Tommy and Quadrophenia

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   I wouldn't be surprised to find these two Who albums reviewed in this site, after finding out that The Beatles, Queen, Radiohead, among others are/were Prog bands!!!
OK, if you want to add these two albums, do it and I will support that. I really think these are two great albums, I own them and really enjoy listening them. For me these two deserve or have enough prog characteristics to be identified as proper prog albums.
But please, don't add Who's next, Odds and Sods, By numbers, etc all remaining Who albums, which are great, but NOT PROG!!! 
It is really irritating and frustrating to see "Rubber & Soul" reviewed after "Larks tongues in Aspic" or "Queen Jazz!!!" before "Sky moves sideways".
I think this is the only way this site can keep its direction. When adding a non prog band, just add what you consider to be their more prog albums or quasi prog albums, but please stop adding bands that don't have enough merits to be here and only contaminate the site.
Steve

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
stechell Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Reviewer page Forum Senior Member Joined: July 30 2005 Status: Offline Points: 155	Topic: Tommy and Quadrophenia Posted: February 16 2006 at 14:55
	I wouldn't be surprised to find these two Who albums reviewed in this site, after finding out that The Beatles, Queen, Radiohead, among others are/were Prog bands!!! OK, if you want to add these two albums, do it and I will support that. I really think these are two great albums, I own them and really enjoy listening them. For me these two deserve or have enough prog characteristics to be identified as proper prog albums. But please, don't add Who's next, Odds and Sods, By numbers, etc all remaining Who albums, which are great, but NOT PROG!!! It is really irritating and frustrating to see "Rubber & Soul" reviewed after "Larks tongues in Aspic" or "Queen Jazz!!!" before "Sky moves sideways". I think this is the only way this site can keep its direction. When adding a non prog band, just add what you consider to be their more prog albums or quasi prog albums, but please stop adding bands that don't have enough merits to be here and only contaminate the site. Steve