Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Lady Gaga
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLady Gaga

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 11>
Author
Message
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 20:05
Originally posted by Kojak Kojak wrote:


As for the lady in your avatar, Bjork is an immense talent, who has never used her sexuality to sell records
Have you seen the video for Pagan Poetry....?
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Stonebolt View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 04 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 91
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 21:02
I don't consider Lady Gaga attractive... I consider Stefani Germatta atractive.
Dark Hair > Blonde hair
Tasteful use of makeup > Cartoonish use of makeup.
I acknowladge Lady Gaga's look fits her character better, but in terms of actual attractiveness, I'd rather shag Stefani.
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 14 2010 at 21:18
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

No. (but I can afford to be picky)


I can't really afford to be picky, but I am anyway. I don't find her all that attractive. She has a good body, but her face leaves much to be desired.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 03:51
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Kojak Kojak wrote:


As for the lady in your avatar, Bjork is an immense talent, who has never used her sexuality to sell records
Have you seen the video for Pagan Poetry....?
 
That was really meant to be shocking and provocative rather than sexually tiltilating. Personally I'm not that bothered by a women showing her areola for a few brief moments, I'm more offended by the pretty raunchy stuff that's marketed towards preteens these days.
 
Oh wait, were you talking about the breasts or that other thing the video was controversial for? Wink
 
Well yeah, I never said Bjork wasn't a dirty little girl, but it's a different kind of dirty.


Edited by boo boo - May 15 2010 at 04:00
Back to Top
Kojak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 04:35
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Kojak Kojak wrote:


As for the lady in your avatar, Bjork is an immense talent, who has never used her sexuality to sell records
Have you seen the video for Pagan Poetry....?
 
That was really meant to be shocking and provocative rather than sexually tiltilating. Personally I'm not that bothered by a women showing her areola for a few brief moments, I'm more offended by the pretty raunchy stuff that's marketed towards preteens these days.
 
Oh wait, were you talking about the breasts or that other thing the video was controversial for? Wink
 
Well yeah, I never said Bjork wasn't a dirty little girl, but it's a different kind of dirty.


You totally answered that for me like you're reading my mind, thanx Boo Boo Wink,  it's a much more genuine display of her sensuality than a show or overt act of it to sell records, if you see what I mean..? I think that video was beautifully done. And yes, Henry, I've seen all her vids, I'm a fan..


Edited by Kojak - May 15 2010 at 04:35
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 04:50
Originally posted by Marty McFly Marty McFly wrote:

Jokes aside, you guys consider gaga attractive ?
 
Yes, very. Unlike a lot of people I don't really see anything wrong with her face, it's just different. Though I can understand why someone would find her extremely unattractive, she's certainly not "normal" looking to say the least, and her choice of outfits and hairstyles tend to be so ridiculous it makes Ian Anderson's stage persona seem subtle by comparison.


Edited by boo boo - May 15 2010 at 04:55
Back to Top
Marty McFly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 04:56
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Originally posted by Marty McFly Marty McFly wrote:

Jokes aside, you guys consider gaga attractive ?
 
Yes, very. Though I can understand why someone would find her extremely unattractive, she's certainly not "normal" looking to say the least, and her choice of outfits tend to be so ridiculous it makes Peter Gabriel seem subtle by comparison.

In my case, the less makeup woman is using, the more attractive I consider her. Of course, she has to follow basic hygienic rules.

There are of course exceptions. Your avatar is showing Bjork in a way I can appreciate. I like also Christina Booth, singer of Epica or The Gathering & Karnataka ensemble. But mostly, I find makeup as something I can stand, not appreciate. MOSTLY.

Peter Gabriel - shocking, certainly. That compensates for how he looks, because purpose sanctions the means, right ?

There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

   -Andyman1125 on Lulu







Even my
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2010 at 04:59
I think she has a strange appeal with her odd use of make up and hair styles, as long as she doesn't go overboard with it and become overwelmed by them, and sometimes she does.
 
Bjork has been guilty of this as well, sometimes she seems to try really hard to make herself unattractive, I personally find her really attractive (even though lately her age is finally starting to show) there are times when I find her pretty even with the crazy costumes, shucks even with the infamous swan outfit, I'd hit it.
 
And yes I changed Peter Gabriel to Ian Anderson, and you all know why, it's the codpiece man.


Edited by boo boo - May 15 2010 at 05:19
Back to Top
soundsweird View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 408
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 00:09
Totally unoriginal. Her look? Easy, just rip off Bjork, Cher, Madonna and a host of lesser dance-music divas. Her music? See previous list minus Bjork. Her lyrics? Ugh. And what a surprise that she tries to outsleaze those who came before her. Many of the songs sound alike, and her voice is average at best. Another victory for marketing.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 03:46
I'm not sure how you guys know your pop because I keep hearing Madonna this, Madonna that when really the person she is imitating directly is Grace Jones.
 
Also, you may have been amused by Q. Two issues ago she wanted a cover photo for her feature interview of her with her crotch thrust out with a dildo under pants, making it look as though she had a great big dick in order to mock the transsexual rumours. Q were a little nervous about this and during the shoot itself when a satisfactory photo could not be agreed on by both parties, she burst into tears and ran away. Literally.
 
She came to later and was fairly reasonable about it and the cover idea was abandoned for a much more traditional topless-with-leather-gloved-hands-over-mammaries photo. That that actually is traditional tells you  lot about how the music media treat women.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 03:53
So...does or does not Lady Gaga have a penis?

Her music? Dont know it, dont care to. If you enjoy it though, whatever floats your boat.
Back to Top
Wretchedspirit View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 07 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 03:56
Originally posted by soundsweird soundsweird wrote:

Totally unoriginal. Her look? Easy, just rip off Bjork, Cher, Madonna and a host of lesser dance-music divas. Her music? See previous list minus Bjork. Her lyrics? Ugh. And what a surprise that she tries to outsleaze those who came before her. Many of the songs sound alike, and her voice is average at best. Another victory for marketing.

Very well said.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 04:37
Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Kojak Kojak wrote:


As for the lady in your avatar, Bjork is an immense talent, who has never used her sexuality to sell records
Have you seen the video for Pagan Poetry....?
 
That was really meant to be shocking and provocative rather than sexually tiltilating. Personally I'm not that bothered by a women showing her areola for a few brief moments, I'm more offended by the pretty raunchy stuff that's marketed towards preteens these days.
 
Oh wait, were you talking about the breasts or that other thing the video was controversial for? Wink
 
Well yeah, I never said Bjork wasn't a dirty little girl, but it's a different kind of dirty.
And Lady Gaga isn't trying to be shocking and provocative? I'm not saying there's not a difference between the video for Pagan Poetry and Bad Romance, but I've seen Bjork's nipples (and fake nipples!) and the best I've gotten from Lady Gaga is a little ass crack, and I think that's worth noting, as I find it hard to believe attention and record sales did not influence Bjork's choice.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 06:33
Bjork? I have not liked one thing she has done - its just like Yoko Ono - actually not that bad, Yoko has woeful singing. Only popular cos of John - seriously!
Back to Top
harmonium.ro View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 06:50
Yoko Ono is a very important artist on her own even ignoring all her connections with the world of music. She was and still is an icon of the contemporary arts scene because of what she has done since the early 60s. How known is she in the world of regular music fans (because of her involvement with John Lennon) has nothing to do with her significance as a contemporary artist. Smile
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 16:06
I totally agree.  Yoko is not a good singer but she has never sold herself as a vocalist. She is an artist. The world is chockablock of people who go on and on about how bad Yoko's music is but upon inspection, have not actually listened to one of her albums. The whole thing is over resentment over how she may have encouraged John to give up on The Beatles. But that's silly too because if you know the history, it was actually George who split first.
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 17:05
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by boo boo boo boo wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by Kojak Kojak wrote:


As for the lady in your avatar, Bjork is an immense talent, who has never used her sexuality to sell records
Have you seen the video for Pagan Poetry....?
 
That was really meant to be shocking and provocative rather than sexually tiltilating. Personally I'm not that bothered by a women showing her areola for a few brief moments, I'm more offended by the pretty raunchy stuff that's marketed towards preteens these days.
 
Oh wait, were you talking about the breasts or that other thing the video was controversial for? Wink
 
Well yeah, I never said Bjork wasn't a dirty little girl, but it's a different kind of dirty.
And Lady Gaga isn't trying to be shocking and provocative? I'm not saying there's not a difference between the video for Pagan Poetry and Bad Romance, but I've seen Bjork's nipples (and fake nipples!) and the best I've gotten from Lady Gaga is a little ass crack, and I think that's worth noting, as I find it hard to believe attention and record sales did not influence Bjork's choice.
 
I'm not really saying anything negative about Gaga really. They are just assumptions and nothing more, I've said before that I admire that she chooses to get attention in a more creative way than just dressing like a slut.
 
I won't deny that Bjork probably has done things to garner publicity for her records, but if all she really wanted was to sell records, she wouldn't be making the kinda music she does, and her music wouldn't have evolved much from the kinda thing she was doing when she was 11.
 
The big difference from Bjork is that in the end of the day, despite how "arty" Lady Gaga wants to be in her way of presentation, she still makes pop music that is accessible enough for 8 year olds, while Bjork does not. Not that there's anything wrong with making accessible pop music, not at all. But I can understand why people find Lady Gaga pretentious, of course people find Bjork pretentious too, and prog rock.
 
But the controversy with Gaga is, she seems to take herself very seriously as an artist when her music isn't THAT different from what you hear on the radio all the time. Kinda like how Kanye West thinks he's a genius when he's not really doing anything revolutionary or challenging, unless making autotune sound as annoying as possible counts.


Edited by boo boo - May 19 2010 at 19:50
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 18 2010 at 21:18
Gaga takes herself seriously because unlike 95% of other pop stars, she participates in the writing of and execution of her shows and music. That it's not that different isn't the point, the point is she creates.
Back to Top
idiotPrayer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2009
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 324
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2010 at 09:08
i appreciate everything about her, except for the music
Back to Top
zappaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2010 at 20:29
Ultimately, there is but one reason so many people on the intertubes are so fascinated with her:
 
 
God help me, but.....
 
WANT. TO TOUCH. THE HINEY.
 
 
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.258 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.