IMHO........ (Reviews) |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: February 05 2007 at 14:34 | ||
in that case, my dearest Dream Theater worshipper, I would say:
I have a paranoia problem from time to time.... It manifests once a month.
|
|||
|
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: February 05 2007 at 14:35 | ||
yeah.... wait a minute.... some under-paid cop will lose his job....
If I were you, I'd defend guest-reviews with my life.... it's your job man!!!
|
|||
|
|||
Chris H
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 08 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC Status: Offline Points: 8191 |
Posted: February 05 2007 at 14:38 | ||
Yup, my only importance on this site is bashing poorly written n00b-reviews! Oh man, when you put it that way, if guest reviews go then I'll be out of a job
I'll end up like that homeless guy that impersonated Peter Criss and lived under a bridge while he pan-handled for nickels Edited by Zappa88 - February 05 2007 at 14:38 |
|||
Beauty will save the world.
|
|||
soundsweird
Prog Reviewer Joined: December 08 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 408 |
Posted: February 05 2007 at 23:36 | ||
In the beginning, all I did here was read album reviews. Now, I pay far less attention to them, and I haven't written a review in a long time. Some reasons:
The honeymoon's over.... (been here awhile now)
Too much Progressive Metal and other stuff I abhor
Too many reviewers with no command of the English language
The forums are much more interesting
|
|||
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2696 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 03:31 | ||
Hi Chaps.........
I think maybe I didn't make myself clear back in the begining....... I didn't mean I only wanted to see positive reviews. But I felf it a little unjust to see some one-star reviews that were down right rude and written with spite and based on lies and malice......... that surely can not be good for an objective overview of an album?
The lines between fact and opinion are easily blurred and never more so than in a "this is truly awful, they can't write, they can't sing, they can't play" type of review.
I enjoy the reviews here, I like to search out different artists or albums.... but I don't like to see lies and opinon dressed up as hard fact. it stinks. I seem to have caused more foroar by saying that though than if I wrote a bunch of nonsense about some hard working band.
|
|||
kazansky
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 24 2006 Location: Indonesia Status: Offline Points: 5085 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 03:39 | ||
I agree with that. I don't have problem with people who dislike some works by some bands. However, i don't think that calling an album rubbish, junk, etc. just because you don't like what you hear is a very good move.
Edited by kazansky - February 06 2007 at 03:41 |
|||
The devil we blame our atrocities on is really just each one of us.
|
|||
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 30 2006 Location: LA, CA Status: Offline Points: 7113 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 03:41 | ||
What if you said: "To be perfectly fair, in a word, this album...uh, sucks. Luckily, we have room for more than one word in a review, but my thesaurus is kinda long, so grab a soda."
|
|||
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 03:45 | ||
There is a way to write something disapproving without it being ugly or purely subjective. I once wrote a bad review for a Bill Bruford album but I started it with how much I love and respect Bill Bruford.
Edited by Atavachron - February 06 2007 at 03:47 |
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 05:18 | ||
You've provoked a lively debate PC, and that must be a good thing!
|
|||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 05:20 | ||
You made yourself perfectly clear. This is the way with threads though, they soon become what others want it to be! |
|||
salmacis
Forum Senior Member Content Addition Joined: April 10 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3928 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 07:15 | ||
I agree that endless band bashing is very tedious. I think I've given very few 1 star reviews and some of those I wonder whether I've been harsh afterwards. But I don't think there any prog bands I hate enough to trash, certainly not on personal issues- even ones I wouldn't go out of my way for, like Dream Theater, I have given various 3/4 star reviews to their albums, because they are enjoyable albums by anyone's standards (Awake and SFAM) even when there are elements I dislike about the band (and they've grown on me recently anyway).
Likewise, I've been rewriting a few of my older, over-zealous reviews where I had perhaps been over generous. I try to keep away from the fanboy track (some of my older reviews sail perilously close) as I too now find gushing 5 star reviews without much justification, and come off like blind praise of a band, to be just as damaging to a band as 1 star reviews. Remember the Octavarium debacle around 2 years ago? I think that created even more hostility/suspicion towards DT. I've seen the same thing happen with new Tool and Mars Volta albums as well.
Edited by salmacis - February 06 2007 at 07:16 |
|||
laplace
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 06 2005 Location: popupControl(); Status: Offline Points: 7606 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 07:24 | ||
I don't think there's any merit in marking an album with more stars than you personally feel it's worth based on how much you enjoyed it. If you're over-generous because you think most people will like it, then let THOSE PEOPLE grade it and allow yourself the luxury of giving it the low score you wanted to. ;)
|
|||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 07:29 | ||
^^^ You see Prog Chick? Carrying on regardless of anything you or I say.
|
|||
laplace
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 06 2005 Location: popupControl(); Status: Offline Points: 7606 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 07:36 | ||
please don't stifle the thread, snowy, you can see we're discussing review etiquette =P
|
|||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 07:40 | ||
You are discussing whatever you wish, regardless of the thread subject. |
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 10:47 | ||
Threads, like conversations, often drift from the original subject. No problem with that if the discussion is constructive.
|
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 14:17 | ||
I don't know the exact data, but when you have thousands of reviews, it's only normal that some will lack quality. Many are written by near-children and others by adults that write like children... but I've seen a few written by young people that are very well-written... it's just bound to happen: you can't have only good reviews if you allow thousands of them, it's just pure logic. But as I say, alongside the crap also good essays come. I would rather forbid the no-review ratings than the no-member reviews.... at least when you take to time to write something, even if it's not good, you are trying to justify your position, however "full of lies and with no facts" (how can a subjective opinion be either a lie or a fact I don't know - it can be based upon lies or facts, that could happen, but in itself can't) it is filled with.
Edited by The T - February 06 2007 at 14:19 |
|||
|
|||
Chris H
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 08 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC Status: Offline Points: 8191 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 14:29 | ||
Hey man I'm only 14 but that doesnt mean I dont work as hard on my reviews as everyone else on this site does. Keep that in mind please
|
|||
Beauty will save the world.
|
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 14:36 | ||
Many of our finest reviewers are young!
|
|||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: February 06 2007 at 14:41 | ||
Yes Bob, I realise this, but the point of the thread has had to be reiterated several times by the thread originator. I sometimes find it frustrating that posters can't or refuse to talk about what the threads topic is. Look at this thread of Dick Heaths as another example of not one person addressing the original post! http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=33946 Edited by Snow Dog - February 06 2007 at 14:44 |
|||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |