![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 7> |
Author | |||||
Slartibartfast ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
![]() |
||||
You could be wrong, you could be right, you could be black. you could be white...
|
|||||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
||||
We're in a progressive rock website in the end. Why don't we take this poll to the "general music discussions"? After all, most people here are just talking about how alive punk is and how dead prog is...
![]() EDIT: I just read that article in that "respected" punk website that Ivan mentioned... very interesting... Is ironic how every fan of any other genre has a right to be completely close-minded and even insulting of other genres (especially prog), but when it comes to prog fans, at the minor display of intolerance to punk, hip hop (name your genre here) everybody runs in defense of those genres...
Guess that's why we like prog. It's open minded BY NATURE. Edited by The T - July 20 2008 at 19:57 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
you're proving my point for me, from my perspective you keep making the assertion Punk is limited to specific sound and style, which I have shown by the bands listed it isn't,
Neurosis and Fugazi have always claimed to just be a Punk band, I tend to take their word for it more so than some dude on a message board
once again this statement shows you know very little about what you are saying...I understand its not your "scene", but....please ![]() and while there have been more than enough bands to copy the Ramones and the basic Punk Rock sound even to this day, there are so many more that have done something different
probably cause I don't consider his opinions, he's another one of those that only considers Punk when it has commercial viability (In the beginning there was the Sex Pistols!...and nothing for a long time...unitl Nirvana!) I've read that site a long time ago, he's basically the equivalent of an old time Prog Head who thinks there hasn't been any Real Prog since 1974, for those types of fogies I say-get bent! |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
VanderGraafKommandöh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
![]() |
||||
Well said. ![]() There's a certain album recorded in 1967 by a band named Van der Graaf Generator. It's prog but listen to Hammill's vocal style... it's got punk-leanings, even back then. Then you have the likes of Iggy Pop and the Stooges and later on, The MC5. Then comes the proper punk of late 1970s, which only lasted about 2 years... then came post-punk. Many post-punk bands are almost prog (some are here in the database!). Frith and Cutler, old Henry Cowsters, embraced the punk scene. Frith was in Massacre. Not post-punk per sé but they certainly didn't have over zealous guitar chops. They made short tunes. Two other bands that also embraced Punk and New Wave were Camberwell Now and This Heat (and with Charles Hayward on drums). Charles Hayward was linked directly to the Canterbury Scene and where is he now? He's playing with the avant-prog band Clear Frame (with Hugh Hopper and Lol Coxhill). Frith also joined Pere Ubu for a short time as well. Then there was PiL with John Lydon on vocals, they certainly weren't straight-up punk. ![]() As someone else also said, you had The Teardrop Explodes as well. Entering the realms of New Wave, you had, in 1977/78, bands such as Television (big pre-cursors to post-punk and new wave) and Joy Division. Both I believe had prog influences (mostly Kraut Rock, I think). Also, The Velvet Underground (arguably proggy) were more than just a punk band (they weren't a punk band) but influenced much of the post-punk. One must not forget the bands on Ralph Records either, such as The Residents and Tuxedomoon (this latter band blend new wave, punk and prog together successfully). So punk didn't kill prog, it just put it on hiatus, until the early 1980s, when post-punk started to blend prog with elements of punk and new wave styles. To go full circle, Peter Hammill and Robert Fripp have guested live with The Stranglers (who got lumped into the punk scene and were much more than that in reality). Fripp also played with David Bowie on Low and Berlin, whilst Adrian Belew played with Bowie and Talking Heads (who are also rather Punk in their sound at times). Edited by James - July 20 2008 at 22:58 |
|||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Treasure ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: June 09 2008 Location: Bland Street Status: Offline Points: 298 |
![]() |
||||
lol punk killing prog
Does anyone here own Robert Fripp's solo album, Exposure?
Listen to that and tell me prog and punk hate each other. Edited by Treasure - July 20 2008 at 21:28 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||||
Please, when you want somebody to reply to your post, QUOTE HIM COMPLETELY AS I'M DOING WITH YOUR POSTS, that's the decent thing to do when you don't want to take phrases out of context, repeat the same quote twice and put words on othe people's mouth
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 20 2008 at 22:52 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
we seem to have 2 different conceptions of reality here, when you think Punk: you assume a disaffected youth banging out simple 2 chord tunes, when I think "Punk" I think so much more in sound/style/diverse song structure, (refer to the list) and ideas all produced with DIY/Underground ethic/ideals
why should I respect that dudes words when he obvious has small view on Punk, he may know and have lived the scene in the late 70s UK, (which has always gotten the most press attention in the mainstream) but he seems to know very little else aside from a few biased opinions bases on his short stint in the scene
once again you have no clue as to what you are talking about, Punk/Hardcore isn't your "thing" I get it, so why don't you take some time and DL some albums from some of the most respected indie labels of the past few years to get some perspective - Dischord, Alternative Tentacles, Touch n Go, Subpop, etc
hmm, I believe in the words of many "recognized" icons in the Punk scene, I just named 2 above Fugazi and Neurosis, I've also been around the block a few times and have pretty much had fanboy ear submerged in Punk for over 3 decades now, but you don't have to believe me... I exist only as "text" on a message board, take what I say to heart or discard is as words of lunatic... |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
if anything this makes complete sense to me, Punk and Prog aren't dead, nor should they be seen as "enemies", they continue on to this day and so much has come since the inception of both Prog and Punk...the only way any of these 2 musics will ever be completely dead is when there isn't a single fan left alive to enjoy the sounds of either ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||||
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 20 2008 at 23:29 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
||||
Just trying here to walk(crawl) under the rocks being cast...
![]() please clarify if it's another Neurosis than the one listed in nthis website and that Ivan mentioned in his post... they have a very, VVVVery weak link with hardcore punk (in their beginnings) but, as of late, they're a very dark and slow and gloomy doom band... to paraphrase somebody, they have left punk behind now that they learned how to play...
![]() ![]() I know many metal bands evolved from punk, and that grunge in a way also drunk from punk's fountains.... but all those genres are so far away from the original thing....
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
to be technical, Post-Hardcore is most appropriate, but Ian Mackaye is humbling personality, he never liked to get too convoluted when tagging his music, "Punk" usually worked just fine with ol' Ian, right?...cause I know you've been a fan of Fugazi ever since they started ![]() nice finding an oddball interview to attempt make a point. It didn't work though, a lot of Punk bands like Gang of Four, PiL, the Slits and Richard Hell, incorporated funk, reggae and dub as well...but going outside the box completely negates them from being Punk anymore according to you,
so? they started out as a Punk band and musically they have advanced light years from their beginnings, but vision and message remains the same (which is still very much Punk in my eyes), not sure what Steve Von Till is saying nowadays but around the time of "Times of Grace" I remember him claiming to still be just a Punk band, Edited by mithrandir - July 21 2008 at 01:11 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
![]() they were definitely Hardcore Punk in their beginnings, one of the most active bands in the SoCal Hardcore scene during the late 80s, when you see a band progress throughout the years the changes don't seem that drastic each album was just the next logical step--a progression of their original Punk sound, ...yeah I guess its a far stretch to say that what they are doing nowadays is Punk (at least in the traditional sense) but to me they'll always be that bright eyed restless Punk band that started out with Pain of Mind, ![]() Edited by mithrandir - July 21 2008 at 00:59 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||||
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 21 2008 at 01:57 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
VanderGraafKommandöh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
![]() |
||||
Iván,
Wikipedia says: Grunge (sometimes referred to as the Seattle Sound) is a subgenre of alternative rock that emerged during the mid-1980s in the American state of Washington, particularly in the Seattle area. Inspired by hardcore punk, heavy metal and indie rock, grunge is generally characterized by heavily distorted electric guitars, contrasting song dynamics, and apathetic or angst-filled lyrics. The grunge aesthetic is stripped-down compared to other forms of rock music, and many grunge musicians were noted for their unkempt appearances and rejection of theatrics. So there's one root for Hardcore Punk for Grunge. Also: Hardcore punk (usually referred to as simply hardcore) is a subgenre of punk rock that originated in North America around 1980. The new sound was generally thicker, heavier and faster than earlier punk rock.[1] The songs are usually short, fast, and loud, covering topics such as politics, personal freedom, violence, social alienation, Straight edge, war, and the hardcore subculture itself.[2][3][4] Hardcore spawned several fusion genres and subgenres, some of which had mainstream success, such as melodic hardcore, metalcore, sludge metal and thrash metal. Thus linking in many forms of metal. Emo (pronounced /ˈiːmoʊ/) is a style of hardcore punk which describes several variations of music with common roots. In the mid-1980s, the term emo described a subgenre of hardcore punk which originated in the Washington, D.C. music scene. In later years, the term emocore, short for "emotional hardcore", was also used to describe the emotional performances of bands in the Washington, D.C. scene and some of the offshoot regional scenes such as Rites of Spring, Embrace, One Last Wish, Beefeater, Gray Matter, Fire Party, and later, Moss Icon. (In more recent years, the term "emotive hardcore" entered the lexicon to describe the period.) Alternative rock
The underground punk rock movement inspired countless bands that either evolved from a punk rock sound or brought its outsider spirit to very different kinds of music. The original punk explosion also had a long-term effect on the music industry, spurring the growth of the independent sector.[233] During the early 1980s, British bands like New Order and The Cure that straddled the lines of post-punk and New Wave developed both new musical styles and a distinctive industrial niche. Though commercially successful over an extended period, they maintained an underground-style, subcultural identity.[234] In the United States, bands such as Minneapolis's Hüsker Dü and their protégés The Replacements bridged the gap between punk rock genres like hardcore and the more expansive sound of what was called "college rock" at the time.[235] A 1985 Rolling Stone feature on the Minneapolis scene and innovative California hardcore acts such as Black Flag and Minutemen declared, "Primal punk is passé. The best of the American punk rockers have moved on. They have learned how to play their instruments. They have discovered melody, guitar solos and lyrics that are more than shouted political slogans. Some of them have even discovered the Grateful Dead."[236] By the end of the 1980s, these bands, who had largely eclipsed their punk rock forebears in popularity, were classified broadly as alternative rock. Alternative rock encompasses a diverse set of styles—including gothic rock and grunge, among others—unified by their debt to punk rock and their origins outside of the musical mainstream.[237] All those genres are heavily influenced by punk. ![]() And finally, a note about current Punk: By 1998, the punk revival had commercially stalled,[252] but not for long. Pop punk band Blink-182's 1999 release, Enema of the State, reached the Billboard top ten and sold four million copies in less than a year.[245] New pop punk bands such as Sum 41, Simple Plan, Yellowcard, and Good Charlotte achieved major sales in the first decade of the 2000s. In 2004, Green Day's American Idiot went to number one on both the U.S. and UK charts. Jimmy Eat World, which had taken emo in a radio-ready pop punk direction,[253] had top-ten albums in 2004 and 2007; in a similar style, Fall Out Boy hit number one with 2007's Infinity on High. The revival was broad-based: AFI, with roots in hardcore, had great success with 2003's Sing the Sorrow and topped the U.S. chart with Decemberunderground in 2006. Ska punk groups such as Reel Big Fish and Less Than Jake continued to attract new fans. Celtic punk, with U.S. bands such as Flogging Molly and Dropkick Murphys merging the sound of Oi! and The Pogues, reached wide audiences. The Australian punk rock tradition was carried on by groups such as Frenzal Rhomb, The Living End, and Bodyjar. ![]() Edited by James - July 21 2008 at 01:58 |
|||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
you're exhausting brotha, each point you make becomes more evident that you have no clue, not sure how many more ways I can point out to you how blocked in your mind is about Punk, and now your saying stuff like Hardcore is not Punk? unless something is lost in translation. It'd be easier if you just say "any Punk band that plays one note outside of the Punk canon, is no longer Punk!" --you would think the idea of a "Subgenre" never crossed your mind, those labels are still contributing great bands/releases to this day not to mention a strong back catalog that keeps them in business, you'll always have new generations of fans getting into Minor Theat and the DKs, (as well as Genesis and Yes) Today, Fugazi isn't doing Reggae, becasue Today Fugazi is no longer around, besides Fugazi never did reggae/dub it was just one of many influences, not what they played...but of course you'd never know that cause I'm certain you never heard a note of their music. You seem to have a hard time understanding the line between "a reggae influence" and actually playing "reggae" ...if you were familiar with the music you're trying to degrade them perhaps you'd understand a bit more, Edited by mithrandir - July 21 2008 at 02:00 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||||
1.- James, your own a words say it:
James wrote:
I might admit they are influenced...BUT INFLUENCED DOESN'T MEAN THERE IS AN IDENTITY....AOR was influenced by Prog, but AOR is not Prog, Prog was influenced by Classical Music but it's not Classical Music.
At the end every new artist is influenced by many others of different genres, but saying this is influenced by Punk or Prog or Disco, is not the same as saying this Punk or Prog or Disco.
2.- Mithrandir, I'm not trying to degrade them, never care enough for them except when people try to resurrect urban myths like Punk killed Prog or similar, but in this case I'm pointing something I strongly believe, Punk lost it's roots a long time ago,
You mention two icons, one is doing Reggae and Steve Von Till is doing a psyche soundtrack....Where is the Punk?
Iván
Now it's time to sleep, tomorrow is working day.
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
VanderGraafKommandöh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
![]() |
||||
You misunderstood me, Iván.
Yes, they're influenced by punk but they also have the mentality of punk. They're just related sub-genres of punk rock. Besides, what is prog-punk (pronk), pop punk. Celtic punk and ska-punk? All four of those genres are punk sub-genres. The bands who play in those styles have the punk ethic and play punk music. It's just not the punk music of 1978, it's grown into something else. Prog has as well. Infact, what is Prog Rock? It's a thousand and one sub genres of some very loose genre called Progressive Rock. Therefore, Prog Rock died before it actually began and in fact, does not exist and never has. Some examples of those four sub-genres of Punk: Pronk - Cardiacs Pop Punk - any number of modern bands... but Blink-182, Green Day, Sum 41 and Good Charlotte Celtic punk - Flogging Molly and Dropkick Murphy's Ska Punk - Reel Big Fish and Less Than Jake Noise Rock is also yet another genre that's influenced by punk and is a sub-genre of punk. This is a huge genre and it's immediate, by listening to such bands, that they have taken Punk in yet another direction. Boredoms, Melt-Banana and Lightning Bolt are obvious bands that come to mind here. |
|||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||||
James, for me, most of this suposedly sub-genres are only tags made to try to keep Punk alive in any way, I can't believe in such things as Pop Punk and much less Prog Punk, both are IMO only attempts which try to find a connection that is nothing but a remote influence.
Prog exists still pure and by sub-genres, it's a different case, sub-genres of Prog existed since the start, only some of them were coined and some particular ones appeared later, for example, Canterbury and Psyche pre-date Prog, Jethro Tull was a Folk Propg band even before theterm Prof Folk was used, Space Rock was created parallel to Symphonic.
Prog is essetially fusion o styles, Punk WAS not,
The main reason of their existence was to simplify music to the extreme,so if you take the over simplification, the anarchism, the purity of Rock in the most essential aspect, the lack of blending....Then you keep nothing of Punk.
Despite what peope said, I never saw New Age as a real form of Punk, tagging and inventing names is very easy, but the question if they really exist is not answered yet.
Iván
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mithrandir ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 25 2006 Location: New Mexico Status: Offline Points: 933 |
![]() |
||||
might I remind you that Punk, even in its prototype form always had a freewheeling experimental element present, dating back to MC5, Velvets, Stooges and its garage/psych roots, and bands such as Suicide, Pere Ubu, Electric Eels, Television, Debris, etc, --none of which are "Pure Punk" as you might say,--all predate the so called 77 British Punk movement you seem to champion as "thee only true form of punk"
Edited by mithrandir - July 21 2008 at 12:26 |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
tszirmay ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 17 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 6673 |
![]() |
||||
Ah Walker! Yes, indeed. As I was there, I saw CLEARLY how the rock press savagely decimated progressive rock (Jethro Dull, The Muddy Blues etc...) because the media beacons such as Rolling Stone, Creem, Trouser Press in the USA and Melody Maker and NME in England , one day decided that it would be politically correct to have alittle revolution and eliminate the "Bourgeois & Elitist" prog acts , labelling them pompous dinasaurs and jumping on the punk bandwagon (Pistols, Clash, Vibrators, etc...) . For some people beyond the large media centers, obviously the CBGB looked like another NY cesspool but had no local impact. Unfortunately, many did get on the wave that led to new wave deeper in thevery late 70s and the 80s. By that time , there is little doubt that prog had faded into a dormant state of mediocrity (some going commercial aka Genesis) and others just faded away. It did happen, it was ugly, I have still some of the clippings from those rambuctuous days .
|
|||||
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
|
|||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |