Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Posted: February 18 2012 at 23:58
I just tried that and it works. Thanks.
It's just part of the system that the really obscure bands who need money don't get any of that copyright protection, and the bands like Rush that are drowning in the stuff get videos blocked. But I guess we'd probably never hear any of the underground music without free streaming on the net.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: February 19 2012 at 00:09
DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:
On the Patton argument, I'm on both sides. Patton is one of the best vocalists ever, but rapping is incredibly easy. Much easier than singing.
Technically? Maybe. But rapping is about enunciation so it is also about doing it convincingly. I don't know if a Maddy Prior would feel very comfortable trying to rap. Versatility is more about expanding one's comfort zone, about executing it with conviction than it is about technicality. Patton achieves it by pasting his trademark insincere, mocking attitude on most if not all the styles he attempts.
And I sort of go with Equality on this, though not exactly. Singing is just a hopeless physical sport for many singers nowadays, fetching whistle notes in the least called for places and attempting the most annoying and incongruous runs and there are many of them who do that, who turn up on X Factor or American Idol and disappear after the season is over. If singing really was about imparting feeling and meaning to the words and connecting with the listener, I would agree that that IS very tough.
Joined: July 27 2010
Location: Tel Aviv
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Posted: February 19 2012 at 09:56
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:
On the Patton argument, I'm on both sides. Patton is one of the best vocalists ever, but rapping is incredibly easy. Much easier than singing.
That's like saying that flying an airplane is easier than glass blowing.
It's like saying Jazz is easier than classical because you just improvise.
But seriously, it's a silly thing to say, that rapping is easier. It's very easy to sing. I'm doing it right now. It's very easy to rap. Rappity rap rap. Does that mean I just did of those well? No. Not at all. Playing a flute is really easy, you blow through one whole and sound comes out. Does that mean I'm a good flute player? Yeah it does. Flute easy, anyone who play flute not musician, and should be stoned, particularly if they play on one foot (love you Ian).
Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Posted: February 19 2012 at 13:03
rogerthat wrote:
DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:
On the Patton argument, I'm on both sides. Patton is one of the best vocalists ever, but rapping is incredibly easy. Much easier than singing.
Technically? Maybe. But rapping is about enunciation so it is also about doing it convincingly. I don't know if a Maddy Prior would feel very comfortable trying to rap. Versatility is more about expanding one's comfort zone, about executing it with conviction than it is about technicality. Patton achieves it by pasting his trademark insincere, mocking attitude on most if not all the styles he attempts.
And I sort of go with Equality on this, though not exactly. Singing is just a hopeless physical sport for many singers nowadays, fetching whistle notes in the least called for places and attempting the most annoying and incongruous runs and there are many of them who do that, who turn up on X Factor or American Idol and disappear after the season is over. If singing really was about imparting feeling and meaning to the words and connecting with the listener, I would agree that that IS very tough.
I can testify from experience that rapping is easy, but that actually doing it well is ridiculously hard, unless you happen to have a natural talent for it.
One of the things I dislike so much about American Idol and similar shows is that it's impossible to succeed on them unless you have a voice that conforms to the musical mainstream, in that if Peter Gabriel, Geddy Lee, or Peter Hammil were ever to go on the show, they'd get kicked out in no time. They have had people in the past like Adam Lambert who actually were unique and unconventional, but as soon as they leave the show the record companies force them into a box and squash their talent until they have nothing left. Chris Daughtery has such a powerful voice that he could have made some really beautiful and potent music, but instead he just got stuck singing bland pop rock music.
I think he should get together with Mike Portnoy and make a prog metal album
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8622
Posted: February 19 2012 at 15:02
Or maybe we could have a thread about the top 5 favorite vocalists instead of a pointless attempt to validate personal tastes. Why do vocal threads have to invariably turn into some manifestation of this argument? Can't we all just agree that James LaBrie is a horrible singer AND a horrible rapper?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.262 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.