Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 21 2016 at 05:53
No no no, it's not like kindergarten. The question is "why all the hate on Kraftwerk" ?
I don't like them, others do. They are indeed, influential, but my argument is that their influence has produced a great deal of appalling music. Other people will have a contrary opinion. We don't all have to agree. In fact, if we weren't arguing, it'd show we didn't care.
Joined: September 01 2010
Location: Sohar, Oman
Status: Offline
Points: 1399
Posted: March 21 2016 at 06:23
There is no such thing as 'appalling music' but music we don't like! If music was that appalling, no one would listen to it! Back to Kraftwerk, I bought the 'Autobahn' single when it came out - I was 12 and it was like looking into the future. Despite their hard (but ironic) approach to the technical aspects of their music, they used to invite the audience to come on stage and mess around with their equipment. Very few prog musicians would let this happen (Zappa certainly did, as ever the laudable exception) - can you imagine Steve Howe letting a fan get on stage to have a go on a highly prized guitar? I doubt it. I don't 'like' everything they did but they were progressive in the true sense of the word!
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 21 2016 at 07:11
Flight123 wrote:
There is no such thing as 'appalling music' but music we don't like! If music was that appalling, no one would listen to it! Back to Kraftwerk, I bought the 'Autobahn' single when it came out - I was 12 and it was like looking into the future. Despite their hard (but ironic) approach to the technical aspects of their music, they used to invite the audience to come on stage and mess around with their equipment. Very few prog musicians would let this happen (Zappa certainly did, as ever the laudable exception) - can you imagine Steve Howe letting a fan get on stage to have a go on his Rickenbacker? I doubt it. I don't 'like' everything they did but they were progressive in the true sense of the word!
In that case, the Birdie Song was "progressive" as well, as nothing like it had been heard before, and it started a whole new genre of music I didn't like. ;-)
Joined: September 01 2010
Location: Sohar, Oman
Status: Offline
Points: 1399
Posted: March 21 2016 at 08:09
Indeed, my kids loved 'The Birdie Song'! (I did play Capt. Beefheart at my daughter's birthday party to 'test' the equipment - that nearly ended in divorce...)
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 18061
Posted: March 21 2016 at 08:26
Davesax1965 wrote:
... Mosh: you need to realise that electronic music bands - early ones - did nothing "simplistic", in that not many of them "just turned a knob with an effect on it" and that Tangerine Dream "didn't turn a knob with an effect on it for five minutes and disguise it as music more successfully." ...
You are mis-interpreting the post ... and how it came out ... it was not simplistic in that learning how to play those things and what to do was ridiculously difficult to the point that not many folks could really do it right.
By today's standards, it feels like a simple turning of the knobs on a VST ... which is what an audience today would know, and not realize the difficulty, in setting those things up and getting the right noise along, and what not.
But the idea for creating music with a "sound", was new, and the synthesizer was the perfect instrument to do it with ... there was not an "idea" or "thought" associated with that sound, and it helped create a lot of music ... it's just a shame that most of it became just another keyboard replacement, instead of an instrument in its own right.
There are many folks today, that are hoping to reclaim the synthesizer as a proper instrument, and leave the workstations to replace musicians!
As time went on, these sounds became easier to do and create and repeat ... and now are so simple, even a dummy like me can do many of these on my Arturia V8 software on my computer! But I have to tell you that my friend in 1976 bought a Quadra (ARP I think it was) and I could not get anything out of that ... and it took him over a year before he could do anything on it, other than piddle!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
No no no, it's not like kindergarten. The question is "why all the hate on Kraftwerk" ?
I don't like them, others do. They are indeed, influential, but my argument is that their influence has produced a great deal of appalling music. Other people will have a contrary opinion. We don't all have to agree. In fact, if we weren't arguing, it'd show we didn't care.
To be honest, I never liked them either. Because they are (among a couple of bands/artists) responsible for the decline of (electronic) Prog. They turned it into simple, even banal pop. Too simple music doesnīt reach my soul in anyway. And as I already said, I am only interested in history. They were very influential, unfortunately.
You may see a smile on Tony Banksī face but thatīs unlikely.
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 21 2016 at 09:51
moshkito wrote:
Davesax1965 wrote:
... Mosh: you need to realise that electronic music bands - early ones - did nothing "simplistic", in that not many of them "just turned a knob with an effect on it" and that Tangerine Dream "didn't turn a knob with an effect on it for five minutes and disguise it as music more successfully." ...
You are mis-interpreting the post ... and how it came out ... it was not simplistic in that learning how to play those things and what to do was ridiculously difficult to the point that not many folks could really do it right.
By today's standards, it feels like a simple turning of the knobs on a VST ... which is what an audience today would know, and not realize the difficulty, in setting those things up and getting the right noise along, and what not.
But the idea for creating music with a "sound", was new, and the synthesizer was the perfect instrument to do it with ... there was not an "idea" or "thought" associated with that sound, and it helped create a lot of music ... it's just a shame that most of it became just another keyboard replacement, instead of an instrument in its own right.
There are many folks today, that are hoping to reclaim the synthesizer as a proper instrument, and leave the workstations to replace musicians!
As time went on, these sounds became easier to do and create and repeat ... and now are so simple, even a dummy like me can do many of these on my Arturia V8 software on my computer! But I have to tell you that my friend in 1976 bought a Quadra (ARP I think it was) and I could not get anything out of that ... and it took him over a year before he could do anything on it, other than piddle!
Mosh, you said "Tangerine Dream .... turned a knob with an effect on it" "and disguised it more musically than others", didn't you ? I don't think I misinterpreted that one. ;-)
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 21 2016 at 10:15
Just to get the technical side of things clear.
Keith Emerson's Moog Modular was - for the time - ludicrously complicated. (Matter of fact, he had it patched up by a technician in a very simple fashion, though. Or so rumour has it.)
Kraftwerks' Minimoog D was very, very simple.
If I put anyone in front of a Minimoog and said, right, just to give you an idea..... nearly anyone could make a noise come out within a few minutes. By 1976'ish, the technology had moved on from complicated modulars to more simple "normalised" synths, such as the ARP 2600 and Minimoog. (Incidentally, an ARP Quadra counted as being "ridiculously simple to use"....... ????? )
Normalised means that the synth is internally connected in a logical manner. The oscillators connect to, say, a filter which connects to an amplifier. Connecting this up by hand is a pain but (on modulars) you can connect other modules in (ie ring modulators, Bode filters etc) to create an entirely different sound. With a normalised, "simple" synth such as a Minimoog, that's the way it works and you're stuck with it.
As time went on, *sounds* were becoming simpler and simpler to produce, but these sounds weren't really anything like the complexity which could be produced using modular systems. Modular systems are much harder to use and much more monolithic, but they offer more creative possibilities and that's the only reason why I use one. Believe you me, you wouldn't want to go through the pain of using a modular on stage if there wasn't a good reason for doing so.
Kraftwerk are *not* part of this early modular synth movement, they come in using much less complicated synths which were designed for every musician.
The early Minimoog was temperamental - the oscillators used to drift out of tune due to poor electronics and heat. (Its' Russian equivalent, the Polivoks, required a re-tune every 20 minutes of playing, and even now, whilst modern electronics are better, I still have to do regular re-tunes of all my kit.)
From a perspective of innovation, remember, this is the early / mid 1970's and for a band to even use a synth of any description was revolutionary. By about 1976-7, synths had changed, down to a basic level of complexity as can be seen in Mosh's (software) Jupiter 8. Anyone could use them. And they certainly did. Synthesizers didn't replace keyboards at all, you still saw plenty of Hammonds and Rhodeses and Elkas on stage.
What did Kraftwerk do that was innovative ? Well. It's mainly down to image - they certainly came well marketed - and sound. The "Moog with no resonance filter" sound had not really appeared much before, neither had completely pared down music. I think Autobahn is a very clever album. However, after that, like Tangerine Dream, the ideas seem to run out and commercialism takes over. I'm not criticising anyone elses' tastes, honestly, if you like it, fine.
Without Kraftwerk, a lot of later bands such as OMD and Soft Cell wouldn't have come along - no synth pop or New Wave. I grew up just before New Wave came along and remember finding it just musically worthless and awful - personal opinion.
We've mentioned Keith Emerson already - what Emerson did was fabulous, involving technical expertise, innovation and superb musicianship. Tangerine Dream were technically fabulous for the time and incredibly innovative. Kraftwerk ? Ah well. One idea. Done to death, I would argue.
I'm not trying to upset the Kraftwerk fans here. Honestly. What I'm saying is that without an actual proper understanding of the development of early synths from, say, the late 60's to the mid 70's, you can't understand whether or not Kraftwerk were technically innovative. Sonically ? Well. A new idea which caught on and influenced a lot of bands which came along. But if you say that, you can argue that disco did very much the same in the mid 70's. Or punk.
I agree fully with the comment that simplicity or complexity is nothing to do with how good a piece of music is, but that's really a throwaway, non specific comment, we're talking about an example here and not an arbitrary rule of thumb - or soundbite. They're just not for me. That's why. If you like them, good for you.
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 21 2016 at 10:22
Hi Son of Tiresias - if you're interested in early analogue synthesizers, have a look at my "The mighty modular synth" thread on here. I built a Eurorack format modular myself (at component level) recently and do analogue synth based music in the style of early Tangerine Dream.
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 21 2016 at 10:50
Indeed he did. 360, by the look of it... Then again - we all associate him with a Gibbo 175. And I've seen him playing a 335. And an LP Junior. I guess he might have been able to afford more than one guitar. ;-)
He used it in studio, he used a plenty of different guitars, mandolins etc. Exists a video from "Going for the One" sessions playing one.
O.K. - I immediately associate Squire with a Ricky (bass) and Pete Banks with a Ricky Guitar.....I never knew Howe played one......
Influenced by Peter Banks perhaps... kinda hybrid character ? Maybe Steve wanted to play like Peter, for a moment... like his hero... yes I wonder if he idolized him...
Btw, just watching the Peter Banks Story interview on YouTube. Very interesting stuff. Great player, one of the greats really. RIP
Edited by Son.of.Tiresias - March 21 2016 at 11:48
You may see a smile on Tony Banksī face but thatīs unlikely.
Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Posted: March 23 2016 at 04:32
Kraftwerk, 1971, Klaus Dinger on drums.
This is...... excellent. Which just goes to show that bands follow fashions (or determine them) and have a half life of interest.
I was thinking last night why I just can't stand the later Kraftwerk stuff. I think the reason is, as a musician, I'm programmed to listen to music and mentally play along to it in my head. On the later stuff, I just can't imagine myself doing it - there's no base material there. But I could easily imagine myself doing it with the early stuff.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.211 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Why the hate on Radioakitivitat(Kraftwerk)?
Topic Options
Flight123 wrote:
