Queen.....WHY THE HELL NOT?!?!?! |
Post Reply | Page <1 456 |
Author | |
tuxon
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: July 29 2005 at 10:08 |
I've begon submitting the Queen albums, if anyone care to check if my input is accurate. I mostly use the hollywood records re-releases from 1991, so including the bonus tracks, maybe I shouldn't, but most of the albums I have are including the bonus tracks. Cert, or Proglover is anyone of you busy writing a bio, else I will just my luck probably, when i'm done entering the albums, M@X will delete Queen from the archives, rendering all my efforts useless, anyway will continue on the chosen path
after this, will proceed with elton John, just so you know Edited by tuxon |
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: July 30 2005 at 03:04 |
I am a fan of Queen, however I not consider them a 'prog band.'
The excellent vocal harmonies, use of instruments and their virtuosity almost gives them a wild card, but they do not have what other prog bands have when it comes to making different a special music. I can say the same for Deep Purple, which I am an even greater fan of, however I cannot put them alongside Genesis, Yes or Van Der Graaf Generator. Seeing as there has already been considerable work in finding cover art, etc. I do not have a problem with them being accepted, but perhaps a new subset style of prog rock could be created for these less progressive, and perhaps influential artists? |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 456 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |