Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Amp/Guitar modeling and related discussion thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAmp/Guitar modeling and related discussion thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
Author
Message
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2009 at 05:34
^So you don't reamp then? I tend to just reamp through POD Farm, so admittedly a tube preamp would do nothing at all. What I am going to do however, is invest in a proper firewire interface and DI box so my DI tracks can improve in quality. Although that was interesting though, I've heard some other people do the tube preamp approach too.
Regarding noise, what pickups are you using ? I just got active pickups installed in my Ibanez RG 7421 (7 string), Seymour Duncan Blackouts to be precise and they are very quiet compared to passive humbuckers.
I was originally gating at -66dB on the Noise Gate, now I'm using about -79dB, it's crazy how much difference switching to active pickups make.
I would have responded earlier, but I spent all day testing my new pickups haha.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2009 at 06:15
I read a really nice article today about the new Guitar Rig 4 (also in the "Sound & Recording" magazine issue that I mentioned in the thread about compression) ... it included an interview with Peter Weihe, who is an expert when it comes to guitar recording and whose studio was used as a model for creating the new Control Room feature of Guitar Rig 4. Very interesting, and very impressive!
Back to Top
meatal View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2009
Location: Kelowna
Status: Offline
Points: 94
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2009 at 18:32
Pickups in my strat & mini-V are, Seymour Duncan Trembucker (cut through excellent when using higher gain and intricate picking) and a Hot Rail for lead. In my custom Tele, a Dimarzio  Air Norton and a Hot Rail. But lately I've been using 2 Dimarzio Custom wound EVH pickups and their surprisingly great. The comment about the pre-gating before my POD for live, is when using high gain I really hate that sshhhh sound when the gates close usually no matter how fast you set them, and during recording I was getting tired of editing. So with that extra gate and cutting of my guitar signal when I stop playing, there's no hiss at all. Although I do turn that gate off when recording solos so I can get more sustain/feedback etc...
The bitter harvest of a barren land, I'm painting pictures you don't understand.
(Fates Warning)
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 03 2009 at 02:16
^ I love the Variax ... zero hum, and only if you use extreme distortion you get a slightly elevated ground noise. With typical configurations (even metal) you can simply record without a gate, or with a threshold at -70dB.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 04 2009 at 01:22
Walking advertisement for the Variax lol.
Yesterday I was out jamming with some guys, cranked out tube amp combos, I had my X3 Live plugged into the effects loop of one of the amps to use the power amp section, and with the Blackouts I seriously didn't need more than -75dB to keep my guitar quiet. For this reason alone I don't even want to go back to passive pickups.
They are also way more articulate than my old stock pickups, as well as having far superior note separation under high gain even with complex chords. The high output allows me to back off the preamp gain level, allowing more dynamics to come through.
Can your Variax do that?Wink
They aren't for everyone, but to Meatal, you'll probably find if you switch to active pickups some of your problems with noise will just go away and you'll need to use less threshold on your noise gate.

Oh and BTW Trembucker simply denotes they are made to be used with a trem equipped guitar, so it doesn't tell me anything about what actual pickup it is.
You can buy a Seymour Duncan JB model in trembucker form and you can buy a '59 model in trembucker form, but they sound nothing alike.

Also read my post on the other page Mike about the frequencies thing.
It might inspire you to get studio monitors so you'll actually be able to hear everything.


Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - October 04 2009 at 01:24
Back to Top
friso View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 24 2007
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 04 2009 at 08:02
I'v disigned a les paul that is being built by a guitar builder in the Netherlands. It has a bigger body then the normal les paul and a mahony body. I choose to not have digital effects and pre-amps and active elements on it. I always had the feeling if it was working back then, it should work now. I'm only using analogue stompboxes since I got so mad about my digital effect paddles.

I guess I will never understand the fuzz about digital effects, amplification and recording equipment. From my point of view it destroyed everything what had been important in music: The real deal. With digital effect all human mistakes are filtered out of the music, as if Jimi Hendrix had a perfect clear distortion sound. This is simply not the case, nor is it important to have a clean distortion sound. The hum belongs to the distortion. Real warm sound can compensate for all humms in recorded music for me.

Having said that, I'm still happy you guys keep me up to date with your digital recording/playing knowledge.

Edited by kingfriso - October 04 2009 at 08:05
Back to Top
meatal View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: September 23 2009
Location: Kelowna
Status: Offline
Points: 94
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 04 2009 at 22:38
Ooops! To clarify, my main pickups are Seymour Duncan Parallel AxisTrembuckers (Original) in Bridge postition and the Seymour Duncan Hot Rail in the Neck.
 And I don't have any ground hum at all, I'm using the gate to competely shut off my guitars signal through my POD and then to my amp, so my amp/monitor doesn't have any operating noise/hiss, even at super high volumes.
 As for recording monitors I still use my Yamaha NS-10's (used them for so long I'm comfortable with them)  w/matching Yamaha sub woofer. Actually have 2 pairs of them the industry standard ones everyone knows (black box w/ white cone 6" spkr and tweeter)  and the actual early NS-10's from the 1970's that had (10" oval spkr and a tweeter).
Unlike a lot of you recording using your computers, I guess I'm a little old school, coming from having a studio way back when and using 2" reel to reels, Fostex G-16's reels, I worked for Roland for years and then moved up to my VS-1680EX's and VS-880EX's synched, I know how to push the limits of these machines and have used them for over 15 years, and well I'm too lazy to change. And I have lots of people keep telling me to just use my computers/programmes but I hate relearning crap, wasting time.  I can get jobs done quicker this way.
Don't get me wrong I do use the computer for a few things (editing etc,,,), but any mastering (a real  artform in itself)  is always sent to professional.

And to add to Kingfriso's comments, I agree technology has sucked some of the life out of music, however there are still a few bands that record old school "live" off the floor, sure they multitrack, but use whole takes instead of overedited computer perfection. Trying to be a little more human again.

The bitter harvest of a barren land, I'm painting pictures you don't understand.
(Fates Warning)
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2009 at 01:26
Given active pickups have been around since, sh*t, the 70s or something, I don't really understand the concern.
Digital stomp boxes have been around for longer than I've been alive (I'm 20), so it's not like it's some "new fangled oddity".
but whatever, I'm pretty much sick of arguing the "analogue vs digital" debate.
Good tone is good tone no matter how you get there.
And good music is good music no matter how the end result is achieved. The "real deal" is just the music.
As far as I'm concerned, if I enjoy it, it's the real deal, whether sampled replaced drums or not, digital amp modeling or not.
If you like a guitar tone and later on find out it was done with a digital amp sim, do you suddenly throw the music away because it's "all wrong and not analogue"?
Is it not possible to just......well, enjoy it, regardless of what gear was used?

Mind you, I'm not saying digital and all this modern stuff is the be end all, if I decide ti pursue audio engineering more seriously I'm going to go out and buy tube amps, real microphones, a real drum kit and learn how to mic it up in the traditional fashion (as early as sometime next year I might be doing that stuff), but the current modern digital technology has its merit.

Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2009 at 01:52
Originally posted by Petrovsk Mizinski Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:

Walking advertisement for the Variax lol.
Yesterday I was out jamming with some guys, cranked out tube amp combos, I had my X3 Live plugged into the effects loop of one of the amps to use the power amp section, and with the Blackouts I seriously didn't need more than -75dB to keep my guitar quiet. For this reason alone I don't even want to go back to passive pickups.
They are also way more articulate than my old stock pickups, as well as having far superior note separation under high gain even with complex chords. The high output allows me to back off the preamp gain level, allowing more dynamics to come through.
Can your Variax do that?Wink



Absolutely - the Variax uses active pickups. They're also piezo, which means that they don't pick up any hum caused by other electric devices (like computers, light dimmers or washing machines). Because it's such a clean signal I can boost it before feeding it into the amp simulation. However, most preamps are designed for typical guitar signals and in those instances boosting the signal will only saturate the preamp.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2009 at 07:45
Oh yeah, they are active. I forgot about that somehow, weird me.
But yeah anyway, my point was more really that your guitar can't do the sound of BlackoutsLOL
Which I guess maybe doesn't bother you, you seem happy with it, which is what mattersSmile
Especially since I got my Blackouts, the more and more I realize there will probably never be a guitar modeling solution available for me.
Unlike amps, you're really physically touching the guitar all the time, so you end up getting an emotional bond to it, how it feels, how the particular piece of wood/it's pickups sound etc and I couldn't let go of that.
And for many too, the point of owing a Les Paul, a Strat, a super Strat and a Tele and perhaps an acoustic is that they all feel different and inspire you to play a certain way, something not really possible with a Variax.

I'm interested to see how far the concept goes, because I wonder what the market is like for the Variax.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2009 at 08:09
^ The Variax clearly isn't suited for modern Thrash/Death metal sounds ... it's basically 100% vintage. Currently I'm quite happy using the Variax for its acoustic models, the Sitar/Banjo/12 string models and the Telecaster/Stratocaster sounds. I use the ESP for pretty much everything else. It surely would be nice to have active pickups in the ESP - that way I could further reduce the noise/humming.

BTW: My Variax 700 is actually nice looking ... the body is transparent blue, and except for the missing pickups it looks pretty much like any other nice guitar in the 1000-1500 EUR price range. Smile


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - October 06 2009 at 08:13
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2009 at 02:30
EMGs or Blackouts would work well in your ESP. It's got a mahogany body, right?
You mentioned latency in that other thread, strange.
The Line6 ASIO driver seems to report inaccurate latency readings. Pretty much everyone on the Sneap forum that knows their stuff have said 128 samples for 2.9ms, 256 is 5.8ms and so on.
Of course, once you start trying to record more than one thing at once (multiple mics etc) then firewire becomes handy, since a lot of high quality firewire devices can easily reach 32 samples.
I might be getting a firewire interface later this year, for my 21st birthday, but I'm not sure yet, we'll see.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2009 at 02:40
^  128 samples = 2.9ms

It's not as simple as that. Depending on the sample rate, the numbers might be correct ... but on top of the ASIO latency you have the latency of the audio interface itself. ASIO only deals with the transportation of audio from one application to another.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2009 at 03:42
IIRC the POD adds about 1-2ms of latency from what I've read on the Line 6 forum boards, which isn't too bad.



Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - October 07 2009 at 03:55
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2009 at 04:06
^ What's bad is that I can't get it to work reliably on my computer with anything below 1024 samples, while I can use Asio4All with 64 samples perfectly fine. I'll definitely get another audio interface soon.

This is the one I think I'll get:

http://www.thomann.de/gb/esi_maya_44e.htm

Screw USB or Firewire ... PCI-E is fine for me!
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2009 at 05:01
Wow, can't get lower than 1024, something must be wrong especially since you have a faster computer than me (but your computer is just barely faster though IIRC). Maybe with USB 2.0 I have on the POD instead of the USB 1.1 that you have for your Line 6 interface is giving me an advantage, who knows? I sure don't reallyLOL
1024 would definitely bring audible latency issues,  you're definitely right about that.
I've been working with 24 bits and 128 samples without a single problem for dry/DI tracking and audible latency is non existent for me.

Just been playing around with 8505 before too, sounds really great. The POD doesn't have a dedicated 5150 model.
It has the 5150II , but it's a different beast to the 5150, and having 8505 is a good thing to have around to fill that void for the POD's lack of 5150.
It can't be tweaked a whole lot (there isn't even a presence control, strangely, only bass, middle and treble) but what it does, it does extremely well.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 07 2009 at 05:14
^ I got really good results with the GR 4 Ultrasonic & Gratifier ... I'll try to record some riffs later today and experiment with the different models.

BTW: I couldn't work with 128 samples either ... especially for fast riffs the latency is annoying. For example, try playing Iron Maiden - Losfer Words, just the riff in the beginning. It's played on the A string throughout ... try to get the timing right with 128 samples, I definitely can't. I can though with 64 samples.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 04:14
Side by side comparison of Diamond Plate and Gratifier is a most do for you sir.
But then again, if you've haven't played a real Recto in recent years, I guess  look at it not so much as what sounds more realistic, but what just sounds better to you.

Well, I haven't tried playing Losfer yet, but I guess if it turns out I get latency problems as well with that riff, than it might be time to look at one of these for christmas:

http://www.mackie.com/products/800r/index.html

I couldn't even get Revalver to work in real time when recording (i.e, monitor through Revalver as I recorded) via my POD and this firewire device should do the trick.
That said, I can always keep using my POD as a dongle so POD Farm will still work (And I can't really sell it at this stage anyway, not having any guitar amps per se), but plug it into the Onyx via the S/PDIF input and ultimately that will do my recording for me. That method seems to work well for many others , so I figure I cannot do wrong if I go for this.




Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - October 09 2009 at 04:15
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 04:50
^ Of course you have a point - I really haven't played a real amp in years. On the other hand I'm listening to music all the time ... and from a mixing/mastering standpoint, the sound of the guitar in existing recordings should be a benchmark. I only just read an article about mixing, and the guy (he runs a successful studio in New York) said that when you're mixing you always need a point of reference - anything else is "just fiddling with knobs".

Losfer Words is a cool exercise for left/right hand coordination - and latency will simply make it harder to keep in sync to a metronome or drums, since your brain tries to sync the picking movement to the beat you hear, but since the actual sound is delayed it also tries to compensate for that at the same time. It's a certain kind of "sluggishness" ... which you would also encounter in real life if you tried to record using monitor speakers which are too far away (1 meter = 3ms latency). That's also why it's a good idea to use headphones when recording ...

Well, my new sound card arrived today ... let's hope it works better than the Line 6 interface. Yesterday I tried again and for some reason the dry signal is too faint. This might be what you meant by your complaints about Line 6 Interfaces as DI boxes ... but if that is so, I wonder why nobody mentions this in reviews or guitar forums. The ESI Maya 44 e has a special "High Z" input for guitars and operates in 24 bit by default, so hopefully it will solve all my problems. :-)
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 05:04
Ohhhh, awesome, so it arrivedBig smile
My internet connection is being annoying, hence me not being on MSN much lately, but hopefully at one point you can tell me what think about the card there since that's getting a little off topic here anyway.

Indeed, as on the previous page, I gave a list of what I consider to be some of the benchmark tones in modern heavy metal. I tend to use a wide range rather than a small range, so I don't get stuck ending up having my tones sounding exactly the same as something I've heard before.
To me it's more about finding what frequencies in the guitar tone need working on, rather than striving for a particular tone, if that makes sense. Maybe it doesn't, heh.

The DI issue is mentioned on the Sneap forum, no surprise given the discerning ears on that board.
Well anyway, I look forward to hearing some stuff you record via your new PCI-E card, sounds like a very nice device indeed.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.