Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - BBC Documentary: The New Prog Rockers
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBBC Documentary: The New Prog Rockers

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Redstar View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 16 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 61
Direct Link To This Post Topic: BBC Documentary: The New Prog Rockers
    Posted: February 20 2004 at 03:47

Hey all;

Check out this link to an online BBC documentary on such 'new prog' bands as Mars Volta, Radiohead, and others.  Grandpa Wakeman is also featured!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/onemusic/documentaries/progrock4 04p01.shtml

BBC Usually archives it's docs likethis for only a month or so, so catch it fast; it's pretty interesting, even though I'm not a big fan of most of the artists.

Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 04:53
I think these guys are missing the point - their argument seems to be if you don't conform to mass radio play, then you must be prog.

Radiohead have in the past been cited as the new prog band to watch, but apart from 'Lucky' on 'OK Computer', this argument holds little water; sure, they're experimental in their way, but certainly not 'progressive' as most of us would define it.

Grandpa Rick has said in the past that Muse are progressive rock, whether they like it or not; again, although Muse are a fantastic band in their own right, I don't think they'd pass muster on this forum as progressive.

The problem here could be the definition of the phrase 'Progressive Rock' itself.

I would say (and this is my own completely subjective opinion ) that what we deem to be progressive rock, is in fact regressive rock, in that we want to hear long, well constructed songs/pieces of music, played by accomplished musicians, using particular instruments (Hammonds , Mellotrons , Double-Neck guitars , Unfeasibly large drum kits , Moogs etc etc), in a style that was considered 'progressive' in the 1970's.

(I will now pause & wait for the splutterings & denials to die down )

Other threads have approached the subject of 'New' prog, but it is still my opinion there are few bands out there today who fit my little pidgeon hole definition of prog rock.

Hey - I could be wrong, but I suspect there may be some out there who agree with me....... no doubt the detractors will let me know

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
wizard View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 06:30

This doc actually pissed me off quite a bit.

People like John Peel and Mary-Anne Hobbs clearly have no idea what they're talking about.  Hobbs actually thinks that prog only means stupid costumes and ridiculous lyrics, nothing about how great and daring the music is.  And as for Peel, well, he's missed the point from day one.

But then, these are people whose musical lives are governed by what is 'in', so I don't expect much more from them.

As far as the new bands are concerned (and I can't believe that Zane Lowe referred to Dream Theater and Spock's Beard as dinosaurs!) some maybe have proggy tendancies, but they have to realise that being flamboyant with a "wall of sound" is not prog.  You need that extra something.

In short, the world would definately be a poorer place without progressive music, but I don't think the documentary puts this across convincingly.

Lord of lords, king of kings, has returned to lead his children home
To take them to the new jerusalem!
Back to Top
Aqualung View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 11 2004
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 07:54

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:





Hey - I could be wrong, but I suspect there may be some out there who agree with me....... no doubt the detractors will let me know

hey Jim, i totally agree with your view 

my idea of progressive rock is the one you write down

i just love regressive rock



"Closer to the heart"
Back to Top
Redstar View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 16 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 61
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 08:10

I'm with you too, Jim; call it what you want, just make it long, analog, and undanceable

And no one should be surprised to hear John peel pissing all over prog rock...it's been part of his job for 30 years.  Still, it's worth a listen just to hear Lord Rick's comments.

Back to Top
Stormcrow View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 05 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 400
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 09:17

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

I would say (and this is my own completely subjective opinion ) that what we deem to be progressive rock, is in fact regressive rock, in that we want to hear long, well constructed songs/pieces of music, played by accomplished musicians, using particular instruments (Hammonds , Mellotrons , Double-Neck guitars , Unfeasibly large drum kits , Moogs etc etc), in a style that was considered 'progressive' in the 1970's. 

Well gee Jim, I can't think of any way at all in which that is a bad thing.  <SMILIE>

Back to Top
corbet View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: February 01 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 101
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 10:49

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

..we want to hear long, well constructed songs/pieces of music, played by accomplished musicians, using particular instruments (Hammonds , Mellotrons , Double-Neck guitars , Unfeasibly large drum kits , Moogs etc etc), in a style that was considered 'progressive' in the 1970's.

Originally posted by Redstar Redstar wrote:

...call it what you want, just make it long, analog, and undanceable

Thumbs Up     Thumbs Up

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2004 at 11:57
Originally posted by corbet corbet wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

..we want to hear long, well constructed songs/pieces of music, played by accomplished musicians, using particular instruments (Hammonds , Mellotrons , Double-Neck guitars , Unfeasibly large drum kits , Moogs etc etc), in a style that was considered 'progressive' in the 1970's.

Originally posted by Redstar Redstar wrote:

...call it what you want, just make it long, analog, and undanceable

Thumbs Up     Thumbs Up

I agree with all you guys! And for Muse: that is defenitely NOT prog

Back to Top
shark View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2004 at 07:52

The BBC documentary was another missed opportunity. Instead of exploring what bands are out there, as usual, they preferred to wheel out a few commentators who just repeated the same age old cliches about progressive rock.

Personally, I find John Peel's comments appalling and dishonest. Let us not forget that the man made his name on a national radio network by championing progressive rock for years! When punk arrived, he swiftly moved on and started sl*gging off the music he had previously championed. With 'experts' like him, how can a documentary on the genre be any good?

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2004 at 09:29
that sounds very evil! sl*gging off prog and doing punk! What kind of music-lover was he?
Back to Top
shark View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 23 2004 at 10:00

Well, I guess 'evil' is too strong a word. I suppose it would be more accurate to say that the likes of Peel go where the wind blows. In the UK he has achieved some sort of iconic status as a DJ who's always moving forward and looking for new things in music. Nothing wrong with that,of course. Except that he's been stuck on playing the likes of The Fall (overrated or what?) for far too long.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.566 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.