Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
boo boo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
|
Posted: May 23 2010 at 11:03 |
Oh c'mon, everyone knew Hammill was gonna get more votes, I certainly did.
Hammill is very good but one thing that he and Jon have in common (how in the heck did this comparison come to be anyway?) is that they are certainly not for all tastes, Hammill's approach is very similar to Roger Waters but while he's technically a better singer I prefer Waters, because when Waters' voice snarls and aches it comes off as much more sincere (like he really DOES have problems) and with Hammill it's more theatrical and show-bizzy. Nothing wrong with that, but I certainly understand why it turns people off.
As for what Anderson III said, Hammill's "ugly" vocals is a bit part of his appeal to me, a lot of great singers don't have "pretty" voices, though Hammill's voice can be either really pretty or really "ugly" and he often goes back and forth between his soft and loud voice in a lot of songs and that makes him really exciting and unpredictable, so he's the closest thing to a prog Jim Morrison in that respect. He has more of an edge to him than other prog vocalists that makes him a bit more rock n roll so it's no wonder VDGG are one of the few prog bands to actually have influence on punk rock.
Mainly I think a great singer can either have a lot of power (Hammill) or a very unique and interesting voice (Anderson) but he doesn't have to have both.
|
 |
Zombywoof
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 26 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
|
Posted: May 23 2010 at 11:15 |
boo boo wrote:
(how in the heck did this comparison come to be anyway? |
It comes from a debate that a friend and I had. I probably should've mentioned that in the initial post.
|
Continue the prog discussion here: http://zombyprog.proboards.com/index.cgi ...
|
 |
eddiefang
Forum Groupie
Joined: January 29 2010
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 41
|
Posted: May 23 2010 at 14:44 |
Jon's voice is like an angel singing heavenly (Yes) music!
|
 |
Anderson III
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2007
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 708
|
Posted: May 23 2010 at 22:55 |
boo boo wrote:
As for what Anderson III said, Hammill's "ugly" vocals is a bit part of his appeal to me, a lot of great singers don't have "pretty" voices, though Hammill's voice can be either really pretty or really "ugly" and he often goes back and forth between his soft and loud voice in a lot of songs and that makes him really exciting and unpredictable, so he's the closest thing to a prog Jim Morrison in that respect. He has more of an edge to him than other prog vocalists that makes him a bit more rock n roll so it's no wonder VDGG are one of the few prog bands to actually have influence on punk rock.
Mainly I think a great singer can either have a lot of power (Hammill) or a very unique and interesting voice (Anderson) but he doesn't have to have both. |
I agree a singer doesn't have to have a beautiful voice. For instance I listen to a lot of extreme metal, and the singers can sound really harsh. I think Jon Anderson has much more power than Hammill, though.
|
"Music expresses that which cannot be put into words and cannot remain silent" - Victor Hugo
|
 |
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
|
Posted: May 23 2010 at 22:56 |
Hammill by a distance larger than 157 parsecs.
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
 |
HotToad5
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 19
|
Posted: May 23 2010 at 23:50 |
At the time of my posting, it appears Hammill has the edge - but in truth Jon Anderson is the only one who was really ever Close to the Edge - so my vote goes to Anderson.
|
ProgFrog
|
 |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 00:01 |
boo boo wrote:
Oh c'mon, everyone knew Hammill was gonna get more votes, I certainly did.
|
Aren't you the one that said this site is Symphonic biased on another thread? 
Jon plays in one of the most popular Symphnic bands, Peter Hammill plays in a respected but weird Eclectic band.
Due to the large number of Yes fans, I honestly believed Jo would win.And by far.
Iván
|
|
 |
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 00:03 |
...yeah but Jon's an alto
|
 |
someone_else
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24659
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 07:28 |
We have had a poll like this before. I voted for Jon Anderson back then because I underestimated the vocal abilities of Peter Hammill (on the other hand, Jon Anderson is no match for Peter Hammill when it comes to lyrics). Now I vote for both.
|
|
 |
MFP
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 31 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 9452
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 07:47 |
Man With Hat wrote:
Hammill by a distance larger than 157 parsecs. |
|
 |
Drifter
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 23 2010
Location: Pa. USA
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 08:44 |
For the longest time I considered Anderson's singing my least favorite part of Yes but I've warmed up to him over the years. That said, it's still Peter by a comfortable distance for me. His vocals are like an extra instrument. He just slaps you across the face and commands your attention. I get goose-bumps when I hear him sing.
|
 |
bucka001
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 864
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 15:42 |
Anderson III wrote:
I think Jon Anderson has much more power than Hammill, though.
|
You have a picture of Fripp for your avatar. Can you even begin to imagine Jon Anderson singing "Disengage"? It's the best tune on Exposure; in fact, Hammill's singing is the most powerful thing about that album (which is a great disc, by the way). Fripp is one of Hammill's biggest fans and loves his singing, and I agree with him on that opinion.
Jon Anderson is okay (I've got all the old Yes albums and used to love them) but as far as lyrics and vocal versatility go, there's no comparison. It's Hammill (for me, anyway).
|
jc
|
 |
Zombywoof
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 26 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 15:49 |
someone_else wrote:
We have had a poll like this before. |
I searched through history and couldn't find one. Oh well, it's hard to be original!
|
Continue the prog discussion here: http://zombyprog.proboards.com/index.cgi ...
|
 |
Zombywoof
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 26 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 15:50 |
someone_else wrote:
We have had a poll like this before. |
I did a search beforehand and I couldn't find anything. Oh well, it's hard to be original!
|
Continue the prog discussion here: http://zombyprog.proboards.com/index.cgi ...
|
 |
Drifter
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 23 2010
Location: Pa. USA
Status: Offline
Points: 40
|
Posted: May 24 2010 at 15:55 |
bucka001 wrote:
You have a picture of Fripp for your avatar. Can you even begin to imagine Jon Anderson singing "Disengage"? It's the best tune on Exposure; in fact, Hammill's singing is the most powerful thing about that album (which is a great disc, by the way). Fripp is one of Hammill's biggest fans and loves his singing, and I agree with him on that opinion. |
Nice to see Exposure get a mention. I need to give it a listen soon because it's been awhile. A very underrated album. Only someone like Fripp could pull off having Hammill and Daryl Hall sing on the same album and make it work.
|
 |
digdug
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4707
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 10:25 |
progkidjoel wrote:
Anderson has an amazing voice, whilst for me, Hammil sounds incredibly melodramatic in an really forced and unenjoyable way 90% of the time. |
Just what I was going to say except worded better...!
|
Prog On!
|
 |
The-time-is-now
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 05 2008
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 2060
|
Posted: May 25 2010 at 12:38 |
Anderson.
|
 One of my best achievements in life was to find this picture :D
|
 |
Anderson III
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2007
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 708
|
Posted: May 27 2010 at 13:39 |
bucka001 wrote:
Anderson III wrote:
I think Jon Anderson has much more power than Hammill, though.
|
You have a picture of Fripp for your avatar. Can you even begin to imagine Jon Anderson singing "Disengage"? It's the best tune on Exposure; in fact, Hammill's singing is the most powerful thing about that album (which is a great disc, by the way). Fripp is one of Hammill's biggest fans and loves his singing, and I agree with him on that opinion.
Jon Anderson is okay (I've got all the old Yes albums and used to love them) but as far as lyrics and vocal versatility go, there's no comparison. It's Hammill (for me, anyway). |
Wouldn't be the only time I disagree with Bob!  Hammill surely has more varied ways of singing, but it doesn't automaticly mean he's the better singer. I'd much rather have one really nice style of singing, than five unpleasant ones. Also I'd like to mention I think Anderson's timbre doesn't limit his emotional range as everyone else seems to think...
|
"Music expresses that which cannot be put into words and cannot remain silent" - Victor Hugo
|
 |
Kojak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 264
|
Posted: May 27 2010 at 14:54 |
Anderson
|
 |
bsms810
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 03 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 363
|
Posted: May 27 2010 at 15:48 |
Hammil, For me the weakest part of of Yes was Anderson
|
'when was the last time you had a girlfriend?'
'I dont look at it as when, I look at it as who...and why' - David Brent
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.