PA Rating System |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Cylli Kat
Forum Groupie Joined: December 29 2007 Location: The Othersphere Status: Offline Points: 97 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: December 18 2018 at 09:47 |
My guess is that this subject has been addressed and debated ad nauseam / ad infinitum; But, I'm also a member of our sister site MetalArchives, and I like that as members, we're offered the opportunity to use a half star in our rating system. I really think we here at PA should switch to either a 10 star, or add half star (or ideally, both) abilities to our ratings. Anyone have any thoughts on this matter? Grace and peace, Cylli Kat - Jim Calistro Sorry, needed to add this post to the correct section...
|
|
[Insert Clever Phrase Here]
|
|
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Half star ratings would be excellent, but will never happen. Even if the owner of the site could be bothered to make the change, I believe the software of the website can't support such a change. (this has been discussed before and rejected for this reason)
|
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Half stars might be useful for reviewers, but for readers it's probably frivolous and unnecessary. Who cares if an album is given 3 or 3&1/2 stars, at that point it's not real helpful and the review itself becomes what matters. |
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Online Points: 15250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'd love to see the half star rating as well as MANY changes on this site but it's not meant to be. As time goes on i'm personally less worried about ratings. A third of the time they don't reflect my own personal take on a particular album. It simply points to where the masses stand regarding an album at any given moment.
It would be interesting to see how many classic prog albums were rated forty years ago. Where did they stand in the day of their release? I bet it would blow our minds how things have changed in that time and likewise an album that has one rating today may be discovered as the next classic several years from now and become the next best thing. It's all rather subjective and fleeting in the big scheme of things. I agree with my pear friend. Reviews tell much more than ratings.
|
|
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
^ From what I tend to see, the reviews of prog in its day were less than stellar. But then Zep were consistently panned too. It proves if people dig it, no one really cares what a critic thinks. Thank God. Edited by Atavachron - December 18 2018 at 19:20 |
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Quinino
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 26 2011 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 3654 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jim, I scientifically rated your suggestion with 2.15 (out of 10) (sorry, pal, just my compulsion to give everything a rigorous evaluation)
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 11666 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |