| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
moshkito 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17708
|
 Posted: December 27 2010 at 19:45 |
 Roland113 wrote:
moshkito wrote:
Eärendil wrote:
I think it's common knowledge by now that all older music (with the cutoff at exactly 1989) is irrelevant. Not only is it unoriginal, but also bad. All of the pre-89 music will soon fade into oblivion to be seceded by the vastly superior modern music. The noise created by these pre-89 caveman should not even be called music. Say NO to the dark shadow of music past and embrace the present! |
Even I will not be that mean to Walter.
Sorry, but I personally feel that the post is mis-guided, ethnocentric and disrespectful to a lot of music ... you might as well stretch your point to say that Beethoven is stupid, Mozart sux and Bach is a flippin idiot! ... and that today's music makes all of them look like white punks on dope ... actually, I would like to suggest the opposite, and I am not trying to tube down a band! |
You have trouble with the concept of sarcasm, don't you?
|
You really should look in the mirror sometime!
|
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
|
 |
zappaholic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
|
Posted: December 27 2010 at 20:51 |
CPicard wrote:
Say something.
|
No.
|
|
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
|
|
Rockjf1
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 29 2010
Location: 2
Status: Offline
Points: 24
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 15:14 |
|
Is there someone in this forum who's ever listen to the beatles? pre-89 music is not sh*t what is music to you mainstream bullsh*t common, those people who played music back then paved the way for us they did miracles with crappy sound recording systems I totally disagree with this forum.
|
|
TheGazzardian
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8726
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 15:18 |
Rockjf1 wrote:
Is there someone in this forum who's ever listen to the beatles? pre-89 music is not sh*t what is music to you mainstream bullsh*t common, those people who played music back then paved the way for us they did miracles with crappy sound recording systems I totally disagree with this forum. |
This thread is a joke aimed at a forum member who is severely against post-89 music. 
|
|
Rockjf1
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 29 2010
Location: 2
Status: Offline
Points: 24
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 15:47 |
|
Alright music is an art in all forms well almost all forms:P I just don't believe that pre-89 music is sh*t to me 89 reminds of Def Leppard and that my friend is crap:P
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 17:52 |
|
Your friend is crap?
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17708
|
Posted: December 29 2010 at 19:32 |
Rockjf1 wrote:
Is there someone in this forum who's ever listen to the beatles? pre-89 music is not sh*t what is music to you mainstream bullsh*t common, those people who played music back then paved the way for us they did miracles with crappy sound recording systems I totally disagree with this forum. |
Had Beatles in our house in Brazil before you were born ... we're talking 1964 and 1965 ... we already could sing "She Loves You" yeah, yeah, yeah!
The point is not that music before 89 was better, or worse ... I really think that the point was that music has become a very commenrcial excuse for creating music, and that tends to dilute the ability to tell what is better or worse, or listenable. And when new "sub-genre's" are created for neo-CDshops, that will never be selling that stuff anyway ... gotta love the irony there! ... it makes it look like some of the music since then is better, because it is more widely seen because of the internet.
The date basically says ... before Internet ... After internet. And 45 years ago, there was no Internet ... and hearing things like the Beatles, or Rolling Stones was amazing and totally different ... and original and creative -- because there was nothing else out there that was visible, or heard! Today, that is not an issue!
And with the internet, everyone can have their website and everyone can sell and everyone is a star! ... and I really think that is what the whole hooplah is about. It is a very valid comment ... but also one that is going to be mis-represented and mis-understood because everyone says something ... in their own language and no one is interested in anyone else's point, except to trash them ... how post 89 that is, btw!
Edited by moshkito - December 30 2010 at 16:12
|
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
|
|
Tapfret
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8581
|
Posted: December 30 2010 at 18:32 |
Hi,
This is the "Just for Fun" section. This thread is here because it is
"Just for Fun". Please, if you post in this section with the intention
of seriousness or any other activity that is not "Just for Fun", you are
in clear violation of the "Just for Fun" by-laws. It should also be
noted, that as a "Just for Fun" poster, I realize that this post is
"Just for Fun" and should not at all be taken seriously, unless the end
result is more non-"Just for Fun" replies. In which case this post
should be taken very seriously and discussed somewhere outside of "Just
for Fun". Like one of the many sections of the forum hierarchy above
"Just for Fun" in which all posts must be taken very seriously and
debated with only clean, pressed culottes while the dogs rest quietly in
front of the hearth, refraining from any activity that might be
construed as "Just for Fun".
That being said, thank you to Zappaholic and CPicard for their commitment to "Just for Fun". 
|
|
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10652
|
Posted: December 30 2010 at 21:45 |
Rockjf1 wrote:
Is there someone in this forum who's ever listen to the beatles? pre-89 music is not sh*t what is music to you mainstream bullsh*t common, those people who played music back then paved the way for us they did miracles with crappy sound recording systems I totally disagree with this forum. |
The Beatles are terrible, the bands after 1989 improved their music and made it easier to dance to, we don't have to listen and be bored with old music, no one likes all that old music for old people. After 1989 we forget the Beatles and have much better music and everyone agrees.
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: December 31 2010 at 13:34 |
|
Pre-1989 music is soooo 2010.
|
|
let prog reign
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 11 2010
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 256
|
Posted: December 31 2010 at 14:11 |
|
Are you kidding me! The 70s were the greatest era for music of all time and probably always will be. Prog or not late 60s and 70s were and still are amazing. Back then good recordings weren't necessary because many bands had talent! Now I'm not saying the prog of recent time is bad. Their are many great bands like PT and Moon Safari, but nothing can beat the classics- Pink Floyd, Genesis, Camel, Gentle Giant, VDGG, and Yes. All amazing bands!
But I do agree with you on one thing. The 80's were terrible. With the exception of Bacamarte.
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: December 31 2010 at 14:13 |
|
^ I know something you don't know.
|
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Posted: December 31 2010 at 17:02 |
CPicard wrote:
Pre-1989 music is soooo 2010.
|
I still liked it when the Backstreet Boys were an underground band.
|
|
Xanatos
Forum Senior Member
Banned
Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Latin America
Status: Offline
Points: 305
|
Posted: January 01 2011 at 19:02 |
|
Hipsters everywhere lol
|
|
crimhead
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
|
Posted: January 01 2011 at 19:10 |
|
^ Better to be a Hipster than a wookie.
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: January 02 2011 at 08:01 |
crimhead wrote:
CPicard wrote:
Pre-1989 music is soooo 2010.
|
I still liked it when the Backstreet Boys were an underground band.
|
But how could they be underground if they were already in the backstreet?
|
|
Rottenhat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 14 2006
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 436
|
Posted: January 05 2011 at 10:59 |
Eärendil wrote:
I think it's common knowledge by now that all older music (with the cutoff at exactly 1989) is irrelevant. Not only is it unoriginal, but also bad. All of the pre-89 music will soon fade into oblivion to be seceded by the vastly superior modern music. The noise created by these pre-89 caveman should not even be called music. Say NO to the dark shadow of music past and embrace the present! |
Yes but the Post-Post-Post-Retro guys will like the 70's prog in 2035.
|
|
Language is a virus from outer space.
-William S. Burroughs
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: January 05 2011 at 13:45 |
Rottenhat wrote:
Eärendil wrote:
I think it's common knowledge by now that all older music (with the cutoff at exactly 1989) is irrelevant. Not only is it unoriginal, but also bad. All of the pre-89 music will soon fade into oblivion to be seceded by the vastly superior modern music. The noise created by these pre-89 caveman should not even be called music. Say NO to the dark shadow of music past and embrace the present! |
Yes but the Post-Post-Post-Retro guys will like the 70's prog in 2035.
|
What about the Post-Post-Post-Neo-Retro-Neo-Post-Revival guys?
|
|
Rottenhat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 14 2006
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 436
|
Posted: January 05 2011 at 14:04 |
CPicard wrote:
Rottenhat wrote:
Eärendil wrote:
I think it's common knowledge by now that all older music (with the cutoff at exactly 1989) is irrelevant. Not only is it unoriginal, but also bad. All of the pre-89 music will soon fade into oblivion to be seceded by the vastly superior modern music. The noise created by these pre-89 caveman should not even be called music. Say NO to the dark shadow of music past and embrace the present! |
Yes but the Post-Post-Post-Retro guys will like the 70's prog in 2035.
|
What about the Post-Post-Post-Neo-Retro-Neo-Post-Revival guys?
|
The Post-Post-Post-Neo-Retro-Neo-Post-Revival guys are not allowed to have opinions about music. They must listen to the state-supported electro-vintage-fusion-agit prop-heavy-postpunkpopmusic or the chip they have implanted in their brainstem will terminate their life support. :)
|
|
Language is a virus from outer space.
-William S. Burroughs
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: January 05 2011 at 14:05 |
pre-89 music is the best.
Pre 1789, that is.
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Pre-89 Music is Dead
