Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
yarstruly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
|
Topic: Plateaus of greatness Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:01 |
There have many heated discussions about who is better than who (or more skilled, or talenetd, etc...) in recent times on the PA forums. I have participated in some more than others, and even have a tournament going (Rush Eliminations) I'm sure they are inevitable on a site such as this, and if done all in good fun with respect for each others' opinions, then completely harmless....
HOWEVER, I'd like to propose a different perspective on these types of things.....
I often see very talented players (as most proggers are) as kind of being on various plateaus on a mountain. For example, I see nothing wrong with saying, for example, that Chris Squire, Geddy Lee, and Tony Levin (along with others) are all on the same plateau of greatness, or that Neil Peart, Bill Bruford & Mike Portonoy are all on the same drumming plateau with several others.....now of course it is obvious to say that say Kurt Cobain was not on the same plateau as Steve Howe as a guitar player, but maybe Steve Hackett IS on the same plateau with Howe...
What does everyone think? Is it possible to look at levels of greatness this way, or can we definitvely say that we can put each player in order of ability compared to all others?
|
Facebook hashtags:
#100greatestprogrockchallenge #scottssongbysong #scottsspotlight
|
|
mickstafa
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 236
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:28 |
I agree mostly. Why humans see the need to declare something as "the best" is beyond me. You can thank crap like the Grammy Award show for that.
I'm happy having Yes' Relayer and PRR's The Dark Third both being 5 star albums for me and coexsting.
|
|
Howe Protege
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 236
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 11:39 |
Yeah I guess that makes sense. However, I don't really feel the need to catagorize the various plateaus of greatness. If a musician is great, thier great. Some have been doing it longer than others and have acheived more accolades.
|
My favorite pasty faced British pal.
|
|
King Lerxt
Forum Newbie
Joined: August 15 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 28
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 12:26 |
How about Alex Lifeson a.k.a. "King Lerxt"... Isn't he at the same level also?
|
|
yarstruly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 12:30 |
King Lerxt wrote:
How about Alex Lifeson a.k.a. "King Lerxt"... Isn't he at the same level also? |
I was just using some examples....not being all inclusive in those examples....
Lifeson is great....
|
Facebook hashtags:
#100greatestprogrockchallenge #scottssongbysong #scottsspotlight
|
|
Asphalt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 456
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 14:20 |
i think i understand what you're saying, but even this leaves place for certain hierarcy so i think that what best puts things in perspective is deciding upon skill, which is quite a lot of times pretty objective; thus, instead of saying that lifeson is on a totally different plateau then cobain, i'd say that lifeson is a very skillful guitarist, while cobain holds other qualities to his guitar playing
|
|
yarstruly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 14:29 |
Asphalt wrote:
i think i understand what you're saying, but even this leaves place for certain hierarcy so i think that what best puts things in perspective is deciding upon skill, which is quite a lot of times pretty objective; thus, instead of saying that lifeson is on a totally different plateau then cobain, i'd say that lifeson is a very skillful guitarist, while cobain holds other qualities to his guitar playing |
It does leave a certain amount of heirarchy, but doesn't split hairs...
Obviously Sid Viscious was not on the level of Chris Squire as a bassist! But trying to decide between Squite, Lee & Levin is REALLY a matter of prefernce....
|
Facebook hashtags:
#100greatestprogrockchallenge #scottssongbysong #scottsspotlight
|
|
johnobvious
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 11 2006
Location: Nebraska
Status: Offline
Points: 1361
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 15:17 |
You have to break it down between technicality and soul (if you will). Squire and Geddy may both be at the top of their games in what they can play, but each brings their own style to anything they touch. This type of thing really shows up with the guitar. It is very hard to quantify that type of thing and comes down to people's personal preference. Thus the never ending "Who's better" discussions and threads.
|
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday
|
|
yarstruly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1322
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 15:29 |
johnobvious wrote:
You have to break it down between technicality and soul (if you will). Squire and Geddy may both be at the top of their games in what they can play, but each brings their own style to anything they touch. This type of thing really shows up with the guitar. It is very hard to quantify that type of thing and comes down to people's personal preference. Thus the never ending "Who's better" discussions and threads. |
My point exactly!
|
Facebook hashtags:
#100greatestprogrockchallenge #scottssongbysong #scottsspotlight
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 15:48 |
yarstruly wrote:
There have many heated discussions about who is better than who (or more skilled, or talenetd, etc...) in recent times on the PA forums. I have participated in some more than others, and even have a tournament going (Rush Eliminations) I'm sure they are inevitable on a site such as this, and if done all in good fun with respect for each others' opinions, then completely harmless....
HOWEVER, I'd like to propose a different perspective on these types of things.....
I often see very talented players (as most proggers are) as kind of being on various plateaus on a mountain. For example, I see nothing wrong with saying, for example, that Chris Squire, Geddy Lee, and Tony Levin (along with others) are all on the same plateau of greatness, or that Neil Peart, Bill Bruford & Mike Portonoy are all on the same drumming plateau with several others.....now of course it is obvious to say that say Kurt Cobain was not on the same plateau as Steve Howe as a guitar player, but maybe Steve Hackett IS on the same plateau with Howe...
What does everyone think? Is it possible to look at levels of greatness this way, or can we definitvely say that we can put each player in order of ability compared to all others? |
Two things: 1. Sometimes an artist is capable of more (technically) than he shows on his albums. It's called understatement ... David Gilmour is a master of that, for example. So while I think it's possible to assign levels to the musicianship of artist performances, they might not properly reflect the artists' abilities. 2. Artists evolve ... when I first read the title of the thread, I assumed that you were talking about plateaus as periods of time during which an artist is on the peak of his abilities (well, a "peak" if it's rather short and a plateau if he maintains the level for several albums).
|
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28059
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 17:21 |
I think great musicians must have the 'balls' to do it first.(and that includes great female musicians as well ) .Perhaps there is nothing wrong with thinking about talent in terms of climbing 'mountains' rather than staying rooted on 'plateaus'.Who cares about the 113th person that climbed Everest? Progression is about moving forward and making a statement ..isn't it?
|
|
epictetus1
Forum Groupie
Joined: September 04 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 52
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 18:33 |
Ah! But one man's mountain peak is another man's valley. It is all subjective my friend. 10 people listening, 10 sets of reality. The best you can do is get a general consensus, but that is meaningless because it does not apply to the individual (you). Dig?
|
|
thecool
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 21
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 19:27 |
i think it's pretty dumb when people tell you not to debate on whether this guitarsit is better than that for example. usually the "u cant compare apples and oranges" thing comes out in the conversation. but i dont blieve this, i can have great fun debating the greatness of one fruit over the other (apples win by the way) and even if it does come down to personal preference its fun to discuss!
|
|
sleeper
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
|
Posted: December 13 2006 at 21:19 |
Since were talking prog I dont see their being all that much point in the disscusions about who is better than who. All of these musicians are going to be very good at what they do, its why we like them, it just comes down to personal preferance of what we all like and creativity. We all want to hear a musician doeing something new and interesting in his music but I also like musicians that do something old but in an interesting way. When you get this it all becoms part of taste and allmost without exception to do this they have to be good musiciansin the first place.
|
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28059
|
Posted: December 14 2006 at 03:08 |
epictetus1 wrote:
Ah! But one man's mountain peak is another man's valley. It is all subjective my friend. 10 people listening, 10 sets of reality. The best you can do is get a general consensus, but that is meaningless because it does not apply to the individual (you). Dig? |
True ,but if you ask someone who is better Roine Stolte or Robert Fripp?...,I'm fairly sure what most knowledgable people on prog rock would say.In fact I would argue that Chris Fry (Magenta) is the equal of Steve Howe on a technical level but most people (understandably) would laugh in my face.Howe was an innovator and one of the first so has much more credability in many peoples eyes.That was my point.
|
|
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
|
Posted: December 14 2006 at 06:41 |
It all comes down to what you like, and not taking offence when other people have different opinions.
For example, it doesn't bother me that some people can't stand Geddy Lee's voice, or think that David Gilmour isn't as talented as (insert shredder's name here).
|
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|
toolsofthetrade
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 09 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 151
|
Posted: December 14 2006 at 07:24 |
Will someone please just tell me who alex lifeson is ?
I've asked you people twice now.
I could just google it, but i'd prefer it if someone would just ANSWER MY DAMN QUESTION.
|
|
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
|
Posted: December 14 2006 at 07:33 |
toolsofthetrade wrote:
Will someone please just tell me who alex lifeson is ?
I've asked you people twice now.
I could just google it, but i'd prefer it if someone would just ANSWER MY DAMN QUESTION. |
Alex Lifeson is the guitarist in a band called Rush. He looks a bit like Iain H who plays guitar in Part Chimp.
<Alex
<Iain
Edited by A B Negative - December 14 2006 at 08:13
|
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|
prog4evr
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 22 2005
Location: Wuhan, China
Status: Offline
Points: 1455
|
Posted: December 30 2006 at 19:32 |
yarstruly wrote:
...but maybe Steve Hackett IS on the same plateau with Howe... |
On this, it is the other way around. It is clear when you listen to Howe on GTR (I know, listening to the GTR album is painful...) that he has been influenced by Hackett's playing, and not the other way around. Also, listen to Howe's guitar intro on ABWH, side two (if on cassette tape), 'Quartet,' leading into 'I Wanna Learn.' If that doesn't sound like Howe imitating Hackett, I don't know what does. While both are great guitarists in their own right, Howe seemingly walked away from GTR with Hackett inspiration, not necessarily reciprocated by Hackett.
Edited by prog4evr - December 30 2006 at 19:36
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.