BBC Documentary: The New Prog Rockers |
Post Reply |
Author | |||
Redstar
Forum Newbie Joined: February 16 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 61 |
Topic: BBC Documentary: The New Prog Rockers Posted: February 20 2004 at 03:47 |
||
Hey all; Check out this link to an online BBC documentary on such 'new prog' bands as Mars Volta, Radiohead, and others. Grandpa Wakeman is also featured! http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/onemusic/documentaries/progrock4 04p01.shtml BBC Usually archives it's docs likethis for only a month or so, so catch it fast; it's pretty interesting, even though I'm not a big fan of most of the artists. |
|||
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator Retired Admin & Razor Guru Joined: February 02 2004 Location: South England Status: Offline Points: 14693 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 04:53 | ||
I think these guys are missing the point - their argument seems to be if you don't conform to mass radio play, then you must be prog.
Radiohead have in the past been cited as the new prog band to watch, but apart from 'Lucky' on 'OK Computer', this argument holds little water; sure, they're experimental in their way, but certainly not 'progressive' as most of us would define it. Grandpa Rick has said in the past that Muse are progressive rock, whether they like it or not; again, although Muse are a fantastic band in their own right, I don't think they'd pass muster on this forum as progressive. The problem here could be the definition of the phrase 'Progressive Rock' itself. I would say (and this is my own completely subjective opinion ) that what we deem to be progressive rock, is in fact regressive rock, in that we want to hear long, well constructed songs/pieces of music, played by accomplished musicians, using particular instruments (Hammonds , Mellotrons , Double-Neck guitars , Unfeasibly large drum kits , Moogs etc etc), in a style that was considered 'progressive' in the 1970's. (I will now pause & wait for the splutterings & denials to die down ) Other threads have approached the subject of 'New' prog, but it is still my opinion there are few bands out there today who fit my little pidgeon hole definition of prog rock. Hey - I could be wrong, but I suspect there may be some out there who agree with me....... no doubt the detractors will let me know |
|||
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
|||
wizard
Forum Newbie Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 06:30 | ||
This doc actually pissed me off quite a bit. People like John Peel and Mary-Anne Hobbs clearly have no idea what they're talking about. Hobbs actually thinks that prog only means stupid costumes and ridiculous lyrics, nothing about how great and daring the music is. And as for Peel, well, he's missed the point from day one. But then, these are people whose musical lives are governed by what is 'in', so I don't expect much more from them. As far as the new bands are concerned (and I can't believe that Zane Lowe referred to Dream Theater and Spock's Beard as dinosaurs!) some maybe have proggy tendancies, but they have to realise that being flamboyant with a "wall of sound" is not prog. You need that extra something. In short, the world would definately be a poorer place without progressive music, but I don't think the documentary puts this across convincingly. |
|||
Lord of lords, king of kings, has returned to lead his children home
To take them to the new jerusalem! |
|||
Aqualung
Forum Newbie Joined: February 11 2004 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 07:54 | ||
hey Jim, i totally agree with your view my idea of progressive rock is the one you write down i just love regressive rock |
|||
"Closer to the heart" |
|||
Redstar
Forum Newbie Joined: February 16 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 61 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 08:10 | ||
I'm with you too, Jim; call it what you want, just make it long, analog, and undanceable And no one should be surprised to hear John peel pissing all over prog rock...it's been part of his job for 30 years. Still, it's worth a listen just to hear Lord Rick's comments. |
|||
Stormcrow
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 05 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 400 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 09:17 | ||
Well gee Jim, I can't think of any way at all in which that is a bad thing. |
|||
corbet
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 01 2004 Status: Offline Points: 101 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 10:49 | ||
|
|||
Joren
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 07 2004 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 6667 |
Posted: February 20 2004 at 11:57 | ||
I agree with all you guys! And for Muse: that is defenitely NOT prog |
|||
shark
Forum Newbie Joined: February 23 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Posted: February 23 2004 at 07:52 | ||
The BBC documentary was another missed opportunity. Instead of exploring what bands are out there, as usual, they preferred to wheel out a few commentators who just repeated the same age old cliches about progressive rock. Personally, I find John Peel's comments appalling and dishonest. Let us not forget that the man made his name on a national radio network by championing progressive rock for years! When punk arrived, he swiftly moved on and started sl*gging off the music he had previously championed. With 'experts' like him, how can a documentary on the genre be any good? |
|||
Joren
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 07 2004 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 6667 |
Posted: February 23 2004 at 09:29 | ||
that sounds very evil! sl*gging off prog and doing punk! What kind of music-lover was he?
|
|||
shark
Forum Newbie Joined: February 23 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Posted: February 23 2004 at 10:00 | ||
Well, I guess 'evil' is too strong a word. I suppose it would be more accurate to say that the likes of Peel go where the wind blows. In the UK he has achieved some sort of iconic status as a DJ who's always moving forward and looking for new things in music. Nothing wrong with that,of course. Except that he's been stuck on playing the likes of The Fall (overrated or what?) for far too long. |
|||
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |