Trolls scare a band from PA

Epignosis wrote: Ivan_Melgar_M wrote: Epignosis wrote: I would abolish ratings only.Simples(er). I been a supporter of this radical option, but M@X wants them So Dean's solution is the best IMO Iván  Who is this M@X you speak of?

This one :

So you write a review for the points it counts for?

Did not realize it was a game. You are winning cuz i am not playing.

timothy leary wrote: So you write a review for the points it counts for?

All my reviews count the same. 

thellama73 wrote: Epignosis wrote: I would abolish ratings only. Simples(er). Second!

Thirded from my part, I hope this possibly futile and here off-topic issue would have it's own discussion.
Separation could be the first stage of eliminating the ratings, and later introducing capability to do a over 200 word review without rating.

I understand why M@x could have opinion for reviews, as they give faster some sort of uncohesion for the albums (hey this is a masterpiece, uh this one with neat covers is only for fans duh), but I personally think a well written essay about the record gives more credit to both the album and and the page promoting it.

However this is a fine place even as it is, but wihtout force majeur demands I hope it is ok to toss around ideas of people's personal future enhancement ideas possibly never happening?
Great that the thread also served it's purpose and the person left is coming back

timothy leary wrote: Not really an answer but you do write good reviews. Just wondering, some weighted reviews are hardly worth the extra points. Yours at least are worth the extra weight.

Your question was an honest one though.

I write reviews because I like music and I like writing.  But if there is a collective "number" applied to an album, I would want to have as much "clout" as possible.

Epignosis wrote: Ivan_Melgar_M wrote: Epignosis wrote: Seriously, eliminate ratings only. The "I can't speak English" facilitation argument has always been weak to me. If this were a Spanish prog rock site, I would do my best to translate my reviews.  I wouldn't waste my time with a rating when a review counts as ten or twenty times. I'm a Spanish speaker, it's hard for me to write in English, I have to use dictionary and synonym dictionary, plus wrrite it in word to avoid typos as possible, Yet here you are, a special collaborator. If a person has something to say about an album, 100 words in English isn't hard to put together.

Eetu Pellonpää wrote: thellama73 wrote: Epignosis wrote: I would abolish ratings only. Simples(er). Second! Thirded from my part, I hope this possibly futile and here off-topic issue would have it's own discussion. Separation could be the first stage of eliminating the ratings, and later introducing capability to do a over 200 word review without rating. I understand why M@x could have opinion for reviews, as they give faster some sort of uncohesion for the albums (hey this is a masterpiece, uh this one with neat covers is only for fans duh), but I personally think a well written essay about the record gives more credit to both the album and and the page promoting it. However this is a fine place even as it is, but wihtout force majeur demands I hope it is ok to toss around ideas of people's personal future enhancement ideas possibly never happening? Great that the thread also served it's purpose and the person left is coming back

^It´s Gnaw Their Tongues...and you are right, it´s dark and evil stuff alright. What you forgot to mention is how brilliantly well composed it is. But thanks for not giving 1 star ratings to something you obviously despise for all the wrong reasons.

^Caio! The point is that Scott is not giving 1 star ratings to artists that he knows beforehand that he won´t like. And yeah I question his reasons for not liking artists like that, but that was more a provocation on my part because I felt provoked by his description of an artist that I greatly respect.