the 113th person that climbed Everest?Confused Progression is about moving forward and making a statement ..isn't it?
Back to Top
epictetus1 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: September 04 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 18:33
Ah!  But one man's mountain peak is another man's valley.  It is all subjective my friend.  10 people listening, 10 sets of reality.  The best you can do is get a general consensus, but that is meaningless because it does not apply to the individual (you).  Dig?
Back to Top
thecool View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: November 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 19:27
i think it's pretty dumb when people tell you not to debate on whether this guitarsit is better than that for example. usually the "u cant compare apples and oranges" thing comes out in the conversation. but i dont blieve this, i can have great fun debating the greatness of one fruit over the other (apples win by the way) and even if it does come down to personal preference its fun to discuss!
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2006 at 21:19
Since were talking prog I dont see their being all that much point in the disscusions about who is better than who. All of these musicians are going to be very good at what they do, its why we like them, it just comes down to personal preferance of what we all like and creativity. We all want to hear a musician doeing something new and interesting in his music but I also like musicians that do something old but in an interesting way. When you get this it all becoms part of taste and allmost without exception to do this they have to be good musiciansin the first place.
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28059
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2006 at 03:08
Originally posted by epictetus1 epictetus1 wrote:

Ah!  But one man's mountain peak is another man's valley.  It is all subjective my friend.  10 people listening, 10 sets of reality.  The best you can do is get a general consensus, but that is meaningless because it does not apply to the individual (you).  Dig?
 
True ,but if you ask someone who is better Roine Stolte or Robert Fripp?...,I'm fairly sure what most knowledgable people on prog rock would say.In fact I would argue that Chris Fry (Magenta) is the equal of Steve Howe on a technical level but most people (understandably) would laugh in my face.Howe was an innovator and one of the first so has much more credability in many peoples eyes.That was my point.
Back to Top
A B Negative View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2006 at 06:41
It all comes down to what you like, and not taking offence when other people have different opinions.
 
For example, it doesn't bother me that some people can't stand Geddy Lee's voice, or think that David Gilmour isn't as talented as (insert shredder's name here).
 
Wink
 
 
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Back to Top
toolsofthetrade View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 151
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2006 at 07:24
Will someone please just tell me who alex lifeson is ?
 
I've asked you people twice now.
 
I could just google it, but i'd prefer it if someone would just ANSWER MY DAMN QUESTION.
Back to Top
A B Negative View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2006 at 07:33
Originally posted by toolsofthetrade toolsofthetrade wrote:

Will someone please just tell me who alex lifeson is ?
 
I've asked you people twice now.
 
I could just google it, but i'd prefer it if someone would just ANSWER MY DAMN QUESTION.
 
Alex Lifeson is the guitarist in a band called Rush. He looks a bit like Iain H who plays guitar in Part Chimp.
 
 <Alex
iain h.<Iain
Wink


Edited by A B Negative - December 14 2006 at 08:13
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Back to Top
prog4evr View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 22 2005
Location: Wuhan, China
Status: Offline
Points: 1455
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2006 at 19:32
Originally posted by yarstruly yarstruly wrote:

...but maybe Steve Hackett IS on the same plateau with Howe...


On this, it is the other way around. It is clear when you listen to Howe on GTR (I know, listening to the GTR album is painful...) that he has been influenced by Hackett's playing, and not the other way around. Also, listen to Howe's guitar intro on ABWH, side two (if on cassette tape), 'Quartet,' leading into 'I Wanna Learn.' If that doesn't sound like Howe imitating Hackett, I don't know what does. While both are great guitarists in their own right, Howe seemingly walked away from GTR with Hackett inspiration, not necessarily reciprocated by Hackett.
    
    
    
    

Edited by prog4evr - December 30 2006 at 19:36
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.232 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.